@article {68889, title = {Neuronal wiring diagram of an adult brain.}, journal = {Nature}, volume = {634}, year = {2024}, month = {2024 Oct 02}, pages = {124-138}, abstract = {

Connections between neurons can be mapped by acquiring and analysing electron microscopic brain images. In recent years, this approach has been applied to chunks of brains to reconstruct local connectivity maps that are highly informative, but nevertheless inadequate for understanding brain function more globally. Here we present a neuronal wiring diagram of a whole brain containing 5 {\texttimes} 107 chemical synapses between 139,255 neurons reconstructed from an adult female Drosophila melanogaster. The resource also incorporates annotations of cell classes and types, nerves, hemilineages and predictions of neurotransmitter identities. Data products are available for download, programmatic access and interactive browsing and have been made interoperable with other fly data resources. We derive a projectome-a map of projections between regions-from the connectome and report on tracing of synaptic pathways and the analysis of information flow from inputs (sensory and ascending neurons) to outputs (motor, endocrine and descending neurons) across both hemispheres and between the central brain and the optic lobes. Tracing from a subset of photoreceptors to descending motor pathways illustrates how structure can uncover putative circuit mechanisms underlying sensorimotor behaviours. The technologies and open ecosystem reported here set the stage for future large-scale connectome projects in other species.

}, doi = {10.1038/s41586-024-07558-y}, url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07558-y}, author = {Dorkenwald, Sven and Matsliah, Arie and Sterling, Amy R and Schlegel, Philipp and Yu, Szi-Chieh and McKellar, Claire E and Lin, Albert and Costa, Marta and Eichler, Katharina and Yin, Yijie and Silversmith, Will and Schneider-Mizell, Casey and Jordan, Chris S and Brittain, Derrick and Halageri, Akhilesh and Kuehner, Kai and Ogedengbe, Oluwaseun and Morey, Ryan and Gager, Jay and Kruk, Krzysztof and Perlman, Eric and Yang, Runzhe and Deutsch, David and Bland, Doug and Sorek, Marissa and Lu, Ran and Macrina, Thomas and Lee, Kisuk and Bae, J Alexander and Mu, Shang and Nehoran, Barak and Mitchell, Eric and Popovych, Sergiy and Wu, Jingpeng and Jia, Zhen and Castro, Manuel and Kemnitz, Nico and Ih, Dodam and Bates, Alexander Shakeel and Eckstein, Nils and Funke, Jan and Collman, Forrest and Bock, Davi D and Jefferis, Gregory S X E and Seung, H Sebastian and Murthy, Mala} } @article {68512, title = {Oligodendrocyte precursor cells ingest axons in the mouse neocortex.}, journal = {Proceedings of the National Academies of Science of the U.S.A.}, volume = {119}, year = {2022}, month = {2022 Nov 29}, pages = {e2202580119}, abstract = {

Neurons in the developing brain undergo extensive structural refinement as nascent circuits adopt their mature form. This physical transformation of neurons is facilitated by the engulfment and degradation of axonal branches and synapses by surrounding glial cells, including microglia and astrocytes. However, the small size of phagocytic organelles and the complex, highly ramified morphology of glia have made it difficult to define the contribution of these and other glial cell types to this crucial process. Here, we used large-scale, serial section transmission\ electron microscopy (TEM) with computational volume segmentation to reconstruct the complete 3D morphologies of distinct glial types in the mouse visual cortex, providing unprecedented resolution of their morphology and composition. Unexpectedly, we discovered that the fine processes of oligodendrocyte precursor cells (OPCs), a population of abundant, highly dynamic glial progenitors, frequently surrounded small branches of axons. Numerous phagosomes and phagolysosomes (PLs) containing fragments of axons and vesicular structures were present inside their processes, suggesting that OPCs engage in axon pruning. Single-nucleus RNA sequencing from the developing mouse cortex revealed that OPCs express key phagocytic genes at this stage, as well as neuronal transcripts, consistent with active axon engulfment. Although microglia are thought to be responsible for the majority of synaptic pruning and structural refinement, PLs were ten times more abundant in OPCs than in microglia at this stage, and these structures were markedly less abundant in newly generated oligodendrocytes, suggesting that OPCs contribute substantially to the refinement of neuronal circuits during cortical development.

}, keywords = {Animals, Axons, Mice, Neocortex, Neurons, Oligodendrocyte Precursor Cells, Oligodendroglia}, issn = {1091-6490}, doi = {10.1073/pnas.2202580119}, author = {Buchanan, JoAnn and Elabbady, Leila and Collman, Forrest and Jorstad, Nikolas L and Bakken, Trygve E and Ott, Carolyn and Glatzer, Jenna and Bleckert, Adam A and Bodor, Agnes L and Brittain, Derrick and Bumbarger, Daniel J and Mahalingam, Gayathri and Seshamani, Sharmishtaa and Schneider-Mizell, Casey and Takeno, Marc M and Torres, Russel and Yin, Wenjing and Hodge, Rebecca D and Castro, Manuel and Dorkenwald, Sven and Ih, Dodam and Jordan, Chris S and Kemnitz, Nico and Lee, Kisuk and Lu, Ran and Macrina, Thomas and Mu, Shang and Popovych, Sergiy and Silversmith, William M and Tartavull, Ignacio and Turner, Nicholas L and Wilson, Alyssa M and Wong, William and Wu, Jingpeng and Zlateski, Aleksandar and Zung, Jonathan and Lippincott-Schwartz, Jennifer and Lein, Ed S and Seung, H Sebastian and Bergles, Dwight E and Reid, R Clay and da Costa, Nuno Ma{\c c}arico} } @article {46327, title = {Space-time wiring specificity supports direction selectivity in the retina.}, journal = {Nature}, volume = {509}, year = {2014}, month = {2014 May 15}, pages = {331-6}, abstract = {

How does the mammalian retina detect motion? This classic problem in visual neuroscience has remained unsolved for 50 years. In search of clues, here we reconstruct Off-type starburst amacrine cells (SACs) and bipolar cells (BCs) in serial electron microscopic images with help from EyeWire, an online community of {\textquoteright}citizen neuroscientists{\textquoteright}. On the basis of quantitative analyses of contact area and branch depth in the retina, we find evidence that one BC type prefers to wire with a SAC dendrite near the SAC soma, whereas another BC type prefers to wire far from the soma. The near type is known to lag the far type in time of visual response. A mathematical model shows how such {\textquoteright}space-time wiring specificity{\textquoteright} could endow SAC dendrites with receptive fields that are oriented in space-time and therefore respond selectively to stimuli that move in the outward direction from the soma.

}, keywords = {Amacrine Cells, Animals, Artificial Intelligence, Brain Mapping, Crowdsourcing, Dendrites, Mice, Models, Neurological, Motion, Neural Pathways, Presynaptic Terminals, Retina, Retinal Bipolar Cells, Spatio-Temporal Analysis}, issn = {1476-4687}, doi = {10.1038/nature13240}, author = {Kim, Jinseop S and Greene, Matthew J and Zlateski, Aleksandar and Lee, Kisuk and Richardson, Mark and Turaga, Srinivas C and Purcaro, Michael and Balkam, Matthew and Robinson, Amy and Behabadi, Bardia F and Campos, Michael and Denk, Winfried and Seung, H Sebastian} }