@article {67895, title = {A neural circuit linking learning and sleep in Drosophila long-term memory.}, journal = {Nature Communications}, volume = {13}, year = {2022}, month = {2022 Feb 01}, pages = {609}, abstract = {

Animals retain some but not all experiences in long-term memory (LTM). Sleep supports LTM retention across animal species. It is well established that learning experiences enhance post-learning sleep. However, the underlying mechanisms of how learning mediates sleep for memory retention are not clear. Drosophila males display increased amounts of sleep after courtship learning. Courtship learning depends on Mushroom Body (MB) neurons, and post-learning sleep is mediated by the sleep-promoting ventral Fan-Shaped Body neurons (vFBs). We show that post-learning sleep is regulated by two opposing output neurons\ (MBONs) from the MB, which encode a measure of learning. Excitatory MBONs-γ2α{\textquoteright}1 becomes increasingly active upon increasing time of learning, whereas inhibitory MBONs-β{\textquoteright}2mp is activated only by a short learning experience. These MB outputs are integrated by SFS neurons, which excite vFBs to promote sleep after prolonged but not short training. This circuit may ensure that only longer or more intense learning experiences induce sleep and are thereby consolidated into LTM.

}, issn = {2041-1723}, doi = {10.1038/s41467-022-28256-1}, author = {Lei, Zhengchang and Henderson, Kristin and Keleman, Krystyna} } @article {65020, title = {Genetics of intellectual disability in consanguineous families.}, journal = {Mol Psychiatry}, volume = {24}, year = {2019}, month = {2018 Jan 04}, pages = {1027-1039}, abstract = {

Autosomal recessive (AR) gene defects are the leading genetic cause of intellectual disability (ID) in countries with frequent parental consanguinity, which account for about 1/7th of the world population. Yet, compared to autosomal dominant de novo mutations, which are the predominant cause of ID in Western countries, the identification of AR-ID genes has lagged behind. Here, we report on whole exome and whole genome sequencing in 404 consanguineous predominantly Iranian families with two or more affected offspring. In 219 of these, we found likely causative variants, involving 77 known and 77 novel AR-ID (candidate) genes, 21 X-linked genes, as well as 9 genes previously implicated in diseases other than ID. This study, the largest of its kind published to date, illustrates that high-throughput DNA sequencing in consanguineous families is a superior strategy for elucidating the thousands of hitherto unknown gene defects underlying AR-ID, and it sheds light on their prevalence.

}, issn = {1476-5578}, doi = {10.1038/s41380-017-0012-2}, author = {Hu, Hao and Kahrizi, Kimia and Musante, Luciana and Fattahi, Zohreh and Herwig, Ralf and Hosseini, Masoumeh and Oppitz, Cornelia and Abedini, Seyedeh Sedigheh and Suckow, Vanessa and Larti, Farzaneh and Beheshtian, Maryam and Lipkowitz, Bettina and Akhtarkhavari, Tara and Mehvari, Sepideh and Otto, Sabine and Mohseni, Marzieh and Arzhangi, Sanaz and Jamali, Payman and Mojahedi, Faezeh and Taghdiri, Maryam and Papari, Elaheh and Soltani Banavandi, Mohammad Javad and Akbari, Saeide and Tonekaboni, Seyed Hassan and Dehghani, Hossein and Ebrahimpour, Mohammad Reza and Bader, Ingrid and Davarnia, Behzad and Cohen, Monika and Khodaei, Hossein and Albrecht, Beate and Azimi, Sarah and Zirn, Birgit and Bastami, Milad and Wieczorek, Dagmar and Bahrami, Gholamreza and Keleman, Krystyna and Vahid, Leila Nouri and Tzschach, Andreas and G{\"a}rtner, Jutta and Gillessen-Kaesbach, Gabriele and Varaghchi, Jamileh Rezazadeh and Timmermann, Bernd and Pourfatemi, Fatemeh and Jankhah, Aria and Chen, Wei and Nikuei, Pooneh and Kalscheuer, Vera M and Oladnabi, Morteza and Wienker, Thomas F and Ropers, Hans-Hilger and Najmabadi, Hossein} } @article {64815, title = {Neuronal reactivation during post-learning sleep consolidates long-term memory in .}, journal = {eLife}, volume = {8}, year = {2019}, month = {2019 Feb 25}, abstract = {

