@article {69749, title = {Cell type-specific driver lines targeting the Drosophila central complex and their use to investigate neuropeptide expression and sleep regulation}, journal = {elife}, year = {2025}, month = {2025 Jan 21}, abstract = {

The central complex (CX) plays a key role in many higher-order functions of the insect brain including navigation and activity regulation. Genetic tools for manipulating individual cell types, and knowledge of what neurotransmitters and neuromodulators they express, will be required to gain mechanistic understanding of how these functions are implemented. We generated and characterized split-GAL4 driver lines that express in individual or small subsets of about half of CX cell types. We surveyed neuropeptide and neuropeptide receptor expression in the central brain using fluorescent\ in situ\ hybridization. About half of the neuropeptides we examined were expressed in only a few cells, while the rest were expressed in dozens to hundreds of cells. Neuropeptide receptors were expressed more broadly and at lower levels. Using our GAL4 drivers to mark individual cell types, we found that 51 of the 85 CX cell types we examined expressed at least one neuropeptide and 21 expressed multiple neuropeptides. Surprisingly, all co-expressed a small neurotransmitter. Finally, we used our driver lines to identify CX cell types whose activation affects sleep, and identified other central brain cell types that link the circadian clock to the CX. The well-characterized genetic tools and information on neuropeptide and neurotransmitter expression we provide should enhance studies of the CX.

}, doi = {10.7554/elife.104764.2}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.104764.2}, author = {Wolff, Tanya and Eddison, Mark and Chen, Nan and Nern, Aljoscha and Sundaramurthi, Preeti and Sitaraman, Divya and Rubin, Gerald M} } @article {69650, title = {Cell type-specific driver lines targeting the Drosophila central complex and their use to investigate neuropeptide expression and sleep regulation}, journal = {bioRxiv}, year = {2024}, month = {2024 Oct 21}, abstract = {

The central complex (CX) plays a key role in many higher-order functions of the insect brain including navigation and activity regulation. Genetic tools for manipulating individual cell types, and knowledge of what neurotransmitters and neuromodulators they express, will be required to gain mechanistic understanding of how these functions are implemented. We generated and characterized split-GAL4 driver lines that express in individual or small subsets of about half of CX cell types. We surveyed neuropeptide and neuropeptide receptor expression in the central brain using fluorescent in situ hybridization. About half of the neuropeptides we examined were expressed in only a few cells, while the rest were expressed in dozens to hundreds of cells. Neuropeptide receptors were expressed more broadly and at lower levels. Using our GAL4 drivers to mark individual cell types, we found that 51 of the 85 CX cell types we examined expressed at least one neuropeptide and 21 expressed multiple neuropeptides. Surprisingly, all co-expressed a small neurotransmitter. Finally, we used our driver lines to identify CX cell types whose activation affects sleep, and identified other central brain cell types that link the circadian clock to the CX. The well-characterized genetic tools and information on neuropeptide and neurotransmitter expression we provide should enhance studies of the CX.

}, doi = {10.1101/2024.10.21.619448}, url = {https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.21.619448}, author = {Wolff, Tanya and Eddison, Mark and Chen, Nan and Nern, Aljoscha and Sundaramurthi, Preeti and Sitaraman, Divya and Rubin, Gerald M.} } @article {69138, title = {Connectomic reconstruction predicts visual features used for navigation.}, journal = {Nature}, volume = {634}, year = {2024}, month = {2024 Oct 02}, pages = {181-190}, abstract = {

Many animals use visual information to navigate, but how such information is encoded and integrated by the navigation system remains incompletely understood. In Drosophila melanogaster, EPG neurons in the central complex compute the heading direction by integrating visual input from ER neurons, which are part of the anterior visual pathway (AVP). Here we densely reconstruct all neurons in the AVP using electron-microscopy data. The AVP comprises four neuropils, sequentially linked by three major classes of neurons: MeTu neurons, which connect the medulla in the optic lobe to the small unit of the anterior optic tubercle (AOTUsu) in the central brain; TuBu neurons, which connect the AOTUsu to the bulb neuropil; and ER neurons, which connect the bulb to the EPG neurons. On the basis of morphologies, connectivity between neural classes and the locations of synapses, we identify distinct information channels that originate from four types of MeTu neurons, and we further divide these into ten subtypes according to the presynaptic connections in the medulla and the postsynaptic connections in the AOTUsu. Using the connectivity of the entire AVP and the dendritic fields of the MeTu neurons in the optic lobes, we infer potential visual features and the visual area from which any ER neuron receives input. We confirm some of these predictions physiologically. These results provide a strong foundation for understanding how distinct sensory features can be extracted and transformed across multiple processing stages to construct higher-order cognitive representations.

