@article {69171, title = {Mapping of multiple neurotransmitter receptor subtypes and distinct protein complexes to the connectome.}, journal = {Neuron}, year = {2024}, month = {2024 Jan 24}, abstract = {

Neurons express various combinations of neurotransmitter receptor (NR) subunits and receive inputs from multiple neuron types expressing different neurotransmitters. Localizing NR subunits to specific synaptic inputs has been challenging. Here, we use epitope-tagged endogenous NR subunits, expansion light-sheet microscopy, and electron microscopy (EM) connectomics to molecularly characterize synapses in Drosophila. We show that in directionally selective motion-sensitive neurons, different multiple NRs elaborated a highly stereotyped molecular topography with NR localized to specific domains receiving cell-type-specific inputs. Developmental studies suggested that NRs or complexes of them with other membrane proteins determine patterns of synaptic inputs. In support of this model, we identify a transmembrane protein selectively associated with a subset of spatially restricted synapses and demonstrate its requirement for synapse formation through genetic analysis. We propose that mechanisms that regulate the precise spatial distribution of NRs provide a molecular cartography specifying the patterns of synaptic connections onto dendrites.

}, issn = {1097-4199}, doi = {10.1016/j.neuron.2023.12.014}, author = {Sanfilippo, Piero and Kim, Alexander J and Bhukel, Anuradha and Yoo, Juyoun and Mirshahidi, Pegah S and Pandey, Vijaya and Bevir, Harry and Yuen, Ashley and Mirshahidi, Parmis S and Guo, Peiyi and Li, Hong-Sheng and Wohlschlegel, James A and Aso, Yoshinori and Zipursky, S Lawrence} } @article {68964, title = {Brain wiring determinants uncovered by integrating connectomes and transcriptomes.}, journal = {Current Biology}, volume = {33}, year = {2023}, month = {2023 Aug 23}, pages = {3998-3998}, abstract = {

Advances in brain connectomics have demonstrated the extraordinary complexity of neural circuits. Developing neurons encounter the axons and dendrites of many different neuron types and form synapses with only a subset of them. During circuit assembly, neurons express cell-type-specific repertoires comprising many cell adhesion molecules (CAMs) that can mediate interactions between developing neurites. Many CAM families have been shown to contribute to brain wiring in different ways. It has been challenging, however, to identify receptor-ligand pairs directly matching neurons with their synaptic targets. Here, we integrated the synapse-level connectome of the neural circuit with the developmental expression patterns and binding specificities of CAMs on pre- and postsynaptic neurons in the Drosophila visual system. To overcome the complexity of neural circuits, we focus on pairs of genetically related neurons that make differential wiring choices. In the motion detection circuit, closely related subtypes of T4/T5 neurons choose between alternative synaptic targets in adjacent layers of neuropil. This choice correlates with the matching expression in synaptic partners of different receptor-ligand pairs of the Beat and Side families of CAMs. Genetic analysis demonstrated that presynaptic Side-II and postsynaptic Beat-VI restrict synaptic partners to the same layer. Removal of this receptor-ligand pair disrupts layers and leads to inappropriate targeting of presynaptic sites and postsynaptic dendrites. We propose that different Side/Beat receptor-ligand pairs collaborate with other recognition molecules to determine wiring specificities in the fly brain. Combining transcriptomes, connectomes, and protein interactome maps allow unbiased identification of determinants of brain wiring.

}, issn = {1879-0445}, doi = {10.1016/j.cub.2023.08.020}, author = {Yoo, Juyoun and Dombrovski, Mark and Mirshahidi, Parmis and Nern, Aljoscha and LoCascio, Samuel A and Zipursky, S Lawrence and Kurmangaliyev, Yerbol Z} } @article {68566, title = {Synaptic gradients transform object location to action.}, journal = {Nature}, volume = {613}, year = {2023}, month = {2023 Jan 04}, pages = {534-42}, abstract = {

