@article {68507, title = {A connectome and analysis of the adult Drosophila central brain.}, journal = {Elife}, volume = {9}, year = {2020}, month = {2020 Sep 07}, abstract = {

The neural circuits responsible for animal behavior remain largely unknown. We summarize new methods and present the circuitry of a large fraction of the brain of the fruit fly . Improved methods include new procedures to prepare, image, align, segment, find synapses in, and proofread such large data sets. We define cell types, refine computational compartments, and provide an exhaustive atlas of cell examples and types, many of them novel. We provide detailed circuits consisting of neurons and their chemical synapses for most of the central brain. We make the data public and simplify access, reducing the effort needed to answer circuit questions, and provide procedures linking the neurons defined by our analysis with genetic reagents. Biologically, we examine distributions of connection strengths, neural motifs on different scales, electrical consequences of compartmentalization, and evidence that maximizing packing density is an important criterion in the evolution of the fly{\textquoteright}s brain.

}, keywords = {Animals, Brain, Connectome, Drosophila melanogaster, Female, Male, Neurons, Synapses}, issn = {2050-084X}, doi = {10.7554/eLife.57443}, author = {Scheffer, Louis K and Xu, C Shan and Januszewski, Michal and Lu, Zhiyuan and Takemura, Shin-ya and Hayworth, Kenneth J and Huang, Gary B and Shinomiya, Kazunori and Maitlin-Shepard, Jeremy and Berg, Stuart and Clements, Jody and Hubbard, Philip M and Katz, William T and Umayam, Lowell and Zhao, Ting and Ackerman, David and Blakely, Tim and Bogovic, John and Dolafi, Tom and Kainmueller, Dagmar and Kawase, Takashi and Khairy, Khaled A and Leavitt, Laramie and Li, Peter H and Lindsey, Larry and Neubarth, Nicole and Olbris, Donald J and Otsuna, Hideo and Trautman, Eric T and Ito, Masayoshi and Bates, Alexander S and Goldammer, Jens and Wolff, Tanya and Svirskas, Robert and Schlegel, Philipp and Neace, Erika and Knecht, Christopher J and Alvarado, Chelsea X and Bailey, Dennis A and Ballinger, Samantha and Borycz, Jolanta A and Canino, Brandon S and Cheatham, Natasha and Cook, Michael and Dreher, Marisa and Duclos, Octave and Eubanks, Bryon and Fairbanks, Kelli and Finley, Samantha and Forknall, Nora and Francis, Audrey and Hopkins, Gary Patrick and Joyce, Emily M and Kim, SungJin and Kirk, Nicole A and Kovalyak, Julie and Lauchie, Shirley A and Lohff, Alanna and Maldonado, Charli and Manley, Emily A and McLin, Sari and Mooney, Caroline and Ndama, Miatta and Ogundeyi, Omotara and Okeoma, Nneoma and Ordish, Christopher and Padilla, Nicholas and Patrick, Christopher M and Paterson, Tyler and Phillips, Elliott E and Phillips, Emily M and Rampally, Neha and Ribeiro, Caitlin and Robertson, Madelaine K and Rymer, Jon Thomson and Ryan, Sean M and Sammons, Megan and Scott, Anne K and Scott, Ashley L and Shinomiya, Aya and Smith, Claire and Smith, Kelsey and Smith, Natalie L and Sobeski, Margaret A and Suleiman, Alia and Swift, Jackie and Takemura, Satoko and Talebi, Iris and Tarnogorska, Dorota and Tenshaw, Emily and Tokhi, Temour and Walsh, John J and Yang, Tansy and Horne, Jane Anne and Li, Feng and Parekh, Ruchi and Rivlin, Patricia K and Jayaraman, Vivek and Costa, Marta and Jefferis, Gregory Sxe and Ito, Kei and Saalfeld, Stephan and George, Reed and Meinertzhagen, Ian A and Rubin, Gerald M and Hess, Harald F and Jain, Viren and Plaza, Stephen M} } @article {51252, title = {Comparisons between the ON- and OFF-edge motion pathways in the brain.}, journal = {eLife}, volume = {8}, year = {2019}, month = {2019 Jan 09}, abstract = {

Understanding the circuit mechanisms behind motion detection is a long-standing question in visual neuroscience. In , recent synapse-level connectomes in the optic lobe, particularly in ON-pathway (T4) receptive-field circuits, in concert with physiological studies, suggest an increasingly intricate motion model compared with the ubiquitous Hassenstein-Reichardt model, while our knowledge of OFF-pathway (T5) has been incomplete. Here we present a conclusive and comprehensive connectome that for the first time integrates detailed connectivity information for inputs to both T4 and T5 pathways in a single EM dataset covering the entire optic lobe. With novel reconstruction methods using automated synapse prediction suited to such a large connectome, we successfully corroborate previous findings in the T4 pathway and comprehensively identify inputs and receptive fields for T5. While the two pathways are likely evolutionarily linked and indeed exhibit many similarities, we uncover interesting differences and interactions that may underlie their distinct functional properties.

