@article {68889, title = {Neuronal wiring diagram of an adult brain.}, journal = {Nature}, volume = {634}, year = {2024}, month = {2024 Oct 02}, pages = {124-138}, abstract = {

Connections between neurons can be mapped by acquiring and analysing electron microscopic brain images. In recent years, this approach has been applied to chunks of brains to reconstruct local connectivity maps that are highly informative, but nevertheless inadequate for understanding brain function more globally. Here we present a neuronal wiring diagram of a whole brain containing 5 {\texttimes} 107 chemical synapses between 139,255 neurons reconstructed from an adult female Drosophila melanogaster. The resource also incorporates annotations of cell classes and types, nerves, hemilineages and predictions of neurotransmitter identities. Data products are available for download, programmatic access and interactive browsing and have been made interoperable with other fly data resources. We derive a projectome-a map of projections between regions-from the connectome and report on tracing of synaptic pathways and the analysis of information flow from inputs (sensory and ascending neurons) to outputs (motor, endocrine and descending neurons) across both hemispheres and between the central brain and the optic lobes. Tracing from a subset of photoreceptors to descending motor pathways illustrates how structure can uncover putative circuit mechanisms underlying sensorimotor behaviours. The technologies and open ecosystem reported here set the stage for future large-scale connectome projects in other species.

}, doi = {10.1038/s41586-024-07558-y}, url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07558-y}, author = {Dorkenwald, Sven and Matsliah, Arie and Sterling, Amy R and Schlegel, Philipp and Yu, Szi-Chieh and McKellar, Claire E and Lin, Albert and Costa, Marta and Eichler, Katharina and Yin, Yijie and Silversmith, Will and Schneider-Mizell, Casey and Jordan, Chris S and Brittain, Derrick and Halageri, Akhilesh and Kuehner, Kai and Ogedengbe, Oluwaseun and Morey, Ryan and Gager, Jay and Kruk, Krzysztof and Perlman, Eric and Yang, Runzhe and Deutsch, David and Bland, Doug and Sorek, Marissa and Lu, Ran and Macrina, Thomas and Lee, Kisuk and Bae, J Alexander and Mu, Shang and Nehoran, Barak and Mitchell, Eric and Popovych, Sergiy and Wu, Jingpeng and Jia, Zhen and Castro, Manuel and Kemnitz, Nico and Ih, Dodam and Bates, Alexander Shakeel and Eckstein, Nils and Funke, Jan and Collman, Forrest and Bock, Davi D and Jefferis, Gregory S X E and Seung, H Sebastian and Murthy, Mala} } @article {69459, title = {Ultrastructural differences impact cilia shape and external exposure across cell classes in the visual cortex}, journal = {Curr Biol}, year = {2024}, month = {2024 May 13}, abstract = {

A primary cilium is a membrane-bound extension from the cell surface that contains receptors for perceiving and transmitting signals that modulate cell state and activity. Primary cilia in the brain are less accessible than cilia on cultured cells or epithelial tissues because in the brain they protrude into a deep, dense network of glial and neuronal processes. Here, we investigated cilia frequency, internal structure, shape, and position in large, high-resolution transmission electron microscopy volumes of mouse primary visual cortex. Cilia extended from the cell bodies of nearly all excitatory and inhibitory neurons, astrocytes, and oligodendrocyte precursor cells (OPCs) but were absent from oligodendrocytes and microglia. Ultrastructural comparisons revealed that the base of the cilium and the microtubule organization differed between neurons and glia. Investigating cilia-proximal features revealed that many cilia were directly adjacent to synapses, suggesting that cilia are poised to encounter locally released signaling molecules. Our analysis indicated that synapse proximity is likely due to random encounters in the neuropil, with no evidence that cilia modulate synapse activity as would be expected in tetrapartite synapses. The observed cell class differences in proximity to synapses were largely due to differences in external cilia length. Many key structural features that differed between neuronal and glial cilia influenced both cilium placement and shape and, thus, exposure to processes and synapses outside the cilium. Together, the ultrastructure both within and around neuronal and glial cilia suggest differences in cilia formation and function across cell types in the brain.

}, issn = {1879-0445}, doi = {10.1016/j.cub.2024.04.043}, author = {Ott, Carolyn M and Torres, Russel and Kuan, Tung-Sheng and Kuan, Aaron and Buchanan, JoAnn and Elabbady, Leila and Seshamani, Sharmishtaa and Bodor, Agnes L and Collman, Forrest and Bock, Davi D and Lee, Wei Chung and da Costa, Nuno Ma{\c c}arico and Lippincott-Schwartz, Jennifer} } @article {68512, title = {Oligodendrocyte precursor cells ingest axons in the mouse neocortex.}, journal = {Proceedings of the National Academies of Science of the U.S.A.}, volume = {119}, year = {2022}, month = {2022 Nov 29}, pages = {e2202580119}, abstract = {

