@article {68507, title = {A connectome and analysis of the adult Drosophila central brain.}, journal = {Elife}, volume = {9}, year = {2020}, month = {2020 Sep 07}, abstract = {

The neural circuits responsible for animal behavior remain largely unknown. We summarize new methods and present the circuitry of a large fraction of the brain of the fruit fly . Improved methods include new procedures to prepare, image, align, segment, find synapses in, and proofread such large data sets. We define cell types, refine computational compartments, and provide an exhaustive atlas of cell examples and types, many of them novel. We provide detailed circuits consisting of neurons and their chemical synapses for most of the central brain. We make the data public and simplify access, reducing the effort needed to answer circuit questions, and provide procedures linking the neurons defined by our analysis with genetic reagents. Biologically, we examine distributions of connection strengths, neural motifs on different scales, electrical consequences of compartmentalization, and evidence that maximizing packing density is an important criterion in the evolution of the fly{\textquoteright}s brain.

}, keywords = {Animals, Brain, Connectome, Drosophila melanogaster, Female, Male, Neurons, Synapses}, issn = {2050-084X}, doi = {10.7554/eLife.57443}, author = {Scheffer, Louis K and Xu, C Shan and Januszewski, Michal and Lu, Zhiyuan and Takemura, Shin-ya and Hayworth, Kenneth J and Huang, Gary B and Shinomiya, Kazunori and Maitlin-Shepard, Jeremy and Berg, Stuart and Clements, Jody and Hubbard, Philip M and Katz, William T and Umayam, Lowell and Zhao, Ting and Ackerman, David and Blakely, Tim and Bogovic, John and Dolafi, Tom and Kainmueller, Dagmar and Kawase, Takashi and Khairy, Khaled A and Leavitt, Laramie and Li, Peter H and Lindsey, Larry and Neubarth, Nicole and Olbris, Donald J and Otsuna, Hideo and Trautman, Eric T and Ito, Masayoshi and Bates, Alexander S and Goldammer, Jens and Wolff, Tanya and Svirskas, Robert and Schlegel, Philipp and Neace, Erika and Knecht, Christopher J and Alvarado, Chelsea X and Bailey, Dennis A and Ballinger, Samantha and Borycz, Jolanta A and Canino, Brandon S and Cheatham, Natasha and Cook, Michael and Dreher, Marisa and Duclos, Octave and Eubanks, Bryon and Fairbanks, Kelli and Finley, Samantha and Forknall, Nora and Francis, Audrey and Hopkins, Gary Patrick and Joyce, Emily M and Kim, SungJin and Kirk, Nicole A and Kovalyak, Julie and Lauchie, Shirley A and Lohff, Alanna and Maldonado, Charli and Manley, Emily A and McLin, Sari and Mooney, Caroline and Ndama, Miatta and Ogundeyi, Omotara and Okeoma, Nneoma and Ordish, Christopher and Padilla, Nicholas and Patrick, Christopher M and Paterson, Tyler and Phillips, Elliott E and Phillips, Emily M and Rampally, Neha and Ribeiro, Caitlin and Robertson, Madelaine K and Rymer, Jon Thomson and Ryan, Sean M and Sammons, Megan and Scott, Anne K and Scott, Ashley L and Shinomiya, Aya and Smith, Claire and Smith, Kelsey and Smith, Natalie L and Sobeski, Margaret A and Suleiman, Alia and Swift, Jackie and Takemura, Satoko and Talebi, Iris and Tarnogorska, Dorota and Tenshaw, Emily and Tokhi, Temour and Walsh, John J and Yang, Tansy and Horne, Jane Anne and Li, Feng and Parekh, Ruchi and Rivlin, Patricia K and Jayaraman, Vivek and Costa, Marta and Jefferis, Gregory Sxe and Ito, Kei and Saalfeld, Stephan and George, Reed and Meinertzhagen, Ian A and Rubin, Gerald M and Hess, Harald F and Jain, Viren and Plaza, Stephen M} } @article {49532, title = {NeuTu: Software for Collaborative, Large-Scale, Segmentation-Based Connectome Reconstruction.}, journal = {Frontiers in Neural Circuits}, volume = {12}, year = {2018}, month = {2018}, pages = {101}, abstract = {

Reconstructing a connectome from an EM dataset often requires a large effort of proofreading automatically generated segmentations. While many tools exist to enable tracing or proofreading, recent advances in EM imaging and segmentation quality suggest new strategies and pose unique challenges for tool design to accelerate proofreading. Namely, we now have access to very large multi-TB EM datasets where (1) many segments are largely correct, (2) segments can be very large (several GigaVoxels), and where (3) several proofreaders and scientists are expected to collaborate simultaneously. In this paper, we introduce NeuTu as a solution to efficiently proofread large, high-quality segmentation in a collaborative setting. NeuTu is a client program of our high-performance, scalable image database called DVID so that it can easily be scaled up. Besides common features of typical proofreading software, NeuTu tames unprecedentedly large data with its distinguishing functions, including: (1) low-latency 3D visualization of large mutable segmentations; (2) interactive splitting of very large false merges with highly optimized semi-automatic segmentation; (3) intuitive user operations for investigating or marking interesting points in 3D visualization; (4) visualizing proofreading history of a segmentation; and (5) real-time collaborative proofreading with lock-based concurrency control. These unique features have allowed us to manage the workflow of proofreading a large dataset smoothly without dividing them into subsets as in other segmentation-based tools. Most importantly, NeuTu has enabled some of the largest connectome reconstructions as well as interesting discoveries in the fly brain.

