@article {69721, title = {A split-GAL4 driver line resource for Drosophila neuron types}, year = {2025}, month = {01/2025}, doi = {10.7554/elife.98405.3}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.98405.3}, author = {Meissner, Geoffrey W and Vannan, Allison and Jeter, Jennifer and Close, Kari and Depasquale, Gina M and Dorman, Zachary and Forster, Kaitlyn and Beringer, Jaye Anne and Gibney, Theresa V and Hausenfluck, Joanna H and He, Yisheng and Henderson, Kristin and Johnson, Lauren and Johnston, Rebecca M and Ihrke, Gudrun and Iyer, Nirmala and Lazarus, Rachel and Lee, Kelley and Li, Hsing-Hsi and Liaw, Hua-Peng and Melton, Brian and Miller, Scott and Motaher, Reeham and Novak, Alexandra and Ogundeyi, Omotara and Petruncio, Alyson and Price, Jacquelyn and Protopapas, Sophia and Tae, Susana and Taylor, Jennifer and Vorimo, Rebecca and Yarbrough, Brianna and Zeng, Kevin Xiankun and Zugates, Christopher T and Dionne, Heather and Angstadt, Claire and Ashley, Kelly and Cavallaro, Amanda and Dang, Tam and Gonzalez, Guillermo A and Hibbard, Karen L and Huang, Cuizhen and Kao, Jui-Chun and Laverty, Todd and Mercer, Monti and Perez, Brenda and Pitts, Scarlett and Ruiz, Danielle and Vallanadu, Viruthika and Zheng, Grace Zhiyu and Goina, Cristian and Otsuna, Hideo and Rokicki, Konrad and Svirskas, Robert R and Cheong, Han Sj and Dolan, Michael-John and Ehrhardt, Erica and Feng, Kai and El Galfi, Basel and Goldammer, Jens and Huston, Stephen J and Hu, Nan and Ito, Masayoshi and McKellar, Claire and minegishi, ryo and Namiki, Shigehiro and Nern, Aljoscha and Schretter, Catherine E and Sterne, Gabriella R and Venkatasubramanian, Lalanti and Wang, Kaiyu and Wolff, Tanya and Wu, Ming and George, Reed and Malkesman, Oz and Aso, Yoshinori and Card, Gwyneth M and Dickson, Barry J and Korff, Wyatt and Ito, Kei and Truman, James W and Zlatic, Marta and Rubin, Gerald M} } @article {69548, title = {Cohesin prevents cross-domain gene coactivation.}, journal = {Nat Genet}, year = {2024}, month = {2024 Jul 24}, abstract = {

The contrast between the disruption of genome topology after cohesin loss and the lack of downstream gene expression changes instigates intense debates regarding the structure-function relationship between genome and gene regulation. Here, by analyzing transcriptome and chromatin accessibility at the single-cell level, we discover that, instead of dictating population-wide gene expression levels, cohesin supplies a general function to neutralize stochastic coexpression tendencies of cis-linked genes in single cells. Notably, cohesin loss induces widespread gene coactivation and chromatin co-opening tens of million bases apart in cis. Spatial genome and protein imaging reveals that cohesin prevents gene co-bursting along the chromosome and blocks spatial mixing of transcriptional hubs. Single-molecule imaging shows that cohesin confines the exploration of diverse enhancer and core promoter binding transcriptional regulators. Together, these results support that cohesin arranges nuclear topology to control gene coexpression in single cells.

}, issn = {1546-1718}, doi = {10.1038/s41588-024-01852-1}, url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-024-01852-1}, author = {Dong, Peng and Zhang, Shu and Gandin, Valentina and Xie, Liangqi and Wang, Lihua and Lemire, Andrew L and Li, Wenhong and Otsuna, Hideo and Kawase, Takashi and Lander, Arthur D and Chang, Howard Y and Liu, Zhe J} } @article {69576, title = {An Image Processing Tool for Automated Quantification of Bacterial Burdens in Zebrafish Larvae}, journal = {bioRxiv}, year = {2024}, month = {2024 Aug 19}, abstract = {

Zebrafish larvae are used to model the pathogenesis of multiple bacteria. This transparent model offers the unique advantage of allowing quantification of fluorescent bacterial burdens (fluorescent pixel counts: FPC) in vivo by facile microscopical methods, replacing enumeration of bacteria using time-intensive plating of lysates on bacteriological media. Accurate FPC measurements require laborious manual image processing to mark the outside borders of the animals so as to delineate the bacteria inside the animals from those in the culture medium that they are in. Here, we have developed an automated ImageJ/Fiji-based macro that accurately detect the outside borders of Mycobacterium marinum-infected larvae.

