@article {47766, title = {Natural courtship song variation caused by an intronic retroelement in an ion channel gene.}, journal = {Nature}, year = {2016}, month = {2016 Aug 10}, abstract = {

Animal species display enormous variation for innate behaviours, but little is known about how this diversity arose. Here, using an unbiased genetic approach, we map a courtship song difference between wild isolates of Drosophila simulans and Drosophila mauritiana to a 966 base pair region within the slowpoke (slo) locus, which encodes a calcium-activated potassium channel. Using the reciprocal hemizygosity test, we confirm that slo is the causal locus and resolve the causal mutation to the evolutionarily recent insertion of a retroelement in a slo intron within D. simulans. Targeted deletion of this retroelement reverts the song phenotype and alters slo splicing. Like many ion channel genes, slo is expressed widely in the nervous system and influences a variety of behaviours; slo-null males sing little song with severely disrupted features. By contrast, the natural variant of slo alters a specific component of courtship song, illustrating that regulatory evolution of a highly pleiotropic ion channel gene can cause modular changes in behaviour.

}, issn = {1476-4687}, doi = {10.1038/nature19093}, author = {Ding, Yun and Berrocal, Augusto and Morita, Tomoko and Longden, Kit D and Stern, David L} } @article {6826, title = {Cellular and behavioral functions of fruitless isoforms in Drosophila courtship.}, journal = {Current Biology }, volume = {24}, year = {2014}, month = {2014 Feb 3}, pages = {242-51}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: Male-specific products of the fruitless (fru) gene control the development and function of neuronal circuits that underlie male-specific behaviors in Drosophila, including courtship. Alternative splicing generates at least three distinct Fru isoforms, each containing a different zinc-finger domain. Here, we examine the expression and function of each of these isoforms. RESULTS: We show that most fru(+) cells express all three isoforms, yet each isoform has a distinct function in the elaboration of sexually dimorphic circuitry and behavior. The strongest impairment in courtship behavior is observed in fru(C) mutants, which fail to copulate, lack sine song, and do not generate courtship song in the absence of visual stimuli. Cellular dimorphisms in the fru circuit are dependent on Fru(C) rather than other single Fru isoforms. Removal of Fru(C) from the neuronal classes vAB3 or aSP4 leads to cell-autonomous feminization of arborizations and loss of courtship in the dark. CONCLUSIONS: These data map specific aspects of courtship behavior to the level of single fru isoforms and fru(+) cell types-an important step toward elucidating the chain of causality from gene to circuit to behavior.

}, issn = {1879-0445}, doi = {10.1016/j.cub.2013.12.015}, author = {von Philipsborn, Anne C and J{\"o}rchel, Sabrina and Tirian, Laszlo and Demir, Ebru and Morita, Tomoko and Stern, David L and Dickson, Barry J} } @article {45061, title = {Looking under the lamp post: neither fruitless nor doublesex has evolved to generate divergent male courtship in Drosophila.}, journal = {Cell Reports}, volume = {8}, year = {2014}, month = {2014 Jul 24}, pages = {363-70}, abstract = {

How do evolved genetic changes alter the nervous system to produce different patterns of behavior? We address this question using Drosophila male courtship behavior, which is innate, stereotyped, and evolves rapidly between species. D. melanogaster male courtship requires the male-specific isoforms of two transcription factors, fruitless\ and doublesex. These genes underlie genetic switches between female and male behaviors, making them excellent candidate genes for courtship behavior evolution. We tested their role in courtship evolution by transferring the entire locus for each gene from divergent species to D.\ melanogaster. We found that despite differences in Fru+ and Dsx+ cell numbers in wild-type species, cross-species transgenes rescued D.\ melanogaster courtship behavior and no species-specific behaviors were conferred. Therefore, fru and dsx are not a significant source of evolutionary variation in courtship behavior.

}, issn = {2211-1247}, doi = {10.1016/j.celrep.2014.06.023}, author = {Cande, Jessica and Stern, David L and Morita, Tomoko and Prud{\textquoteright}homme, Benjamin and Gompel, Nicolas} }