@article {69721, title = {A split-GAL4 driver line resource for Drosophila neuron types}, year = {2025}, month = {01/2025}, doi = {10.7554/elife.98405.3}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.98405.3}, author = {Meissner, Geoffrey W and Vannan, Allison and Jeter, Jennifer and Close, Kari and Depasquale, Gina M and Dorman, Zachary and Forster, Kaitlyn and Beringer, Jaye Anne and Gibney, Theresa V and Hausenfluck, Joanna H and He, Yisheng and Henderson, Kristin and Johnson, Lauren and Johnston, Rebecca M and Ihrke, Gudrun and Iyer, Nirmala and Lazarus, Rachel and Lee, Kelley and Li, Hsing-Hsi and Liaw, Hua-Peng and Melton, Brian and Miller, Scott and Motaher, Reeham and Novak, Alexandra and Ogundeyi, Omotara and Petruncio, Alyson and Price, Jacquelyn and Protopapas, Sophia and Tae, Susana and Taylor, Jennifer and Vorimo, Rebecca and Yarbrough, Brianna and Zeng, Kevin Xiankun and Zugates, Christopher T and Dionne, Heather and Angstadt, Claire and Ashley, Kelly and Cavallaro, Amanda and Dang, Tam and Gonzalez, Guillermo A and Hibbard, Karen L and Huang, Cuizhen and Kao, Jui-Chun and Laverty, Todd and Mercer, Monti and Perez, Brenda and Pitts, Scarlett and Ruiz, Danielle and Vallanadu, Viruthika and Zheng, Grace Zhiyu and Goina, Cristian and Otsuna, Hideo and Rokicki, Konrad and Svirskas, Robert R and Cheong, Han Sj and Dolan, Michael-John and Ehrhardt, Erica and Feng, Kai and El Galfi, Basel and Goldammer, Jens and Huston, Stephen J and Hu, Nan and Ito, Masayoshi and McKellar, Claire and minegishi, ryo and Namiki, Shigehiro and Nern, Aljoscha and Schretter, Catherine E and Sterne, Gabriella R and Venkatasubramanian, Lalanti and Wang, Kaiyu and Wolff, Tanya and Wu, Ming and George, Reed and Malkesman, Oz and Aso, Yoshinori and Card, Gwyneth M and Dickson, Barry J and Korff, Wyatt and Ito, Kei and Truman, James W and Zlatic, Marta and Rubin, Gerald M} } @article {69171, title = {Mapping of multiple neurotransmitter receptor subtypes and distinct protein complexes to the connectome.}, journal = {Neuron}, year = {2024}, month = {2024 Jan 24}, abstract = {

Neurons express various combinations of neurotransmitter receptor (NR) subunits and receive inputs from multiple neuron types expressing different neurotransmitters. Localizing NR subunits to specific synaptic inputs has been challenging. Here, we use epitope-tagged endogenous NR subunits, expansion light-sheet microscopy, and electron microscopy (EM) connectomics to molecularly characterize synapses in Drosophila. We show that in directionally selective motion-sensitive neurons, different multiple NRs elaborated a highly stereotyped molecular topography with NR localized to specific domains receiving cell-type-specific inputs. Developmental studies suggested that NRs or complexes of them with other membrane proteins determine patterns of synaptic inputs. In support of this model, we identify a transmembrane protein selectively associated with a subset of spatially restricted synapses and demonstrate its requirement for synapse formation through genetic analysis. We propose that mechanisms that regulate the precise spatial distribution of NRs provide a molecular cartography specifying the patterns of synaptic connections onto dendrites.

}, issn = {1097-4199}, doi = {10.1016/j.neuron.2023.12.014}, author = {Sanfilippo, Piero and Kim, Alexander J and Bhukel, Anuradha and Yoo, Juyoun and Mirshahidi, Pegah S and Pandey, Vijaya and Bevir, Harry and Yuen, Ashley and Mirshahidi, Parmis S and Guo, Peiyi and Li, Hong-Sheng and Wohlschlegel, James A and Aso, Yoshinori and Zipursky, S Lawrence} } @article {68839, title = {New genetic tools for mushroom body output neurons in~Drosophila}, journal = {eLife}, year = {2024}, month = {2024 Jan 24}, abstract = {

How memories of past events influence behavior is a key question in neuroscience. The major associative learning center in\ Drosophila, the Mushroom Body (MB), communicates to the rest of the brain through Mushroom Body Output Neurons (MBONs). While 21 MBON cell types have their dendrites confined to small compartments of the MB lobes, analysis of EM connectomes revealed the presence of an additional 14 MBON cell types that are atypical in having dendritic input both within the MB lobes and in adjacent brain regions. Genetic reagents for manipulating atypical MBONs and experimental data on their functions has been lacking. In this report we describe new cell-type-specific GAL4 drivers for many MBONs, including the majority of atypical MBONs. Using these genetic reagents, we conducted optogenetic activation screening to examine their ability to drive behaviors and learning. These reagents provide important new tools for the study of complex behaviors in\ Drosophila.

}, doi = {10.7554/eLife.90523}, url = {https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.90523}, author = {Rubin, Gerald M and Aso, Yoshinori} } @article {68629, title = {A searchable image resource of Drosophila GAL4-driver expression patterns with single neuron resolution.}, journal = {eLife}, volume = {12}, year = {2023}, month = {2023 Feb 23}, abstract = {

Precise, repeatable genetic access to specific neurons via GAL4/UAS and related methods is a key advantage of Drosophila neuroscience. Neuronal targeting is typically documented using light microscopy of full GAL4 expression patterns, which generally lack the single-cell resolution required for reliable cell type identification. Here we use stochastic GAL4 labeling with the MultiColor FlpOut approach to generate cellular resolution confocal images at large scale. We are releasing aligned images of 74,000 such adult central nervous systems. An anticipated use of this resource is to bridge the gap between neurons identified by electron or light microscopy. Identifying individual neurons that make up each GAL4 expression pattern improves the prediction of split-GAL4 combinations targeting particular neurons. To this end we have made the images searchable on the NeuronBridge website. We demonstrate the potential of NeuronBridge to rapidly and effectively identify neuron matches based on morphology across imaging modalities and datasets.

