@article {49125, title = {Dedicated photoreceptor pathways in Drosophila larvae mediate navigation by processing either spatial or temporal cues.}, journal = {Nature Communications}, volume = {9}, year = {2018}, month = {2018 Mar 28}, pages = {1260}, abstract = {

To integrate changing environmental cues with high spatial and temporal resolution is critical for animals to orient themselves. Drosophila larvae show an effective motor program to navigate away from light sources. How the larval visual circuit processes light stimuli to control navigational decision remains unknown. The larval visual system is composed of two sensory input channels, Rhodopsin5 (Rh5) and Rhodopsin6 (Rh6) expressing photoreceptors (PRs). We here characterize how spatial and temporal information are used to control navigation. Rh6-PRs are required to perceive temporal changes of light intensity during head casts, while Rh5-PRs are required to control behaviors that allow navigation in response to spatial cues. We characterize how distinct behaviors are modulated and identify parallel acting and converging features of the visual circuit. Functional features of the larval visual circuit highlight the principle of how early in a sensory circuit distinct behaviors may be computed by partly overlapping sensory pathways.

}, issn = {2041-1723}, doi = {10.1038/s41467-018-03520-5}, author = {Humberg, Tim-Henning and Bruegger, Pascal and Afonso, Bruno and Zlatic, Marta and Truman, James W and Gershow, Marc and Samuel, Aravinthan and Sprecher, Simon G} } @article {48642, title = {The Ol1mpiad: concordance of behavioural faculties of stage 1 and stage 3 Drosophila larvae.}, journal = {The Journal of Experimental Biology}, volume = {220}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 Jul 01}, pages = {2452-2475}, abstract = {

Mapping brain function to brain structure is a fundamental task for neuroscience. For such an endeavour, the Drosophila larva is simple enough to be tractable, yet complex enough to be interesting. It features about 10,000 neurons and is capable of various taxes, kineses and Pavlovian conditioning. All its neurons are currently being mapped into a light-microscopical atlas, and Gal4 strains are being generated to experimentally access neurons one at a time. In addition, an electron microscopic reconstruction of its nervous system seems within reach. Notably, this electron microscope-based connectome is being drafted for a stage 1 larva - because stage 1 larvae are much smaller than stage 3 larvae. However, most behaviour analyses have been performed for stage 3 larvae because their larger size makes them easier to handle and observe. It is therefore warranted to either redo the electron microscopic reconstruction for a stage 3 larva or to survey the behavioural faculties of stage 1 larvae. We provide the latter. In a community-based approach we called the Ol1mpiad, we probed stage 1 Drosophila larvae for free locomotion, feeding, responsiveness to substrate vibration, gentle and nociceptive touch, burrowing, olfactory preference and thermotaxis, light avoidance, gustatory choice of various tastants plus odour-taste associative learning, as well as light/dark-electric shock associative learning. Quantitatively, stage 1 larvae show lower scores in most tasks, arguably because of their smaller size and lower speed. Qualitatively, however, stage 1 larvae perform strikingly similar to stage 3 larvae in almost all cases. These results bolster confidence in mapping brain structure and behaviour across developmental stages.

}, issn = {1477-9145}, doi = {10.1242/jeb.156646}, author = {Almeida-Carvalho, Maria J and Berh, Dimitri and Braun, Andreas and Chen, Yi-chun and Eichler, Katharina and Eschbach, Claire and Fritsch, Pauline M J and Gerber, Bertram and Hoyer, Nina and Jiang, Xiaoyi and Kleber, J{\"o}rg and Kl{\"a}mbt, Christian and K{\"o}nig, Christian and Louis, Matthieu and Michels, Birgit and Miroschnikow, Anton and Mirth, Christen and Miura, Daisuke and Niewalda, Thomas and Otto, Nils and Paisios, Emmanouil and Pankratz, Michael J and Petersen, Meike and Ramsperger, Noel and Randel, Nadine and Risse, Benjamin and Saumweber, Timo and Schlegel, Philipp and Schleyer, Michael and Soba, Peter and Sprecher, Simon G and Tanimura, Teiichi and Thum, Andreas S and Toshima, Naoko and Truman, Jim W and Yarali, Ayse and Zlatic, Marta} } @article {48847, title = {Organization of the drosophila larval visual circuit.}, journal = {eLife}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 Aug 8}, pages = {e28387}, abstract = {

Visual systems transduce, process and transmit light-dependent environmental cues. Computation of visual features depends on photoreceptor neuron types (PR) present, organization of the eye and wiring of the underlying neural circuit. Here, we describe the circuit architecture of the visual system of\ Drosophila\ larvae by mapping the synaptic wiring diagram and neurotransmitters. By contacting different targets, the two larval PR-subtypes create two converging pathways potentially underlying the computation of ambient light intensity and temporal light changes already within this first visual processing center. Locally processed visual information then signals via dedicated projection interneurons to higher brain areas including the lateral horn and mushroom body. The stratified structure of the larval optic neuropil (LON) suggests common organizational principles with the adult fly and vertebrate visual systems. The complete synaptic wiring diagram of the LON paves the way to understanding how circuits with reduced numerical complexity control wide ranges of behaviors.

