@article {65382, title = {Conservation and divergence of related neuronal lineages in the central brain.}, journal = {eLife}, volume = {9}, year = {2020}, month = {2020 Apr 07}, abstract = {

Wiring a complex brain requires many neurons with intricate cell specificity, generated by a limited number of neural stem cells. central brain lineages are a predetermined series of neurons, born in a specific order. To understand how lineage identity translates to neuron morphology, we mapped 18 central brain lineages. While we found large aggregate differences between lineages, we also discovered shared patterns of morphological diversification. Lineage identity plus Notch-mediated sister fate govern primary neuron trajectories, whereas temporal fate diversifies terminal elaborations. Further, morphological neuron types may arise repeatedly, interspersed with other types. Despite the complexity, related lineages produce similar neuron types in comparable temporal patterns. Different stem cells even yield two identical series of dopaminergic neuron types, but with unrelated sister neurons. Together, these phenomena suggest that straightforward rules drive incredible neuronal complexity, and that large changes in morphology can result from relatively simple fating mechanisms.

}, issn = {2050-084X}, doi = {10.7554/eLife.53518}, author = {Lee, Ying-Jou and Yang, Ching-Po and Miyares, Rosa L and Huang, Yu-Fen and He, Yisheng and Ren, Qingzhong and Chen, Hui-Min and Kawase, Takashi and Ito, Masayoshi and Otsuna, Hideo and Sugino, Ken and Aso, Yoshi and Ito, Kei and Lee, Tzumin} } @article {65622, title = {Enhanced Golic+: Highly effective CRISPR gene targeting and transgene HACKing in .}, journal = {Development}, year = {2020}, month = {2020 May 28}, abstract = {

Gene targeting is an incredibly valuable technique. Sometimes however, it can also be extremely challenging for various intrinsic reasons (e.g. low target accessibility or nature/extent of gene modification). To bypass these barriers, we designed a transgene-based system in Drosophila that increases the number of independent gene targeting events while at the same time enriching for correctly targeted progeny. Unfortunately, with particularly challenging gene targeting experiments, our original design yielded numerous false positives. Here we deliver a much-improved technique named Enhanced Golic+ (E-Golic+). E-Golic+ incorporates genetic modifications to tighten lethality-based selection while simultaneously boosting efficiency. With E-Golic+, we easily achieve previously unattainable gene targeting. Additionally, we built an E-Golic+ based, high-efficiency genetic pipeline for transgene swapping. We demonstrate its utility by transforming GAL4 enhancer-trap lines into tissue-specific Cas9-expressing lines. Given the superior efficiency, specificity and scalability, E-Golic+ promises to expedite development of additional sophisticated genetic/genomic tools in .

}, issn = {1477-9129}, doi = {10.1242/dev.181974}, author = {Chen, Hui-Min and Yao, Xiaohao and Ren, Qingzhong and Chang, Chuan-Chie and Liu, Ling-Yu and Miyares, Rosa Linda and Lee, Tzumin} } @article {49232, title = {Lineage-guided Notch-dependent gliogenesis by multi-potent progenitors.}, journal = {Development (Cambridge, England)}, year = {2018}, month = {2018 May 15}, abstract = {

Macroglial cells in the central nervous system exhibit regional specialization and carry out region-specific functions. Diverse glial cells arise from specific progenitors in specific spatiotemporal patterns. This raises an interesting possibility that there exist glial precursors with distinct developmental fates, which govern region-specific gliogenesis. Here we mapped the glial progeny produced by the type II neuroblasts, which, like vertebrate radial glia cells, yield both neurons and glia via intermediate neural progenitors (INPs). Distinct type II neuroblasts produce different characteristic sets of glia. A single INP can make both astrocyte-like and ensheathing glia, which co-occupy a relatively restrictive subdomain. Blocking apoptosis uncovers further lineage distinctions in the specification, proliferation, and survival of glial precursors. Both the switch from neurogenesis to gliogenesis and the subsequent glial expansion depend on Notch signaling. Taken together, lineage origins preconfigure the development of individual glial precursors with involvement of serial Notch actions in promoting gliogenesis.

