@article {45811, title = {Mushroom body output neurons encode valence and guide memory-based action selection in Drosophila.}, journal = {eLife}, volume = {4}, year = {2014}, month = {12/2014}, abstract = {

Animals discriminate stimuli, learn their predictive value and use this knowledge to modify their behavior. In Drosophila, the mushroom body (MB) plays a key role in these processes. Sensory stimuli are sparsely represented by \~{}2000 Kenyon cells, which converge onto 34 output neurons (MBONs) of 21 types. We studied the role of MBONs in several associative learning tasks and in sleep regulation, revealing the extent to which information flow is segregated into distinct channels and suggesting possible roles for the multi-layered MBON network. We also show that optogenetic activation of MBONs can, depending on cell type, induce repulsion or attraction in flies. The behavioral effects of MBON perturbation are combinatorial, suggesting that the MBON ensemble collectively represents valence. We propose that local, stimulus-specific dopaminergic modulation selectively alters the balance within the MBON network for those stimuli. Our results suggest that valence encoded by the MBON ensemble biases memory-based action selection.

}, issn = {2050-084X}, doi = {10.7554/eLife.04580}, author = {Aso, Yoshinori and Sitaraman, Divya and Ichinose, Toshiharu and Kaun, Karla R and Vogt, Katrin and Belliart-Gu{\'e}rin, Ghislain and Placais, Pierre-Yves and Robie, Alice A and Yamagata, Nobuhiro and Schnaitmann, Christopher and Rowell, William J and Johnston, Rebecca M and Ngo, Teri-T B and Chen, Nan and Korff, Wyatt and Nitabach, Michael N and Heberlein, Ulrike and Preat, Thomas and Branson, Kristin M and Tanimoto, Hiromu and Rubin, Gerald M} } @article {45416, title = {Shared mushroom body circuits underlie visual and olfactory memories in Drosophila.}, journal = {eLife}, volume = {3}, year = {2014}, month = {2014}, pages = {e02395}, abstract = {

In nature, animals form memories associating reward or punishment with stimuli from different sensory modalities, such as smells and colors. It is unclear, however, how distinct sensory memories are processed in the brain. We established appetitive and aversive visual learning assays for Drosophila that are comparable to the widely used olfactory learning assays. These assays share critical features, such as reinforcing stimuli (sugar reward and electric shock punishment), and allow direct comparison of the cellular requirements for visual and olfactory memories. We found that the same subsets of dopamine neurons drive formation of both sensory memories. Furthermore, distinct yet partially overlapping subsets of mushroom body intrinsic neurons are required for visual and olfactory memories. Thus, our results suggest that distinct sensory memories are processed in a common brain center. Such centralization of related brain functions is an economical design that avoids the repetition of similar circuit motifs.

}, issn = {2050-084X}, doi = {10.7554/eLife.02395}, author = {Vogt, Katrin and Schnaitmann, Christopher and Dylla, Kristina V and Knapek, Stephan and Aso, Yoshinori and Rubin, Gerald M and Tanimoto, Hiromu} } @article {2686, title = {Appetitive and aversive visual learning in freely moving Drosophila.}, journal = {Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience}, volume = {4}, year = {2010}, month = {2010 Mar 9}, pages = {10}, abstract = {

To compare appetitive and aversive visual memories of the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster, we developed a new paradigm for classical conditioning. Adult flies are trained en masse to differentially associate one of two visual conditioned stimuli (CS) (blue and green light as CS) with an appetitive or aversive chemical substance (unconditioned stimulus or US). In a test phase, flies are given a choice between the paired and the unpaired visual stimuli. Associative memory is measured based on altered visual preference in the test. If a group of flies has, for example, received a sugar reward with green light in the training, they show a significantly higher preference for the green stimulus during the test than another group of flies having received the same reward with blue light. We demonstrate critical parameters for the formation of visual appetitive memory, such as training repetition, order of reinforcement, starvation, and individual conditioning. Furthermore, we show that formic acid can act as an aversive chemical reinforcer, yielding weak, yet significant, aversive memory. These results provide a basis for future investigations into the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying visual memory and perception in Drosophila.

}, issn = {1662-5153}, doi = {10.3389/fnbeh.2010.00010}, author = {Schnaitmann, Christopher and Vogt, Katrin and Triphan, Tilman and Tanimoto, Hiromu} }