}, doi = {10.1101/2024.08.16.608298}, url = {hhtps://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.16.608298}, author = {Yamaguchi, Naoya and Otsuna, Hideo and Eisenberg-Bord, Michal and Ramakrishnan, Lalita} } @article {69708, title = {An Image Processing Tool for Automated Quantification of Bacterial Burdens in Zebrafish Larvae.}, journal = {Zebrafish}, year = {2024}, month = {12/2024}, abstract = {

Zebrafish larvae are used to model the pathogenesis of multiple bacteria. This transparent model offers the unique advantage of allowing quantification of fluorescent bacterial burdens (fluorescent pixel counts [FPC]) by facile microscopical methods, replacing enumeration of bacteria using time-intensive plating of lysates on bacteriological media. Accurate FPC measurements require laborious manual image processing to mark the outside borders of the animals so as to delineate the bacteria inside the animals from those in the culture medium that they are in. Here, we have developed an automated ImageJ/Fiji-based macro that accurately detects the outside borders of -infected larvae.

}, issn = {1557-8542}, doi = {10.1089/zeb.2024.0170}, author = {Yamaguchi, Naoya and Otsuna, Hideo and Eisenberg-Bord, Michal and Ramakrishnan, Lalita} } @article {68629, title = {A searchable image resource of Drosophila GAL4-driver expression patterns with single neuron resolution.}, journal = {eLife}, volume = {12}, year = {2023}, month = {2023 Feb 23}, abstract = {

Precise, repeatable genetic access to specific neurons via GAL4/UAS and related methods is a key advantage of Drosophila neuroscience. Neuronal targeting is typically documented using light microscopy of full GAL4 expression patterns, which generally lack the single-cell resolution required for reliable cell type identification. Here we use stochastic GAL4 labeling with the MultiColor FlpOut approach to generate cellular resolution confocal images at large scale. We are releasing aligned images of 74,000 such adult central nervous systems. An anticipated use of this resource is to bridge the gap between neurons identified by electron or light microscopy. Identifying individual neurons that make up each GAL4 expression pattern improves the prediction of split-GAL4 combinations targeting particular neurons. To this end we have made the images searchable on the NeuronBridge website. We demonstrate the potential of NeuronBridge to rapidly and effectively identify neuron matches based on morphology across imaging modalities and datasets.

}, issn = {2050-084X}, doi = {10.7554/eLife.80660}, author = {Meissner, Geoffrey Wilson and Nern, Aljoscha and Dorman, Zachary and Depasquale, Gina M and Forster, Kaitlyn and Gibney, Theresa and Hausenfluck, Joanna H and He, Yisheng and Iyer, Nirmala A and Jeter, Jennifer and Johnson, Lauren and Johnston, Rebecca M and Lee, Kelley and Melton, Brian and Yarbrough, Brianna and Zugates, Christopher T and Clements, Jody and Goina, Cristian and Otsuna, Hideo and Rokicki, Konrad and Svirskas, Robert R and Aso, Yoshinori and Card, Gwyneth M and Dickson, Barry J and Ehrhardt, Erica and Goldammer, Jens and Ito, Masayoshi and Kainmueller, Dagmar and Korff, Wyatt and Mais, Lisa and minegishi, ryo and Namiki, Shigehiro and Rubin, Gerald M and Sterne, Gabriella R and Wolff, Tanya and Malkesman, Oz} } @article {67714, title = {Classification and genetic targeting of cell types in the primary taste and premotor center of the adult brain.}, journal = {eLife}, volume = {10}, year = {2021}, month = {2021 Sep 02}, abstract = {

Neural circuits carry out complex computations that allow animals to evaluate food, select mates, move toward attractive stimuli, and move away from threats. In insects, the subesophageal zone (SEZ) is a brain region that receives gustatory, pheromonal, and mechanosensory inputs and contributes to the control of diverse behaviors, including feeding, grooming, and locomotion. Despite its importance in sensorimotor transformations, the study of SEZ circuits has been hindered by limited knowledge of the underlying diversity of SEZ neurons. Here, we generate a collection of split-GAL4 lines that provides precise genetic targeting of 138 different SEZ cell types in adult , comprising approximately one third of all SEZ neurons. We characterize the single cell anatomy of these neurons and find that they cluster by morphology into six supergroups that organize the SEZ into discrete anatomical domains. We find that the majority of local SEZ interneurons are not classically polarized, suggesting rich local processing, whereas SEZ projection neurons tend to be classically polarized, conveying information to a limited number of higher brain regions. This study provides insight into the anatomical organization of the SEZ and generates resources that will facilitate further study of SEZ neurons and their contributions to sensory processing and behavior.