}, issn = {2050-084X}, doi = {10.7554/eLife.80660}, author = {Meissner, Geoffrey Wilson and Nern, Aljoscha and Dorman, Zachary and Depasquale, Gina M and Forster, Kaitlyn and Gibney, Theresa and Hausenfluck, Joanna H and He, Yisheng and Iyer, Nirmala A and Jeter, Jennifer and Johnson, Lauren and Johnston, Rebecca M and Lee, Kelley and Melton, Brian and Yarbrough, Brianna and Zugates, Christopher T and Clements, Jody and Goina, Cristian and Otsuna, Hideo and Rokicki, Konrad and Svirskas, Robert R and Aso, Yoshinori and Card, Gwyneth M and Dickson, Barry J and Ehrhardt, Erica and Goldammer, Jens and Ito, Masayoshi and Kainmueller, Dagmar and Korff, Wyatt and Mais, Lisa and minegishi, ryo and Namiki, Shigehiro and Rubin, Gerald M and Sterne, Gabriella R and Wolff, Tanya and Malkesman, Oz} } @article {65284, title = {Toward nanoscale localization of memory engrams in Drosophila.}, journal = {Journal of Neurogenetics}, volume = {34}, year = {2020}, month = {2020 Mar 01}, pages = {151-55}, abstract = {

The Mushroom Body (MB) is the primary location of stored associative memories in the Drosophila brain. We discuss recent advances in understanding the MB{\textquoteright}s neuronal circuits made using advanced light microscopic methods and cell-type-specific genetic tools. We also review how the compartmentalized nature of the MB{\textquoteright}s organization allows this brain area to form and store memories with widely different dynamics.

}, issn = {1563-5260}, doi = {10.1080/01677063.2020.1715973}, author = {Aso, Yoshinori and Rubin, Gerald M} } @article {64933, title = {Neurogenetic dissection of the lateral horn reveals major outputs, diverse behavioural functions, and interactions with the mushroom body.}, journal = {Elife}, volume = {8}, year = {2019}, month = {2019 May 21}, abstract = {

Animals exhibit innate behaviours to a variety of sensory stimuli including olfactory cues. In , one higher olfactory centre, the lateral horn (LH), is implicated in innate behaviour. However, our structural and functional understanding of the LH is scant, in large part due to a lack of sparse neurogenetic tools for this region. We generate a collection of split-GAL4 driver lines providing genetic access to 82 LH cell types. We use these to create an anatomical and neurotransmitter map of the LH and link this to EM connectomics data. We find ~30\% of LH projections converge with outputs from the mushroom body, site of olfactory learning and memory. Using optogenetic activation, we identify LH cell types that drive changes in valence behavior or specific locomotor programs. In summary, we have generated a resource for manipulating and mapping LH neurons, providing new insights into the circuit basis of innate and learned olfactory behavior.

}, issn = {2050-084X}, doi = {10.7554/eLife.43079}, author = {Dolan, Michael-John and Frechter, Shahar and Bates, Alexander Shakeel and Dan, Chuntao and Huoviala, Paavo and Roberts, Ruair{\'\i} Jv and Schlegel, Philipp and Dhawan, Serene and Tabano, Remy and Dionne, Heather and Christoforou, Christina and Close, Kari and Sutcliffe, Ben and Giuliani, Bianca and Li, Feng and Costa, Marta and Ihrke, Gudrun and Meissner, Geoffrey Wilson and Bock, Davi D and Aso, Yoshinori and Rubin, Gerald M and Jefferis, Gregory Sxe} } @article {65227, title = {Nitric oxide acts as a cotransmitter in a subset of dopaminergic neurons to diversify memory dynamics.}, journal = {eLife}, volume = {8}, year = {2019}, month = {2019 Nov 14}, abstract = {

Animals employ diverse learning rules and synaptic plasticity dynamics to record temporal and statistical information about the world. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying this diversity are poorly understood. The anatomically defined compartments of the insect mushroom body function as parallel units of associative learning, with different learning rates, memory decay dynamics and flexibility (Aso \& Rubin 2016). Here we show that nitric oxide (NO) acts as a neurotransmitter in a subset of dopaminergic neurons in . NO{\textquoteright}s effects develop more slowly than those of dopamine and depend on soluble guanylate cyclase in postsynaptic Kenyon cells. NO acts antagonistically to dopamine; it shortens memory retention and facilitates the rapid updating of memories. The interplay of NO and dopamine enables memories stored in local domains along Kenyon cell axons to be specialized for predicting the value of odors based only on recent events. Our results provide key mechanistic insights into how diverse memory dynamics are established in parallel memory systems.

}, issn = {2050-084X}, doi = {10.7554/eLife.49257}, author = {Aso, Yoshinori and Ray, Robert P and Long, Xi and Bushey, Daniel and Cichewicz, Karol and Ngo, Teri-Tb and Sharp, Brandi and Christoforou, Christina and Hu, Amy and Lemire, Andrew L and Tillberg, Paul and Hirsh, Jay and Litwin-Kumar, Ashok and Rubin, Gerald M} } @article {49434, title = {Communication from learned to innate olfactory processing centers is required for memory retrieval in Drosophila.}, journal = {Neuron}, volume = {100}, year = {2018}, month = {2018 Sep 19}, pages = {651-68}, abstract = {

The behavioral response to a sensory stimulus may depend on both learned and innate neuronal representations. How these circuits interact to produce appropriate behavior is unknown. In Drosophila, the lateral horn (LH) and mushroom body (MB) are thought to mediate innate and learned olfactory behavior, respectively, although LH function has not been tested directly. Here we identify two LH cell types (PD2a1 and PD2b1) that receive input from an MB output neuron required for recall of aversive olfactory memories. These neurons are required for aversive memory retrieval and modulated by training. Connectomics data demonstrate that PD2a1 and PD2b1 neurons also receive direct input from food odor-encoding neurons. Consistent with this, PD2a1 and PD2b1 are also necessary for unlearned attraction to some odors, indicating that these neurons have a dual behavioral role. This provides a circuit mechanism by which learned and innate olfactory information can interact in identified neurons to produce appropriate behavior.

