@article {70012, title = {Sexually-dimorphic neurons in the Drosophila whole-brain connectome}, journal = {Research Square}, year = {2025}, month = {2025 Jun 26}, abstract = {

Sexual dimorphisms are present across brains. Male and female brains contain sets of cell types with differences in cell number, morphology, or synaptic connectivity between the two sexes. These differences are driven by differentially-expressed transcription factors, which set the stage for disparate sexual and social behaviors observed between males and females, such as courtship, aggression, receptivity, and mating. In the Drosophila brain, sexual dimorphisms result from differential expression of two transcription factors, Fruitless (Fru) and Doublesex (Dsx), and genetic reagents driven by enhancers for Fru and Dsx label sexually-dimorphic neurons in both male and female brains. The recent release of the first whole-brain connectome for Drosophila provides a unique opportunity to study the connectivity between these neurons as well as their integration into the larger brain network. Here, we identify 91 putative Fru or Dsx cell types, comprising ~1400 neurons, within the whole-brain connectome, using morphological similarity between electron microscopic (EM) reconstructions and light microscopic (LM) images of known Fru and Dsx neurons. We discover that while Fru and Dsx neurons are highly interconnected, each cell type typically receives more inputs from and sends more outputs to non-Fru/Dsx neurons. We characterize the connectivity in the Fru/Dsx networks to predict the function of cell types not previously characterized, we measure distances to the sensory periphery and uncover multisensory interactions, and we map connections to descending neurons that drive behavior. All Fru and Dsx labels reported here are shared within FlyWire Codex (codex.flywire.ai; gene==Fruitless or Doublesex); this work is a critical first step towards deciphering the neural basis of sexually-dimorphic behaviors and for making comparisons with future connectomes of the male brain.

}, doi = {10.21203/rs.3.rs-6881911/v1}, url = {https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6881911/v1}, author = {Deutsch, David and Matsliah, Arie and Wang, Kaiyu and Dorkenwald, Sven and Mondal, Arpita and Burke, Austin and Hebditch, James and Gager, Jay and Yu, Szi-Chieh and Sterling, Amy and McKellar, Amy and Schlegel, Philipp and Gerhard, Stephan and Sterne, Gabriella and Costa, Marta and Eichler, Katharina and Yin, Yijie and Jefferis, Gregory and Dickson, Barry and Seung, H Sebastian and Murthy, Mala} } @article {68889, title = {Neuronal wiring diagram of an adult brain.}, journal = {Nature}, volume = {634}, year = {2024}, month = {2024 Oct 02}, pages = {124-138}, abstract = {

Connections between neurons can be mapped by acquiring and analysing electron microscopic brain images. In recent years, this approach has been applied to chunks of brains to reconstruct local connectivity maps that are highly informative, but nevertheless inadequate for understanding brain function more globally. Here we present a neuronal wiring diagram of a whole brain containing 5 {\texttimes} 107 chemical synapses between 139,255 neurons reconstructed from an adult female Drosophila melanogaster. The resource also incorporates annotations of cell classes and types, nerves, hemilineages and predictions of neurotransmitter identities. Data products are available for download, programmatic access and interactive browsing and have been made interoperable with other fly data resources. We derive a projectome-a map of projections between regions-from the connectome and report on tracing of synaptic pathways and the analysis of information flow from inputs (sensory and ascending neurons) to outputs (motor, endocrine and descending neurons) across both hemispheres and between the central brain and the optic lobes. Tracing from a subset of photoreceptors to descending motor pathways illustrates how structure can uncover putative circuit mechanisms underlying sensorimotor behaviours. The technologies and open ecosystem reported here set the stage for future large-scale connectome projects in other species.

}, doi = {10.1038/s41586-024-07558-y}, url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07558-y}, author = {Dorkenwald, Sven and Matsliah, Arie and Sterling, Amy R and Schlegel, Philipp and Yu, Szi-Chieh and McKellar, Claire E and Lin, Albert and Costa, Marta and Eichler, Katharina and Yin, Yijie and Silversmith, Will and Schneider-Mizell, Casey and Jordan, Chris S and Brittain, Derrick and Halageri, Akhilesh and Kuehner, Kai and Ogedengbe, Oluwaseun and Morey, Ryan and Gager, Jay and Kruk, Krzysztof and Perlman, Eric and Yang, Runzhe and Deutsch, David and Bland, Doug and Sorek, Marissa and Lu, Ran and Macrina, Thomas and Lee, Kisuk and Bae, J Alexander and Mu, Shang and Nehoran, Barak and Mitchell, Eric and Popovych, Sergiy and Wu, Jingpeng and Jia, Zhen and Castro, Manuel and Kemnitz, Nico and Ih, Dodam and Bates, Alexander Shakeel and Eckstein, Nils and Funke, Jan and Collman, Forrest and Bock, Davi D and Jefferis, Gregory S X E and Seung, H Sebastian and Murthy, Mala} } @article {69439, title = {Neurotransmitter classification from electron microscopy images at synaptic sites in Drosophila melanogaster}, journal = {Cell}, volume = {187}, year = {2024}, month = {2024 May 09}, pages = {2574-2594.e23}, abstract = {

High-resolution electron microscopy of nervous systems has enabled the reconstruction of synaptic connectomes. However, we do not know the synaptic sign for each connection (i.e., whether a connection is excitatory or inhibitory), which is implied by the released transmitter. We demonstrate that artificial neural networks can predict transmitter types for presynapses from electron micrographs: a network trained to predict six transmitters (acetylcholine, glutamate, GABA, serotonin, dopamine, octopamine) achieves an accuracy of 87\% for individual synapses, 94\% for neurons, and 91\% for known cell types across a D.\ melanogaster whole brain. We visualize the ultrastructural features used for prediction, discovering subtle but significant differences between transmitter phenotypes. We also analyze transmitter distributions across the brain and find that neurons that develop together largely express only one fast-acting transmitter (acetylcholine, glutamate, or GABA). We hope that our publicly available predictions act as an accelerant for neuroscientific hypothesis generation for the fly.

}, keywords = {Animals, Brain, Connectome, Drosophila melanogaster, gamma-Aminobutyric Acid, Microscopy, Electron, Neural Networks, Computer, Neurons, Neurotransmitter Agents, Synapses}, issn = {1097-4172}, doi = {10.1016/j.cell.2024.03.016}, author = {Eckstein, Nils and Bates, Alexander Shakeel and Champion, Andrew and Du, Michelle and Yin, Yijie and Schlegel, Philipp and Lu, Alicia Kun-Yang and Rymer, Thomson and Finley-May, Samantha and Paterson, Tyler and Parekh, Ruchi and Dorkenwald, Sven and Matsliah, Arie and Yu, Szi-Chieh and McKellar, Claire and Sterling, Amy and Eichler, Katharina and Costa, Marta and Seung, Sebastian and Murthy, Mala and Hartenstein, Volker and Jefferis, Gregory S X E and Funke, Jan} }