}, issn = {2050-084X}, doi = {10.7554/eLife.71679}, author = {Sterne, Gabriella R and Otsuna, Hideo and Dickson, Barry J and Scott, Kristin} } @article {68507, title = {A connectome and analysis of the adult Drosophila central brain.}, journal = {Elife}, volume = {9}, year = {2020}, month = {2020 Sep 07}, abstract = {

The neural circuits responsible for animal behavior remain largely unknown. We summarize new methods and present the circuitry of a large fraction of the brain of the fruit fly . Improved methods include new procedures to prepare, image, align, segment, find synapses in, and proofread such large data sets. We define cell types, refine computational compartments, and provide an exhaustive atlas of cell examples and types, many of them novel. We provide detailed circuits consisting of neurons and their chemical synapses for most of the central brain. We make the data public and simplify access, reducing the effort needed to answer circuit questions, and provide procedures linking the neurons defined by our analysis with genetic reagents. Biologically, we examine distributions of connection strengths, neural motifs on different scales, electrical consequences of compartmentalization, and evidence that maximizing packing density is an important criterion in the evolution of the fly{\textquoteright}s brain.

}, keywords = {Animals, Brain, Connectome, Drosophila melanogaster, Female, Male, Neurons, Synapses}, issn = {2050-084X}, doi = {10.7554/eLife.57443}, author = {Scheffer, Louis K and Xu, C Shan and Januszewski, Michal and Lu, Zhiyuan and Takemura, Shin-ya and Hayworth, Kenneth J and Huang, Gary B and Shinomiya, Kazunori and Maitlin-Shepard, Jeremy and Berg, Stuart and Clements, Jody and Hubbard, Philip M and Katz, William T and Umayam, Lowell and Zhao, Ting and Ackerman, David and Blakely, Tim and Bogovic, John and Dolafi, Tom and Kainmueller, Dagmar and Kawase, Takashi and Khairy, Khaled A and Leavitt, Laramie and Li, Peter H and Lindsey, Larry and Neubarth, Nicole and Olbris, Donald J and Otsuna, Hideo and Trautman, Eric T and Ito, Masayoshi and Bates, Alexander S and Goldammer, Jens and Wolff, Tanya and Svirskas, Robert and Schlegel, Philipp and Neace, Erika and Knecht, Christopher J and Alvarado, Chelsea X and Bailey, Dennis A and Ballinger, Samantha and Borycz, Jolanta A and Canino, Brandon S and Cheatham, Natasha and Cook, Michael and Dreher, Marisa and Duclos, Octave and Eubanks, Bryon and Fairbanks, Kelli and Finley, Samantha and Forknall, Nora and Francis, Audrey and Hopkins, Gary Patrick and Joyce, Emily M and Kim, SungJin and Kirk, Nicole A and Kovalyak, Julie and Lauchie, Shirley A and Lohff, Alanna and Maldonado, Charli and Manley, Emily A and McLin, Sari and Mooney, Caroline and Ndama, Miatta and Ogundeyi, Omotara and Okeoma, Nneoma and Ordish, Christopher and Padilla, Nicholas and Patrick, Christopher M and Paterson, Tyler and Phillips, Elliott E and Phillips, Emily M and Rampally, Neha and Ribeiro, Caitlin and Robertson, Madelaine K and Rymer, Jon Thomson and Ryan, Sean M and Sammons, Megan and Scott, Anne K and Scott, Ashley L and Shinomiya, Aya and Smith, Claire and Smith, Kelsey and Smith, Natalie L and Sobeski, Margaret A and Suleiman, Alia and Swift, Jackie and Takemura, Satoko and Talebi, Iris and Tarnogorska, Dorota and Tenshaw, Emily and Tokhi, Temour and Walsh, John J and Yang, Tansy and Horne, Jane Anne and Li, Feng and Parekh, Ruchi and Rivlin, Patricia K and Jayaraman, Vivek and Costa, Marta and Jefferis, Gregory Sxe and Ito, Kei and Saalfeld, Stephan and George, Reed and Meinertzhagen, Ian A and Rubin, Gerald M and Hess, Harald F and Jain, Viren and Plaza, Stephen M} } @article {65382, title = {Conservation and divergence of related neuronal lineages in the central brain.}, journal = {eLife}, volume = {9}, year = {2020}, month = {2020 Apr 07}, abstract = {