}, issn = {1097-4199}, doi = {10.1016/j.neuron.2018.08.037}, author = {Dolan, Michael-John and Belliart-Gu{\'e}rin, Ghislain and Bates, Alexander Shakeel and Frechter, Shahar and Lampin-Saint-Amaux, Aur{\'e}lie and Aso, Yoshinori and Roberts, Ruair{\'\i} J V and Schlegel, Philipp and Wong, Allan and Hammad, Adnan and Bock, Davi and Rubin, Gerald M and Preat, Thomas and Placais, Pierre-Yves and Jefferis, Gregory S X E} } @article {49093, title = {Functional architecture of reward learning in mushroom body extrinsic neurons of larval Drosophila.}, journal = {Nature Communications}, volume = {9}, year = {2018}, month = {2018 Mar 16}, pages = {1104}, abstract = {

The brain adaptively integrates present sensory input, past experience, and options for future action. The insect mushroom body exemplifies how a central brain structure brings about such integration. Here we use a combination of systematic single-cell labeling, connectomics, transgenic silencing, and activation experiments to study the mushroom body at single-cell resolution, focusing on the behavioral architecture of its input and output neurons (MBINs and MBONs), and of the mushroom body intrinsic APL neuron. Our results reveal the identity and morphology of almost all of these 44 neurons in stage 3 Drosophila larvae. Upon an initial screen, functional analyses focusing on the mushroom body medial lobe uncover sparse and specific functions of its dopaminergic MBINs, its MBONs, and of the GABAergic APL neuron across three behavioral tasks, namely odor preference, taste preference, and associative learning between odor and taste. Our results thus provide a cellular-resolution study case of how brains organize behavior.

}, issn = {2041-1723}, doi = {10.1038/s41467-018-03130-1}, author = {Saumweber, Timo and Rohwedder, Astrid and Schleyer, Michael and Eichler, Katharina and Chen, Yi-chun and Aso, Yoshinori and Cardona, Albert and Eschbach, Claire and Kobler, Oliver and Voigt, Anne and Durairaja, Archana and Mancini, Nino and Zlatic, Marta and Truman, James W and Thum, Andreas S and Gerber, Bertram} } @article {49233, title = {Reinforcement signaling of punishment versus relief in fruit flies.}, journal = {Learning \& Memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.)}, volume = {25}, year = {2018}, month = {2018 Jun}, pages = {247-257}, abstract = {

Painful events establish opponent memories: cues that precede pain are remembered negatively, whereas cues that follow pain, thus coinciding with relief are recalled positively. How do individual reinforcement-signaling neurons contribute to this "timing-dependent valence-reversal?" We addressed this question using an optogenetic approach in the fruit fly. Two types of fly dopaminergic neuron, each comprising just one paired cell, indeed established learned avoidance of odors that preceded their photostimulation during training, and learned approach to odors that followed the photostimulation. This is in striking parallel to punishment versus relief memories reinforced by a real noxious event. For only one of these neuron types, both effects were strong enough for further analyses. Notably, interfering with dopamine biosynthesis in these neurons partially impaired the punishing effect, but not the relieving after-effect of their photostimulation. We discuss how this finding constraints existing computational models of punishment versus relief memories and introduce a new model, which also incorporates findings from mammals. Furthermore, whether using dopaminergic neuron photostimulation or a real noxious event, more prolonged punishment led to stronger relief. This parametric feature of relief may also apply to other animals and may explain particular aspects of related behavioral dysfunction in humans.

}, issn = {1549-5485}, doi = {10.1101/lm.047308.118}, author = {K{\"o}nig, Christian and Khalili, Afshin and Ganesan, Mathangi and Nishu, Amrita P and Garza, Alejandra P and Niewalda, Thomas and Gerber, Bertram and Aso, Yoshinori and Yarali, Ayse} } @article {48658, title = {A connectome of a learning and memory center in the adult Drosophila brain.}, journal = {eLife}, volume = {6}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 Jul 18}, pages = {e26975}, abstract = {

Understanding memory formation, storage and retrieval requires knowledge of the underlying neuronal circuits. In\ Drosophila, the mushroom body (MB) is the major site of associative learning. We reconstructed the morphologies and synaptic connections of all 983 neurons within the three functional units, or compartments, that compose the adult MB{\textquoteright}s α lobe, using a dataset of isotropic 8-nm voxels collected by focused ion-beam milling scanning electron microscopy. We found that Kenyon cells (KCs), whose sparse activity encodes sensory information, each make multiple\ en passant\ synapses to MB output neurons (MBONs) in each compartment. Some MBONs have inputs from all KCs, while others differentially sample sensory modalities. Only six percent of KC\>MBON synapses receive a direct synapse from a dopaminergic neuron (DAN). We identified two unanticipated classes of synapses, KC\>DAN and DAN\>MBON. DAN activation produces a slow depolarization of the MBON in these DAN\>MBON synapses and can weaken memory recall.

}, doi = {10.7554/eLife.26975}, author = {Takemura, Shin-ya and Aso, Yoshinori and Hige, Toshihide and Wong, Allan M and Lu, Zhiyuan and Xu, C Shan and Rivlin, Patricia K and Hess, Harald F and Zhao, Ting and Parag, Toufiq and Berg, Stuart and Huang, Gary and Katz, William T and Olbris, Donald J and Plaza, Stephen M and Umayam, Lowell A and Aniceto, Roxanne and Chang, Lei-Ann and Lauchie, Shirley and et al} } @article {48494, title = {Representations of Novelty and Familiarity in a Mushroom Body Compartment.}, journal = {Cell}, volume = {169}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 May 09}, pages = {956-69}, abstract = {

Animals exhibit a behavioral response to novel sensory stimuli about which they have no prior knowledge. We have examined the neural and behavioral correlates of novelty and familiarity in the olfactory system of Drosophila. Novel odors elicit strong activity in output neurons (MBONs) of the α{\textquoteright}3 compartment of the mushroom body that is rapidly suppressed upon repeated exposure to the same odor. This transition in neural activity upon familiarization requires odor-evoked activity in the dopaminergic neuron innervating this compartment. Moreover, exposure of a fly to novel odors evokes an alerting response that can also be elicited by optogenetic activation of α{\textquoteright}3 MBONs. Silencing these MBONs eliminates the alerting behavior. These data suggest that the α{\textquoteright}3 compartment plays a causal role in the behavioral response to novel and familiar stimuli as a consequence of dopamine-mediated plasticity at the Kenyon cell-MBONα{\textquoteright}3 synapse.

