@article {69542, title = {Neural circuit basis of placebo pain relief.}, journal = {Nature}, year = {2024}, month = {2024 Jul 24}, abstract = {

Placebo effects are striking demonstrations of mind-body interactions . During pain perception, in the absence of any treatment, an expectation of pain relief can reduce the experience of pain, a phenomenon known as placebo analgesia . However, despite the strength of placebo effects and their impact on everyday human experience and failure of clinical trials for new therapeutics , the neural circuit basis of placebo effects has remained elusive. Here, we show that analgesia from the expectation of pain relief is mediated by rostral anterior cingulate cortex (rACC) neurons that project to the pontine nucleus (rACC{\textrightarrow}Pn), a pre-cerebellar nucleus with no established function in pain. We created a behavioral assay that generates placebo-like anticipatory pain relief in mice. In vivo calcium imaging of neural activity and electrophysiological recordings in brain slices showed that expectations of pain relief boost the activity of rACC{\textrightarrow}Pn neurons and potentiate neurotransmission in this pathway. Transcriptomic studies of Pn neurons revealed an abundance of opioid receptors, further suggesting a role in pain modulation. Inhibition of the rACC{\textrightarrow}Pn pathway disrupted placebo analgesia and decreased pain thresholds, whereas activation elicited analgesia in the absence of placebo conditioning. Finally, Purkinje cells exhibited activity patterns resembling those of rACC{\textrightarrow}Pn neurons during pain relief expectation, providing cellular-level evidence of a role for the cerebellum in cognitive pain modulation. These findings open the possibility of targeting this prefrontal cortico-ponto-cerebellar pathway with drugs or neurostimulation to treat pain.

}, issn = {1476-4687}, doi = {10.1038/s41586-024-07816-z}, author = {Chen, Chong and Niehaus, Jesse K and Dinc, Fatih and Huang, Karen L and Barnette, Alexander L and Tassou, Adrien and Shuster, S Andrew and Wang, Lihua and Lemire, Andrew and Menon, Vilas and Ritola, Kimberly and Hantman, Adam and Zeng, Hongkui and Schnitzer, Mark J and Scherrer, Gr{\'e}gory} } @article {68418, title = {In situ cell-type-specific cell-surface proteomic profiling in mice.}, journal = {Neuron}, year = {2022}, month = {10/2022}, abstract = {

Cell-surface proteins (CSPs) mediate intercellular communication throughout the lives of multicellular organisms. However, there are no generalizable methods for quantitative CSP profiling in specific cell types in vertebrate tissues. Here, we present in situ cell-surface proteome extraction by extracellular labeling (iPEEL), a proximity labeling method in mice that enables spatiotemporally precise labeling of cell-surface proteomes in a cell-type-specific environment in native tissues for discovery proteomics. Applying iPEEL to developing and mature cerebellar Purkinje cells revealed differential enrichment in CSPs with post-translational protein processing and synaptic functions in the developing and mature cell-surface proteomes, respectively. A proteome-instructed in\ vivo loss-of-function screen identified a critical, multifaceted role for Armh4 in Purkinje cell dendrite morphogenesis. Armh4 overexpression also disrupts dendrite morphogenesis; this effect requires its conserved cytoplasmic domain and is augmented by disrupting its endocytosis. Our results highlight the utility of CSP profiling in native mammalian tissues for identifying regulators of cell-surface signaling.

}, issn = {1097-4199}, doi = {10.1016/j.neuron.2022.09.025}, author = {Shuster, S Andrew and Li, Jiefu and Chon, URee and Sinantha-Hu, Miley C and Luginbuhl, David J and Udeshi, Namrata D and Carey, Dominique Kiki and Takeo, Yukari H and Xie, Qijing and Xu, Chuanyun and Mani, D R and Han, Shuo and Ting, Alice Y and Carr, Steven A and Luo, Liqun} } @article {68419, title = {Transcription factor Acj6 controls dendrite targeting via a combinatorial cell-surface code.}, journal = {Neuron}, volume = {110}, year = {2022}, month = {07/2022}, pages = {2299-2314.e8}, abstract = {

Transcription factors specify the fate and connectivity of developing neurons. We investigate how a lineage-specific transcription factor, Acj6, controls the precise dendrite targeting of Drosophila olfactory projection neurons (PNs) by regulating the expression of cell-surface proteins. Quantitative cell-surface proteomic profiling of wild-type and acj6 mutant PNs in intact developing brains, and a proteome-informed genetic screen identified PN surface proteins that execute Acj6-regulated wiring decisions. These include canonical cell adhesion molecules and proteins previously not associated with wiring, such as Piezo, whose mechanosensitive ion channel activity is dispensable for its function in PN dendrite targeting. Comprehensive genetic analyses revealed that Acj6 employs unique sets of cell-surface proteins in different PN types for dendrite targeting. Combined expression of Acj6 wiring executors rescued acj6 mutant phenotypes with higher efficacy and breadth than expression of individual executors. Thus, Acj6 controls wiring specificity of different neuron types by specifying distinct combinatorial expression of cell-surface executors.

}, keywords = {Animals, Dendrites, Drosophila, Drosophila Proteins, Ion Channels, Membrane Proteins, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Olfactory Pathways, Olfactory Receptor Neurons, POU Domain Factors, Proteomics, Transcription Factors}, issn = {1097-4199}, doi = {10.1016/j.neuron.2022.04.026}, author = {Xie, Qijing and Li, Jiefu and Li, Hongjie and Udeshi, Namrata D and Svinkina, Tanya and Orlin, Daniel and Kohani, Sayeh and Guajardo, Ricardo and Mani, D R and Xu, Chuanyun and Li, Tongchao and Han, Shuo and Wei, Wei and Shuster, S Andrew and Luginbuhl, David J and Quake, Stephen R and Murthy, Swetha E and Ting, Alice Y and Carr, Steven A and Luo, Liqun} } @article {68435, title = {Linking neuronal lineage and wiring specificity.}, journal = {Neural Dev}, volume = {13}, year = {2018}, month = {04/2018}, pages = {5}, abstract = {

Brain function requires precise neural circuit assembly during development. Establishing a functional circuit involves multiple coordinated steps ranging from neural cell fate specification to proper matching between pre- and post-synaptic partners. How neuronal lineage and birth timing influence wiring specificity remains an open question. Recent findings suggest that the relationships between lineage, birth timing, and wiring specificity vary in different neuronal circuits. In this review, we summarize our current understanding of the cellular, molecular, and developmental mechanisms linking neuronal lineage and birth timing to wiring specificity in a few specific systems in Drosophila and mice, and review different methods employed to explore these mechanisms.

}, keywords = {Animals, Brain, Cell Lineage, Neural Pathways, Neurons}, issn = {1749-8104}, doi = {10.1186/s13064-018-0102-0}, author = {Li, Hongjie and Shuster, S Andrew and Li, Jiefu and Luo, Liqun} }