Wiring a complex brain requires many neurons with intricate cell specificity, generated by a limited number of neural stem cells. central brain lineages are a predetermined series of neurons, born in a specific order. To understand how lineage identity translates to neuron morphology, we mapped 18 central brain lineages. While we found large aggregate differences between lineages, we also discovered shared patterns of morphological diversification. Lineage identity plus Notch-mediated sister fate govern primary neuron trajectories, whereas temporal fate diversifies terminal elaborations. Further, morphological neuron types may arise repeatedly, interspersed with other types. Despite the complexity, related lineages produce similar neuron types in comparable temporal patterns. Different stem cells even yield two identical series of dopaminergic neuron types, but with unrelated sister neurons. Together, these phenomena suggest that straightforward rules drive incredible neuronal complexity, and that large changes in morphology can result from relatively simple fating mechanisms.

}, issn = {2050-084X}, doi = {10.7554/eLife.53518}, author = {Lee, Ying-Jou and Yang, Ching-Po and Miyares, Rosa L and Huang, Yu-Fen and He, Yisheng and Ren, Qingzhong and Chen, Hui-Min and Kawase, Takashi and Ito, Masayoshi and Otsuna, Hideo and Sugino, Ken and Aso, Yoshi and Ito, Kei and Lee, Tzumin} } @article {65910, title = {An unbiased template of the Drosophila brain and ventral nerve cord.}, journal = {PLoS One}, volume = {15}, year = {2020}, month = {2020 Dec 31}, pages = {e0236495}, abstract = {

The fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster is an important model organism for neuroscience with a wide array of genetic tools that enable the mapping of individual neurons and neural subtypes. Brain templates are essential for comparative biological studies because they enable analyzing many individuals in a common reference space. Several central brain templates exist for Drosophila, but every one is either biased, uses sub-optimal tissue preparation, is imaged at low resolution, or does not account for artifacts. No publicly available Drosophila ventral nerve cord template currently exists. In this work, we created high-resolution templates of the Drosophila brain and ventral nerve cord using the best-available technologies for imaging, artifact correction, stitching, and template construction using groupwise registration. We evaluated our central brain template against the four most competitive, publicly available brain templates and demonstrate that ours enables more accurate registration with fewer local deformations in shorter time.

}, issn = {1932-6203}, doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0236495}, author = {Bogovic, John A and Otsuna, Hideo and Heinrich, Larissa and Ito, Masayoshi and Jeter, Jennifer and Meissner, Geoffrey and Nern, Aljoscha and Colonell, Jennifer and Malkesman, Oz and Ito, Kei and Saalfeld, Stephan} } @article {49236, title = {Color depth MIP mask search: a new tool to expedite Split-GAL4 creation.}, journal = {bioRxiv}, year = {2018}, month = {2018 May 09}, abstract = {

The GAL4-UAS system has proven its versatility in studying the function and expression patterns of neurons the Drosophila central nervous system. Although the GAL4 system has been used for 25 years, recent genetic intersectional tools have enabled genetic targeting of very small numbers of neurons aiding in the understanding of their function. This split-GAL4 system is extremely powerful for studying neuronal morphology and the neural basis of animal behavior. However, choosing lines to intersect that have overlapping patterns restricted to one to a few neurons has been cumbersome. This challenge is now growing as the collections of GAL4 driver lines has increased. Here we present a new method and software plug-in for Fiji to dramatically improve the speed of querying large databases of potential lines to intersect and aid in the split-GAL4 creation. We also provide pre-computed datasets for the Janelia GAL4 (5,738 lines) and VT GAL4 (7,429 lines) of the Drosophila central nervous system (CNS). The tool reduced our split-GAL4 creation effort dramatically.