Neurons in the developing brain undergo extensive structural refinement as nascent circuits adopt their mature form. This physical transformation of neurons is facilitated by the engulfment and degradation of axonal branches and synapses by surrounding glial cells, including microglia and astrocytes. However, the small size of phagocytic organelles and the complex, highly ramified morphology of glia have made it difficult to define the contribution of these and other glial cell types to this crucial process. Here, we used large-scale, serial section transmission\ electron microscopy (TEM) with computational volume segmentation to reconstruct the complete 3D morphologies of distinct glial types in the mouse visual cortex, providing unprecedented resolution of their morphology and composition. Unexpectedly, we discovered that the fine processes of oligodendrocyte precursor cells (OPCs), a population of abundant, highly dynamic glial progenitors, frequently surrounded small branches of axons. Numerous phagosomes and phagolysosomes (PLs) containing fragments of axons and vesicular structures were present inside their processes, suggesting that OPCs engage in axon pruning. Single-nucleus RNA sequencing from the developing mouse cortex revealed that OPCs express key phagocytic genes at this stage, as well as neuronal transcripts, consistent with active axon engulfment. Although microglia are thought to be responsible for the majority of synaptic pruning and structural refinement, PLs were ten times more abundant in OPCs than in microglia at this stage, and these structures were markedly less abundant in newly generated oligodendrocytes, suggesting that OPCs contribute substantially to the refinement of neuronal circuits during cortical development.

}, keywords = {Animals, Axons, Mice, Neocortex, Neurons, Oligodendrocyte Precursor Cells, Oligodendroglia}, issn = {1091-6490}, doi = {10.1073/pnas.2202580119}, author = {Buchanan, JoAnn and Elabbady, Leila and Collman, Forrest and Jorstad, Nikolas L and Bakken, Trygve E and Ott, Carolyn and Glatzer, Jenna and Bleckert, Adam A and Bodor, Agnes L and Brittain, Derrick and Bumbarger, Daniel J and Mahalingam, Gayathri and Seshamani, Sharmishtaa and Schneider-Mizell, Casey and Takeno, Marc M and Torres, Russel and Yin, Wenjing and Hodge, Rebecca D and Castro, Manuel and Dorkenwald, Sven and Ih, Dodam and Jordan, Chris S and Kemnitz, Nico and Lee, Kisuk and Lu, Ran and Macrina, Thomas and Mu, Shang and Popovych, Sergiy and Silversmith, William M and Tartavull, Ignacio and Turner, Nicholas L and Wilson, Alyssa M and Wong, William and Wu, Jingpeng and Zlateski, Aleksandar and Zung, Jonathan and Lippincott-Schwartz, Jennifer and Lein, Ed S and Seung, H Sebastian and Bergles, Dwight E and Reid, R Clay and da Costa, Nuno Ma{\c c}arico} } @article {68251, title = {A scalable and modular automated pipeline for stitching of large electron microscopy datasets.}, journal = {eLife}, volume = {11}, year = {2022}, month = {2022 Jul 26}, abstract = {

Serial-section electronmicroscopy (ssEM) is themethod of choice for studyingmacroscopic biological samples at extremely high resolution in three dimensions. In the nervous system, nanometer-scale images are necessary to reconstruct dense neural wiring diagrams in the brain, so called connectomes. In order to use this data, consisting of up to 10 individual EM images, it must be assembled into a volume, requiring seamless 2D stitching from each physical section followed by 3D alignment of the stitched sections. The high throughput of ssEM necessitates 2D stitching to be done at the pace of imaging, which currently produces tens of terabytes per day. To achieve this, we present a modular volume assembly software pipeline ASAP (Assembly Stitching and Alignment Pipeline) that is scalable to datasets containing petabytes of data and parallelized to work in a distributed computational environment. The pipeline is built on top of the Render (27) services used in the volume assembly of the brain of adult Drosophilamelanogaster (30). It achieves high throughput by operating on themeta-data and transformations of each image stored in a database, thus eliminating the need to render intermediate output. ASAP ismodular, allowing for easy incorporation of new algorithms without significant changes in the workflow. The entire software pipeline includes a complete set of tools for stitching, automated quality control, 3D section alignment, and final rendering of the assembled volume to disk. ASAP has been deployed for continuous stitching of several large-scale datasets of the mouse visual cortex and human brain samples including one cubic millimeter of mouse visual cortex (28; 8) at speeds that exceed imaging. The pipeline also has multi-channel processing capabilities and can be applied to fluorescence and multi-modal datasets like array tomography.

