@article {2707,
	title = {The sequence of the human genome.},
	journal = {Science},
	volume = {291},
	year = {2001},
	month = {2001 Feb 16},
	pages = {1304-51},
	abstract = {<p>A 2.91-billion base pair (bp) consensus sequence of the euchromatic portion of the human genome was generated by the whole-genome shotgun sequencing method. The 14.8-billion bp DNA sequence was generated over 9 months from 27,271,853 high-quality sequence reads (5.11-fold coverage of the genome) from both ends of plasmid clones made from the DNA of five individuals. Two assembly strategies-a whole-genome assembly and a regional chromosome assembly-were used, each combining sequence data from Celera and the publicly funded genome effort. The public data were shredded into 550-bp segments to create a 2.9-fold coverage of those genome regions that had been sequenced, without including biases inherent in the cloning and assembly procedure used by the publicly funded group. This brought the effective coverage in the assemblies to eightfold, reducing the number and size of gaps in the final assembly over what would be obtained with 5.11-fold coverage. The two assembly strategies yielded very similar results that largely agree with independent mapping data. The assemblies effectively cover the euchromatic regions of the human chromosomes. More than 90\% of the genome is in scaffold assemblies of 100,000 bp or more, and 25\% of the genome is in scaffolds of 10 million bp or larger. Analysis of the genome sequence revealed 26,588 protein-encoding transcripts for which there was strong corroborating evidence and an additional approximately 12,000 computationally derived genes with mouse matches or other weak supporting evidence. Although gene-dense clusters are obvious, almost half the genes are dispersed in low G+C sequence separated by large tracts of apparently noncoding sequence. Only 1.1\% of the genome is spanned by exons, whereas 24\% is in introns, with 75\% of the genome being intergenic DNA. Duplications of segmental blocks, ranging in size up to chromosomal lengths, are abundant throughout the genome and reveal a complex evolutionary history. Comparative genomic analysis indicates vertebrate expansions of genes associated with neuronal function, with tissue-specific developmental regulation, and with the hemostasis and immune systems. DNA sequence comparisons between the consensus sequence and publicly funded genome data provided locations of 2.1 million single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). A random pair of human haploid genomes differed at a rate of 1 bp per 1250 on average, but there was marked heterogeneity in the level of polymorphism across the genome. Less than 1\% of all SNPs resulted in variation in proteins, but the task of determining which SNPs have functional consequences remains an open challenge.</p>
},
	keywords = {Algorithms, Animals, Artificial, Bacterial, Chromosome Banding, Chromosome Mapping, Chromosomes, Computational Biology, Consensus Sequence, CpG Islands, Databases, DNA, Evolution, Exons, Factual, Female, Gene Duplication, Genes, Genetic Variation, Genome, Human, Human Genome Project, Humans, Intergenic, Introns, Male, Molecular, Nucleic Acid, Phenotype, Physical Chromosome Mapping, Polymorphism, Proteins, Pseudogenes, Repetitive Sequences, Retroelements, Sequence Analysis, Single Nucleotide, Species Specificity},
	issn = {0036-8075},
	doi = {10.1126/science.1058040},
	author = {Venter, J C and Adams, M D and Myers, E W and Li, P W and Mural, R J and Sutton, G G and Smith, H O and Yandell, M and Evans, C A and Holt, R A and Gocayne, J D and Amanatides, P and Ballew, R M and Huson, D H and Wortman, J R and Zhang, Q and Kodira, C D and Zheng, X H and Chen, L and Skupski, M and Subramanian, G and Thomas, P D and Zhang, J and Gabor Miklos, G L and Nelson, C and Broder, S and Clark, A G and Nadeau, J and McKusick, V A and Zinder, N and Levine, A J and Roberts, R J and Simon, M and Slayman, C and Hunkapiller, M and Bolanos, R and Delcher, A and Dew, I and Fasulo, D and Flanigan, M and Florea, L and Halpern, A and Hannenhalli, S and Kravitz, S and Levy, S and Mobarry, C and Reinert, K and Remington, K and Abu-Threideh, J and Beasley, E and Biddick, K and Bonazzi, V and Brandon, R and Cargill, M and Chandramouliswaran, I and Charlab, R and Chaturvedi, K and Deng, Z and Di Francesco, V and Dunn, P and Eilbeck, K and Evangelista, C and Gabrielian, A E and Gan, W and Ge, W and Gong, F and Gu, Z and Guan, P and Heiman, T J and Higgins, M E and Ji, R R and Ke, Z and Ketchum, K A and Lai, Z and Lei, Y and Li, Z and Li, J and Liang, Y and Lin, X and Lu, F and Merkulov, G V and Milshina, N and Moore, H M and Naik, A K and Narayan, V A and Neelam, B and Nusskern, D and Rusch, D B