@article {46756, title = {Genomic signatures of evolutionary transitions from solitary to group living.}, journal = {Science}, year = {2015}, month = {2015 May 14}, abstract = {

The evolution of eusociality is one of the major transitions in evolution, but the underlying genomic changes are unknown. We compared the genomes of ten bee species that vary in social complexity, representing multiple independent transitions in social evolution, and report three major findings. First, many important genes show evidence of neutral evolution as a consequence of relaxed selection with increasing social complexity. Second, there is no single road map to eusociality; independent evolutionary transitions in sociality have independent genetic underpinnings. Third, though clearly independent in detail, these transitions do have similar general features, including an increase in constrained protein evolution accompanied by increases in the potential for gene regulation and decreases in diversity and abundance of transposable elements. Eusociality may arise through different mechanisms each time, but would likely always involve an increase in the complexity of gene networks.

}, issn = {1095-9203}, doi = {10.1126/science.aaa4788}, author = {Kapheim, Karen M and Pan, Hailin and Li, Cai and Salzberg, Steven L and Puiu, Daniela and Magoc, Tanja and Robertson, Hugh M and Hudson, Matthew E and Venkat, Aarti and Fischman, Brielle J and Hernandez, Alvaro and Yandell, Mark and Ence, Daniel and Holt, Carson and Yocum, George D and Kemp, William P and Bosch, Jordi and Waterhouse, Robert M and Zdobnov, Evgeny M and Stolle, Eckart and Kraus, F Bernhard and Helbing, Sophie and Moritz, Robin F A and Glastad, Karl M and Hunt, Brendan G and Goodisman, Michael A D and Hauser, Frank and Grimmelikhuijzen, Cornelis J P and Pinheiro, Daniel Guariz and Nunes, Francis Morais Franco and Soares, Michelle Prioli Miranda and Tanaka, {\'E}rica Donato and Sim{\~o}es, Zil{\'a} Luz Paulino and Hartfelder, Klaus and Evans, Jay D and Barribeau, Seth M and Johnson, Reed M and Massey, Jonathan H and Southey, Bruce R and Hasselmann, Martin and Hamacher, Daniel and Biewer, Matthias and Kent, Clement F and Zayed, Amro and Blatti, Charles and Sinha, Saurabh and Johnston, J Spencer and Hanrahan, Shawn J and Kocher, Sarah D and Wang, Jun and Robinson, Gene E and Zhang, Guojie} } @inbook {46570, title = {Population genomic and phylogenomic insights into the evolution of physiology and behaviour in social insects}, booktitle = {Advances in Insect Physiology}, number = {48}, year = {2015}, pages = {293{\textendash}324}, abstract = {

Genomics revolutionized the field of social insect research by providing powerful tools to understand the relationship between genes, physiology and behaviour of social insects. Notably, analysis of gene expression and methylation patterns in the different castes of insect colonies highlighted many genes that likely underlie caste-specific physiological and behavioural phenotypes. However, earlier studies of social insect genomes lacked an {\textquoteleft}evolutionary{\textquoteright} context.\ Out of the millions of DNA bases found in the genome of a social insect, which pieces were most important to fitness over the timescale of social evolution?\ Here, we review a burgeoning body of literature that utilizes between-species or within-species genomic comparisons to highlight the evolutionary forces that have shaped social insect genomes. These pioneering phylogenetic and population genomic studies provide a critically needed evolutionary context to social insect genomes and underscore the importance of adaptive changes in physiology and behaviour in social evolution.

}, doi = {10.1016/bs.aiip.2015.01.002}, author = {Kent, Clement F and Zayed, Amro} } @article {6717, title = {Population genomics of the honey bee reveals strong signatures of positive selection on worker traits.}, journal = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America}, volume = {111}, year = {2014}, month = {2014 Jan 31}, pages = {2614-19}, abstract = {

Most theories used to explain the evolution of eusociality rest upon two key assumptions: mutations affecting the phenotype of sterile workers evolve by positive selection if the resulting traits benefit fertile kin, and that worker traits provide the primary mechanism allowing social insects to adapt to their environment. Despite the common view that positive selection drives phenotypic evolution of workers, we know very little about the prevalence of positive selection acting on the genomes of eusocial insects. We mapped the footprints of positive selection in Apis mellifera through analysis of 40 individual genomes, allowing us to identify thousands of genes and regulatory sequences with signatures of adaptive evolution over multiple timescales. We found Apoidea- and Apis-specific genes to be enriched for signatures of positive selection, indicating that novel genes play a disproportionately large role in adaptive evolution of eusocial insects. Worker-biased proteins have higher signatures of adaptive evolution relative to queen-biased proteins, supporting the view that worker traits are key to adaptation. We also found genes regulating worker division of labor to be enriched for signs of positive selection. Finally, genes associated with worker behavior based on analysis of brain gene expression were highly enriched for adaptive protein and cis-regulatory evolution. Our study highlights the significant contribution of worker phenotypes to adaptive evolution in social insects, and provides a wealth of knowledge on the loci that influence fitness in honey bees.

}, issn = {1091-6490}, doi = {10.1073/pnas.1315506111}, author = {Harpur, Brock A and Kent, Clement F and Molodtsova, Daria and Lebon, Jonathan M D and Alqarni, Abdulaziz S and Owayss, Ayman A and Zayed, Amro} }