}, issn = {2050-084X}, doi = {10.7554/eLife.76534}, author = {Mahalingam, Gayathri and Torres, Russel and Kapner, Daniel and Trautman, Eric T and Fliss, Tim and Seshamani, Shamishtaa and Perlman, Eric and Young, Rob and Kinn, Samuel and Buchanan, JoAnn and Takeno, Marc M and Yin, Wenjing and Bumbarger, Daniel J and Gwinn, Ryder P and Nyhus, Julie and Lein, Ed and Smith, Steven J and Reid, R Clay and Khairy, Khaled A and Saalfeld, Stephan and Collman, Forrest and Macarico da Costa, Nuno} } @article {49149, title = {A community-developed Open-Source computational ecosystem for big neuro data.}, journal = {Nature Methods}, volume = {15}, year = {2018}, month = {2018 Nov}, pages = {846-7}, abstract = {

Big imaging data is becoming more prominent in brain sciences across spatiotemporal scales and phylogenies. We have developed a computational ecosystem that enables storage, visualization, and analysis of these data in the cloud, thusfar spanning 20+ publications and 100+ terabytes including nanoscale ultrastructure, microscale synaptogenetic diversity, and mesoscale whole brain connectivity, making NeuroData the largest and most diverse open repository of brain data.

}, doi = {10.1038/s41592-018-0181-1}, author = {Vogelstein, Joshua T and Perlman, Eric and Falk, Benjamin and Baden, Alex and Roncal, William Gray and Chandrashekhar, Vikram and Collman, Forrest and Seshamani, Sharmishtaa and Patsolic, Jesse and Lillaney, Kunal and Kazhdan, Michael and Hider Jr., Robert and Pryor, Derek and Matelsky, Jordan and Gion, Timothy and Manavalan, Priya and Wester, Brock and Chevillet, Mark and Trautman, Eric T and Khairy, Khaled} } @article {49095, title = {NeuroStorm: accelerating brain science discovery in the cloud.}, journal = {arXiv}, year = {2018}, month = {2018 Mar 09}, abstract = {

Neuroscientists are now able to acquire data at staggering rates across spatiotemporal scales. However, our ability to capitalize on existing datasets, tools, and intellectual capacities is hampered by technical challenges. The key barriers to accelerating scientific discovery correspond to the FAIR data principles: findability, global access to data, software interoperability, and reproducibility/re-usability. We conducted a hackathon dedicated to making strides in those steps. This manuscript is a technical report summarizing these achievements, and we hope serves as an example of the effectiveness of focused, deliberate hackathons towards the advancement of our quickly-evolving field.

}, url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.03367}, author = {Kiar, Gregory and Anderson, Robert J and Baden, Alex and Badea, Alexandra and Bridgeford, Eric W and Champion, Andrew and Chandrashekar, Jayaram and Collman, Forrest and Duderstadt, Brandon and Evans, Alan C and Engert, Florian and Falk, Benjamin and Glatard, Tristan and Roncal, William Gray and Kennedy, David N and Maitlin-Shepard and Marren, Ryan A and Nnaemeka, Onyeka and Perlman, Eric and Seshamani, Sharmishtaas} } @article {47895, title = {Canonical genetic signatures of the adult human brain.}, journal = {Nature neuroscience}, volume = {18}, year = {2015}, month = {2015 Dec}, pages = {1832-44}, abstract = {

The structure and function of the human brain are highly stereotyped, implying a conserved molecular program responsible for its development, cellular structure and function. We applied a correlation-based metric called differential stability to assess reproducibility of gene expression patterning across 132 structures in six individual brains, revealing mesoscale genetic organization. The genes with the highest differential stability are highly biologically relevant, with enrichment for brain-related annotations, disease associations, drug targets and literature citations. Using genes with high differential stability, we identified 32 anatomically diverse and reproducible gene expression signatures, which represent distinct cell types, intracellular components and/or associations with neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative disorders. Genes in neuron-associated compared to non-neuronal networks showed higher preservation between human and mouse; however, many diversely patterned genes displayed marked shifts in regulation between species. Finally, highly consistent transcriptional architecture in neocortex is correlated with resting state functional connectivity, suggesting a link between conserved gene expression and functionally relevant circuitry.

}, keywords = {Adult, Animals, Brain, Gene Regulatory Networks, Humans, Mice, Nerve Net, Transcriptome}, issn = {1546-1726}, doi = {10.1038/nn.4171}, author = {Hawrylycz, Michael and Miller, Jeremy A and Menon, Vilas and Feng, David and Dolbeare, Tim and Guillozet-Bongaarts, Angela L and Jegga, Anil G and Aronow, Bruce J and Lee, Chang-Kyu and Bernard, Amy and Glasser, Matthew F and Dierker, Donna L and Menche, J{\"o}rg and Szafer, Aaron and Collman, Forrest and Grange, Pascal and Berman, Kenneth A and Mihalas, Stefan and Yao, Zizhen and Stewart, Lance and Barab{\'a}si, Albert-L{\'a}szl{\'o} and Schulkin, Jay and Phillips, John and Ng, Lydia and Dang, Chinh and Haynor, David R and Jones, Allan and Van Essen, David C and Koch, Christof and Lein, Ed} }