@article {65042, title = {Changes throughout a genetic network mask the contribution of Hox gene evolution.}, journal = {Current Biology}, volume = {29}, year = {2019}, month = {2019 Jul 08}, pages = {2157-66}, abstract = {

Hox genes pattern the anterior-posterior axis of animals and are posited to drive animal body plan evolution, yet their precise role in evolution has been difficult to determine. Here, we identified evolutionary modifications in the Hox gene\ Abd-Bthat dramatically altered its expression along the body plan of\ Drosophila santomea.\ Abd-B\ is required for pigmentation in\ Drosophila yakuba, the sister species of\ D.\ santomea, and changes to Abd-B expression would be predicted to make large contributions to the loss of body pigmentation in\ D.\ santomea. However, manipulating\ Abd-B\ expression in current-day\ D.\ santomea\ does not affect pigmentation. We attribute this epistatic interaction to four other genes within the\ D.\ santomea\ pigmentation network, three of which have evolved expression patterns that do not respond to Abd-B. Our results demonstrate how body plans may evolve through small evolutionary steps distributed throughout Hox-regulated networks. Polygenicity and epistasis may hinder efforts to identify genes and mechanisms underlying macroevolutionary traits.

}, issn = {09609822}, doi = {10.1016/j.cub.2019.05.074}, author = {Liu, Yang and Ramos-Womack, Margarita and Han, Clair and Reilly, Patrick and Brackett, Kelly LaRue and Rogers, William and Williams, Thomas M. and Andolfatto, Peter and Stern, David L. and Rebeiz, Mark} } @article {4411, title = {Evolution of the tan locus contributed to pigment loss in Drosophila santomea: a response to Matute et al.}, journal = {Cell}, volume = {139}, year = {2009}, month = {2009 Dec 11}, pages = {1189-96}, abstract = {

We have shown previously that the loss of abdominal pigmentation in D. santomea relative to its sister species D. yakuba resulted, in part, from cis-regulatory mutations at the tan locus. Matute et al. claim, based solely upon extrapolation from genetic crosses of D. santomea and D. melanogaster, a much more divergent species, that at least four X chromosome regions but not tan are responsible for pigmentation differences. Here, we provide additional evidence from introgressions of D. yakuba genes into D. santomea that support a causative role for tan in the loss of pigmentation and present analyses that contradict Matute et al.{\textquoteright}s claims. We discuss how the choice of parental species and other factors affect the ability to identify loci responsible for species divergence, and we affirm that all of our previously reported results and conclusions stand.

}, keywords = {Animals, Chimera, Chromosomal Proteins, DNA-Binding Proteins, Drosophila, Drosophila Proteins, Evolution, Molecular, Non-Histone, Pigmentation, Species Specificity, X Chromosome}, issn = {1097-4172}, doi = {10.1016/j.cell.2009.11.004}, author = {Rebeiz, Mark and Ramos-Womack, Margarita and Jeong, Sangyun and Andolfatto, Peter and Werner, Thomas and True, John and Stern, David L and Carroll, Sean B} }