Animals consolidate some, but not all, learning experiences into long-term memory. Across the animal kingdom, sleep has been found to have a beneficial effect on the consolidation of recently formed memories into long-term storage. However, the underlying mechanisms of sleep dependent memory consolidation are poorly understood. Here, we show that consolidation of courtship long-term memory in is mediated by reactivation during sleep of dopaminergic neurons that were earlier involved in memory acquisition. We identify specific fan-shaped body neurons that induce sleep after the learning experience and activate dopaminergic neurons for memory consolidation. Thus, we provide a direct link between sleep, neuronal reactivation of dopaminergic neurons, and memory consolidation.

}, issn = {2050-084X}, doi = {10.7554/eLife.42786}, author = {Dag, Ugur and Lei, Zhengchang and Le, Jasmine Q and Wong, Allan and Bushey, Daniel and Keleman, Krystyna} } @article {49002, title = {Persistent activity in a recurrent circuit underlies courtship memory in Drosophila.}, journal = {eLife}, volume = {7}, year = {2018}, month = {2018 Jan 11}, abstract = {

Recurrent connections are thought to be a common feature of the neural circuits that encode memories, but how memories are laid down in such circuits is not fully understood. Here we present evidence that courtship memory in Drosophila relies on the recurrent circuit between mushroom body gamma (MBg), M6 output, and aSP13 dopaminergic neurons. We demonstrate persistent neuronal activity of aSP13 neurons and show that it transiently potentiates synaptic transmission from MBγ\>M6 neurons. M6 neurons in turn provide input to aSP13 neurons, prolonging potentiation of MBγ\>M6 synapses over time periods that match short-term memory. These data support a model in which persistent aSP13 activity within a recurrent circuit lays the foundation for a short-term memory.

}, issn = {2050-084X}, doi = {10.7554/eLife.31425}, author = {Zhao, Xiaoliang and Lenek, Daniela and Dag, Ugur and Dickson, Barry and Keleman, Krystyna} } @article {48561, title = {Drosophila courtship conditioning as a measure of learning and memory.}, journal = {Journal of Visualized Experiments - Neuroscience }, year = {2017}, month = {2017-06-05}, pages = {e55808}, abstract = {

Many insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying learning and memory have been elucidated through the use of simple behavioral assays in model organisms such as the fruit fly,\ Drosophila melanogaster.\ Drosophila\ is useful for understanding the basic neurobiology underlying cognitive deficits resulting from mutations in genes associated with human cognitive disorders, such as intellectual disability (ID) and autism. This work describes a methodology for testing learning and memory using a classic paradigm in\ Drosophilaknown as courtship conditioning. Male flies\ court females using a distinct pattern of easily recognizable behaviors. Premated females are not receptive to mating and will reject the male{\textquoteright}s copulation attempts. In response to this rejection, male flies reduce their courtship behavior. This learned reduction in courtship behavior is measured over time, serving as an indicator of learning and memory. The basic numerical output of this assay is the courtship index (CI), which is defined as the percentage of time that a male spends courting during a 10 min interval. The learning index (LI) is the relative reduction of CI in flies that have been exposed to a premated female compared to na{\"\i}ve flies with no previous social encounters. For the statistical comparison of LIs between genotypes, a randomization test with bootstrapping is used. To illustrate how the assay can be used to address the role of a gene relating to learning and memory, the pan-neuronal knockdown of\ Dihydroxyacetone phosphate acyltransferase\ (Dhap-at) was characterized here. The human ortholog\ of\ Dhap-at,\ glyceronephosphate O-acyltransferase\ (GNPT), is involved in rhizomelic chondrodysplasia punctata type 2, an autosomal-recessive syndrome characterized by severe ID. Using the courtship conditioning assay, it was determined that Dhap-at is required for long-term memory, but not for short-term memory. This result serves as a basis for further investigation of the underlying molecular mechanisms.

