@article {69705, title = {Permanent cilia loss during cerebellar granule cell neurogenesis involves withdrawal of cilia maintenance and centriole capping.}, journal = {Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A}, volume = {121}, year = {2024}, month = {2024 Dec 24}, pages = {e2408083121}, abstract = {

Brain neurons utilize the primary cilium as a privileged compartment to detect and respond to extracellular ligands such as Sonic hedgehog (SHH). However, cilia in cerebellar granule cell (GC) neurons disassemble during differentiation through ultrastructurally unique intermediates, a process we refer to as cilia deconstruction. In addition, mature neurons do not reciliate despite having docked centrioles. Here, we identify molecular changes that accompany cilia deconstruction and centriole docking in GC neurons. We used single cell transcriptomic and immunocytological analyses to compare the transcript levels and subcellular localization of proteins between progenitor, differentiating, and mature GCs. Differentiating GCs lacked transcripts for key activators of premitotic cilia resorption, indicating that cilia disassembly in differentiating cells is distinct from premitotic cilia resorption. Instead, during differentiation, transcripts of many genes required for cilia maintenance-specifically those encoding components of intraflagellar transport, pericentrosomal material, and centriolar satellites-decreased. The abundance of several corresponding proteins in and around cilia and centrosomes also decreased. These changes coincided with downregulation of SHH signaling prior to differentiation, even in a mutant with excessive SHH activation. Finally, mother centrioles in maturing granule neurons recruited the cap complex protein, CEP97. These data suggest that a global, developmentally programmed decrease in cilium maintenance in differentiating GCs mediates cilia deconstruction, while capping of docked mother centrioles prevents cilia regrowth and dysregulated SHH signaling. Our study provides mechanistic insights expanding our understanding of permanent cilia loss in multiple tissue-specific contexts.

}, keywords = {Animals, Cell Differentiation, Centrioles, Cerebellum, Cilia, Hedgehog Proteins, Mice, Neurogenesis, Neurons, Signal Transduction}, issn = {1091-6490}, doi = {10.1073/pnas.2408083121}, author = {Constable, Sandii and Ott, Carolyn M and Lemire, Andrew L and White, Kevin and Xun, Yu and Lim, Amin and Lippincott-Schwartz, Jennifer and Mukhopadhyay, Saikat} } @article {69136, title = {Permanent deconstruction of intracellular primary cilia in differentiating granule cell neurons.}, journal = {J Cell Biol.}, volume = {223}, year = {2024}, month = {2024 Aug 13}, pages = {e202404038}, abstract = {

Primary cilia on granule cell neuron progenitors in the developing cerebellum detect sonic hedgehog to facilitate proliferation. Following differentiation, cerebellar granule cells become the most abundant neuronal cell type in the brain. While granule cell cilia are essential during early developmental stages, they become infrequent upon maturation. Here, we provide nanoscopic resolution of cilia in situ using large-scale electron microscopy volumes and immunostaining of mouse cerebella. In many granule cells, we found intracellular cilia, concealed from the external environment. Cilia were disassembled in differentiating granule cell neurons-in a process we call cilia deconstruction-distinct from premitotic cilia resorption in proliferating progenitors. In differentiating granule cells, cilia deconstruction involved unique disassembly intermediates, and, as maturation progressed, mother centriolar docking at the plasma membrane. Unlike ciliated neurons in other brain regions, our results show the deconstruction of concealed cilia in differentiating granule cells, which might prevent mitogenic hedgehog responsiveness. Ciliary deconstruction could be paradigmatic of cilia removal during differentiation in other tissues.

