@article {69947, title = {Multiplex Detection of Gene Expression in the Intact Drosophila Brain Using Expansion-Assisted Iterative Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization.}, journal = {J Vis Exp}, year = {2025}, month = {2025 May 02}, abstract = {

Understanding gene expression is essential for deciphering cellular functions. However, methods for analyzing the expression of numerous genes in situ within a given tissue remain limited. The EASI-FISH protocol described here has been adapted to detect the expression of dozens of genes in the intact adult Drosophila central nervous system (CNS) using commercially available reagents. This protocol includes a new gel formulation that enhances gel robustness, enabling multiple rounds of hybridization and allowing the embedding of multiple brains per gel. This improvement increases throughput, facilitates optimal comparison of experimental conditions, and reduces reagent costs. Additionally, by employing the GAL4-UAS system for co-detection of green fluorescent protein (GFP), gene expression can be visualized in specific neuronal or glial cell types. Notably, the high resolution achieved through expansion microscopy, combined with the sensitivity of the method, allows for the detection of single RNA transcripts. This approach effectively integrates high image quality with high throughput, making it a powerful tool for studying gene expression throughout the intact fly brain.

}, keywords = {Animals, Brain, Drosophila, Green Fluorescent Proteins, In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence}, issn = {1940-087X}, doi = {10.3791/67656}, url = {https://doi.org/10.3791/67656}, author = {Close, Kari and He, Yisheng and Jeter, Jennifer and Ihrke, Gudrun and Eddison, Mark} } @article {69721, title = {A split-GAL4 driver line resource for Drosophila neuron types}, year = {2025}, month = {01/2025}, doi = {10.7554/elife.98405.3}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.98405.3}, author = {Meissner, Geoffrey W and Vannan, Allison and Jeter, Jennifer and Close, Kari and Depasquale, Gina M and Dorman, Zachary and Forster, Kaitlyn and Beringer, Jaye Anne and Gibney, Theresa V and Hausenfluck, Joanna H and He, Yisheng and Henderson, Kristin and Johnson, Lauren and Johnston, Rebecca M and Ihrke, Gudrun and Iyer, Nirmala and Lazarus, Rachel and Lee, Kelley and Li, Hsing-Hsi and Liaw, Hua-Peng and Melton, Brian and Miller, Scott and Motaher, Reeham and Novak, Alexandra and Ogundeyi, Omotara and Petruncio, Alyson and Price, Jacquelyn and Protopapas, Sophia and Tae, Susana and Taylor, Jennifer and Vorimo, Rebecca and Yarbrough, Brianna and Zeng, Kevin Xiankun and Zugates, Christopher T and Dionne, Heather and Angstadt, Claire and Ashley, Kelly and Cavallaro, Amanda and Dang, Tam and Gonzalez, Guillermo A and Hibbard, Karen L and Huang, Cuizhen and Kao, Jui-Chun and Laverty, Todd and Mercer, Monti and Perez, Brenda and Pitts, Scarlett and Ruiz, Danielle and Vallanadu, Viruthika and Zheng, Grace Zhiyu and Goina, Cristian and Otsuna, Hideo and Rokicki, Konrad and Svirskas, Robert R and Cheong, Han Sj and Dolan, Michael-John and Ehrhardt, Erica and Feng, Kai and El Galfi, Basel and Goldammer, Jens and Huston, Stephen J and Hu, Nan and Ito, Masayoshi and McKellar, Claire and minegishi, ryo and Namiki, Shigehiro and Nern, Aljoscha and Schretter, Catherine E and Sterne, Gabriella R and Venkatasubramanian, Lalanti and Wang, Kaiyu and Wolff, Tanya and Wu, Ming and George, Reed and Malkesman, Oz and Aso, Yoshinori and Card, Gwyneth M and Dickson, Barry J and Korff, Wyatt and Ito, Kei and Truman, James W and Zlatic, Marta and Rubin, Gerald M} } @article {68629, title = {A searchable image resource of Drosophila GAL4-driver expression patterns with single neuron resolution.}, journal = {eLife}, volume = {12}, year = {2023}, month = {2023 Feb 23}, abstract = {

Precise, repeatable genetic access to specific neurons via GAL4/UAS and related methods is a key advantage of Drosophila neuroscience. Neuronal targeting is typically documented using light microscopy of full GAL4 expression patterns, which generally lack the single-cell resolution required for reliable cell type identification. Here we use stochastic GAL4 labeling with the MultiColor FlpOut approach to generate cellular resolution confocal images at large scale. We are releasing aligned images of 74,000 such adult central nervous systems. An anticipated use of this resource is to bridge the gap between neurons identified by electron or light microscopy. Identifying individual neurons that make up each GAL4 expression pattern improves the prediction of split-GAL4 combinations targeting particular neurons. To this end we have made the images searchable on the NeuronBridge website. We demonstrate the potential of NeuronBridge to rapidly and effectively identify neuron matches based on morphology across imaging modalities and datasets.

