@article {69301, title = {Motor neurons generate pose-targeted movements via proprioceptive sculpting.}, journal = {Nature}, year = {2024}, month = {2024 Mar 20}, abstract = {

Motor neurons are the final common pathway through which the brain controls movement of the body, forming the basic elements from which all movement is composed. Yet how a single motor neuron contributes to control during natural movement remains unclear. Here we anatomically and functionally characterize the individual roles of the motor neurons that control head movement in the fly, Drosophila melanogaster. Counterintuitively, we find that activity in a single motor neuron rotates the head in different directions, depending on the starting posture of the head, such that the head converges towards a pose determined by the identity of the stimulated motor neuron. A feedback model predicts that this convergent behaviour results from motor neuron drive interacting with proprioceptive feedback. We identify and genetically suppress a single class of proprioceptive neuron that changes the motor neuron-induced convergence as predicted by the feedback model. These data suggest a framework for how the brain controls movements: instead of directly generating movement in a given direction by activating a fixed set of motor neurons, the brain controls movements by adding bias to a continuing proprioceptive-motor loop.

}, issn = {1476-4687}, doi = {10.1038/s41586-024-07222-5}, author = {Gorko, Benjamin and Siwanowicz, Igor and Close, Kari and Christoforou, Christina and Hibbard, Karen L and Kabra, Mayank and Lee, Allen and Park, Jin-Yong and Li, Si Ying and Chen, Alex B and Namiki, Shigehiro and Chen, Chenghao and Tuthill, John C and Bock, Davi D and Rouault, Herv{\'e} and Branson, Kristin and Ihrke, Gudrun and Huston, Stephen J} } @article {65050, title = {State-dependent decoupling of sensory and motor circuits underlies behavioral flexibility in Drosophila.}, journal = {Nature Neuroscience}, volume = {22}, year = {2019}, month = {2019 Jul 01}, pages = {1132-1139}, abstract = {

An approaching predator and self-motion toward an object can generate similar looming patterns on the retina, but these situations demand different rapid responses. How central circuits flexibly process visual cues to activate appropriate, fast motor pathways remains unclear. Here we identify two descending neuron (DN) types that control landing and contribute to visuomotor flexibility in Drosophila. For each, silencing impairs visually evoked landing, activation drives landing, and spike rate determines leg extension amplitude. Critically, visual responses of both DNs are severely attenuated during non-flight periods, effectively decoupling visual stimuli from the landing motor pathway when landing is inappropriate. The flight-dependence mechanism differs between DN types. Octopamine exposure mimics flight effects in one, whereas the other probably receives neuronal feedback from flight motor circuits. Thus, this sensorimotor flexibility arises from distinct mechanisms for gating action-specific descending pathways, such that sensory and motor networks are coupled or decoupled according to the behavioral state.

}, issn = {1546-1726}, doi = {10.1038/s41593-019-0413-4}, author = {Ache, Jan M and Namiki, Shigehiro and Lee, Allen and Branson, Kristin and Card, Gwyneth M} } @article {48646, title = {Mapping the neural substrates of behavior.}, journal = {Cell}, volume = {170}, year = {2017}, month = {2017-07-13}, pages = {393-406}, abstract = {

Assigning behavioral functions to neural structures has long been a central goal in neuroscience and is a necessary first step toward a circuit-level understanding of how the brain generates behavior. Here, we map the neural substrates of locomotion and social behaviors for Drosophila melanogaster using automated machine-vision and machine-learning techniques. From videos of 400,000 flies, we quantified the behavioral effects of activating 2,204 genetically targeted populations of neurons. We combined a novel quantification of anatomy with our behavioral analysis to create brain-behavior correlation maps, which are shared as browsable web pages and interactive software. Based on these maps, we generated hypotheses of regions of the brain causally related to sensory processing, locomotor control, courtship, aggression, and sleep. Our maps directly specify genetic tools to target these regions, which we used to identify a small population of neurons with a role in the control of walking.

{\textbullet}We developed machine-vision methods to broadly and precisely quantify fly behavior{\textbullet}We measured effects of activating 2,204 genetically targeted neuronal populations{\textbullet}We created whole-brain maps of neural substrates of locomotor and social behaviors{\textbullet}We created resources for exploring our results and enabling further investigation

Machine-vision analyses of large behavior and neuroanatomy data reveal whole-brain maps of regions associated with numerous complex behaviors.

}, doi = {10.1016/j.cell.2017.06.032}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2017.06.032}, author = {Robie, Alice A and Hirokawa, Jonathan and Edwards, Austin W and Umayam, Lowell A and Lee, Allen and Phillips, Mary L and Card, Gwyneth M and Korff, Wyatt and Rubin, Gerald M and Simpson, Julie H and Reiser, Michael B and Branson, Kristin M} } @article {47277, title = {Cortex commands the performance of skilled movement.}, journal = {eLife}, volume = {4}, year = {2015}, month = {2015 Dec 3}, abstract = {

Mammalian cerebral cortex is accepted as being critical for voluntary motor control, but what functions depend on cortex is still unclear. Here we used rapid, reversible optogenetic inhibition to test the role of cortex during a head-fixed task in which mice reach, grab, and eat a food pellet. Sudden cortical inhibition blocked initiation or froze execution of this skilled prehension behavior, but left untrained forelimb movements unaffected. Unexpectedly, kinematically normal prehension occurred immediately after cortical inhibition even during rest periods lacking cue and pellet. This {\textquoteright}rebound{\textquoteright} prehension was only evoked in trained and food-deprived animals, suggesting that a motivation-gated motor engram sufficient to evoke prehension is activated at inhibition{\textquoteright}s end. These results demonstrate the necessity and sufficiency of cortical activity for enacting a learned skill.

}, issn = {2050-084X}, doi = {10.7554/eLife.10774}, author = {Guo, Jian-Zhong and Graves, Austin R and Guo, Wendy W and Zheng, Jihong and Lee, Allen and Rodr{\'\i}guez-Gonz{\'a}lez, Juan and Li, Nuo and Macklin, John J and Phillips, James W and Mensh, Brett D and Branson, Kristin and Hantman, Adam W} }