}, doi = {10.3791/55808}, author = {Koemans, Tom S and Oppitz, Cornelia and Donders, Rogier AT and van Bokhoven, Hans and Schenck, Annette and Keleman, Krystyna and Kramer, Jamie M} } @article {48069, title = {RNA-binding profiles of Drosophila CPEB proteins Orb and Orb2.}, journal = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America}, year = {2016}, month = {2016 Oct 24}, abstract = {

Localized protein translation is critical in many biological contexts, particularly in highly polarized cells, such as neurons, to regulate gene expression in a spatiotemporal manner. The cytoplasmic polyadenylation element-binding (CPEB) family of RNA-binding proteins has emerged as a key regulator of mRNA transport and local translation required for early embryonic development, synaptic plasticity, and long-term memory (LTM). Drosophila Orb and Orb2 are single members of the CPEB1 and CPEB2 subfamilies of the CPEB proteins, respectively. At present, the identity of the mRNA targets they regulate is not fully known, and the binding specificity of the CPEB2 subfamily is a matter of debate. Using transcriptome-wide UV cross-linking and immunoprecipitation, we define the mRNA-binding sites and targets of Drosophila CPEBs. Both Orb and Orb2 bind linear cytoplasmic polyadenylation element-like sequences in the 3{\textquoteright} UTRs of largely overlapping target mRNAs, with Orb2 potentially having a broader specificity. Both proteins use their RNA-recognition motifs but not the Zinc-finger region for RNA binding. A subset of Orb2 targets is translationally regulated in cultured S2 cells and fly head extracts. Moreover, pan-neuronal RNAi knockdown of these targets suggests that a number of these targets are involved in LTM. Our results provide a comprehensive list of mRNA targets of the two CPEB proteins in Drosophila, thus providing insights into local protein synthesis involved in various biological processes, including LTM.

}, issn = {1091-6490}, doi = {10.1073/pnas.1603715113}, author = {Stepien, Barbara Krystyna and Oppitz, Cornelia and Gerlach, Daniel and Dag, Ugur and Novatchkova, Maria and Kr{\"u}ttner, Sebastian and Stark, Alexander and Keleman, Krystyna} } @article {46522, title = {Identification of genes that promote or inhibit olfactory memory formation in Drosophila.}, journal = {Genetics}, volume = {199}, year = {2015}, month = {2015 Apr}, pages = {1173-82}, abstract = {

Genetic screens in Drosophila melanogaster and other organisms have been pursued to filter the genome for genetic functions important for memory formation. Such screens have employed primarily chemical or transposon-mediated mutagenesis and have identified numerous mutants including classical memory mutants, dunce and rutabaga. Here, we report the results of a large screen using panneuronal RNAi expression to identify additional genes critical for memory formation. We identified \>500 genes that compromise memory when inhibited (low hits), either by disrupting the development and normal function of the adult animal or by participating in the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying memory formation. We also identified \>40 genes that enhance memory when inhibited (high hits). The dunce gene was identified as one of the low hits and further experiments were performed to map the effects of the dunce RNAi to the α/β and γ mushroom body neurons. Additional behavioral experiments suggest that dunce knockdown in the mushroom body neurons impairs memory without significantly affecting acquisition. We also characterized one high hit, sickie, to show that RNAi knockdown of this gene enhances memory through effects in dopaminergic neurons without apparent effects on acquisition. These studies further our understanding of two genes involved in memory formation, provide a valuable list of genes that impair memory that may be important for understanding the neurophysiology of memory or neurodevelopmental disorders, and offer a new resource of memory suppressor genes that will aid in understanding restraint mechanisms employed by the brain to optimize resources.

}, issn = {1943-2631}, doi = {10.1534/genetics.114.173575}, author = {Walkinshaw, Erica and Gai, Yunchao and Farkas, Caitlin and Richter, Daniel and Nicholas, Eric and Keleman, Krystyna and Davis, Ronald L} } @article {46887, title = {Synaptic Orb2A bridges memory acquisition and late memory consolidation in Drosophila.}, journal = {Cell Reports}, volume = {11}, year = {2015}, month = {2015 Jun 30}, pages = {1953-65}, abstract = {

To adapt to an ever-changing environment, animals consolidate some, but not all, learning experiences to long-term memory. In mammals, long-term memory consolidation often involves neural pathway reactivation hours after memory acquisition. It is not known whether this delayed-reactivation schema is\ common across the animal kingdom or how information is stored during the delay period. Here, we show\ that, during courtship suppression learning, Drosophila exhibits delayed long-term memory consolidation. We also show that the same class of dopaminergic neurons engaged earlier in memory acquisition is also both necessary and sufficient for delayed long-term memory consolidation. Furthermore, we present evidence that, during learning, the translational regulator Orb2A tags specific synapses of mushroom body neurons for later consolidation. Consolidation involves the subsequent recruitment of Orb2B and the activity-dependent synthesis of CaMKII. Thus, our results provide evidence for the role of a neuromodulated, synapse-restricted molecule bridging memory acquisition and long-term memory consolidation in a learning animal.