To survive, animals must convert sensory information into appropriate behaviours. Vision is a common sense for locating ethologically relevant stimuli and guiding motor responses. How circuitry converts object location in retinal coordinates to movement direction in body coordinates remains largely unknown. Here we show through behaviour, physiology, anatomy and connectomics in Drosophila that visuomotor transformation occurs by conversion of topographic maps formed by the dendrites of feature-detecting visual projection neurons (VPNs) into synaptic weight gradients of VPN outputs onto central brain neurons. We demonstrate how this gradient motif transforms the anteroposterior location of a visual looming stimulus into the fly{\textquoteright}s directional escape. Specifically, we discover that two neurons postsynaptic to a looming-responsive VPN type promote opposite takeoff directions. Opposite synaptic weight gradients onto these neurons from looming VPNs in different visual field regions convert localized looming threats into correctly oriented escapes. For a second looming-responsive VPN type, we demonstrate graded responses along the dorsoventral axis. We show that this synaptic gradient motif generalizes across all 20 primary VPN cell types and most often arises without VPN axon topography. Synaptic gradients may thus be a general mechanism for conveying spatial features of sensory information into directed motor outputs.

}, issn = {1476-4687}, doi = {10.1038/s41586-022-05562-8}, author = {Dombrovski, Mark and Peek, Martin Y and Park, Jin-Yong and Vaccari, Andrea and Sumathipala, Marissa and Morrow, Carmen and Breads, Patrick and Zhao, Arthur and Kurmangaliyev, Yerbol Z and Sanfilippo, Piero and Rehan, Aadil and Polsky, Jason and Alghailani, Shada and Tenshaw, Emily and Namiki, Shigehiro and Zipursky, S Lawrence and Card, Gwyneth M} } @article {49529, title = {Neuron-subtype-specific expression, interaction affinities, and specificity determinants of DIP/Dpr cell recognition proteins.}, journal = {Neuron}, volume = {100}, year = {2018}, month = {2018 Nov 12}, pages = {1385-1400}, abstract = {

Binding between DIP and Dpr neuronal recognition proteins has been proposed to regulate synaptic connections between lamina and medulla neurons in the Drosophila visual system. Each lamina neuron was previously shown to express many Dprs. Here, we demonstrate, by contrast, that their synaptic partners typically express one or two DIPs, with binding specificities matched to the lamina neuron-expressed Dprs. A deeper understanding of the molecular logic of DIP/Dpr interaction requires quantitative studies on the properties of these proteins. We thus generated a quantitative affinity-based DIP/Dpr interactome for all DIP/Dpr protein family members. This revealed a broad range of affinities and identified homophilic binding for some DIPs and some Dprs. These data, along with full-length ectodomain DIP/Dpr and DIP/DIP crystal structures, led to the identification of molecular determinants of DIP/Dpr specificity. This structural knowledge, along with a comprehensive set of quantitative binding affinities, provides new tools for functional studies in\ vivo.

}, issn = {1097-4199}, doi = {10.1016/j.neuron.2018.10.046}, author = {Cosmanescu, Filip and Katsamba, Phinikoula S and Sergeeva, Alina P and Ahlsen, Goran and Patel, Saurabh D and Brewer, Joshua J and Tan, Liming and Xu, Shuwa and Xiao, Qi and Nagarkar-Jaiswal, Sonal and Nern, Aljoscha and Bellen, Hugo J and Zipursky, S Lawrence and Honig, Barry and Shapiro, Lawrence} } @article {47237, title = {Ig superfamily ligand and receptor pairs expressed in synaptic partners in Drosophila.}, journal = {Cell}, volume = {163}, year = {2015}, month = {2015 Dec 17}, pages = {1756-69}, abstract = {

Information processing relies on precise patterns of synapses between neurons. The cellular recognition mechanisms regulating this specificity are poorly understood. In the medulla of the Drosophila visual system, different neurons form synaptic connections in different layers. Here, we sought to identify candidate cell recognition molecules underlying this specificity. Using RNA sequencing (RNA-seq), we show that neurons with different synaptic specificities express unique combinations of mRNAs encoding hundreds of cell surface and secreted proteins. Using RNA-seq and protein tagging, we demonstrate that 21 paralogs of the Dpr family, a subclass of immunoglobulin (Ig)-domain containing proteins, are expressed in unique combinations in homologous neurons with different layer-specific synaptic connections. Dpr interacting proteins (DIPs), comprising nine paralogs of another subclass of Ig-containing proteins, are expressed in a complementary layer-specific fashion in a subset of synaptic partners. We propose that pairs of Dpr/DIP paralogs contribute to layer-specific patterns of synaptic connectivity.

