@article {67287,
	title = {Neural Correlates of Cognition in Primary Visual versus Neighboring Posterior Cortices during Visual Evidence-Accumulation-based Navigation},
	journal = {bioRxiv},
	year = {2019},
	month = {03/2019},
	abstract = {<p>Studies of perceptual decision-making have often assumed that the main role of sensory cortices is to provide sensory input to downstream processes that accumulate and drive behavioral decisions. We performed a systematic comparison of neural activity in primary visual (V1) to secondary visual and retrosplenial cortices, as mice performed a task where they should accumulate pulsatile visual cues through time to inform a navigational decision. Even in V1, only a small fraction of neurons had sensory-like responses to cues. Instead, in all areas neurons were sequentially active, and contained information ranging from sensory to cognitive, including cue timings, evidence, place/time, decision and reward outcome. Per-cue sensory responses were amplitude-modulated by various cognitive quantities, notably accumulated evidence. This inspired a multiplicative feedback-loop circuit hypothesis that proposes a more intricate role of sensory areas in the accumulation process, and furthermore explains a surprising observation that perceptual discrimination deviates from Weber-Fechner Law.Highlights / eTOC BlurbMice made navigational decisions based on accumulating pulsatile visual cuesThe bulk of neural activity in visual cortices was sequential and beyond-sensoryAccumulated pulse-counts modulated sensory (cue) responses, suggesting feedbackA feedback-loop neural circuit explains behavioral deviations from Weber{\textquoteright}s LawHighlights / eTOC BlurbIn a task where navigation was informed by accumulated pulsatile visual evidence, neural activity in visual cortices predominantly coded for cognitive variables across multiple timescales, including outside of a visual processing context. Even sensory responses to visual pulses were amplitude-modulated by accumulated pulse counts and other variables, inspiring a multiplicative feedback-loop circuit hypothesis that in turn explained behavioral deviations from Weber-Fechner Law.</p>
},
	doi = {10.1101/568766},
	url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2019/03/06/568766},
	author = {Koay, Sue Ann and Thiberge, Stephan Y. and Brody, Carlos D. and Tank, David W.}
}