}, issn = {2211-1247}, doi = {10.1016/j.celrep.2015.05.037}, author = {Kr{\"u}ttner, Sebastian and Traunm{\"u}ller, Lisa and Dag, Ugur and Jandrasits, Katharina and Stepien, Barbara and Iyer, Nirmala and Fradkin, Lee G and Noordermeer, Jasprina N and Mensh, Brett D and Keleman, Krystyna} } @article {6854, title = {Dopamine neurons modulate pheromone responses in Drosophila courtship learning.}, journal = {Nature}, volume = {489}, year = {2012}, month = {2012 Sep 6}, pages = {145-9}, abstract = {

Learning through trial-and-error interactions allows animals to adapt innate behavioural {\textquoteleft}rules of thumb{\textquoteright} to the local environment, improving their prospects for survival and reproduction. Naive Drosophila melanogaster males, for example, court both virgin and mated females, but learn through experience to selectively suppress futile courtship towards females that have already mated. Here we show that courtship learning reflects an enhanced response to the male pheromone cis-vaccenyl acetate (cVA), which is deposited on females during mating and thus distinguishes mated females from virgins. Dissociation experiments suggest a simple learning rule in which unsuccessful courtship enhances sensitivity to cVA. The learning experience can be mimicked by artificial activation of dopaminergic neurons, and we identify a specific class of dopaminergic neuron that is critical for courtship learning. These neurons provide input to the mushroom body (MB) γ lobe, and the DopR1 dopamine receptor is required in MBγ neurons for both natural and artificial courtship learning. Our work thus reveals critical behavioural, cellular and molecular components of the learning rule by which Drosophila adjusts its innate mating strategy according to experience.

}, keywords = {Acetates, Animal, Animals, Brain, Courtship, Dopamine, Dopaminergic Neurons, Drosophila melanogaster, Female, Learning, Male, Mushroom Bodies, Oleic Acids, Pheromones, Presynaptic Terminals, Receptors, Sex Attractants, Sexual Behavior, Synaptic Transmission}, issn = {1476-4687}, doi = {10.1038/nature11345}, author = {Keleman, Krystyna and Vrontou, Eleftheria and Kr{\"u}ttner, Sebastian and Yu, Jai Y and Kurtovic-Kozaric, Amina and Dickson, Barry J} } @article {6856, title = {Drosophila CPEB Orb2A mediates memory independent of Its RNA-binding domain.}, journal = {Neuron}, volume = {76}, year = {2012}, month = {2012 Oct 18}, pages = {383-95}, abstract = {

Long-term memory and synaptic plasticity are thought to require the synthesis of new proteins at activated synapses. The CPEB family of RNA binding proteins, including Drosophila Orb2, has been implicated in this process. The precise mechanism by which these molecules regulate memory formation is however poorly understood. We used gene targeting and site-specific transgenesis to specifically modify the endogenous orb2 gene in order to investigate its role in long-term memory formation. We show that the Orb2A and Orb2B isoforms, while both essential, have distinct functions in memory formation. These two isoforms have common glutamine-rich and RNA-binding domains, yet Orb2A uniquely requires the former and Orb2B the latter. We further show that Orb2A induces Orb2 complexes in a manner dependent upon both its glutamine-rich region and neuronal activity. We propose that Orb2B acts as a conventional CPEB to regulate transport and/or translation of specific mRNAs, whereas Orb2A acts in an unconventional manner to form stable Orb2 complexes that are essential for memory to persist.

