@article {68709, title = {BigNeuron: a resource to benchmark and predict performance of algorithms for automated tracing of neurons in light microscopy datasets.}, journal = {Nature Methods}, volume = {20}, year = {2023}, month = {2023 Jun 01}, abstract = {

BigNeuron is an open community bench-testing platform with the goal of setting open standards for accurate and fast automatic neuron tracing. We gathered a diverse set of image volumes across several species that is representative of the data obtained in many neuroscience laboratories interested in neuron tracing. Here, we report generated gold standard manual annotations for a subset of the available imaging datasets and quantified tracing quality for 35 automatic tracing algorithms. The goal of generating such a hand-curated diverse dataset is to advance the development of tracing algorithms and enable generalizable benchmarking. Together with image quality features, we pooled the data in an interactive web application that enables users and developers to perform principal component analysis, t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding, correlation and clustering, visualization of imaging and tracing data, and benchmarking of automatic tracing algorithms in user-defined data subsets. The image quality metrics explain most of the variance in the data, followed by neuromorphological features related to neuron size. We observed that diverse algorithms can provide complementary information to obtain accurate results and developed a method to iteratively combine methods and generate consensus reconstructions. The consensus trees obtained provide estimates of the neuron structure ground truth that typically outperform single algorithms in noisy datasets. However, specific algorithms may outperform the consensus tree strategy in specific imaging conditions. Finally, to aid users in predicting the most accurate automatic tracing results without manual annotations for comparison, we used support vector machine regression to predict reconstruction quality given an image volume and a set of automatic tracings.

}, issn = {1548-7105}, doi = {10.1038/s41592-023-01848-5}, author = {Manubens-Gil, Linus and Zhou, Zhi and Chen, Hanbo and Ramanathan, Arvind and Liu, Xiaoxiao and Liu, Yufeng and Bria, Alessandro and Gillette, Todd and Ruan, Zongcai and Yang, Jian and Radojevi{\'c}, Miroslav and Zhao, Ting and Cheng, Li and Qu, Lei and Liu, Siqi and Bouchard, Kristofer E and Gu, Lin and Cai, Weidong and Ji, Shuiwang and Roysam, Badrinath and Wang, Ching-Wei and Yu, Hongchuan and Sironi, Amos and Iascone, Daniel Maxim and Zhou, Jie and Bas, Erhan and Conde-Sousa, Eduardo and Aguiar, Paulo and Li, Xiang and Li, Yujie and Nanda, Sumit and Wang, Yuan and Muresan, Leila and Fua, Pascal and Ye, Bing and He, Hai-Yan and Staiger, Jochen F and Peter, Manuel and Cox, Daniel N and Simonneau, Michel and Oberlaender, Marcel and Jefferis, Gregory and Ito, Kei and Gonzalez-Bellido, Paloma and Kim, Jinhyun and Rubel, Edwin and Cline, Hollis T and Zeng, Hongkui and Nern, Aljoscha and Chiang, Ann-Shyn and Yao, Jianhua and Roskams, Jane and Livesey, Rick and Stevens, Janine and Liu, Tianming and Dang, Chinh and Guo, Yike and Zhong, Ning and Tourassi, Georgia and Hill, Sean and Hawrylycz, Michael and Koch, Christof and Meijering, Erik and Ascoli, Giorgio A and Peng, Hanchuan} } @article {68964, title = {Brain wiring determinants uncovered by integrating connectomes and transcriptomes.}, journal = {Current Biology}, volume = {33}, year = {2023}, month = {2023 Aug 23}, pages = {3998-3998}, abstract = {

Advances in brain connectomics have demonstrated the extraordinary complexity of neural circuits. Developing neurons encounter the axons and dendrites of many different neuron types and form synapses with only a subset of them. During circuit assembly, neurons express cell-type-specific repertoires comprising many cell adhesion molecules (CAMs) that can mediate interactions between developing neurites. Many CAM families have been shown to contribute to brain wiring in different ways. It has been challenging, however, to identify receptor-ligand pairs directly matching neurons with their synaptic targets. Here, we integrated the synapse-level connectome of the neural circuit with the developmental expression patterns and binding specificities of CAMs on pre- and postsynaptic neurons in the Drosophila visual system. To overcome the complexity of neural circuits, we focus on pairs of genetically related neurons that make differential wiring choices. In the motion detection circuit, closely related subtypes of T4/T5 neurons choose between alternative synaptic targets in adjacent layers of neuropil. This choice correlates with the matching expression in synaptic partners of different receptor-ligand pairs of the Beat and Side families of CAMs. Genetic analysis demonstrated that presynaptic Side-II and postsynaptic Beat-VI restrict synaptic partners to the same layer. Removal of this receptor-ligand pair disrupts layers and leads to inappropriate targeting of presynaptic sites and postsynaptic dendrites. We propose that different Side/Beat receptor-ligand pairs collaborate with other recognition molecules to determine wiring specificities in the fly brain. Combining transcriptomes, connectomes, and protein interactome maps allow unbiased identification of determinants of brain wiring.

}, issn = {1879-0445}, doi = {10.1016/j.cub.2023.08.020}, author = {Yoo, Juyoun and Dombrovski, Mark and Mirshahidi, Parmis and Nern, Aljoscha and LoCascio, Samuel A and Zipursky, S Lawrence and Kurmangaliyev, Yerbol Z} } @article {48982, title = {Behavioral state modulates the ON visual motion pathway of Drosophila.}, journal = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America}, volume = {115}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 Dec 18}, pages = {E102-11}, abstract = {

The behavioral state of an animal can dynamically modulate visual processing. In flies, the behavioral state is known to alter the temporal tuning of neurons that carry visual motion information into the central brain. However, where this modulation occurs and how it tunes the properties of this neural circuit are not well understood. Here, we show that the behavioral state alters the baseline activity levels and the temporal tuning of the first directionally selective neuron in the ON motion pathway (T4) as well as its primary input neurons (Mi1, Tm3, Mi4, Mi9). These effects are especially prominent in the inhibitory neuron Mi4, and we show that central octopaminergic neurons provide input to Mi4 and increase its excitability. We further show that octopamine neurons are required for sustained behavioral responses to fast-moving, but not slow-moving, visual stimuli in walking flies. These results indicate that behavioral-state modulation acts directly on the inputs to the directionally selective neurons and supports efficient neural coding of motion stimuli.

}, issn = {1091-6490}, doi = {10.1073/pnas.1703090115}, author = {Strother, James A and Wu, Shiuan-Tze and Rogers, Edward M and Eliason, Jessica L M and Wong, Allan M and Nern, Aljoscha and Reiser, Michael B} }