@article {46630, title = {Guidelines on nicotine dose selection for in vivo research.}, journal = {Psychopharmacology (Berl)}, volume = {190}, year = {2007}, month = {2007 Feb}, pages = {269-319}, abstract = {

RATIONALE: This review provides insight for the judicious selection of nicotine dose ranges and routes of administration for in vivo studies. The literature is replete with reports in which a dosaging regimen chosen for a specific nicotine-mediated response was suboptimal for the species used. In many cases, such discrepancies could be attributed to the complex variables comprising species-specific in vivo responses to acute or chronic nicotine exposure.

OBJECTIVES: This review capitalizes on the authors{\textquoteright} collective decades of in vivo nicotine experimentation to clarify the issues and to identify the variables to be considered in choosing a dosaging regimen. Nicotine dose ranges tolerated by humans and their animal models provide guidelines for experiments intended to extrapolate to human tobacco exposure through cigarette smoking or nicotine replacement therapies. Just as important are the nicotine dosaging regimens used to provide a mechanistic framework for acquisition of drug-taking behavior, dependence, tolerance, or withdrawal in animal models.

RESULTS: Seven species are addressed: humans, nonhuman primates, rats, mice, Drosophila, Caenorhabditis elegans, and zebrafish. After an overview on nicotine metabolism, each section focuses on an individual species, addressing issues related to genetic background, age, acute vs chronic exposure, route of administration, and behavioral responses.

CONCLUSIONS: The selected examples of successful dosaging ranges are provided, while emphasizing the necessity of empirically determined dose-response relationships based on the precise parameters and conditions inherent to a specific hypothesis. This review provides a new, experimentally based compilation of species-specific dose selection for studies on the in vivo effects of nicotine.

}, keywords = {Animals, Behavioral Research, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Ganglionic Stimulants, Guidelines as Topic, Humans, Models, Biological, Nicotine, Species Specificity}, issn = {0033-3158}, doi = {10.1007/s00213-006-0441-0}, author = {Matta, Shannon G and Balfour, David J and Benowitz, Neal L and Boyd, R Thomas and Buccafusco, Jerry J and Caggiula, Anthony R and Craig, Caroline R and Collins, Allan C and Damaj, M Imad and Donny, Eric C and Gardiner, Phillip S and Grady, Sharon R and Heberlein, Ulrike and Leonard, Sherry S and Levin, Edward D and Lukas, Ronald J and Markou, Athina and Marks, Michael J and McCallum, Sarah E and Parameswaran, Neeraja and Perkins, Kenneth A and Picciotto, Marina R and Quik, Maryka and Rose, Jed E and Rothenfluh, Adrian and Schafer, William R and Stolerman, Ian P and Tyndale, Rachel F and Wehner, Jeanne M and Zirger, Jeffrey M} } @article {5487, title = {Distinct behavioral responses to ethanol are regulated by alternate RhoGAP18B isoforms.}, journal = {Cell}, volume = {127}, year = {2006}, month = {2006 Oct 6}, pages = {199-211}, abstract = {

In most organisms, low ethanol doses induce increased activity, while high doses are sedating. To investigate the underlying mechanisms, we isolated Drosophila mutants with altered ethanol responsiveness. Mutations in white rabbit (whir), disrupting RhoGAP18B, are strongly resistant to the sedating effects of ethanol. This resistance can be suppressed by reducing the levels of Rho1 or Rac, implicating these GTPases in the behavioral response to ethanol. Indeed, expression of constitutively active forms of Rho1 or Rac1 in adult flies results in ethanol resistance similar to that observed in whir mutants. The whir locus produces several transcripts, RA-RD, which are predicted to encode three distinct RhoGAPs that share only the GAP domain. The RC transcript mediates the sedating effects of ethanol, while the RA transcript regulates its stimulant effects. Thus, distinct RhoGAPs, encoded by the same gene, regulate different manifestations of acute ethanol intoxication.

}, keywords = {Animal, Animals, Behavior, Brain, Central Nervous System Depressants, Drosophila melanogaster, Drosophila Proteins, Enzyme Activation, Ethanol, Female, GTPase-Activating Proteins, Humans, Molecular Sequence Data, Motor Activity, Mutation, Protein Isoforms, Rabbits, rho GTP-Binding Proteins, Transgenes}, issn = {0092-8674}, doi = {10.1016/j.cell.2006.09.010}, author = {Rothenfluh, Adrian and Threlkeld, Robert J and Bainton, Roland J and Tsai, Linus T-Y and Lasek, Amy W and Heberlein, Ulrike} } @article {46633, title = {Molecular Genetic Analysis of Ethanol Intoxication in Drosophila melanogaster.}, journal = {Integrative and Comparative Biology}, volume = {44}, year = {2004}, month = {2004 Aug}, pages = {269-74}, abstract = {

Recently, the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster has been introduced as a model system to study the molecular bases of a variety of ethanol-induced behaviors. It became immediately apparent that the behavioral changes elicited by acute ethanol exposure are remarkably similar in flies and mammals. Flies show signs of acute intoxication, which range from locomotor stimulation at low doses to complete sedation at higher doses and they develop tolerance upon intermittent ethanol exposure. Genetic screens for mutants with altered responsiveness to ethanol have been carried out and a few of the disrupted genes have been identified. This analysis, while still in its early stages, has already revealed some surprising molecular parallels with mammals. The availability of powerful tools for genetic manipulation in Drosophila, together with the high degree of conservation at the genomic level, make Drosophila a promising model organism to study the mechanism by which ethanol regulates behavior and the mechanisms underlying the organism{\textquoteright}s adaptation to long-term ethanol exposure.

}, issn = {1540-7063}, doi = {10.1093/icb/44.4.269}, author = {Heberlein, Ulrike and Wolf, Fred W and Rothenfluh, Adrian and Guarnieri, Douglas J} } @article {46638, title = {Drugs, flies, and videotape: the effects of ethanol and cocaine on Drosophila locomotion.}, journal = {Current Opinion in Neurobiology}, volume = {12}, year = {2002}, month = {2002 Dec}, pages = {639-45}, abstract = {

Drosophila melanogaster has been introduced recently as a model organism in which to study the mechanisms by which drugs of abuse change behavior and by which the nervous system changes upon repeated drug exposure. Surprising similarities between flies and mammals have begun to emerge at the behavioral, neurochemical and molecular levels.

}, keywords = {Animals, Behavior, Animal, Circadian Rhythm, Cocaine, Cyclic AMP, Dopamine, Drosophila melanogaster, Drug Tolerance, Ethanol, Locomotion}, issn = {0959-4388}, author = {Rothenfluh, Adrian and Heberlein, Ulrike} }