}, doi = {10.1038/s41586-024-07967-z}, url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07967-z}, author = {Garner, Dustin and Kind, Emil and Yuet Ha Lai, Jennifer and Nern, Aljoscha and Zhao, Arthur and Houghton, Lucy and Sancer, Gizem and Wolff, Tanya and Rubin, Gerald M and Wernet, Mathias F and Kim, Sung Soo} } @article {65899, title = {The connectome of the adult mushroom body provides insights into function.}, journal = {eLife}, volume = {9}, year = {2020}, month = {2020 Dec 14}, abstract = {

Making inferences about the computations performed by neuronal circuits from synapse-level connectivity maps is an emerging opportunity in neuroscience. The mushroom body (MB) is well positioned for developing and testing such an approach due to its conserved neuronal architecture, recently completed dense connectome, and extensive prior experimental studies of its roles in learning, memory and activity regulation. Here we identify new components of the MB circuit in , including extensive visual input and MB output neurons (MBONs) with direct connections to descending neurons. We find unexpected structure in sensory inputs, in the transfer of information about different sensory modalities to MBONs, and in the modulation of that transfer by dopaminergic neurons (DANs). We provide insights into the circuitry used to integrate MB outputs, connectivity between the MB and the central complex and inputs to DANs, including feedback from MBONs. Our results provide a foundation for further theoretical and experimental work.

}, issn = {2050-084X}, doi = {10.7554/eLife.62576}, author = {Li, Feng and Lindsey, Jack W and Marin, Elizabeth C and Otto, Nils and Dreher, Marisa and Dempsey, Georgia and Stark, Ildiko and Bates, Alexander S and Pleijzier, Markus William and Schlegel, Philipp and Nern, Aljoscha and Takemura, Shin-ya and Eckstein, Nils and Yang, Tansy and Francis, Audrey and Braun, Amalia and Parekh, Ruchi and Costa, Marta and Scheffer, Louis K and Aso, Yoshi and Jefferis, Gregory Sxe and Abbott, Larry F and Litwin-Kumar, Ashok and Waddell, Scott and Rubin, Gerald M} } @article {51252, title = {Comparisons between the ON- and OFF-edge motion pathways in the brain.}, journal = {eLife}, volume = {8}, year = {2019}, month = {2019 Jan 09}, abstract = {

Understanding the circuit mechanisms behind motion detection is a long-standing question in visual neuroscience. In , recent synapse-level connectomes in the optic lobe, particularly in ON-pathway (T4) receptive-field circuits, in concert with physiological studies, suggest an increasingly intricate motion model compared with the ubiquitous Hassenstein-Reichardt model, while our knowledge of OFF-pathway (T5) has been incomplete. Here we present a conclusive and comprehensive connectome that for the first time integrates detailed connectivity information for inputs to both T4 and T5 pathways in a single EM dataset covering the entire optic lobe. With novel reconstruction methods using automated synapse prediction suited to such a large connectome, we successfully corroborate previous findings in the T4 pathway and comprehensively identify inputs and receptive fields for T5. While the two pathways are likely evolutionarily linked and indeed exhibit many similarities, we uncover interesting differences and interactions that may underlie their distinct functional properties.

}, issn = {2050-084X}, doi = {10.7554/eLife.40025}, author = {Shinomiya, Kazunori and Huang, Gary and Lu, Zhiyuan and Parag, Toufiq and Xu, C Shan and Aniceto, Roxanne and Ansari, Namra and Cheatham, Natasha and Lauchie, Shirley and Neace, Erika and Ogundeyi, Omotara and Ordish, Christopher and Peel, David and Shinomiya, Aya and Smith, Claire and Takemura, Satoko and Talebi, Iris and Rivlin, Patricia K and Nern, Aljoscha and Scheffer, Louis K and Plaza, Stephen M and Meinertzhagen, Ian A} } @article {48436, title = {The comprehensive connectome of a neural substrate for {\textquoteright}ON{\textquoteright} motion detection in Drosophila.}, journal = {eLife}, volume = {6}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 Apr 22}, abstract = {

Analysing computations in neural circuits often uses simplified models because the actual neuronal implementation is not known. For example, a problem in vision, how the eye detects image motion, has long been analysed using Hassenstein-Reichardt (HR) detector or Barlow-Levick (BL) models. These both simulate motion detection well, but the exact neuronal circuits undertaking these tasks remain elusive. We reconstructed a comprehensive connectome of the circuits of Drosophila{\textquoteright}s motion-sensing T4 cells using a novel EM technique. We uncover complex T4 inputs and reveal that putative excitatory inputs cluster at T4{\textquoteright}s dendrite shafts, while inhibitory inputs localize to the bases. Consistent with our previous study, we reveal that Mi1 and Tm3 cells provide most synaptic contacts onto T4. We are, however, unable to reproduce the spatial offset between these cells reported previously. Our comprehensive connectome reveals complex circuits that include candidate anatomical substrates for both HR and BL types of motion detectors.