}, doi = {10.1101/318006}, author = {Otsuna, Hideo and Ito, Masayoshi and Kawase, Takashi} } @article {49386, title = {An unbiased template of the Drosophila brain and ventral nerve cord.}, journal = {bioRxiv}, year = {2018}, month = {2018 Jul 25}, abstract = {

The fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster is an important model organism for neuroscience with a wide array of genetic tools that enable the mapping of individuals neurons and neural subtypes. Brain templates are essential for comparative biological studies because they enable analyzing many individuals in a common reference space. Several central brain templates exist for Drosophila, but every one is either biased, uses sub-optimal tissue preparation, is imaged at low resolution, or does not account for artifacts. No publicly available Drosophila ventral nerve cord template currently exists. In this work, we created high-resolution templates of the Drosophila brain and ventral nerve cord using the best-available technologies for imaging, artifact correction, stitching, and template construction using groupwise registration. We evaluated our central brain template against the four most competitive, publicly available brain templates and demonstrate that ours enables more accurate registration with fewer local deformations in shorter time.

}, doi = {10.1101/376384}, author = {Bogovic, John A and Otsuna, Hideo and Heinrich, Larissa and Ito, Masayoshi and Jeter, Jennifer and Meissner, Geoffrey W and Nern, Aljoscha and Colonell, Jennifer and Malkesman, Oz and Saalfeld, Stephan} } @article {48435, title = {Stem cell-intrinsic, seven-up-triggered temporal factor gradients diversify intermediate neural progenitors.}, journal = {Current Biology : CB}, volume = {27}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 Apr 10}, pages = {1303-13}, abstract = {

Building a sizable, complex brain requires both cellular expansion and diversification. One mechanism to achieve these goals is production of multiple transiently amplifying intermediate neural progenitors (INPs) from a single neural stem cell. Like mammalian neural stem cells, Drosophila type II neuroblasts utilize INPs to produce neurons and glia. Within a given lineage, the consecutively born INPs produce morphologically distinct progeny, presumably due to differential inheritance of temporal factors. To uncover the underlying temporal fating mechanisms, we profiled type II neuroblasts{\textquoteright} transcriptome across time. Our results reveal opposing temporal gradients of Imp and Syp RNA-binding proteins (descending and ascending, respectively). Maintaining high Imp throughout serial INP production expands the number of neurons and glia with early temporal fate at the expense of cells with late fate. Conversely, precocious upregulation of Syp reduces the number of cells with early fate. Furthermore, we reveal that the transcription factor Seven-up initiates progression of the Imp/Syp gradients. Interestingly, neuroblasts that maintain initial Imp/Syp levels can still yield progeny with a small range of early fates. We therefore propose that the Seven-up-initiated Imp/Syp gradients create coarse temporal windows within type II neuroblasts to pattern INPs, which subsequently undergo fine-tuned subtemporal patterning.

}, issn = {1879-0445}, doi = {10.1016/j.cub.2017.03.047}, author = {Ren, Qingzhong and Yang, Ching-Po and Liu, Zhiyong and Sugino, Ken and Mok, Kent and He, Yisheng and Ito, Masayoshi and Nern, Aljoscha and Otsuna, Hideo and Lee, Tzumin} } @article {48921, title = {Topological and modality-specific representation of somatosensory information in the fly brain.}, journal = {Science (New York, N.Y.)}, volume = {358}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 11 03}, pages = {615-623}, abstract = {

Insects and mammals share similarities of neural organization underlying the perception of odors, taste, vision, sound, and gravity. We observed that insect somatosensation also corresponds to that of mammals. In Drosophila, the projections of all the somatosensory neuron types to the insect{\textquoteright}s equivalent of the spinal cord segregated into modality-specific layers comparable to those in mammals. Some sensory neurons innervate the ventral brain directly to form modality-specific and topological somatosensory maps. Ascending interneurons with dendrites in matching layers of the nerve cord send axons that converge to respective brain regions. Pathways arising from leg somatosensory neurons encode distinct qualities of leg movement information and play different roles in ground detection. Establishment of the ground pattern and genetic tools for neuronal manipulation should provide the basis for elucidating the mechanisms underlying somatosensation.

}, issn = {1095-9203}, doi = {10.1126/science.aan4428}, author = {Tsubouchi, Asako and Yano, Tomoko and Yokoyama, Takeshi K and Murtin, Chlo{\'e} and Otsuna, Hideo and Ito, Kei} }