@article {6356, title = {Cell and tissue dynamics during Tribolium embryogenesis revealed by versatile fluorescence labeling approaches.}, journal = {Development}, volume = {140}, year = {2013}, month = {2013 Aug}, pages = {3210-20}, abstract = {

Studies on new arthropod models such as the beetle Tribolium castaneum are shifting our knowledge of embryonic patterning and morphogenesis beyond the Drosophila paradigm. In contrast to Drosophila, Tribolium embryos exhibit the short-germ type of development and become enveloped by extensive extra-embryonic membranes, the amnion and serosa. The genetic basis of these processes has been the focus of active research. Here, we complement genetic approaches with live fluorescence imaging of Tribolium embryos to make the link between gene function and morphogenetic cell behaviors during blastoderm formation and differentiation, germband condensation and elongation, and extra-embryonic development. We first show that transient labeling methods result in strong, homogeneous and persistent expression of fluorescent markers in Tribolium embryos, labeling the chromatin, membrane, cytoskeleton or combinations thereof. We then use co-injection of fluorescent markers with dsRNA for live imaging of embryos with disrupted caudal gene function caused by RNA interference. Using these approaches, we describe and compare cell and tissue dynamics in Tribolium embryos with wild-type and altered fate maps. We find that Tribolium germband condensation is effected by cell contraction and intercalation, with the latter being dependent on the anterior-posterior patterning system. We propose that germband condensation drives initiation of amnion folding, whereas expansion of the amniotic fold and closure of the amniotic cavity are likely driven by contraction of an actomyosin cable at the boundary between the amnion and serosa. Our methodology provides a comprehensive framework for testing quantitative models of patterning, growth and morphogenetic mechanisms in Tribolium and other arthropod species.

}, issn = {1477-9129}, doi = {10.1242/dev.096271}, author = {Benton, Matthew A and Akam, Michael and Pavlopoulos, Anastasios} } @article {6358, title = {Hox gene Ultrabithorax regulates distinct sets of target genes at successive stages of Drosophila haltere morphogenesis.}, journal = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America}, volume = {108}, year = {2011}, month = {2011 Feb 15}, pages = {2855-60}, abstract = {

Hox genes encode highly conserved transcription factors that regionalize the animal body axis by controlling complex developmental processes. Although they are known to operate in multiple cell types and at different stages, we are still missing the batteries of genes targeted by any one Hox gene over the course of a single developmental process to achieve a particular cell and organ morphology. The transformation of wings into halteres by the Hox gene Ultrabithorax (Ubx) in Drosophila melanogaster presents an excellent model system to study the Hox control of transcriptional networks during successive stages of appendage morphogenesis and cell differentiation. We have used an inducible misexpression system to switch on Ubx in the wing epithelium at successive stages during metamorphosis{\textendash}in the larva, prepupa, and pupa. We have then used extensive microarray expression profiling and quantitative RT-PCR to identify the primary transcriptional responses to Ubx. We find that Ubx targets range from regulatory genes like transcription factors and signaling components to terminal differentiation genes affecting a broad repertoire of cell behaviors and metabolic reactions. Ubx up- and down-regulates hundreds of downstream genes at each stage, mostly in a subtle manner. Strikingly, our analysis reveals that Ubx target genes are largely distinct at different stages of appendage morphogenesis, suggesting extensive interactions between Hox genes and hormone-controlled regulatory networks to orchestrate complex genetic programs during metamorphosis.

}, keywords = {Animals, Cluster Analysis, Developmental, Drosophila, Drosophila Proteins, Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Gene Expression Regulation, Gene Regulatory Networks, Homeodomain Proteins, In Situ Hybridization, Life Cycle Stages, Microarray Analysis, Morphogenesis, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, Transcription Factors, Wing}, issn = {1091-6490}, doi = {10.1073/pnas.1015077108}, author = {Pavlopoulos, Anastasios and Akam, Michael} } @article {6359, title = {Probing the evolution of appendage specialization by Hox gene misexpression in an emerging model crustacean.}, journal = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America}, volume = {106}, year = {2009}, month = {2009 Aug 18}, pages = {13897-902}, abstract = {

Changes in the expression of Hox genes have been widely linked to the evolution of animal body plans, but functional demonstrations of this relationship have been impeded by the lack of suitable model organisms. A classic case study involves the repeated evolution of specialized feeding appendages, called maxillipeds, from anterior thoracic legs, in many crustacean lineages. These leg-to-maxilliped transformations correlate with the loss of Ultrabithorax (Ubx) expression from corresponding segments, which is proposed to be the underlying genetic cause. To functionally test this hypothesis, we establish tools for conditional misexpression and use these to misexpress Ubx in the crustacean Parhyale hawaiensis. Ectopic Ubx leads to homeotic transformations of anterior appendages toward more posterior thoracic fates, including maxilliped-to-leg transformations, confirming the capacity of Ubx to control thoracic (leg) versus gnathal (feeding) segmental identities. We find that maxillipeds not only are specified in the absence of Ubx, but also can develop in the presence of low/transient Ubx expression. Our findings suggest a path for the gradual evolutionary transition from thoracic legs to maxillipeds, in which stepwise changes in Hox gene expression have brought about this striking morphological and functional transformation.

}, keywords = {Animals, Cloning, Crustacea, Down-Regulation, Electron, Extremities, Gene Expression Regulation, Genes, Genetic, Genetically Modified, Heat-Shock Proteins, Homeobox, Homeodomain Proteins, Immunohistochemistry, Microscopy, Models, Molecular, Phenotype, Scanning, Transgenes}, issn = {1091-6490}, doi = {10.1073/pnas.0902804106}, author = {Pavlopoulos, Anastasios and Kontarakis, Zacharias and Liubicich, Danielle M and Serano, Julia M and Akam, Michael and Patel, Nipam H and Averof, Michalis} } @article {6362, title = {Hox go omics: insights from Drosophila into Hox gene targets.}, journal = {Genome Biology}, volume = {8}, year = {2007}, month = {2007}, pages = {208}, abstract = {

Genetic studies of the targets of the Hox genes have revealed only the tip of the iceberg. Recent microarray studies that have identified hundreds more transcriptional responses to Hox genes in Drosophila will help elucidate the role of Hox genes in development and evolution.

}, keywords = {Animals, Drosophila, Genes, Genetic, Homeobox, Microarray Analysis, Transcription}, issn = {1465-6914}, doi = {10.1186/gb-2007-8-3-208}, author = {Pavlopoulos, Anastasios and Akam, Michael} }