@article {69633, title = {A Drosophila computational brain model reveals sensorimotor processing.}, journal = {Nature}, volume = {634}, year = {2024}, month = {2024 Oct 02}, pages = {210-219}, abstract = {

The recent assembly of the adult Drosophila melanogaster central brain connectome, containing more than 125,000 neurons and 50 million synaptic connections, provides a template for examining sensory processing throughout the brain. Here we create a leaky integrate-and-fire computational model of the entire Drosophila brain, on the basis of neural connectivity and neurotransmitter identity, to study circuit properties of feeding and grooming behaviours. We show that activation of sugar-sensing or water-sensing gustatory neurons in the computational model accurately predicts neurons that respond to tastes and are required for feeding initiation. In addition, using the model to activate neurons in the feeding region of the Drosophila brain predicts those that elicit motor neuron firing-a testable hypothesis that we validate by optogenetic activation and behavioural studies. Activating different classes of gustatory neurons in the model makes accurate predictions of how several taste modalities interact, providing circuit-level insight into aversive and appetitive taste processing. Additionally, we applied this model to mechanosensory circuits and found that computational activation of mechanosensory neurons predicts activation of a small set of neurons comprising the antennal grooming circuit, and accurately describes the circuit response upon activation of different mechanosensory subtypes. Our results demonstrate that modelling brain circuits using only synapse-level connectivity and predicted neurotransmitter identity generates experimentally testable hypotheses and can describe complete sensorimotor transformations.

}, keywords = {Animals, Brain, Computer Simulation, Connectome, Drosophila melanogaster, Feeding Behavior, Female, Grooming, Male, Models, Neurological, Motor Neurons, Optogenetics, Synapses, Taste}, issn = {1476-4687}, doi = {10.1038/s41586-024-07763-9}, url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07763-9}, author = {Shiu, Philip K and Sterne, Gabriella R and Spiller, Nico and Franconville, Romain and Sandoval, Andrea and Zhou, Joie and Simha, Neha and Kang, Chan Hyuk and Yu, Seongbong and Kim, Jinseop S and Dorkenwald, Sven and Matsliah, Arie and Schlegel, Philipp and Yu, Szi-Chieh and McKellar, Claire E and Sterling, Amy and Costa, Marta and Eichler, Katharina and Bates, Alexander Shakeel and Eckstein, Nils and Funke, Jan and Jefferis, Gregory S X E and Murthy, Mala and Bidaye, Salil S and Hampel, Stefanie and Seeds, Andrew M and Scott, Kristin} } @article {68889, title = {Neuronal wiring diagram of an adult brain.}, journal = {Nature}, volume = {634}, year = {2024}, month = {2024 Oct 02}, pages = {124-138}, abstract = {

Connections between neurons can be mapped by acquiring and analysing electron microscopic brain images. In recent years, this approach has been applied to chunks of brains to reconstruct local connectivity maps that are highly informative, but nevertheless inadequate for understanding brain function more globally. Here we present a neuronal wiring diagram of a whole brain containing 5 {\texttimes} 107 chemical synapses between 139,255 neurons reconstructed from an adult female Drosophila melanogaster. The resource also incorporates annotations of cell classes and types, nerves, hemilineages and predictions of neurotransmitter identities. Data products are available for download, programmatic access and interactive browsing and have been made interoperable with other fly data resources. We derive a projectome-a map of projections between regions-from the connectome and report on tracing of synaptic pathways and the analysis of information flow from inputs (sensory and ascending neurons) to outputs (motor, endocrine and descending neurons) across both hemispheres and between the central brain and the optic lobes. Tracing from a subset of photoreceptors to descending motor pathways illustrates how structure can uncover putative circuit mechanisms underlying sensorimotor behaviours. The technologies and open ecosystem reported here set the stage for future large-scale connectome projects in other species.

