@article {69902, title = {Chromatix: a differentiable, GPU-accelerated wave-optics library}, journal = {bioRxiv}, year = {2025}, month = {2025 May 2}, abstract = {

Modern microscopy methods incorporate computational modeling of optical systems as an integral part of the imaging process, either to solve inverse problems or enable optimization of the optical system design. These methods often depend on differentiable simulations of optical systems, yet no standardized framework exists{\textemdash}forcing computational optics researchers to repeatedly and independently implement simulations that are prone to errors, difficult to reuse in other applications, and often computationally suboptimal. These common problems limit the potential impact of computational optics as a field. We present Chromatix: an open-source, GPU-accelerated differentiable wave optics library. Chromatix builds on JAX to enable fast simulation of diverse optical systems and inverse problem solving, scaling these simulations from single-CPU laptops to multi-GPU servers. The library implements various optical elements (e.g., lenses, polarizers and spatial light modulators) and multiple light propagation models (e.g., Fresnel approximation, angular spectrum and off-axis propagation) that can be flexibly combined to model various computational optics applications such as snapshot microscopy, holography, and phase retrieval of multiple scattering samples. These simulations can be automatically parallelized to scale across multiple GPUs with a single-line change to the modeling code, enabling simulation and optimization of previously impractical optical system designs. We demonstrate Chromatix{\textquoteright}s capacity to substantially accelerate optics simulation and optimization on existing methods in computational optics, speeding up optical simulation and optimization from 2-6{\texttimes} on a single GPU to up to 22{\texttimes} on 8 GPUs (depending on the particular system being modeled) compared to the original implementations. Chromatix establishes a standard for wave optics simulations, democratizing access to and expanding the design space of computational optics.i

}, doi = {10.1101/2025.04.29.651152}, url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2025/05/02/2025.04.29.651152}, author = {Deb, Diptodip and Both, Gert-Jan and Bezzam, Eric and Kohli, Amit and Yang, Siqi and Chaware, Amey and Allier, C{\'e}dric and Cai, Changjia and Anderberg, Geneva and Eybposh, M. Hossein and Schneider, Magdalena C. and Heintzmann, Rainer and Rivera-Sanchez, Fabrizio A. and Simmerer, Corey and Meng, Guanghan and Tormes-Vaquerano, Jovan and Han, SeungYun and Shanmugavel, Sibi Chakravarthy and Maruvada, Teja and Yang, Xi and Kim, Yewon and Diederich, Benedict and Joo, Chulmin and Waller, Laura and Durr, Nicholas J. and P{\'e}gard, Nicolas C. and La Rivi{\`e}re, Patrick J. and Horstmeyer, Roarke and Chowdhury, Shwetadwip and Turaga, Srinivas C.} } @article {67225, title = {Comparative single-cell transcriptomics of complete insect nervous systems}, journal = {bioRxiv}, year = {2020}, month = {01/2020}, abstract = {

Molecular profiles of neurons influence information processing, but bridging the gap between genes, circuits, and behavior has been very difficult. Furthermore, the behavioral state of an animal continuously changes across development and as a result of sensory experience. How behavioral state influences molecular cell state is poorly understood. Here we present a complete atlas of the Drosophila larval central nervous system composed of over 200,000 single cells across four developmental stages. We develop polyseq, a python package, to perform cell-type analyses. We use single-molecule RNA-FISH to validate our scRNAseq findings. To investigate how internal state affects cell state, we optogentically altered internal state with high-throughput behavior protocols designed to mimic wasp sting and over activation of the memory system. We found nervous system-wide and neuron-specific gene expression changes. This resource is valuable for developmental biology and neuroscience, and it advances our understanding of how genes, neurons, and circuits generate behavior.

}, doi = {10.1101/785931}, url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2020/01/16/785931}, author = {Cocanougher, Benjamin T. and Wittenbach, Jason D. and Long, Xi Salina and Kohn, Andrea B. and Norekian, Tigran P. and Yan, Jinyao and Colonell, Jennifer and Masson, Jean-Baptiste and Truman, James W. and Cardona, Albert and Turaga, Srinivas C. and Singer, Robert H. and Moroz, Leonid L. and Zlatic, Marta} } @article {67219, title = {Community-based benchmarking improves spike rate inference from two-photon calcium imaging data}, journal = {PLOS Computational Biology}, volume = {14}, year = {2018}, month = {Sep-05-2019}, pages = {e1006157}, abstract = {

In recent years, two-photon calcium imaging has become a standard tool to probe the function of neural circuits and to study computations in neuronal populations. However, the acquired signal is only an indirect measurement of neural activity due to the comparatively slow dynamics of fluorescent calcium indicators. Different algorithms for estimating spike rates from noisy calcium measurements have been proposed in the past, but it is an open question how far performance can be improved. Here, we report the results of the\ spikefinder\ challenge, launched to catalyze the development of new spike rate inference algorithms through crowd-sourcing. We present ten of the submitted algorithms which show improved performance compared to previously evaluated methods. Interestingly, the top-performing algorithms are based on a wide range of principles from deep neural networks to generative models, yet provide highly correlated estimates of the neural activity. The competition shows that benchmark challenges can drive algorithmic developments in neuroscience.

}, doi = {10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006157}, url = {https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?rev=2\&id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006157}, author = {Berens, Philipp and Freeman, Jeremy and Deneux, Thomas and Chenkov, Nikolay and McColgan, Thomas and Speiser, Artur and Macke, Jakob H. and Turaga, Srinivas C. and Mineault, Patrick and Rupprecht, Peter and Gerhard, Stephan and Friedrich, Rainer W. and Friedrich, Johannes and Paninski, Liam and Pachitariu, Marius and Harris, Kenneth D. and Bolte, Ben and Machado, Timothy A. and Ringach, Dario and Stone, Jasmine and Rogerson, Luke E. and Sofroniew, Nicolas J. and Reimer, Jacob and Froudarakis, Emmanouil and Euler, Thomas and Rom{\'a}n Ros{\'o}n, Miroslav and Theis, Lucas and Tolias, Andreas S. and Bethge, Matthias}, editor = {Bush, Daniel} }