}, issn = {1097-4172}, doi = {10.1016/j.cell.2017.04.028}, author = {Hattori, Daisuke and Aso, Yoshinori and Swartz, Kurtis J and Rubin, Gerald M and Abbott, L F and Axel, Richard} } @article {47434, title = {Direct neural pathways convey distinct visual information to Drosophila mushroom bodies.}, journal = {eLife}, volume = {5}, year = {2016}, month = {2016 Apr 15}, pages = {e14009}, abstract = {

Previously, we identified that visual and olfactory associative memories of Drosophila share the mushroom body (MB) circuits (Vogt et al. 2014). Despite well-characterized odor representations in the Drosophila MB, the MB circuit for visual information is totally unknown. Here we show that a small subset of MB Kenyon cells (KCs) selectively responds to visual but not olfactory stimulation. The dendrites of these atypical KCs form a ventral accessory calyx (vAC), distinct from the main calyx that receives olfactory input. We identified two types of visual projection neurons (VPNs) directly connecting the optic lobes and the vAC. Strikingly, these VPNs are differentially required for visual memories of color and brightness. The segregation of visual and olfactory domains in the MB allows independent processing of distinct sensory memories and may be a conserved form of sensory representations among insects.

}, issn = {2050-084X}, doi = {10.7554/eLife.14009}, author = {Vogt, Katrin and Aso, Yoshinori and Hige, Toshihide and Knapek, Stephan and Ichinose, Toshiharu and Friedrich, Anja B and Turner, Glenn C and Rubin, Gerald M and Tanimoto, Hiromu} } @article {47708, title = {Dopaminergic neurons write and update memories with cell-type-specific rules.}, journal = {eLife}, volume = {5}, year = {2016}, month = {2016 Jul 21}, pages = {e16135}, abstract = {

Associative learning is thought to involve parallel and distributed mechanisms of memory formation and storage. In Drosophila, the mushroom body (MB) is the major site of associative odor memory formation. Previously we described the anatomy of the adult MB and defined 20 types of dopaminergic neurons (DANs) that each innervate distinct MB compartments (Aso et al., 2014a; Aso et al., 2014b). Here we compare the properties of memories formed by optogenetic activation of individual DAN cell types. We found extensive differences in training requirements for memory formation, decay dynamics, storage capacity and flexibility to learn new associations. Even a single DAN cell type can either write or reduce an aversive memory, or write an appetitive memory, depending on when it is activated relative to odor delivery. Our results show that different learning rules are executed in seemingly parallel memory systems, providing multiple distinct circuit-based strategies to predict future events from past experiences.

}, issn = {2050-084X}, doi = {10.7554/eLife.16135}, author = {Aso, Yoshinori and Rubin, Gerald M} } @article {47965, title = {A new brain dopamine deficient Drosophila and its pharmacological and genetic rescue.}, journal = {Genes, Brain, and Behavior}, volume = {16}, year = {2016}, month = {2017 Mar.01 }, pages = {394-403}, abstract = {

Dopamine (DA) is a neurotransmitter with conserved behavioral roles between invertebrate and vertebrate animals. In addition to its neural functions, in insects DA is a critical substrate for cuticle pigmentation and hardening. Drosophila tyrosine hydroxylase (DTH) is the rate limiting enzyme for DA biosynthesis. Viable brain DA deficient flies were previously generated using tissue selective GAL4-UAS binary expression rescue of a DTH null mutation and these flies show specific behavioral impairments. To circumvent the limitations of rescue via binary expression, here we achieve rescue utilizing genomically integrated mutant DTH. As expected, our DA deficient flies have no detectable DTH or DA in the brain, and show reduced locomotor activity. This deficit can be rescued by L-DOPA/carbidopa feeding, similar to human Parkinson{\textquoteright}s disease treatment. Genetic rescue via GAL4/UAS-DTH was also successful, although this required the generation of a new UAS-DTH1 transgene devoid of most untranslated regions, since existing UAS-DTH transgenes express in the brain without a Gal4 driver via endogenous regulatory elements. A surprising finding of our newly constructed UAS-DTH1m is that it expresses DTH at an undetectable level when regulated by dopaminergic GAL4 drivers even when fully rescuing DA, indicating that DTH immunostaining is not necessarily a valid marker for DA expression. This finding necessitated optimizing DA immunohistochemistry, revealing details of DA innervation to the mushroom body and the central complex. When DA rescue is limited to specific DA neurons, DA does not diffuse beyond the DTH-expressing terminals, such that DA signaling can be limited to very specific brain regions.

}, issn = {1601-183X}, doi = {10.1111/gbb.12353}, author = {Cichewicz, Karol and Garren, Emma J and Adiele, Chika and Aso, Yoshinori and Wang, Zhang and Wu, Martin and Birman, Serge and Rubin, Gerald M and Hirsh, Jay} } @article {47214, title = {Control of sleep by dopaminergic inputs to the Drosophila mushroom body.}, journal = {Frontiers in Neural Circuits}, volume = {9}, year = {2015}, month = {2015 Nov 09}, pages = {73}, abstract = {

The Drosophila mushroom body (MB) is an associative learning network that is important for the control of sleep. We have recently identified particular intrinsic MB Kenyon cell (KC) classes that regulate sleep through synaptic activation of particular MB output neurons (MBONs) whose axons convey sleep control signals out of the MB to downstream target regions. Specifically, we found that sleep-promoting KCs increase sleep by preferentially activating cholinergic sleep-promoting MBONs, while wake-promoting KCs decrease sleep by preferentially activating glutamatergic wake-promoting MBONs. Here we use a combination of genetic and physiological approaches to identify wake-promoting dopaminergic neurons (DANs) that innervate the MB, and show that they activate wake-promoting MBONs. These studies reveal a dopaminergic sleep control mechanism that likely operates by modulation of KC-MBON microcircuits.