and Salzberg, S and Shao, W and Shue, B and Sun, J and Wang, Z and Wang, A and Wang, X and Wang, J and Wei, M and Wides, R and Xiao, C and Yan, C and Yao, A and Ye, J and Zhan, M and Zhang, W and Zhang, H and Zhao, Q and Zheng, L and Zhong, F and Zhong, W and Zhu, S and Zhao, S and Gilbert, D and Baumhueter, S and Spier, G and Carter, C and Cravchik, A and Woodage, T and Ali, F and An, H and Awe, A and Baldwin, D and Baden, H and Barnstead, M and Barrow, I and Beeson, K and Busam, D and Carver, A and Center, A and Cheng, M L and Curry, L and Danaher, S and Davenport, L and Desilets, R and Dietz, S and Dodson, K and Doup, L and Ferriera, S and Garg, N and Gluecksmann, A and Hart, B and Haynes, J and Haynes, C and Heiner, C and Hladun, S and Hostin, D and Houck, J and Howland, T and Ibegwam, C and Johnson, J and Kalush, F and Kline, L and Koduru, S and Love, A and Mann, F and May, D and McCawley, S and McIntosh, T and McMullen, I and Moy, M and Moy, L and Murphy, B and Nelson, K and Pfannkoch, C and Pratts, E and Puri, V and Qureshi, H and Reardon, M and Rodriguez, R and Rogers, Y H and Romblad, D and Ruhfel, B and Scott, R and Sitter, C and Smallwood, M and Stewart, E and Strong, R and Suh, E and Thomas, R and Tint, N N and Tse, S and Vech, C and Wang, G and Wetter, J and Williams, S and Williams, M and Windsor, S and Winn-Deen, E and Wolfe, K and Zaveri, J and Zaveri, K and Abril, J F and Guig{\'o}, R and Campbell, M J and Sjolander, K V and Karlak, B and Kejariwal, A and Mi, H and Lazareva, B and Hatton, T and Narechania, A and Diemer, K and Muruganujan, A and Guo, N and Sato, S and Bafna, V and Istrail, S and Lippert, R and Schwartz, R and Walenz, B and Yooseph, S and Allen, D and Basu, A and Baxendale, J and Blick, L and Caminha, M and Carnes-Stine, J and Caulk, P and Chiang, Y H and Coyne, M and Dahlke, C and Mays, A and Dombroski, M and Donnelly, M and Ely, D and Esparham, S and Fosler, C and Gire, H and Glanowski, S and Glasser, K and Glodek, A and Gorokhov, M and Graham, K and Gropman, B and Harris, M and Heil, J and Henderson, S and Hoover, J and Jennings, D and Jordan, C and Jordan, J and Kasha, J and Kagan, L and Kraft, C and Levitsky, A and Lewis, M and Liu, X and Lopez, J and Ma, D and Majoros, W and McDaniel, J and Murphy, S and Newman, M and Nguyen, T and Nguyen, N and Nodell, M and Pan, S and Peck, J and Peterson, M and Rowe, W and Sanders, R and Scott, J and Simpson, M and Smith, T and Sprague, A and Stockwell, T and Turner, R and Venter, E and Wang, M and Wen, M and Wu, D and Wu, M and Xia, A and Zandieh, A and Zhu, X}
}
@article {958,
	title = {Comparative genomics of the eukaryotes.},
	journal = {Science},
	volume = {287},
	year = {2000},
	month = {2000 Mar 24},
	pages = {2204-15},
	abstract = {<p>A comparative analysis of the genomes of Drosophila melanogaster, Caenorhabditis elegans, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae-and the proteins they are predicted to encode-was undertaken in the context of cellular, developmental, and evolutionary processes. The nonredundant protein sets of flies and worms are similar in size and are only twice that of yeast, but different gene families are expanded in each genome, and the multidomain proteins and signaling pathways of the fly and worm are far more complex than those of yeast. The fly has orthologs to 177 of the 289 human disease genes examined and provides the foundation for rapid analysis of some of the basic processes involved in human disease.</p>
},
	keywords = {Animals, Apoptosis, Biological Evolution, Caenorhabditis elegans, Cell Adhesion, Cell Cycle, Drosophila melanogaster, Duplicate, Fungal Proteins, Genes, Genetic Diseases, Genetics, Genome, Helminth Proteins, Humans, Immunity, Inborn, Insect Proteins, Medical, Multigene Family, Neoplasms, Protein Structure, Proteome, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Signal Transduction, Tertiary},
	issn = {0036-8075},
	doi = {10.1186/gb-2007-8-7-r145},
	author = {Rubin, G M and Yandell, M D and Wortman, J R and Gabor Miklos, G L and Nelson, C R and Hariharan, I K and Fortini, M E and Li, P W and Apweiler, R and Fleischmann, W and Cherry, J M and Henikoff, S and Skupski, M P and Misra, S and Ashburner, M and Birney, E and Boguski, M S and Brody, T and Brokstein, P and Celniker, S E and Chervitz, S A and Coates, D and Cravchik, A and Gabrielian, A and Galle, R F and Gelbart, W M and George, R A and Goldstein, L S and Gong, F and Guan, P and Harris, N L and Hay, B A and Hoskins, R A and Li, J and Li, Z and Hynes, R O and Jones, S J and Kuehl, P M and Lemaitre, B and Littleton, J T and Morrison, D K and Mungall, C and O{\textquoteright}Farrell, P H and Pickeral, O K and Shue, C and Vosshall, L B and Zhang, J and Zhao, Q and Zheng, X H and Lewis, S}
}
