@article {68656, title = {Connectome-constrained networks predict neural activity across the fly visual system}, journal = {Nature}, year = {2024}, month = {2024 Sep 11}, abstract = {

We can now measure the connectivity of every neuron in a neural circuit, but we cannot measure other biological details, including the dynamical characteristics of each neuron. The degree to which measurements of connectivity alone can inform the understanding of neural computation is an open question. Here we show that with experimental measurements of only the connectivity of a biological neural network, we can predict the neural activity underlying a specified neural computation. We constructed a model neural network with the experimentally determined connectivity for 64 cell types in the motion pathways of the fruit fly optic lobe but with unknown parameters for the single-neuron and single-synapse properties. We then optimized the values of these unknown parameters using techniques from deep learning, to allow the model network to detect visual motion. Our mechanistic model makes detailed, experimentally testable predictions for each neuron in the connectome. We found that model predictions agreed with experimental measurements of neural activity across 26 studies. Our work demonstrates a strategy for generating detailed hypotheses about the mechanisms of neural circuit function from connectivity measurements. We show that this strategy is more likely to be successful when neurons are sparsely connected-a universally observed feature of biological neural networks across species and brain regions.

}, doi = {10.1038/s41586-024-07939-3}, url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07939-3}, author = {Janne K. Lappalainen and Fabian D. Tschopp and Sridhama Prakhya and Mason McGill and Aljoscha Nern and Kazunori Shinomiya and Shin-ya Takemura and Eyal Gruntman and Jakob H. Macke and Srinivas C. Turaga} } @article {69373, title = {Connectome-driven neural inventory of a complete visual system}, journal = {Nature}, year = {2024}, month = {2025 Mar 26}, abstract = {

Vision provides animals with detailed information about their surroundings, conveying diverse features such as color, form, and movement across the visual scene. Computing these parallel spatial features requires a large and diverse network of neurons, such that in animals as distant as flies and humans, visual regions comprise half the brain{\textquoteright}s volume. These visual brain regions often reveal remarkable structure-function relationships, with neurons organized along spatial maps with shapes that directly relate to their roles in visual processing. To unravel the stunning diversity of a complex visual system, a careful mapping of the neural architecture matched to tools for targeted exploration of that circuitry is essential. Here, we report a new connectome of the right optic lobe from a male Drosophila central nervous system FIB-SEM volume and a comprehensive inventory of the fly{\textquoteright}s visual neurons. We developed a computational framework to quantify the anatomy of visual neurons, establishing a basis for interpreting how their shapes relate to spatial vision. By integrating this analysis with connectivity information, neurotransmitter identity, and expert curation, we classified the 53,000 neurons into 727 types, about half of which are systematically described and named for the first time. Finally, we share an extensive collection of split-GAL4 lines matched to our neuron type catalog. Together, this comprehensive set of tools and data unlock new possibilities for systematic investigations of vision in Drosophila, a foundation for a deeper understanding of sensory processing.

}, doi = {10.1038/s41586-025-08746-0}, url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-08746-0}, author = {Aljoscha Nern and Frank Loesche and Shin-ya Takemura and Laura E Burnett and Marisa Dreher and Eyal Gruntman and Judith Hoeller and Gary B Huang and Michal Januszewski and Nathan C Klapoetke and Sanna Koskela and Kit D Longden and Zhiyuan Lu and Stephan Preibisch and Wei Qiu and Edward M Rogers and Pavithraa Seenivasan and Arthur Zhao and John Bogovic and Brandon S Canino and Jody Clements and Michael Cook and Samantha Finley-May and Miriam A Flynn and Imran Hameed and Kenneth J Hayworth and Gary Patrick Hopkins and Philip M Hubbard and William T Katz and Julie Kovalyak and Shirley A Lauchie and Meghan Leonard and Alanna Lohff and Charli A Maldonado and Caroline Mooney and Nneoma Okeoma and Donald J Olbris and Christopher Ordish and Tyler Paterson and Emily M Phillips and Tobias Pietzsch and Jennifer Rivas Salinas and Patricia K Rivlin and Ashley L Scott and Louis A Scuderi and Satoko Takemura and Iris Talebi and Alexander Thomson and Eric T Trautman and Lowell Umayam and Claire Walsh and John J Walsh and C Shan Xu and Emily A Yakal and Tansy Yang and Ting Zhao and Jan Funke and Reed George and Harald F Hess and Gregory S X E Jefferis and Christopher Knecht and Wyatt Korff and Stephen M Plaza and Sandro Romani and Stephan Saalfeld and Louis K Scheffer and Stuart Berg and Gerald M Rubin and Michael B Reiser} } @article {68570, title = {Eye structure shapes neuron function in Drosophila motion vision}, journal = {bioRxiv}, year = {2022}, month = {2022 Dec 15}, abstract = {

Many animals rely on vision to navigate through their environment. The pattern of changes in the visual scene induced by self-motion is the\ optic flow1, which is first estimated in local patches by directionally selective (DS) neurons2{\textendash}4. But how should the arrays of DS neurons, each responsive to motion in a preferred direction at a specific retinal position, be organized to support robust decoding of optic flow by downstream circuits? Understanding this global organization is challenging because it requires mapping fine, local features of neurons across the animal{\textquoteright}s field of view3. In\ Drosophila, the asymmetric dendrites of the T4 and T5 DS neurons establish their preferred direction, making it possible to predict DS responses from anatomy4,5. Here we report that the preferred directions of fly DS neurons vary at different retinal positions and show that this spatial variation is established by the anatomy of the compound eye. To estimate the preferred directions across the visual field, we reconstructed hundreds of T4 neurons in a full brain EM volume6\ and discovered unexpectedly stereotypical dendritic arborizations that are independent of location. We then used whole-head μCT scans to map the viewing directions of all compound eye facets and found a non-uniform sampling of visual space that explains the spatial variation in preferred directions. Our findings show that the organization of preferred directions in the fly is largely determined by the compound eye, exposing an intimate and unexpected connection between the peripheral structure of the eye, functional properties of neurons deep in the brain, and the control of body movements.

}, doi = {10.1101/2022.12.14.520178}, url = {https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.12.14.520178}, author = {Arthur Zhao and Eyal Gruntman and Aljoscha Nern and Nirmala A. Iyer and Edward M. Rogers and Sanna Koskela and Igor Siwanowicz and Marisa Dreher and Miriam A. Flynn and Connor W. Laughland and Henrique D.F. Ludwig and Alex G. Thomson and Cullen P. Moran and Bruck Gezahegn and Davi D. Bock and Michael B. Reiser} }