@article {65624,
	title = {Live-cell imaging in the era of too many microscopes.},
	journal = {Current Opinion in Cell Biology},
	volume = {66},
	year = {2020},
	month = {2020 May 26},
	pages = {34-42},
	abstract = {<p>At the time of this writing, searching Google Scholar for {\textquoteright}light-sheet microscopy{\textquoteright} returns almost 8500 results; over three-quarters of which were published in the last 5 years alone. Searching for other advanced imaging methods in the last 5 years yields similar results: {\textquoteright}super-resolution microscopy{\textquoteright} (\&gt;16 000), {\textquoteright}single-molecule imaging{\textquoteright} (almost 10 000), SPIM (Single Plane Illumination Microscopy, 5000), and {\textquoteright}lattice light-sheet{\textquoteright} (1300). The explosion of new imaging methods has also produced a dizzying menagerie of acronyms, with over 100 different species of {\textquoteright}light-sheet{\textquoteright} alone, from SPIM to UM (Ultra microscopy) to SiMView (Simultaneous MultiView) to iSPIM (inclined SPIM, not to be confused with iSPIM, inverted SPIM). How then is the average biologist, without an advanced degree in physics, optics, or computer science supposed to make heads or tails of which method is best suited for their needs? Let us also not forget the plight of the optical physicist, who at best might need help with obtaining healthy samples and keeping them that way, or at worst may not realize the impact their newest technique could have for biologists. This review will not attempt to solve all\&nbsp;these problems, but instead highlight some of the most recent, successful mergers between biology and advanced imaging technologies, as well as hopefully provide some guidance for anyone interested in journeying into the world of live-cell imaging.</p>
},
	issn = {1879-0410},
	doi = {10.1016/j.ceb.2020.04.008},
	author = {Lemon, William C and McDole, Katie}
}