}, issn = {2050-084X}, doi = {10.7554/eLife.80660}, author = {Meissner, Geoffrey Wilson and Nern, Aljoscha and Dorman, Zachary and Depasquale, Gina M and Forster, Kaitlyn and Gibney, Theresa and Hausenfluck, Joanna H and He, Yisheng and Iyer, Nirmala A and Jeter, Jennifer and Johnson, Lauren and Johnston, Rebecca M and Lee, Kelley and Melton, Brian and Yarbrough, Brianna and Zugates, Christopher T and Clements, Jody and Goina, Cristian and Otsuna, Hideo and Rokicki, Konrad and Svirskas, Robert R and Aso, Yoshinori and Card, Gwyneth M and Dickson, Barry J and Ehrhardt, Erica and Goldammer, Jens and Ito, Masayoshi and Kainmueller, Dagmar and Korff, Wyatt and Mais, Lisa and minegishi, ryo and Namiki, Shigehiro and Rubin, Gerald M and Sterne, Gabriella R and Wolff, Tanya and Malkesman, Oz} } @article {65382, title = {Conservation and divergence of related neuronal lineages in the central brain.}, journal = {eLife}, volume = {9}, year = {2020}, month = {2020 Apr 07}, abstract = {

Wiring a complex brain requires many neurons with intricate cell specificity, generated by a limited number of neural stem cells. central brain lineages are a predetermined series of neurons, born in a specific order. To understand how lineage identity translates to neuron morphology, we mapped 18 central brain lineages. While we found large aggregate differences between lineages, we also discovered shared patterns of morphological diversification. Lineage identity plus Notch-mediated sister fate govern primary neuron trajectories, whereas temporal fate diversifies terminal elaborations. Further, morphological neuron types may arise repeatedly, interspersed with other types. Despite the complexity, related lineages produce similar neuron types in comparable temporal patterns. Different stem cells even yield two identical series of dopaminergic neuron types, but with unrelated sister neurons. Together, these phenomena suggest that straightforward rules drive incredible neuronal complexity, and that large changes in morphology can result from relatively simple fating mechanisms.

}, issn = {2050-084X}, doi = {10.7554/eLife.53518}, author = {Lee, Ying-Jou and Yang, Ching-Po and Miyares, Rosa L and Huang, Yu-Fen and He, Yisheng and Ren, Qingzhong and Chen, Hui-Min and Kawase, Takashi and Ito, Masayoshi and Otsuna, Hideo and Sugino, Ken and Aso, Yoshi and Ito, Kei and Lee, Tzumin} } @article {48435, title = {Stem cell-intrinsic, seven-up-triggered temporal factor gradients diversify intermediate neural progenitors.}, journal = {Current Biology : CB}, volume = {27}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 Apr 10}, pages = {1303-13}, abstract = {

Building a sizable, complex brain requires both cellular expansion and diversification. One mechanism to achieve these goals is production of multiple transiently amplifying intermediate neural progenitors (INPs) from a single neural stem cell. Like mammalian neural stem cells, Drosophila type II neuroblasts utilize INPs to produce neurons and glia. Within a given lineage, the consecutively born INPs produce morphologically distinct progeny, presumably due to differential inheritance of temporal factors. To uncover the underlying temporal fating mechanisms, we profiled type II neuroblasts{\textquoteright} transcriptome across time. Our results reveal opposing temporal gradients of Imp and Syp RNA-binding proteins (descending and ascending, respectively). Maintaining high Imp throughout serial INP production expands the number of neurons and glia with early temporal fate at the expense of cells with late fate. Conversely, precocious upregulation of Syp reduces the number of cells with early fate. Furthermore, we reveal that the transcription factor Seven-up initiates progression of the Imp/Syp gradients. Interestingly, neuroblasts that maintain initial Imp/Syp levels can still yield progeny with a small range of early fates. We therefore propose that the Seven-up-initiated Imp/Syp gradients create coarse temporal windows within type II neuroblasts to pattern INPs, which subsequently undergo fine-tuned subtemporal patterning.