}, keywords = {Animals, Biogenic Amines, Brain, Cell Line, Chromatography, Courtship, Developmental, Drosophila, Drosophila Proteins, Embryo, Gene Expression Regulation, Genetically Modified, Genotype, Green Fluorescent Proteins, High Pressure Liquid, Immunoelectron, Immunoprecipitation, Larva, Learning, Male, Mass Spectrometry, Memory, Messenger, Microscopy, Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases, mRNA Cleavage and Polyadenylation Factors, Mushroom Bodies, Mutation, Nonmammalian, Protein Isoforms, Protein Structure, RNA, RNA-Binding Proteins, Tertiary, Transcription Factors}, issn = {1097-4199}, doi = {10.1016/j.neuron.2012.08.028}, author = {Kr{\"u}ttner, Sebastian and Stepien, Barbara and Noordermeer, Jasprina N and Mommaas, Mieke A and Mechtler, Karl and Dickson, Barry J and Keleman, Krystyna} } @article {6858, title = {Function of the Drosophila CPEB protein Orb2 in long-term courtship memory.}, journal = {Nature Neuroscience}, volume = {10}, year = {2007}, month = {2007 Dec 28}, pages = {1587-93}, abstract = {

Both long-term behavioral memory and synaptic plasticity require protein synthesis, some of which may occur locally at specific synapses. Cytoplasmic polyadenylation element-binding (CPEB) proteins are thought to contribute to the local protein synthesis that underlies long-term changes in synaptic efficacy, but a role has not been established for them in the formation of long-term behavioral memory. We found that the Drosophila melanogaster CPEB protein Orb2 is acutely required for long-term conditioning of male courtship behavior. Deletion of the N-terminal glutamine-rich region of Orb2 resulted in flies that were impaired in their ability to form long-term, but not short-term, memory. Memory was restored by expressing Orb2 selectively in fruitless (fru)-positive gamma neurons of the mushroom bodies and by providing Orb2 function in mushroom bodies only during and shortly after training. Our data thus demonstrate that a CPEB protein is important in long-term memory and map the molecular, spatial and temporal requirements for its function in memory formation.

}, keywords = {Animal, Animals, Behavior, Computational Biology, Courtship, Drosophila, Drosophila Proteins, Female, Gene Expression, Genetically Modified, Green Fluorescent Proteins, Male, Memory, Memory Disorders, Mushroom Bodies, Neurons, Phylogeny, RNA-Binding Proteins, Sequence Deletion, Time Factors}, issn = {1097-6256}, doi = {10.1038/nn1996}, author = {Keleman, Krystyna and Kr{\"u}ttner, Sebastian and Alenius, Mattias and Dickson, Barry J} } @article {6857, title = {A genome-wide transgenic RNAi library for conditional gene inactivation in Drosophila.}, journal = {Nature}, volume = {448}, year = {2007}, month = {2007 Jul 12}, pages = {151-6}, abstract = {

Forward genetic screens in model organisms have provided important insights into numerous aspects of development, physiology and pathology. With the availability of complete genome sequences and the introduction of RNA-mediated gene interference (RNAi), systematic reverse genetic screens are now also possible. Until now, such genome-wide RNAi screens have mostly been restricted to cultured cells and ubiquitous gene inactivation in Caenorhabditis elegans. This powerful approach has not yet been applied in a tissue-specific manner. Here we report the generation and validation of a genome-wide library of Drosophila melanogaster RNAi transgenes, enabling the conditional inactivation of gene function in specific tissues of the intact organism. Our RNAi transgenes consist of short gene fragments cloned as inverted repeats and expressed using the binary GAL4/UAS system. We generated 22,270 transgenic lines, covering 88\% of the predicted protein-coding genes in the Drosophila genome. Molecular and phenotypic assays indicate that the majority of these transgenes are functional. Our transgenic RNAi library thus opens up the prospect of systematically analysing gene functions in any tissue and at any stage of the Drosophila lifespan.

}, keywords = {Animals, Drosophila melanogaster, Exons, Female, Genetically Modified, Genomic Library, Male, Messenger, Muscles, Neurons, Organ Specificity, Ribonuclease III, RNA, RNA Interference}, issn = {1476-4687}, doi = {10.1038/nature05954}, author = {Dietzl, Georg and Chen, Doris and Schnorrer, Frank and Su, Kuan-Chung and Barinova, Yulia and Fellner, Michaela and Gasser, Beate and Kinsey, Kaolin and Oppel, Silvia and Scheiblauer, Susanne and Couto, Africa and Marra, Vincent and Keleman, Krystyna and Dickson, Barry J} }