@article {1770,
	title = {Preserving cell shape under environmental stress.},
	journal = {Nature},
	volume = {452},
	year = {2008},
	month = {2008 Mar 20},
	pages = {361-4},
	abstract = {<p>Maintaining cell shape and tone is crucial for the function and survival of cells and tissues. Mechanotransduction relies on the transformation of minuscule mechanical forces into high-fidelity electrical responses. When mechanoreceptors are stimulated, mechanically sensitive cation channels open and produce an inward transduction current that depolarizes the cell. For this process to operate effectively, the transduction machinery has to retain integrity and remain unfailingly independent of environmental changes. This is particularly challenging for poikilothermic organisms, where changes in temperature in the environment may impact the function of mechanoreceptor neurons. Thus, we wondered how insects whose habitat might quickly vary over several tens of degrees of temperature manage to maintain highly effective mechanical senses. We screened for Drosophila mutants with defective mechanical responses at elevated ambient temperatures, and identified a gene, spam, whose role is to protect the mechanosensory organ from massive cellular deformation caused by heat-induced osmotic imbalance. Here we show that Spam protein forms an extracellular shield that guards mechanosensory neurons from environmental insult. Remarkably, heterologously expressed Spam protein also endowed other cells with superb defence against physically and chemically induced deformation. We studied the mechanical impact of Spam coating and show that spam-coated cells are up to ten times stiffer than uncoated controls. Together, these results help explain how poikilothermic organisms preserve the architecture of critical cells during environmental stress, and illustrate an elegant and simple solution to such challenge.</p>
},
	keywords = {Animals, Biological, Cell Line, Cell Shape, Cellular, Chemical, Drosophila melanogaster, Drosophila Proteins, Electrophysiology, Environment, Eye Proteins, Hot Temperature, Humidity, Mechanical, Mechanoreceptors, Mechanotransduction, Models, Osmotic Pressure, Stimulation, Stress},
	issn = {1476-4687},
	doi = {10.1038/nature06603},
	author = {Cook, Boaz and Hardy, Robert W and McConnaughey, William B and Zuker, Charles S}
}
@article {1772,
	title = {Transforming the architecture of compound eyes.},
	journal = {Nature},
	volume = {443},
	year = {2006},
	month = {2006 Oct 12},
	pages = {696-9},
	abstract = {<p>Eyes differ markedly in the animal kingdom, and are an extreme example of the evolution of multiple anatomical solutions to light detection and image formation. A salient feature of all photoreceptor cells is the presence of a specialized compartment (disc outer segments in vertebrates, and microvillar rhabdomeres in insects), whose primary role is to accommodate the millions of light receptor molecules required for efficient photon collection. In insects, compound eyes can have very different inner architectures. Fruitflies and houseflies have an open rhabdom system, in which the seven rhabdomeres of each ommatidium are separated from each other and function as independent light guides. In contrast, bees and various mosquitoes and beetle species have a closed system, in which rhabdomeres within each ommatidium are fused to each other, thus sharing the same visual axis. To understand the transition between open and closed rhabdom systems, we isolated and characterized the role of Drosophila genes involved in rhabdomere assembly. Here we show that Spacemaker, a secreted protein expressed only in the eyes of insects with open rhabdom systems, acts together with Prominin and the cell adhesion molecule Chaoptin to choreograph the partitioning of rhabdomeres into an open system. Furthermore, the complete loss of spacemaker (spam) converts an open rhabdom system to a closed one, whereas its targeted expression to photoreceptors of a closed system markedly reorganizes the architecture of the compound eyes to resemble an open system. Our results provide a molecular atlas for the construction of microvillar assemblies and illustrate the critical effect of differences in a single structural protein in morphogenesis.</p>
},
	keywords = {Adhesiveness, Animals, Bees, Drosophila melanogaster, Drosophila Proteins, Eye, Eye Proteins, Membrane Glycoproteins, Molecular Sequence Data, Morphogenesis, Mutation},
	issn = {1476-4687},
	doi = {10.1038/nature05128},
	author = {Zelhof, Andrew C and Hardy, Robert W and Becker, Ann and Zuker, Charles S}
}