}, issn = {1879-0445}, doi = {10.1016/j.cub.2017.03.047}, author = {Ren, Qingzhong and Yang, Ching-Po and Liu, Zhiyong and Sugino, Ken and Mok, Kent and He, Yisheng and Ito, Masayoshi and Nern, Aljoscha and Otsuna, Hideo and Lee, Tzumin} } @article {6898, title = {Making Drosophila lineage-restricted drivers via patterned recombination in neuroblasts.}, journal = {Nature Neuroscience}, volume = {17}, year = {2014}, month = {2014 Apr}, pages = {631-7}, abstract = {

The Drosophila cerebrum originates from about 100 neuroblasts per hemisphere, with each neuroblast producing a characteristic set of neurons. Neurons from a neuroblast are often so diverse that many neuron types remain unexplored. We developed new genetic tools that target neuroblasts and their diverse descendants, increasing our ability to study fly brain structure and development. Common enhancer-based drivers label neurons on the basis of terminal identities rather than origins, which provides limited labeling in the heterogeneous neuronal lineages. We successfully converted conventional drivers that are temporarily expressed in neuroblasts, into drivers expressed in all subsequent neuroblast progeny. One technique involves immortalizing GAL4 expression in neuroblasts and their descendants. Another depends on loss of the GAL4 repressor, GAL80, from neuroblasts during early neurogenesis. Furthermore, we expanded the diversity of MARCM-based reagents and established another site-specific mitotic recombination system. Our transgenic tools can be combined to map individual neurons in specific lineages of various genotypes.

}, issn = {1546-1726}, doi = {10.1038/nn.3654}, author = {Awasaki, Takeshi and Kao, Chih-Fei and Lee, Ying-Jou and Yang, Ching-Po and Huang, Yaling and Pfeiffer, Barret D and Luan, Haojiang and Jing, Xiaotang and Huang, Yu-Fen and He, Yisheng and Schroeder, Mark David and Kuzin, Alexander and Brody, Thomas and Zugates, Christopher T and Odenwald, Ward F and Lee, Tzumin} } @article {6284, title = {Clonal development and organization of the adult Drosophila central brain.}, journal = {Current biology : CB}, volume = {23}, year = {2013}, month = {2013 Apr 22}, pages = {633-43}, abstract = {BACKGROUND: The insect brain can be divided into neuropils that are formed by neurites of both local and remote origin. The complexity of the interconnections obscures how these neuropils are established and interconnected through development. The Drosophila central brain develops from a fixed number of neuroblasts (NBs) that deposit neurons in regional clusters. RESULTS: By determining individual NB clones and pursuing their projections into specific neuropils, we unravel the regional development of the brain neural network. Exhaustive clonal analysis revealed 95 stereotyped neuronal lineages with characteristic cell-body locations and neurite trajectories. Most clones show complex projection patterns, but despite the complexity, neighboring clones often coinnervate the same local neuropil or neuropils and further target a restricted set of distant neuropils. CONCLUSIONS: These observations argue for regional clonal development of both neuropils and neuropil connectivity throughout the Drosophila central brain.}, issn = {1879-0445}, doi = {10.1016/j.cub.2013.02.057}, author = {Yu, Hung-Hsiang and Awasaki, Takeshi and Schroeder, Mark David and Long, Fuhui and Yang, Jacob S and He, Yisheng and Ding, Peng and Kao, Jui-Chun and Wu, Gloria Yueh-Yi and Peng, Hanchuan and Myers, Gene and Lee, Tzumin} } @article {6277, title = {Diverse neuronal lineages make stereotyped contributions to the Drosophila locomotor control center, the central complex.}, journal = {The Journal of Comparative Neurology}, volume = {521}, year = {2013}, month = {2013 Aug 15}, pages = {2645-62, Spc1}, abstract = {

The Drosophila central brain develops from a fixed number of neuroblasts. Each neuroblast makes a clone of neurons that exhibit common trajectories. Here we identified 15 distinct clones that carry larval-born neurons innervating the Drosophila central complex (CX), which consists of four midline structures including the protocerebral bridge (PB), fan-shaped body (FB), ellipsoid body (EB), and noduli (NO). Clonal analysis revealed that the small-field CX neurons, which establish intricate projections across different CX substructures, exist in four isomorphic groups that respectively derive from four complex posterior asense-negative lineages. In terms of the region-characteristic large-field CX neurons, we found that two lineages make PB neurons, 10 lineages produce FB neurons, three lineages generate EB neurons, and two lineages yield NO neurons. The diverse FB developmental origins reflect the discrete input pathways for different FB subcompartments. Clonal analysis enlightens both development and anatomy of the insect locomotor control center.