}, issn = {1477-9129}, doi = {10.1242/dev.160127}, author = {Ren, Qingzhong and Awasaki, Takeshi and Wang, Yu-Chun and Huang, Yu-Fen and Lee, Tzumin} } @article {48786, title = {Dissection of the Drosophila neuropeptide F circuit using a high-throughput two-choice assay.}, journal = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America}, volume = {114}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 Sep 05}, pages = {e8091-9}, abstract = {

In their classic experiments, Olds and Milner showed that rats learn to lever press to receive an electric stimulus in specific brain regions. This led to the identification of mammalian reward centers. Our interest in defining the neuronal substrates of reward perception in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster prompted us to develop a simpler experimental approach wherein flies could implement behavior that induces self-stimulation of specific neurons in their brains. The high-throughput assay employs optogenetic activation of neurons when the fly occupies a specific area of a behavioral chamber, and the flies{\textquoteright} preferential occupation of this area reflects their choosing to experience optogenetic stimulation. Flies in which neuropeptide F (NPF) neurons are activated display preference for the illuminated side of the chamber. We show that optogenetic activation of NPF neuron is rewarding in olfactory conditioning experiments and that the preference for NPF neuron activation is dependent on NPF signaling. Finally, we identify a small subset of NPF-expressing neurons located in the dorsomedial posterior brain that are sufficient to elicit preference in our assay. This assay provides the means for carrying out unbiased screens to map reward neurons in flies.

}, issn = {1091-6490}, doi = {10.1073/pnas.1710552114}, author = {Shao, Lisha and Saver, Mathias and Chung, Phuong and Ren, Qingzhong and Lee, Tzumin and Kent, Clement F and Heberlein, Ulrike} } @article {48435, title = {Stem cell-intrinsic, seven-up-triggered temporal factor gradients diversify intermediate neural progenitors.}, journal = {Current Biology : CB}, volume = {27}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 Apr 10}, pages = {1303-13}, abstract = {

Building a sizable, complex brain requires both cellular expansion and diversification. One mechanism to achieve these goals is production of multiple transiently amplifying intermediate neural progenitors (INPs) from a single neural stem cell. Like mammalian neural stem cells, Drosophila type II neuroblasts utilize INPs to produce neurons and glia. Within a given lineage, the consecutively born INPs produce morphologically distinct progeny, presumably due to differential inheritance of temporal factors. To uncover the underlying temporal fating mechanisms, we profiled type II neuroblasts{\textquoteright} transcriptome across time. Our results reveal opposing temporal gradients of Imp and Syp RNA-binding proteins (descending and ascending, respectively). Maintaining high Imp throughout serial INP production expands the number of neurons and glia with early temporal fate at the expense of cells with late fate. Conversely, precocious upregulation of Syp reduces the number of cells with early fate. Furthermore, we reveal that the transcription factor Seven-up initiates progression of the Imp/Syp gradients. Interestingly, neuroblasts that maintain initial Imp/Syp levels can still yield progeny with a small range of early fates. We therefore propose that the Seven-up-initiated Imp/Syp gradients create coarse temporal windows within type II neuroblasts to pattern INPs, which subsequently undergo fine-tuned subtemporal patterning.

}, issn = {1879-0445}, doi = {10.1016/j.cub.2017.03.047}, author = {Ren, Qingzhong and Yang, Ching-Po and Liu, Zhiyong and Sugino, Ken and Mok, Kent and He, Yisheng and Ito, Masayoshi and Nern, Aljoscha and Otsuna, Hideo and Lee, Tzumin} } @article {47849, title = {Cell class-lineage analysis reveals sexually dimorphic lineage compositions in the Drosophila brain.}, journal = {Current Biology : CB}, volume = {26}, year = {2016}, month = {2016 Sep 08}, pages = {2583-93}, abstract = {