}, doi = {10.1038/s41586-024-07558-y}, url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07558-y}, author = {Dorkenwald, Sven and Matsliah, Arie and Sterling, Amy R and Schlegel, Philipp and Yu, Szi-Chieh and McKellar, Claire E and Lin, Albert and Costa, Marta and Eichler, Katharina and Yin, Yijie and Silversmith, Will and Schneider-Mizell, Casey and Jordan, Chris S and Brittain, Derrick and Halageri, Akhilesh and Kuehner, Kai and Ogedengbe, Oluwaseun and Morey, Ryan and Gager, Jay and Kruk, Krzysztof and Perlman, Eric and Yang, Runzhe and Deutsch, David and Bland, Doug and Sorek, Marissa and Lu, Ran and Macrina, Thomas and Lee, Kisuk and Bae, J Alexander and Mu, Shang and Nehoran, Barak and Mitchell, Eric and Popovych, Sergiy and Wu, Jingpeng and Jia, Zhen and Castro, Manuel and Kemnitz, Nico and Ih, Dodam and Bates, Alexander Shakeel and Eckstein, Nils and Funke, Jan and Collman, Forrest and Bock, Davi D and Jefferis, Gregory S X E and Seung, H Sebastian and Murthy, Mala} } @article {69439, title = {Neurotransmitter classification from electron microscopy images at synaptic sites in Drosophila melanogaster}, journal = {Cell}, volume = {187}, year = {2024}, month = {2024 May 09}, pages = {2574-2594.e23}, abstract = {

High-resolution electron microscopy of nervous systems has enabled the reconstruction of synaptic connectomes. However, we do not know the synaptic sign for each connection (i.e., whether a connection is excitatory or inhibitory), which is implied by the released transmitter. We demonstrate that artificial neural networks can predict transmitter types for presynapses from electron micrographs: a network trained to predict six transmitters (acetylcholine, glutamate, GABA, serotonin, dopamine, octopamine) achieves an accuracy of 87\% for individual synapses, 94\% for neurons, and 91\% for known cell types across a D.\ melanogaster whole brain. We visualize the ultrastructural features used for prediction, discovering subtle but significant differences between transmitter phenotypes. We also analyze transmitter distributions across the brain and find that neurons that develop together largely express only one fast-acting transmitter (acetylcholine, glutamate, or GABA). We hope that our publicly available predictions act as an accelerant for neuroscientific hypothesis generation for the fly.

}, keywords = {Animals, Brain, Connectome, Drosophila melanogaster, gamma-Aminobutyric Acid, Microscopy, Electron, Neural Networks, Computer, Neurons, Neurotransmitter Agents, Synapses}, issn = {1097-4172}, doi = {10.1016/j.cell.2024.03.016}, author = {Eckstein, Nils and Bates, Alexander Shakeel and Champion, Andrew and Du, Michelle and Yin, Yijie and Schlegel, Philipp and Lu, Alicia Kun-Yang and Rymer, Thomson and Finley-May, Samantha and Paterson, Tyler and Parekh, Ruchi and Dorkenwald, Sven and Matsliah, Arie and Yu, Szi-Chieh and McKellar, Claire and Sterling, Amy and Eichler, Katharina and Costa, Marta and Seung, Sebastian and Murthy, Mala and Hartenstein, Volker and Jefferis, Gregory S X E and Funke, Jan} } @article {67303, title = {Information flow, cell types and stereotypy in a full olfactory connectome.}, journal = {eLife}, volume = {10}, year = {2021}, month = {2021 May 25}, abstract = {

The connectome provides large scale connectivity and morphology information for the majority of the central brain of . Using this data set, we provide a complete description of the olfactory system, covering all first, second and lateral horn-associated third-order neurons. We develop a generally applicable strategy to extract information flow and layered organisation from connectome graphs, mapping olfactory input to descending interneurons. This identifies a range of motifs including highly lateralised circuits in the antennal lobe and patterns of convergence downstream of the mushroom body and lateral horn. Leveraging a second data set we provide a first quantitative assessment of inter- versus intra-individual stereotypy. Comparing neurons across two brains (three hemispheres) reveals striking similarity in neuronal morphology across brains. Connectivity correlates with morphology and neurons of the same morphological type show similar connection variability within the same brain as across two brains.