}, issn = {1662-5110}, doi = {10.3389/fncir.2015.00073}, author = {Sitaraman, Divya and Aso, Yoshinori and Rubin, Gerald M and Nitabach, Michael N} } @article {45979, title = {Distinct dopamine neurons mediate reward signals for short- and long-term memories.}, journal = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America}, volume = {112}, year = {2015}, month = {2015 Jan 13}, pages = {578-83}, abstract = {

Drosophila melanogaster can acquire a stable appetitive olfactory memory when the presentation of a sugar reward and an odor are paired. However, the neuronal mechanisms by which a single training induces long-term memory are poorly understood. Here we show that two distinct subsets of dopamine neurons in the fly brain signal reward for short-term (STM) and long-term memories (LTM). One subset induces memory that decays within several hours, whereas the other induces memory that gradually develops after training. They convey reward signals to spatially segregated synaptic domains of the mushroom body (MB), a potential site for convergence. Furthermore, we identified a single type of dopamine neuron that conveys the reward signal to restricted subdomains of the mushroom body lobes and induces long-term memory. Constant appetitive memory retention after a single training session thus comprises two memory components triggered by distinct dopamine neurons.

}, issn = {1091-6490}, doi = {10.1073/pnas.1421930112}, author = {Yamagata, Nobuhiro and Ichinose, Toshiharu and Aso, Yoshinori and Placais, Pierre-Yves and Friedrich, Anja B and Sima, Richard J and Preat, Thomas and Rubin, Gerald M and Tanimoto, Hiromu} } @article {46773, title = {A dopamine-modulated neural circuit regulating aversive taste memory in Drosophila.}, journal = {Current Biology}, volume = {25}, year = {2015}, month = {2015 May 14}, pages = {1535-41}, abstract = {

Taste memories allow animals to modulate feeding behavior in accordance with past experience and avoid the consumption of potentially harmful food [1]. We have developed a single-fly taste memory assay to functionally interrogate the neural circuitry encoding taste memories [2]. Here, we screen a collection of Split-GAL4 lines that label small populations of neurons associated with the fly memory center-the mushroom bodies (MBs) [3]. Genetic silencing of PPL1 dopamine neurons disrupts conditioned, but not naive, feeding behavior, suggesting these neurons are selectively involved in the conditioned taste response. We identify two PPL1 subpopulations that innervate the MB α lobe and are essential for aversive taste memory. Thermogenetic activation of these dopamine neurons during training induces memory, indicating these neurons are sufficient for the reinforcing properties of bitter tastant to the MBs. Silencing of either the intrinsic MB neurons or the output neurons from the α lobe disrupts taste conditioning. Thermogenetic manipulation of these output neurons alters naive feeding response, suggesting that dopamine neurons modulate the threshold of response to appetitive tastants. Taken together, these findings detail a neural mechanism underlying the formation of taste memory and provide a functional model for dopamine-dependent plasticity in Drosophila.

}, issn = {1879-0445}, doi = {10.1016/j.cub.2015.04.027}, author = {Masek, Pavel and Worden, Kurtresha and Aso, Yoshinori and Rubin, Gerald M and Keene, Alex C} } @article {47180, title = {Heterosynaptic plasticity underlies aversive olfactory learning in Drosophila}, journal = {Neuron}, volume = {88}, year = {2015}, month = {2015 Dec 2}, pages = {985-98}, abstract = {

Although associative learning has been localized to specific brain areas in many animals, identifying the underlying synaptic processes in vivo has been difficult. Here, we provide the first demonstration of long-term synaptic plasticity at the output site of the Drosophila mushroom body. Pairing an odor with activation of specific dopamine neurons induces both learning and odor-specific synaptic depression. The plasticity induction strictly depends on the temporal order of the two stimuli, replicating the logical requirement for associative learning. Furthermore, we reveal that dopamine action is confined to and distinct across different anatomical compartments of the mushroom body lobes. Finally, we find that overlap between sparse representations of different odors defines both stimulus specificity of the plasticity and generalizability of associative memories across odors. Thus, the plasticity we find here not only manifests important features of associative learning but also provides general insights into how a sparse sensory code is read out.

}, doi = {10.1016/j.neuron.2015.11.003}, author = {Hige, Toshihide and Aso, Yoshinori and Modi, Mehrab and Rubin, Gerald M and Turner, Glenn C} } @article {47409, title = {Plasticity-driven individualization of olfactory coding in mushroom body output neurons.}, journal = {Nature}, volume = {526}, year = {2015}, month = {2015 Oct 8}, pages = {258-62}, abstract = {

Although all sensory circuits ascend to higher brain areas where stimuli are represented in sparse, stimulus-specific activity patterns, relatively little is known about sensory coding on the descending side of neural circuits, as a network converges. In insects, mushroom bodies have been an important model system for studying sparse coding in the olfactory system, where this format is important for accurate memory formation. In Drosophila, it has recently been shown that the 2,000 Kenyon cells of the mushroom body converge onto a population of only 34 mushroom body output neurons (MBONs), which fall into 21 anatomically distinct cell types. Here we provide the first, to our knowledge, comprehensive view of olfactory representations at the fourth layer of the circuit, where we find a clear transition in the principles of sensory coding. We show that MBON tuning curves are highly correlated with one another. This is in sharp contrast to the process of progressive decorrelation of tuning in the earlier layers of the circuit. Instead, at the population level, odour representations are reformatted so that positive and negative correlations arise between representations of different odours. At the single-cell level, we show that uniquely identifiable MBONs display profoundly different tuning across different animals, but that tuning of the same neuron across the two hemispheres of an individual fly was nearly identical. Thus, individualized coordination of tuning arises at this level of the olfactory circuit. Furthermore, we find that this individualization is an active process that requires a learning-related gene, rutabaga. Ultimately, neural circuits have to flexibly map highly stimulus-specific information in sparse layers onto a limited number of different motor outputs. The reformatting of sensory representations we observe here may mark the beginning of this sensory-motor transition in the olfactory system.