}, issn = {1097-4172}, doi = {10.1016/j.cell.2015.11.021}, author = {Tan, Liming and Zhang, Kelvin Xi and Pecot, Matthew Y and Nagarkar-Jaiswal, Sonal and Lee, Pei-Tseng and Takemura, Shin-ya and McEwen, Jason M and Nern, Aljoscha and Xu, Shuwa and Tadros, Wael and Chen, Zhenqing and Zinn, Kai and Bellen, Hugo J and Morey, Marta and Zipursky, S Lawrence} } @article {6890, title = {Cell-type-specific labeling of synapses in vivo through synaptic tagging with recombination.}, journal = {Neuron}, volume = {81}, year = {2014}, month = {2014 Jan 22}, pages = {280-93}, abstract = {

The study of synaptic specificity and plasticity in the CNS is limited by the inability to efficiently visualize synapses in identified neurons using light microscopy. Here, we describe synaptic tagging with recombination (STaR), a method for labeling endogenous presynaptic and postsynaptic proteins in a cell-type-specific fashion. We modified genomic loci encoding synaptic proteins within bacterial artificial chromosomes such that these proteins, expressed at endogenous levels and with normal spatiotemporal patterns, were labeled in an inducible fashion in specific neurons through targeted expression of site-specific recombinases. Within the Drosophila visual system, the number and distribution of synapses correlate with electron microscopy studies. Using two different recombination systems, presynaptic and postsynaptic specializations of synaptic pairs can be colabeled. STaR also allows synapses within the CNS to be studied in live animals noninvasively. In principle, STaR can be adapted to the mammalian nervous system.

}, keywords = {Animals, Drosophila, Drosophila Proteins, Electron, Genetic, Genetically Modified, Luminescent Proteins, Medulla Oblongata, Microscopy, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Neurons, Neurotransmitter, Presynaptic Terminals, Receptors, Recombinases, Recombination, Synapses, Transcription Factors, Transmission, Visual Pathways}, issn = {1097-4199}, doi = {10.1016/j.neuron.2013.12.021}, author = {Chen, Yi and Akin, Orkun and Nern, Aljoscha and Tsui, C Y Kimberly and Pecot, Matthew Y and Zipursky, S Lawrence} } @article {6926, title = {Multiple interactions control synaptic layer specificity in the Drosophila visual system.}, journal = {Neuron}, volume = {77}, year = {2013}, month = {2013 Jan 23}, pages = {299-310}, abstract = {

How neurons form synapses within specific layers remains poorly understood. In the Drosophila medulla, neurons target to discrete layers in a precise fashion. Here we demonstrate that the targeting of L3 neurons to a specific layer occurs in two steps. Initially, L3 growth cones project to a common domain in the outer medulla, overlapping with the growth cones of other neurons destined for a different layer through the redundant functions of N-Cadherin (CadN) and Semaphorin-1a (Sema-1a). CadN mediates adhesion within the domain and Sema-1a mediates repulsion through Plexin A (PlexA) expressed in an adjacent region. Subsequently, L3 growth cones segregate from the domain into their target layer in part through Sema-1a/PlexA-dependent remodeling. Together, our results and recent studies argue that the early medulla is organized into common domains, comprising processes bound for different layers, and that discrete layers later emerge through successive interactions between processes within domains and developing layers.

}, keywords = {Animals, Cell Communication, Drosophila, Drosophila Proteins, Genetically Modified, Growth Cones, Medulla Oblongata, Protein Interaction Mapping, Synapses, Visual Pathways}, issn = {1097-4199}, doi = {10.1016/j.neuron.2012.11.007}, author = {Pecot, Matthew Y and Tadros, Wael and Nern, Aljoscha and Bader, Maya and Chen, Yi and Zipursky, S Lawrence} }