}, issn = {2050-084X}, doi = {10.7554/eLife.40025}, author = {Shinomiya, Kazunori and Huang, Gary and Lu, Zhiyuan and Parag, Toufiq and Xu, C Shan and Aniceto, Roxanne and Ansari, Namra and Cheatham, Natasha and Lauchie, Shirley and Neace, Erika and Ogundeyi, Omotara and Ordish, Christopher and Peel, David and Shinomiya, Aya and Smith, Claire and Takemura, Satoko and Talebi, Iris and Rivlin, Patricia K and Nern, Aljoscha and Scheffer, Louis K and Plaza, Stephen M and Meinertzhagen, Ian A} } @article {48658, title = {A connectome of a learning and memory center in the adult Drosophila brain.}, journal = {eLife}, volume = {6}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 Jul 18}, pages = {e26975}, abstract = {

Understanding memory formation, storage and retrieval requires knowledge of the underlying neuronal circuits. In\ Drosophila, the mushroom body (MB) is the major site of associative learning. We reconstructed the morphologies and synaptic connections of all 983 neurons within the three functional units, or compartments, that compose the adult MB{\textquoteright}s α lobe, using a dataset of isotropic 8-nm voxels collected by focused ion-beam milling scanning electron microscopy. We found that Kenyon cells (KCs), whose sparse activity encodes sensory information, each make multiple\ en passant\ synapses to MB output neurons (MBONs) in each compartment. Some MBONs have inputs from all KCs, while others differentially sample sensory modalities. Only six percent of KC\>MBON synapses receive a direct synapse from a dopaminergic neuron (DAN). We identified two unanticipated classes of synapses, KC\>DAN and DAN\>MBON. DAN activation produces a slow depolarization of the MBON in these DAN\>MBON synapses and can weaken memory recall.

}, doi = {10.7554/eLife.26975}, author = {Takemura, Shin-ya and Aso, Yoshinori and Hige, Toshihide and Wong, Allan M and Lu, Zhiyuan and Xu, C Shan and Rivlin, Patricia K and Hess, Harald F and Zhao, Ting and Parag, Toufiq and Berg, Stuart and Huang, Gary and Katz, William T and Olbris, Donald J and Plaza, Stephen M and Umayam, Lowell A and Aniceto, Roxanne and Chang, Lei-Ann and Lauchie, Shirley and et al} } @article {46940, title = {A common evolutionary origin for the ON- and OFF-edge motion detection pathways of the Drosophila visual system.}, journal = {Frontiers in Neural Circuits}, volume = {9}, year = {2015}, month = {2015}, pages = {33}, abstract = {

Synaptic circuits for identified behaviors in the Drosophila brain have typically been considered from either a developmental or functional perspective without reference to how the circuits might have been inherited from ancestral forms. For example, two candidate pathways for ON- and OFF-edge motion detection in the visual system act via circuits that use respectively either T4 or T5, two cell types of the fourth neuropil, or lobula plate (LOP), that exhibit narrow-field direction-selective responses and provide input to wide-field tangential neurons. T4 or T5 both have four subtypes that terminate one each in the four strata of the LOP. Representatives are reported in a wide range of Diptera, and both cell types exhibit various similarities in: (1) the morphology of their dendritic arbors; (2) their four morphological and functional subtypes; (3) their cholinergic profile in Drosophila; (4) their input from the pathways of L3 cells in the first neuropil, or lamina (LA), and by one of a pair of LA cells, L1 (to the T4 pathway) and L2 (to the T5 pathway); and (5) their innervation by a single, wide-field contralateral tangential neuron from the central brain. Progenitors of both also express the gene atonal early in their proliferation from the inner anlage of the developing optic lobe, being alone among many other cell type progeny to do so. Yet T4 receives input in the second neuropil, or medulla (ME), and T5 in the third neuropil or lobula (LO). Here we suggest that these two cell types were originally one, that their ancestral cell population duplicated and split to innervate separate ME and LO neuropils, and that a fiber crossing-the internal chiasma-arose between the two neuropils. The split most plausibly occurred, we suggest, with the formation of the LO as a new neuropil that formed when it separated from its ancestral neuropil to leave the ME, suggesting additionally that ME input neurons to T4 and T5 may also have had a common origin.

}, issn = {1662-5110}, doi = {10.3389/fncir.2015.00033}, author = {Shinomiya, Kazunori and Takemura, Shin-ya and Rivlin, Patricia K and Plaza, Stephen M and Scheffer, Louis K and Meinertzhagen, Ian A} } @article {46224, title = {A context-aware delayed agglomeration framework for EM segmentation.}, journal = {arXiv}, year = {2014}, month = {2014 Jun 5}, pages = {arXiv:1406.1476 [cs.CV]}, abstract = {

This paper proposes a novel agglomerative framework for Electron Microscopy (EM) image (or volume) segmentation. For the overall segmentation methodology, we propose a context-aware algorithm that clusters the over-segmented regions of different sub-classes (representing different biological entities) in different stages. Furthermore, a delayed scheme for agglomerative clustering, which postpones the merge of newly formed bodies, is also proposed to generate a more confident boundary prediction. We report significant improvements in both segmentation accuracy and speed attained by the proposed approaches over existing standard methods on both 2D and 3D datasets.

}, url = {http://arxiv.org/abs/1406.1476}, author = {Parag, Toufiq and Chakraborty, Anirban and Plaza, Stephen M} }