}, issn = {1096-9861}, doi = {10.1002/cne.23339}, author = {Yang, Jacob S and Awasaki, Takeshi and Yu, Hung-Hsiang and He, Yisheng and Ding, Peng and Kao, Jui-Chun and Lee, Tzumin} } @article {4590, title = {Hierarchical deployment of factors regulating temporal fate in a diverse neuronal lineage of the Drosophila central brain.}, journal = {Neuron}, volume = {73}, year = {2012}, month = {2012 Feb 23}, pages = {677-84}, abstract = {

The anterodorsal projection neuron lineage of Drosophila melanogaster produces 40 neuronal types in a stereotypic order. Here we take advantage of this complete lineage sequence to examine the role of known temporal fating factors, including Chinmo and the Hb/Kr/Pdm/Cas transcriptional cascade, within this diverse central brain lineage. Kr mutation affects the temporal fate of the neuroblast (NB) itself, causing a single fate to be skipped, whereas Chinmo null only elicits fate transformation of NB progeny without altering cell counts. Notably, Chinmo operates in two separate windows to prevent fate transformation (into the subsequent Chinmo-indenpendent fate) within each window. By contrast, Hb/Pdm/Cas play no detectable role, indicating that Kr either acts outside of the cascade identified in the ventral nerve cord or that redundancy exists at the level of fating factors. Therefore, hierarchical fating mechanisms operate within the lineage to generate neuronal diversity in an unprecedented fashion.

}, issn = {1097-4199}, doi = {10.1016/j.neuron.2011.12.018}, author = {Kao, Chih-Fei and Yu, Hung-Hsiang and He, Yisheng and Kao, Jui-Chun and Lee, Tzumin} } @article {783, title = {A complete developmental sequence of a Drosophila neuronal lineage as revealed by twin-spot MARCM.}, journal = {PLoS Biology}, volume = {8}, year = {2010}, month = {2010 Aug 24}, abstract = {

Drosophila brains contain numerous neurons that form complex circuits. These neurons are derived in stereotyped patterns from a fixed number of progenitors, called neuroblasts, and identifying individual neurons made by a neuroblast facilitates the reconstruction of neural circuits. An improved MARCM (mosaic analysis with a repressible cell marker) technique, called twin-spot MARCM, allows one to label the sister clones derived from a common progenitor simultaneously in different colors. It enables identification of every single neuron in an extended neuronal lineage based on the order of neuron birth. Here we report the first example, to our knowledge, of complete lineage analysis among neurons derived from a common neuroblast that relay olfactory information from the antennal lobe (AL) to higher brain centers. By identifying the sequentially derived neurons, we found that the neuroblast serially makes 40 types of AL projection neurons (PNs). During embryogenesis, one PN with multi-glomerular innervation and 18 uniglomerular PNs targeting 17 glomeruli of the adult AL are born. Many more PNs of 22 additional types, including four types of polyglomerular PNs, derive after the neuroblast resumes dividing in early larvae. Although different offspring are generated in a rather arbitrary sequence, the birth order strictly dictates the fate of each post-mitotic neuron, including the fate of programmed cell death. Notably, the embryonic progenitor has an altered temporal identity following each self-renewing asymmetric cell division. After larval hatching, the same progenitor produces multiple neurons for each cell type, but the number of neurons for each type is tightly regulated. These observations substantiate the origin-dependent specification of neuron types. Sequencing neuronal lineages will not only unravel how a complex brain develops but also permit systematic identification of neuron types for detailed structure and function analysis of the brain.

}, keywords = {Animals, Brain, Cell Lineage, Clone Cells, Drosophila, Genetic Techniques, Mosaicism, Neurogenesis, Neurons, Olfactory Pathways}, issn = {1545-7885}, doi = {10.1371/journal.pbio.1000461}, author = {Yu, Hung-Hsiang and Kao, Chih-Fei and He, Yisheng and Ding, Peng and Kao, Jui-Chun and Lee, Tzumin} }