}, doi = {10.7554/eLife.28387}, author = {Larderet, Ivan and Fritsch, Pauline M J and Gendre, Nanae and Neagu-Maier, G Larisa and Fetter, Richard D and Schneider-Mizell, Casey M and Truman, James W and Zlatic, Marta and Cardona, Albert and Sprecher, Simon G} } @article {46187, title = {Sensory determinants of behavioral dynamics in Drosophila thermotaxis.}, journal = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America}, volume = {112}, year = {2015}, month = {2015 Jan 13}, pages = {E220-9}, abstract = {

Complex animal behaviors are built from dynamical relationships between sensory inputs, neuronal activity, and motor outputs in patterns with strategic value. Connecting these patterns illuminates how nervous systems compute behavior. Here, we study Drosophila larva navigation up temperature gradients toward preferred temperatures (positive thermotaxis). By tracking the movements of animals responding to fixed spatial temperature gradients or random temperature fluctuations, we calculate the sensitivity and dynamics of the conversion of thermosensory inputs into motor responses. We discover three thermosensory neurons in each dorsal organ ganglion (DOG) that are required for positive thermotaxis. Random optogenetic stimulation of the DOG thermosensory neurons evokes behavioral patterns that mimic the response to temperature variations. In vivo calcium and voltage imaging reveals that the DOG thermosensory neurons exhibit activity patterns with sensitivity and dynamics matched to the behavioral response. Temporal processing of temperature variations carried out by the DOG thermosensory neurons emerges in distinct motor responses during thermotaxis.

}, issn = {1091-6490}, doi = {10.1073/pnas.1416212112}, author = {Klein, Mason and Afonso, Bruno and Vonner, Ashley J and Hernandez-Nunez, Luis and Berck, Matthew and Tabone, Christopher J and Kane, Elizabeth A and Pieribone, Vincent A and Nitabach, Michael N and Cardona, Albert and Zlatic, Marta and Sprecher, Simon G and Gershow, Marc and Garrity, Paul A and Samuel, Aravinthan D T} } @article {6436, title = {Sensorimotor structure of Drosophila larva phototaxis.}, journal = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America}, volume = {110}, year = {2013}, month = {2013 Sep 16}, pages = {E3868-77}, abstract = {

The avoidance of light by fly larvae is a classic paradigm for sensorimotor behavior. Here, we use behavioral assays and video microscopy to quantify the sensorimotor structure of phototaxis using the Drosophila larva. Larval locomotion is composed of sequences of runs (periods of forward movement) that are interrupted by abrupt turns, during which the larva pauses and sweeps its head back and forth, probing local light information to determine the direction of the successive run. All phototactic responses are mediated by the same set of sensorimotor transformations that require temporal processing of sensory inputs. Through functional imaging and genetic inactivation of specific neurons downstream of the sensory periphery, we have begun to map these sensorimotor circuits into the larval central brain. We find that specific sensorimotor pathways that govern distinct light-evoked responses begin to segregate at the first relay after the photosensory neurons.

}, issn = {1091-6490}, doi = {10.1073/pnas.1215295110}, author = {Kane, Elizabeth A and Gershow, Marc and Afonso, Bruno and Larderet, Ivan and Klein, Mason and Carter, Ashley R and de Bivort, Benjamin L and Sprecher, Simon G and Samuel, Aravinthan D. T.} } @article {5686, title = {The Drosophila larval visual system: high-resolution analysis of a simple visual neuropil.}, journal = {Developmental Biology}, volume = {358}, year = {2011}, month = {2011 Oct 1}, pages = {33-43}, abstract = {

The task of the visual system is to translate light into neuronal encoded information. This translation of photons into neuronal signals is achieved by photoreceptor neurons (PRs), specialized sensory neurons, located in the eye. Upon perception of light the PRs will send a signal to target neurons, which represent a first station of visual processing. Increasing complexity of visual processing stems from the number of distinct PR subtypes and their various types of target neurons that are contacted. The visual system of the fruit fly larva represents a simple visual system (larval optic neuropil, LON) that consists of 12 PRs falling into two classes: blue-senstive PRs expressing Rhodopsin 5 (Rh5) and green-sensitive PRs expressing Rhodopsin 6 (Rh6). These afferents contact a small number of target neurons, including optic lobe pioneers (OLPs) and lateral clock neurons (LNs). We combine the use of genetic markers to label both PR subtypes and the distinct, identifiable sets of target neurons with a serial EM reconstruction to generate a high-resolution map of the larval optic neuropil. We find that the larval optic neuropil shows a clear bipartite organization consisting of one domain innervated by PRs and one devoid of PR axons. The topology of PR projections, in particular the relationship between Rh5 and Rh6 afferents, is maintained from the nerve entering the brain to the axon terminals. The target neurons can be subdivided according to neurotransmitter or neuropeptide they use as well as the location within the brain. We further track the larval optic neuropil through development from first larval instar to its location in the adult brain as the accessory medulla.

}, keywords = {Animals, Confocal, Drosophila, Drosophila Proteins, Electron, Immunohistochemistry, Invertebrate, Larva, Microscopy, Neuropil, Ocular, Photoreceptor Cells, Rhodopsin, Synapses, Transmission, Vision}, issn = {1095-564X}, doi = {10.1016/j.ydbio.2011.07.006}, author = {Sprecher, Simon G and Cardona, Albert and Hartenstein, Volker.} }