}, doi = {10.1016/j.cub.2024.07.036}, url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2024.07.036 }, author = {Ott, Carolyn M and Constable, Sandii and Nguyen, Tri M and White, Kevin and Lee, Wei-Chung Allen and Lippincott-Schwartz, Jennifer and Mukhopadhyay, Saikat} } @article {69459, title = {Ultrastructural differences impact cilia shape and external exposure across cell classes in the visual cortex}, journal = {Curr Biol}, year = {2024}, month = {2024 May 13}, abstract = {

A primary cilium is a membrane-bound extension from the cell surface that contains receptors for perceiving and transmitting signals that modulate cell state and activity. Primary cilia in the brain are less accessible than cilia on cultured cells or epithelial tissues because in the brain they protrude into a deep, dense network of glial and neuronal processes. Here, we investigated cilia frequency, internal structure, shape, and position in large, high-resolution transmission electron microscopy volumes of mouse primary visual cortex. Cilia extended from the cell bodies of nearly all excitatory and inhibitory neurons, astrocytes, and oligodendrocyte precursor cells (OPCs) but were absent from oligodendrocytes and microglia. Ultrastructural comparisons revealed that the base of the cilium and the microtubule organization differed between neurons and glia. Investigating cilia-proximal features revealed that many cilia were directly adjacent to synapses, suggesting that cilia are poised to encounter locally released signaling molecules. Our analysis indicated that synapse proximity is likely due to random encounters in the neuropil, with no evidence that cilia modulate synapse activity as would be expected in tetrapartite synapses. The observed cell class differences in proximity to synapses were largely due to differences in external cilia length. Many key structural features that differed between neuronal and glial cilia influenced both cilium placement and shape and, thus, exposure to processes and synapses outside the cilium. Together, the ultrastructure both within and around neuronal and glial cilia suggest differences in cilia formation and function across cell types in the brain.

}, issn = {1879-0445}, doi = {10.1016/j.cub.2024.04.043}, author = {Ott, Carolyn M and Torres, Russel and Kuan, Tung-Sheng and Kuan, Aaron and Buchanan, JoAnn and Elabbady, Leila and Seshamani, Sharmishtaa and Bodor, Agnes L and Collman, Forrest and Bock, Davi D and Lee, Wei Chung and da Costa, Nuno Ma{\c c}arico and Lippincott-Schwartz, Jennifer} } @article {67646, title = {YAP1 nuclear efflux and transcriptional reprograming follow membrane diminution upon VSV-G-induced cell fusion.}, journal = {Nature Communications}, volume = {12}, year = {2021}, month = {2021 Jul 23}, pages = {4502}, abstract = {

Cells in many tissues, such as bone, muscle, and placenta, fuse into syncytia to acquire new functions and transcriptional programs. While it is known that fused cells are specialized, it is unclear whether cell-fusion itself contributes to programmatic-changes that generate the new cellular state. Here, we address this by employing a fusogen-mediated, cell-fusion system to create syncytia from undifferentiated cells.\ RNA-Seq analysis reveals VSV-G-induced cell fusion precedes transcriptional changes. To gain mechanistic insights, we measure the plasma membrane surface area after cell-fusion and observe it diminishes through increases in endocytosis. Consequently, glucose transporters internalize, and cytoplasmic glucose and ATP transiently decrease. This reduced energetic state activates AMPK, which inhibits YAP1, causing transcriptional-reprogramming and cell-cycle arrest. Impairing either endocytosis or AMPK activity prevents YAP1 inhibition and cell-cycle arrest after fusion. Together, these data demonstrate plasma membrane diminishment upon cell-fusion causes transient nutrient stress that may promote transcriptional-reprogramming independent from extrinsic cues.