}, keywords = {Adenylyl Cyclases, Animals, Drosophila melanogaster, Drosophila Proteins, Female, Learning, Male, Mushroom Bodies, Mutation, Neuronal Plasticity, Neurons, Olfactory Pathways, Olfactory Perception, Psychomotor Performance}, issn = {1476-4687}, doi = {10.1038/nature15396}, author = {Hige, Toshihide and Aso, Yoshinori and Rubin, Gerald M and Turner, Glenn C} } @article {47202, title = {Propagation of homeostatic sleep signals by segregated synaptic microcircuits of the Drosophila mushroom body.}, journal = {Current Biology : CB}, volume = {25}, year = {2015}, month = {2015 Nov 16}, pages = {2915-27}, abstract = {

The Drosophila mushroom body (MB) is a key associative memory center that has also been implicated in the control of sleep. However, the identity of MB neurons underlying homeostatic sleep regulation, as well as the types of sleep signals generated by specific classes of MB neurons, has remained poorly understood. We recently identified two MB output neuron (MBON) classes whose axons convey sleep control signals from the MB to converge in the same downstream target region: a cholinergic sleep-promoting MBON class and a glutamatergic wake-promoting MBON class. Here, we deploy a combination of neurogenetic, behavioral, and physiological approaches to identify and mechanistically dissect sleep-controlling circuits of the MB. Our studies reveal the existence of two segregated excitatory synaptic microcircuits that propagate homeostatic sleep information from different populations of intrinsic MB\ "Kenyon cells" (KCs) to specific sleep-regulating MBONs: sleep-promoting KCs increase sleep by preferentially activating the cholinergic MBONs, while wake-promoting KCs decrease sleep by preferentially activating the glutamatergic MBONs. Importantly, activity of the sleep-promoting MB microcircuit is increased by sleep deprivation and is necessary for homeostatic rebound sleep (i.e., the increased sleep that occurs after, and in compensation for, sleep lost during deprivation). These studies reveal for the first time specific functional connections between subsets of KCs and particular MBONs and establish the identity of synaptic microcircuits underlying transmission of homeostatic sleep signals in the MB.

}, issn = {1879-0445}, doi = {10.1016/j.cub.2015.09.017}, author = {Sitaraman, Divya and Aso, Yoshinori and Jin, Xin and Chen, Nan and Felix, Mario and Rubin, Gerald M and Nitabach, Michael N} } @article {47182, title = {Reward signal in a recurrent circuit drives appetitive long-term memory formation.}, journal = {eLife}, volume = {4}, year = {2015}, month = {2015 Nov 18}, abstract = {

Dopamine signals reward in animal brains. A single presentation of a sugar reward to Drosophila activates distinct subsets of dopamine neurons that independently induce short- and long-term olfactory memories (STM and LTM, respectively). In this study, we show that a recurrent reward circuit underlies the formation and consolidation of LTM. This feedback circuit is composed of a single class of reward-signaling dopamine neurons (PAM-α1) projecting to a restricted region of the mushroom body (MB), and a specific MB output cell type, MBON-α1, whose dendrites arborize that same MB compartment. Both MBON-α1 and PAM-α1 neurons are required during the acquisition and consolidation of appetitive LTM. MBON-α1 additionally mediates the retrieval of LTM, which is dependent on the dopamine receptor signaling in the MB α/β neurons. Our results suggest that a reward signal transforms a nascent memory trace into a stable LTM using a feedback circuit at the cost of memory specificity.

}, issn = {2050-084X}, doi = {10.7554/eLife.10719}, author = {Ichinose, Toshiharu and Aso, Yoshinori and Yamagata, Nobuhiro and Abe, Ayako and Rubin, Gerald M and Tanimoto, Hiromu} } @article {45811, title = {Mushroom body output neurons encode valence and guide memory-based action selection in Drosophila.}, journal = {eLife}, volume = {4}, year = {2014}, month = {12/2014}, abstract = {

Animals discriminate stimuli, learn their predictive value and use this knowledge to modify their behavior. In Drosophila, the mushroom body (MB) plays a key role in these processes. Sensory stimuli are sparsely represented by \~{}2000 Kenyon cells, which converge onto 34 output neurons (MBONs) of 21 types. We studied the role of MBONs in several associative learning tasks and in sleep regulation, revealing the extent to which information flow is segregated into distinct channels and suggesting possible roles for the multi-layered MBON network. We also show that optogenetic activation of MBONs can, depending on cell type, induce repulsion or attraction in flies. The behavioral effects of MBON perturbation are combinatorial, suggesting that the MBON ensemble collectively represents valence. We propose that local, stimulus-specific dopaminergic modulation selectively alters the balance within the MBON network for those stimuli. Our results suggest that valence encoded by the MBON ensemble biases memory-based action selection.

}, issn = {2050-084X}, doi = {10.7554/eLife.04580}, author = {Aso, Yoshinori and Sitaraman, Divya and Ichinose, Toshiharu and Kaun, Karla R and Vogt, Katrin and Belliart-Gu{\'e}rin, Ghislain and Placais, Pierre-Yves and Robie, Alice A and Yamagata, Nobuhiro and Schnaitmann, Christopher and Rowell, William J and Johnston, Rebecca M and Ngo, Teri-T B and Chen, Nan and Korff, Wyatt and Nitabach, Michael N and Heberlein, Ulrike and Preat, Thomas and Branson, Kristin M and Tanimoto, Hiromu and Rubin, Gerald M} } @article {45810, title = {The neuronal architecture of the mushroom body provides a logic for associative learning.}, journal = {eLife}, volume = {3}, year = {2014}, month = {2014 Dec 23}, abstract = {

We identified the neurons comprising the Drosophila mushroom body (MB), an associative center in invertebrate brains, and provide a comprehensive map describing their potential connections. Each of the 21 MB output neuron (MBON) types elaborates segregated dendritic arbors along the parallel axons of \~{}2000 Kenyon cells, forming 15 compartments that collectively tile the MB lobes. MBON axons project to five discrete neuropils outside of the MB and three MBON types form a feedforward network in the lobes. Each of the 20 dopaminergic neuron (DAN) types projects axons to one, or at most two, of the MBON compartments. Convergence of DAN axons on compartmentalized Kenyon cell-MBON synapses creates a highly ordered unit that can support learning to impose valence on sensory representations. The elucidation of the complement of neurons of the MB provides a comprehensive anatomical substrate from which one can infer a functional logic of associative olfactory learning and memory.