The morphology and physiology of neurons are directed by developmental decisions made within their lines of descent from single stem cells. Distinct stem cells may produce neurons having shared properties that define their cell class, such as the type of secreted neurotransmitter. The relationship between cell class and lineage is complex. Here we developed the transgenic cell class-lineage intersection (CLIn) system to assign cells of a particular class to specific lineages within the Drosophila brain. CLIn also enables birth-order analysis and genetic manipulation of particular cell classes arising from particular lineages. We demonstrated the power of CLIn in the context of the eight central brain type II lineages, which produce highly diverse progeny through intermediate neural progenitors. We mapped 18 dopaminergic neurons from three distinct clusters to six type\ II lineages that show lineage-characteristic neurite trajectories. In addition, morphologically distinct dopaminergic neurons are produced within a given lineage, and they arise in an invariant sequence. We also identified type II lineages that produce doublesex- and fruitless-expressing neurons and examined whether female-specific apoptosis in these lineages accounts for the lower number of these neurons in the female brain. Blocking apoptosis in these lineages resulted in more cells in both sexes with males still carrying more cells than females. This argues that sex-specific stem cell fate together with differential progeny apoptosis contribute to the final sexual dimorphism.

}, issn = {1879-0445}, doi = {10.1016/j.cub.2016.07.086}, author = {Ren, Qingzhong and Awasaki, Takeshi and Huang, Yu-Fen and Liu, Zhiyong and Lee, Tzumin} } @article {47307, title = {Transcriptomes of lineage-specific Drosophila neuroblasts profiled by genetic targeting and robotic sorting.}, journal = {Development (Cambridge, England)}, volume = {143}, year = {2016}, month = {2016 Feb 1}, pages = {411-21}, abstract = {

A brain consists of numerous distinct neurons arising from a limited number of progenitors, called neuroblasts in Drosophila. Each neuroblast produces a specific neuronal lineage. To unravel the transcriptional networks that underlie the development of distinct neuroblast lineages, we marked and isolated lineage-specific neuroblasts for RNA sequencing. We labeled particular neuroblasts throughout neurogenesis by activating a conditional neuroblast driver in specific lineages using various intersection strategies. The targeted neuroblasts were efficiently recovered using a custom-built device for robotic single-cell picking. Transcriptome analysis of mushroom body, antennal lobe and type II neuroblasts compared with non-selective neuroblasts, neurons and glia revealed a rich repertoire of transcription factors expressed among neuroblasts in diverse patterns. Besides transcription factors that are likely to be pan-neuroblast, many transcription factors exist that are selectively enriched or repressed in certain neuroblasts. The unique combinations of transcription factors present in different neuroblasts may govern the diverse lineage-specific neuron fates.

}, issn = {1477-9129}, doi = {10.1242/dev.129163}, author = {Yang, Ching-Po and Fu, Chi-Cheng and Sugino, Ken and Liu, Zhiyong and Ren, Qingzhong and Liu, Ling-Yu and Yao, Xiaohao and Lee, Luke P and Lee, Tzumin} } @article {6876, title = {Drosophila intermediate neural progenitors produce lineage-dependent related series of diverse neurons.}, journal = {Development}, volume = {141}, year = {2014}, month = {2014 Jan}, pages = {253-8}, abstract = {

Drosophila type II neuroblasts (NBs), like mammalian neural stem cells, deposit neurons through intermediate neural progenitors (INPs) that can each produce a series of neurons. Both type II NBs and INPs exhibit age-dependent expression of various transcription factors, potentially specifying an array of diverse neurons by combinatorial temporal patterning. Not knowing which mature neurons are made by specific INPs, however, conceals the actual variety of neuron types and limits further molecular studies. Here we mapped neurons derived from specific type II NB lineages and found that sibling INPs produced a morphologically similar but temporally regulated series of distinct neuron types. This suggests a common fate diversification program operating within each INP that is modulated by NB age to generate slightly different sets of diverse neurons based on the INP birth order. Analogous mechanisms might underlie the expansion of neuron diversity via INPs in mammalian brain.

}, keywords = {Animals, Brain, Cell Lineage, Drosophila, Genetically Modified, Models, Neural Stem Cells, Neurogenesis, Neurological}, issn = {1477-9129}, doi = {10.1242/dev.103069}, author = {Wang, Yu-Chun and Yang, Jacob S and Johnston, Rebecca and Ren, Qingzhong and Lee, Ying-Jou and Luan, Haojiang and Brody, Thomas and Odenwald, Ward F and Lee, Tzumin} }