}, issn = {2041-1723}, doi = {10.1038/s41467-021-24708-2}, author = {Feliciano, Daniel and Ott, Carolyn M and Isabel Espinosa Medina and Weigel, Aubrey V and Benedetti, Lorena and Milano, Kristin M and Tang, Zhonghua and Lee, Tzumin and Kliman, Harvey J and Guller, Seth M and Lippincott-Schwartz, Jennifer} } @article {51795, title = {Cortical column and whole-brain imaging with molecular contrast and nanoscale resolution.}, journal = {Science (New York, N.Y.)}, volume = {363}, year = {2019}, month = {2019 Jan 18}, pages = {eaau8302}, abstract = {

Optical and electron microscopy have made tremendous inroads toward understanding the complexity of the brain. However, optical microscopy offers insufficient resolution to reveal subcellular details, and electron microscopy lacks the throughput and molecular contrast to visualize specific molecular constituents over millimeter-scale or larger dimensions. We combined expansion microscopy and lattice light-sheet microscopy to image the nanoscale spatial relationships between proteins across the thickness of the mouse cortex or the entire\ Drosophila\ brain. These included synaptic proteins at dendritic spines, myelination along axons, and presynaptic densities at dopaminergic neurons in every fly brain region. The technology should enable statistically rich, large-scale studies of neural development, sexual dimorphism, degree of stereotypy, and structural correlations to behavior or neural activity, all with molecular contrast.

}, doi = {10.1126/science.aau8302}, author = {Gao, Ruixuan and Asano, Shoh M and Upadhyayula, Srigokul and Pisarev, Igor and Milkie, Daniel E and Liu, Tsung-Li and Singh, Ved and Graves, Austin R and Huynh, Grace H and Zhao, Yongxin and Bogovic, John A and Colonell, Jennifer and Ott, Carolyn M and Zugates, Christopher T and Tappan, Susan and Rodriguez, Alfredo and Mosaliganti, Kishore R and Sheu, Shu-Hsien and Pasolli, H Amalia and et al} } @article {47733, title = {Midbody remnant licenses primary cilia formation in epithelial cells.}, journal = {The Journal of Cell Biology}, volume = {214}, year = {2016}, month = {2016 Aug 1}, pages = {237-9}, abstract = {

Tethered midbody remnants dancing across apical microvilli, encountering the centrosome, and beckoning forth a cilium-who would have guessed this is how polarized epithelial cells coordinate the end of mitosis and the beginning of ciliogenesis? New evidence from Bernab{\'e}-Rubio et al. (2016. J. Cell Biol http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201601020) supports this emerging model.

}, issn = {1540-8140}, doi = {10.1083/jcb.201607046}, author = {Ott, Carolyn M} } @article {47619, title = {Intracellular and extracellular forces drive primary cilia movement.}, journal = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America}, volume = {112}, year = {2015}, month = {2015 Feb 3}, pages = {1410-5}, abstract = {

Primary cilia are ubiquitous, microtubule-based organelles that play diverse roles in sensory transduction in many eukaryotic cells. They interrogate the cellular environment through chemosensing, osmosensing, and mechanosensing using receptors and ion channels in the ciliary membrane. Little is known about the mechanical and structural properties of the cilium and how these properties contribute to ciliary perception. We probed the mechanical responses of primary cilia from kidney epithelial cells [Madin-Darby canine kidney-II (MDCK-II)], which sense fluid flow in renal ducts. We found that, on manipulation with an optical trap, cilia deflect by bending along their length and pivoting around an effective hinge located below the basal body. The calculated bending rigidity indicates weak microtubule doublet coupling. Primary cilia of MDCK cells lack interdoublet dynein motors. Nevertheless, we found that the organelles display active motility. 3D tracking showed correlated fluctuations of the cilium and basal body. These angular movements seemed random but were dependent on ATP and cytoplasmic myosin-II in the cell cortex. We conclude that force generation by the actin cytoskeleton surrounding the basal body results in active ciliary movement. We speculate that actin-driven ciliary movement might tune and calibrate ciliary sensory functions.

}, keywords = {Animals, Centrosome, Cilia, Dogs, Madin Darby Canine Kidney Cells, Microscopy, Electron, Movement}, issn = {1091-6490}, doi = {10.1073/pnas.1421845112}, author = {Battle, Christopher and Ott, Carolyn M and Burnette, Dylan T and Lippincott-Schwartz, Jennifer and Schmidt, Christoph F} }