}, issn = {2050-084X}, doi = {10.7554/eLife.04577}, author = {Aso, Yoshinori and Hattori, Daisuke and Yu, Yang and Johnston, Rebecca M and Iyer, Nirmala A and Ngo, Teri-Tb and Dionne, Heather and Abbott, Lf and Axel, Richard and Tanimoto, Hiromu and Rubin, Gerald M} } @article {45416, title = {Shared mushroom body circuits underlie visual and olfactory memories in Drosophila.}, journal = {eLife}, volume = {3}, year = {2014}, month = {2014}, pages = {e02395}, abstract = {

In nature, animals form memories associating reward or punishment with stimuli from different sensory modalities, such as smells and colors. It is unclear, however, how distinct sensory memories are processed in the brain. We established appetitive and aversive visual learning assays for Drosophila that are comparable to the widely used olfactory learning assays. These assays share critical features, such as reinforcing stimuli (sugar reward and electric shock punishment), and allow direct comparison of the cellular requirements for visual and olfactory memories. We found that the same subsets of dopamine neurons drive formation of both sensory memories. Furthermore, distinct yet partially overlapping subsets of mushroom body intrinsic neurons are required for visual and olfactory memories. Thus, our results suggest that distinct sensory memories are processed in a common brain center. Such centralization of related brain functions is an economical design that avoids the repetition of similar circuit motifs.

}, issn = {2050-084X}, doi = {10.7554/eLife.02395}, author = {Vogt, Katrin and Schnaitmann, Christopher and Dylla, Kristina V and Knapek, Stephan and Aso, Yoshinori and Rubin, Gerald M and Tanimoto, Hiromu} } @article {6270, title = {Essential role of the mushroom body in context-dependent CO2 avoidance in Drosophila.}, journal = {Current Biology}, volume = {23}, year = {2013}, month = {2013 Jul 8}, pages = {1228-34}, abstract = {

Internal state as well as environmental conditions influence choice behavior. The neural circuits underpinning state-dependent behavior remain largely unknown. Carbon dioxide (CO2) is an important olfactory cue for many insects, including mosquitoes, flies, moths, and honeybees [1]. Concentrations of CO2 higher than 0.02\% above atmospheric level trigger a strong innate avoidance in the fly Drosophila melanogaster [2, 3]. Here, we show that the mushroom body (MB), a brain center essential for olfactory associative memories [4-6] but thought to be dispensable for innate odor processing [7], is essential for CO2 avoidance behavior only in the context of starvation or in the context of a food-related odor. Consistent with this, CO2 stimulation elicits Ca(2+) influx into the MB intrinsic cells (Kenyon cells: KCs) in\ vivo. We identify an atypical projection neuron (bilateral ventral projection neuron, biVPN) that connects CO2 sensory input bilaterally to the MB calyx. Blocking synaptic output of the biVPN completely abolishes CO2 avoidance in food-deprived flies, but not in fed flies. These findings show that two alternative neural pathways control innate choice behavior, and they are dependent on the animal{\textquoteright}s internal state. In addition, they suggest that, during innate choice behavior, the MB serves as an integration site for internal state and olfactory input.

}, issn = {1879-0445}, doi = {10.1016/j.cub.2013.05.029}, author = {Br{\"a}cker, Lasse B and Siju, K P and Varela, N{\'e}lia and Aso, Yoshinori and Zhang, Mo and Hein, Irina and Vasconcelos, Maria Lu{\'\i}sa and Grunwald Kadow, Ilona C} } @article {5423, title = {A GAL4-driver line resource for Drosophila neurobiology.}, journal = {Cell Reports}, volume = {2}, year = {2012}, month = {2012 Oct 25}, pages = {991-1001}, abstract = {

We established a collection of 7,000 transgenic lines of Drosophila melanogaster. Expression of GAL4 in each line is controlled by a different, defined fragment of genomic DNA that serves as a transcriptional enhancer. We used confocal microscopy of dissected nervous systems to determine the expression patterns driven by each fragment in the adult brain and ventral nerve cord. We present image data on 6,650 lines. Using both manual and machine-assisted annotation, we describe the expression patterns in the most useful lines. We illustrate the utility of these data for identifying novel neuronal cell types, revealing brain asymmetry, and describing the nature and extent of neuronal shape stereotypy. The GAL4 lines allow expression of exogenous genes in distinct, small subsets of the adult nervous system. The set of DNA fragments, each driving a documented expression pattern, will facilitate the generation of additional constructs for manipulating neuronal function. synapse was substantially elevated, at the endocytic zone there was no enhanced polymerization activity. We conclude that actin subserves spatially diverse, independently regulated processes throughout spines. Perisynaptic actin forms a uniquely dynamic structure well suited for direct, active regulation of the synapse.

For the overall strategy and methods used to produce the GAL4 lines:
Pfeiffer, B.D., Jenett, A., Hammonds, A.S., Ngo, T.T., Misra, S., Murphy, C., Scully, A., Carlson, J.W., Wan, K.H., Laverty, T.R., Mungall, C., Svirskas, R., Kadonaga, J.T., Doe, C.Q., Eisen, M.B., Celniker, S.E., Rubin, G.M. (2008). Tools for neuroanatomy and neurogenetics in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 9715-9720. http://www.pnas.org/content/105/28/9715.full.pdf+html synapse was substantially elevated, at the endocytic zone there was no enhanced polymerization activity. We conclude that actin subserves spatially diverse, independently regulated processes throughout spines. Perisynaptic actin forms a uniquely dynamic structure well suited for direct, active regulation of the synapse.

For data on expression in the embryo:
Manning, L., Purice, M.D., Roberts, J., Pollard, J.L., Bennett, A.L., Kroll, J.R., Dyukareva, A.V., Doan, P.N., Lupton, J.R., Strader, M.E., Tanner, S., Bauer, D., Wilbur, A., Tran, K.D., Laverty, T.R., Pearson, J.C., Crews, S.T., Rubin, G.M., and Doe, C.Q. (2012) Annotated embryonic CNS expression patterns of 5000 GMR GAL4 lines: a resource for manipulating gene expression and analyzing cis-regulatory motifs. Cell Reports (2012) Doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2012.09.009 http://www.cell.com/cell-reports/fulltext/S2211-1247(12)00290-2 synapse was substantially elevated, at the endocytic zone there was no enhanced polymerization activity. We conclude that actin subserves spatially diverse, independently regulated processes throughout spines. Perisynaptic actin forms a uniquely dynamic structure well suited for direct, active regulation of the synapse.