}, issn = {1662-5110}, doi = {10.3389/fncir.2018.00101}, author = {Zhao, Ting and Olbris, Donald J and Yu, Yang and Plaza, Stephen M} } @article {48658, title = {A connectome of a learning and memory center in the adult Drosophila brain.}, journal = {eLife}, volume = {6}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 Jul 18}, pages = {e26975}, abstract = {

Understanding memory formation, storage and retrieval requires knowledge of the underlying neuronal circuits. In\ Drosophila, the mushroom body (MB) is the major site of associative learning. We reconstructed the morphologies and synaptic connections of all 983 neurons within the three functional units, or compartments, that compose the adult MB{\textquoteright}s α lobe, using a dataset of isotropic 8-nm voxels collected by focused ion-beam milling scanning electron microscopy. We found that Kenyon cells (KCs), whose sparse activity encodes sensory information, each make multiple\ en passant\ synapses to MB output neurons (MBONs) in each compartment. Some MBONs have inputs from all KCs, while others differentially sample sensory modalities. Only six percent of KC\>MBON synapses receive a direct synapse from a dopaminergic neuron (DAN). We identified two unanticipated classes of synapses, KC\>DAN and DAN\>MBON. DAN activation produces a slow depolarization of the MBON in these DAN\>MBON synapses and can weaken memory recall.

}, doi = {10.7554/eLife.26975}, author = {Takemura, Shin-ya and Aso, Yoshinori and Hige, Toshihide and Wong, Allan M and Lu, Zhiyuan and Xu, C Shan and Rivlin, Patricia K and Hess, Harald F and Zhao, Ting and Parag, Toufiq and Berg, Stuart and Huang, Gary and Katz, William T and Olbris, Donald J and Plaza, Stephen M and Umayam, Lowell A and Aniceto, Roxanne and Chang, Lei-Ann and Lauchie, Shirley and et al} } @article {47152, title = {Synaptic circuits and their variations within different columns in the visual system of Drosophila.}, journal = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America}, volume = {112}, year = {2015}, month = {2015 Nov 3}, pages = {13711-6}, abstract = {

We reconstructed the synaptic circuits of seven columns in the second neuropil or medulla behind the fly{\textquoteright}s compound eye. These neurons embody some of the most stereotyped circuits in one of the most miniaturized of animal brains. The reconstructions allow us, for the first time to our knowledge, to study variations between circuits in the medulla{\textquoteright}s neighboring columns. This variation in the number of synapses and the types of their synaptic partners has previously been little addressed because methods that visualize multiple circuits have not resolved detailed connections, and existing connectomic studies, which can see such connections, have not so far examined multiple reconstructions of the same circuit. Here, we address the omission by comparing the circuits common to all seven columns to assess variation in their connection strengths and the resultant rates of several different and distinct types of connection error. Error rates reveal that, overall, \<1\% of contacts are not part of a consensus circuit, and we classify those contacts that supplement (E+) or are missing from it (E-). Autapses, in which the same cell is both presynaptic and postsynaptic at the same synapse, are occasionally seen; two cells in particular, Dm9 and Mi1, form >=20-fold more autapses than do other neurons. These results delimit the accuracy of developmental events that establish and normally maintain synaptic circuits with such precision, and thereby address the operation of such circuits. They also establish a precedent for error rates that will be required in the new science of connectomics.

}, issn = {1091-6490}, doi = {10.1073/pnas.1509820112}, author = {Takemura, Shin-ya and Xu, C Shan and Lu, Zhiyuan and Rivlin, Patricia K and Parag, Toufiq and Olbris, Donald J and Plaza, Stephen and Zhao, Ting and Katz, William T and Umayam, Lowell and Weaver, Charlotte and Hess, Harald F and Horne, Jane Anne and Nunez-Iglesias, Juan and Aniceto, Roxanne and Chang, Lei-Ann and Lauchie, Shirley and Nasca, Ashley and Ogundeyi, Omotara and Sigmund, Christopher and Takemura, Satoko and Tran, Julie and Langille, Carlie and Le Lacheur, Kelsey and McLin, Sari and Shinomiya, Aya and Chklovskii, Dmitri B and Meinertzhagen, Ian A and Scheffer, Louis K} }