}, issn = {2050-084X}, doi = {10.7554/eLife.24394}, author = {Takemura, Shin-ya and Nern, Aljoscha and Chklovskii, Dmitri B and Scheffer, Louis K and Rubin, Gerald M and Meinertzhagen, Ian A} } @article {6890, title = {Cell-type-specific labeling of synapses in vivo through synaptic tagging with recombination.}, journal = {Neuron}, volume = {81}, year = {2014}, month = {2014 Jan 22}, pages = {280-93}, abstract = {

The study of synaptic specificity and plasticity in the CNS is limited by the inability to efficiently visualize synapses in identified neurons using light microscopy. Here, we describe synaptic tagging with recombination (STaR), a method for labeling endogenous presynaptic and postsynaptic proteins in a cell-type-specific fashion. We modified genomic loci encoding synaptic proteins within bacterial artificial chromosomes such that these proteins, expressed at endogenous levels and with normal spatiotemporal patterns, were labeled in an inducible fashion in specific neurons through targeted expression of site-specific recombinases. Within the Drosophila visual system, the number and distribution of synapses correlate with electron microscopy studies. Using two different recombination systems, presynaptic and postsynaptic specializations of synaptic pairs can be colabeled. STaR also allows synapses within the CNS to be studied in live animals noninvasively. In principle, STaR can be adapted to the mammalian nervous system.

}, keywords = {Animals, Drosophila, Drosophila Proteins, Electron, Genetic, Genetically Modified, Luminescent Proteins, Medulla Oblongata, Microscopy, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Neurons, Neurotransmitter, Presynaptic Terminals, Receptors, Recombinases, Recombination, Synapses, Transcription Factors, Transmission, Visual Pathways}, issn = {1097-4199}, doi = {10.1016/j.neuron.2013.12.021}, author = {Chen, Yi and Akin, Orkun and Nern, Aljoscha and Tsui, C Y Kimberly and Pecot, Matthew Y and Zipursky, S Lawrence} } @article {6091, title = {Contributions of the 12 neuron classes in the fly lamina to motion vision.}, journal = {Neuron}, volume = {79}, year = {2013}, month = {07/2013}, pages = {128-140}, abstract = {

Motion detection is a fundamental neural computation performed by many sensory systems. In the fly, local motion computation is thought to occur within the first two layers of the visual system, the lamina and medulla. We constructed specific genetic driver lines for each of the 12 neuron classes in the lamina. We then depolarized and hyperpolarized each neuron type and quantified fly behavioral responses to a diverse set of motion stimuli. We found that only a small number of lamina output neurons are essential for motion detection, while most neurons serve to sculpt and enhance these feedforward pathways. Two classes of feedback neurons (C2 and C3), and lamina output neurons (L2 and L4), are required for normal detection of directional motion stimuli. Our results reveal a prominent role for feedback and lateral interactions in motion processing and demonstrate that motion-dependent behaviors rely on contributions from nearly all lamina neuron classes.

}, doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2013.05.024}, author = {Tuthill, John C and Nern, Aljoscha and Stephen L. Holtz and Rubin, Gerald M and Reiser, Michael B} } @article {65028, title = {Columnar cells necessary for motion responses of wide-field visual interneurons in Drosophila.}, journal = {J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol}, volume = {198}, year = {2012}, month = {2012 May 01}, pages = {389-95}, abstract = {

Wide-field motion-sensitive neurons in the lobula plate (lobula plate tangential cells, LPTCs) of the fly have been studied for decades. However, it has never been conclusively shown which cells constitute their major presynaptic elements. LPTCs are supposed to be rendered directionally selective by integrating excitatory as well as inhibitory input from many local motion detectors. Based on their stratification in the different layers of the lobula plate, the columnar cells T4 and T5 are likely candidates to provide some of this input. To study their role in motion detection, we performed whole-cell recordings from LPTCs in Drosophila with T4 and T5 cells blocked using two different genetically encoded tools. In these flies, motion responses were abolished, while flicker responses largely remained. We thus demonstrate that T4 and T5 cells indeed represent those columnar cells that provide directionally selective motion information to LPTCs. Contrary to previous assumptions, flicker responses seem to be largely mediated by a third, independent pathway. This work thus represents a further step towards elucidating the complete motion detection circuitry of the fly.

}, keywords = {Animals, Drosophila, Ganglia, Invertebrate, Interneurons, Motion Perception, Nerve Net, Sensory Receptor Cells, Visual Fields, Visual Pathways}, issn = {1432-1351}, doi = {10.1007/s00359-012-0716-3}, author = {Schnell, Bettina and Raghu, Shamprasad Varija and Nern, Aljoscha and Borst, Alexander} }