For data on expression in imaginal discs:
Jory, A., Estella, C., Giorgianni, M.W., Slattery, M., Laverty, T.R., Rubin, G.M., and Mann, R.S. (2012) A survey of 6300 genomic fragments for cis-regulatory activity in the imaginal discs of Drosophila melanogaster. Cell Reports (2012) Doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2012.09.010 http://www.cell.com/cell-reports/fulltext/S2211-1247(12)00291-4 synapse was substantially elevated, at the endocytic zone there was no enhanced polymerization activity. We conclude that actin subserves spatially diverse, independently regulated processes throughout spines. Perisynaptic actin forms a uniquely dynamic structure well suited for direct, active regulation of the synapse.

For data on expression in the larval nervous system:
Li, H.-H., Kroll, J.R., Lennox, S., Ogundeyi, O., Jeter, J., Depasquale, G., and Truman, J.W. (2013) A GAL4 driver resource for developmental and behavioral studies on the larval CNS of Drosophila. Cell Reports (submitted).

}, issn = {2211-1247}, doi = {10.1016/j.celrep.2012.09.011}, author = {Jenett, Arnim and Rubin, Gerald M and Ngo, Teri-T B and Shepherd, David and Murphy, Christine and Dionne, Heather and Pfeiffer, Barret D and Cavallaro, Amanda and Hall, Donald and Jeter, Jennifer and Iyer, Nirmala and Fetter, Dona and Hausenfluck, Joanna H and Peng, Hanchuan and Trautman, Eric T and Svirskas, Robert R and Myers, Eugene W and Iwinski, Zbigniew R and Aso, Yoshinori and Depasquale, Gina M and Enos, Adrianne and Hulamm, Phuson and Lam, Shing Chun Benny and Li, Hsing-Hsi and Laverty, Todd R and Long, Fuhui and Qu, Lei and Murphy, Sean D and Rokicki, Konrad and Safford, Todd and Shaw, Kshiti and Simpson, Julie H and Sowell, Allison and Tae, Susana and Yu, Yang and Zugates, Christopher T} } @article {6300, title = {A subset of dopamine neurons signals reward for odour memory in Drosophila.}, journal = {Nature}, volume = {488}, year = {2012}, month = {2012 Aug 23}, pages = {512-6}, abstract = {

Animals approach stimuli that predict a pleasant outcome. After the paired presentation of an odour and a reward, Drosophila melanogaster can develop a conditioned approach towards that odour. Despite recent advances in understanding the neural circuits for associative memory and appetitive motivation, the cellular mechanisms for reward processing in the fly brain are unknown. Here we show that a group of dopamine neurons in the protocerebral anterior medial (PAM) cluster signals sugar reward by transient activation and inactivation of target neurons in intact behaving flies. These dopamine neurons are selectively required for the reinforcing property of, but not a reflexive response to, the sugar stimulus. In vivo calcium imaging revealed that these neurons are activated by sugar ingestion and the activation is increased on starvation. The output sites of the PAM neurons are mainly localized to the medial lobes of the mushroom bodies (MBs), where appetitive olfactory associative memory is formed. We therefore propose that the PAM cluster neurons endow a positive predictive value to the odour in the MBs. Dopamine in insects is known to mediate aversive reinforcement signals. Our results highlight the cellular specificity underlying the various roles of dopamine and the importance of spatially segregated local circuits within the MBs.

}, keywords = {Animals, Appetitive Behavior, Calcium Signaling, Dendrites, Dopamine, Dopaminergic Neurons, Drosophila melanogaster, Memory, Mushroom Bodies, Odors, Reward, Smell}, issn = {1476-4687}, doi = {10.1038/nature11304}, author = {Liu, Chang and Placais, Pierre-Yves and Yamagata, Nobuhiro and Pfeiffer, Barret D and Aso, Yoshinori and Friedrich, Anja B and Siwanowicz, Igor and Rubin, Gerald M and Preat, Thomas and Tanimoto, Hiromu} } @article {5291, title = {Mushroom body efferent neurons responsible for aversive olfactory memory retrieval in Drosophila.}, journal = {Nature Neuroscience}, volume = {14}, year = {2011}, month = {2011 Jun 19}, pages = {903-10}, abstract = {

Aversive olfactory memory is formed in the mushroom bodies in Drosophila melanogaster. Memory retrieval requires mushroom body output, but the manner in which a memory trace in the mushroom body drives conditioned avoidance of a learned odor remains unknown. To identify neurons that are involved in olfactory memory retrieval, we performed an anatomical and functional screen of defined sets of mushroom body output neurons. We found that MB-V2 neurons were essential for retrieval of both short- and long-lasting memory, but not for memory formation or memory consolidation. MB-V2 neurons are cholinergic efferent neurons that project from the mushroom body vertical lobes to the middle superiormedial protocerebrum and the lateral horn. Notably, the odor response of MB-V2 neurons was modified after conditioning. As the lateral horn has been implicated in innate responses to repellent odorants, we propose that MB-V2 neurons recruit the olfactory pathway involved in innate odor avoidance during memory retrieval.

}, keywords = {Afferent Pathways, Analysis of Variance, Animal, Animals, Antigens, Avoidance Learning, Behavior, Biological, CD8, Choline O-Acetyltransferase, Conditioning (Psychology), Drosophila melanogaster, Drosophila Proteins, Gene Expression Regulation, Genetically Modified, Glutamate Decarboxylase, Green Fluorescent Proteins, Memory, Mental Recall, Models, Motor Neurons, Mushroom Bodies, Odors, Olfactory Pathways, Short-Term, Smell, Synapsins, Temperature, Time Factors, Transcription Factors, Tyrosine 3-Monooxygenase, Vesicular Glutamate Transport Proteins}, issn = {1546-1726}, doi = {10.1038/nn.2846}, author = {S{\'e}journ{\'e}, Julien and Placais, Pierre-Yves and Aso, Yoshinori and Siwanowicz, Igor and Trannoy, S{\'e}verine and Thoma, Vladimiros and Tedjakumala, Stevanus R and Rubin, Gerald M and Tch{\'e}nio, Paul and Ito, Kei and Isabel, Guillaume and Tanimoto, Hiromu and Preat, Thomas} }