@article {958, title = {Comparative genomics of the eukaryotes.}, journal = {Science}, volume = {287}, year = {2000}, month = {2000 Mar 24}, pages = {2204-15}, abstract = {

A comparative analysis of the genomes of Drosophila melanogaster, Caenorhabditis elegans, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae-and the proteins they are predicted to encode-was undertaken in the context of cellular, developmental, and evolutionary processes. The nonredundant protein sets of flies and worms are similar in size and are only twice that of yeast, but different gene families are expanded in each genome, and the multidomain proteins and signaling pathways of the fly and worm are far more complex than those of yeast. The fly has orthologs to 177 of the 289 human disease genes examined and provides the foundation for rapid analysis of some of the basic processes involved in human disease.

}, keywords = {Animals, Apoptosis, Biological Evolution, Caenorhabditis elegans, Cell Adhesion, Cell Cycle, Drosophila melanogaster, Duplicate, Fungal Proteins, Genes, Genetic Diseases, Genetics, Genome, Helminth Proteins, Humans, Immunity, Inborn, Insect Proteins, Medical, Multigene Family, Neoplasms, Protein Structure, Proteome, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Signal Transduction, Tertiary}, issn = {0036-8075}, doi = {10.1186/gb-2007-8-7-r145}, author = {Rubin, G M and Yandell, M D and Wortman, J R and Gabor Miklos, G L and Nelson, C R and Hariharan, I K and Fortini, M E and Li, P W and Apweiler, R and Fleischmann, W and Cherry, J M and Henikoff, S and Skupski, M P and Misra, S and Ashburner, M and Birney, E and Boguski, M S and Brody, T and Brokstein, P and Celniker, S E and Chervitz, S A and Coates, D and Cravchik, A and Gabrielian, A and Galle, R F and Gelbart, W M and George, R A and Goldstein, L S and Gong, F and Guan, P and Harris, N L and Hay, B A and Hoskins, R A and Li, J and Li, Z and Hynes, R O and Jones, S J and Kuehl, P M and Lemaitre, B and Littleton, J T and Morrison, D K and Mungall, C and O{\textquoteright}Farrell, P H and Pickeral, O K and Shue, C and Vosshall, L B and Zhang, J and Zhao, Q and Zheng, X H and Lewis, S} } @article {968, title = {The optic lobe projection pattern of polarization-sensitive photoreceptor cells in Drosophila melanogaster.}, journal = {Cell and Tissue Research}, volume = {265}, year = {1991}, month = {1991 Jul}, pages = {185-91}, abstract = {

Histological staining of wild-type and sevenless transgenic Drosophila melanogaster bearing Rh3-lacZ fusion genes permits the selective visualization of polarization-sensitive R7 and R8 photoreceptor cells located along the dorsal anterior eye margin. Diffusion of beta-galactosidase throughout these cells reveals that they project long axons to the two most peripheral synaptic target rows of the dorsal posterior medulla, defining a specialized marginal zone of this optic lobe. Comparison of the staining patterns of marginal and nonmarginal Rh3-lacZ-expressing photoreceptor cells in the same histological preparations suggest that the marginal cells possess morphologically specialized axons and synaptic terminals. These findings are discussed with reference to the neuroanatomy of the corresponding dorsal marginal eye and optic lobe regions of the larger dipterans Musca and Calliphora, and in relation to the ability of Drosophila to orient to polarized light.

}, keywords = {Animals, beta-Galactosidase, Cloning, Drosophila melanogaster, Eye, Gene Expression, Histocytochemistry, Light, Molecular, Nonmammalian, Ocular, Ocular Physiological Phenomena, Optic Lobe, Photoreceptor Cells, Vision}, issn = {0302-766X}, doi = {10.1186/gb-2007-8-7-r145}, author = {Fortini, M E and Rubin, G M} } @article {970, title = {Analysis of cis-acting requirements of the Rh3 and Rh4 genes reveals a bipartite organization to rhodopsin promoters in Drosophila melanogaster.}, journal = {Genes \& Development}, volume = {4}, year = {1990}, month = {1990 Mar}, pages = {444-63}, abstract = {

The rhodopsin genes of Drosophila melanogaster are expressed in nonoverlapping subsets of photoreceptor cells within the insect visual system. Two of these genes, Rh3 and Rh4, are known to display complementary expression patterns in the UV-sensitive R7 photoreceptor cell population of the compound eye. In addition, we find that Rh3 is expressed in a small group of paired R7 and R8 photoreceptor cells at the dorsal eye margin that are apparently specialized for the detection of polarized light. In this paper we present a detailed characterization of the cis-acting requirements of both Rh3 and Rh4. Promoter deletion series demonstrate that small regulatory regions (less than 300 bp) of both R7 opsin genes contain DNA sequences sufficient to generate their respective expression patterns. Individual cis-acting elements were further identified by oligonucleotide-directed mutagenesis guided by interspecific sequence comparisons. Our results suggest that the Drosophila rhodopsin genes share a simple bipartite promoter structure, whereby the proximal region constitutes a functionally equivalent promoter "core" and the distal region determines cell-type specificity. The expression patterns of several hybrid rhodopsin promoters, in which all or part of the putative core regions have been replaced with the analogous regions of different rhodopsin promoters, provide additional evidence in support of this model.

}, keywords = {Animals, Base Sequence, DNA Mutational Analysis, Drosophila melanogaster, Eye Proteins, Gene Expression, Genes, Genetic, Histocytochemistry, Molecular Sequence Data, Mutation, Nucleic Acid, Promoter Regions, Retinal Pigments, Rhodopsin, Rod Opsins, Sequence Homology}, issn = {0890-9369}, doi = {10.1186/gb-2007-8-7-r145}, author = {Fortini, M E and Rubin, G M} }