}, issn = {2050-084X}, doi = {10.7554/eLife.66018}, author = {Schlegel, Philipp and Bates, Alexander Shakeel and St{\"u}rner, Tomke and Jagannathan, Sridhar R and Drummond, Nikolas and Hsu, Joseph and Serratosa Capdevila, Laia and Javier, Alexandre and Marin, Elizabeth C and Barth-Maron, Asa and Tamimi, Imaan Fm and Li, Feng and Rubin, Gerald M and Plaza, Stephen M and Costa, Marta and Jefferis, Gregory Sxe} } @article {64934, title = {Functional and anatomical specificity in a higher olfactory centre.}, journal = {Elife}, volume = {8}, year = {2019}, month = {2019 May 21}, abstract = {

Most sensory systems are organized into parallel neuronal pathways that process distinct aspects of incoming stimuli. In the insect olfactory system, second order projection neurons target both the mushroom body, required for learning, and the lateral horn (LH), proposed to mediate innate olfactory behavior. Mushroom body neurons form a sparse olfactory population code, which is not stereotyped across animals. In contrast, odor coding in the LH remains poorly understood. We combine genetic driver lines, anatomical and functional criteria to show that the LH has ~1400 neurons and \>165 cell types. Genetically labeled LHNs have stereotyped odor responses across animals and on average respond to three times more odors than single projection neurons. LHNs are better odor categorizers than projection neurons, likely due to stereotyped pooling of related inputs. Our results reveal some of the principles by which a higher processing area can extract innate behavioral significance from sensory stimuli.

}, issn = {2050-084X}, doi = {10.7554/eLife.44590}, author = {Frechter, Shahar and Bates, Alexander Shakeel and Tootoonian, Sina and Dolan, Michael-John and Manton, James D and Jamasb, Arian Rokkum and Kohl, Johannes and Bock, Davi and Jefferis, Gregory Sxe} } @article {64933, title = {Neurogenetic dissection of the lateral horn reveals major outputs, diverse behavioural functions, and interactions with the mushroom body.}, journal = {Elife}, volume = {8}, year = {2019}, month = {2019 May 21}, abstract = {

Animals exhibit innate behaviours to a variety of sensory stimuli including olfactory cues. In , one higher olfactory centre, the lateral horn (LH), is implicated in innate behaviour. However, our structural and functional understanding of the LH is scant, in large part due to a lack of sparse neurogenetic tools for this region. We generate a collection of split-GAL4 driver lines providing genetic access to 82 LH cell types. We use these to create an anatomical and neurotransmitter map of the LH and link this to EM connectomics data. We find ~30\% of LH projections converge with outputs from the mushroom body, site of olfactory learning and memory. Using optogenetic activation, we identify LH cell types that drive changes in valence behavior or specific locomotor programs. In summary, we have generated a resource for manipulating and mapping LH neurons, providing new insights into the circuit basis of innate and learned olfactory behavior.

}, issn = {2050-084X}, doi = {10.7554/eLife.43079}, author = {Dolan, Michael-John and Frechter, Shahar and Bates, Alexander Shakeel and Dan, Chuntao and Huoviala, Paavo and Roberts, Ruair{\'\i} Jv and Schlegel, Philipp and Dhawan, Serene and Tabano, Remy and Dionne, Heather and Christoforou, Christina and Close, Kari and Sutcliffe, Ben and Giuliani, Bianca and Li, Feng and Costa, Marta and Ihrke, Gudrun and Meissner, Geoffrey Wilson and Bock, Davi D and Aso, Yoshinori and Rubin, Gerald M and Jefferis, Gregory Sxe} } @article {49434, title = {Communication from learned to innate olfactory processing centers is required for memory retrieval in Drosophila.}, journal = {Neuron}, volume = {100}, year = {2018}, month = {2018 Sep 19}, pages = {651-68}, abstract = {

The behavioral response to a sensory stimulus may depend on both learned and innate neuronal representations. How these circuits interact to produce appropriate behavior is unknown. In Drosophila, the lateral horn (LH) and mushroom body (MB) are thought to mediate innate and learned olfactory behavior, respectively, although LH function has not been tested directly. Here we identify two LH cell types (PD2a1 and PD2b1) that receive input from an MB output neuron required for recall of aversive olfactory memories. These neurons are required for aversive memory retrieval and modulated by training. Connectomics data demonstrate that PD2a1 and PD2b1 neurons also receive direct input from food odor-encoding neurons. Consistent with this, PD2a1 and PD2b1 are also necessary for unlearned attraction to some odors, indicating that these neurons have a dual behavioral role. This provides a circuit mechanism by which learned and innate olfactory information can interact in identified neurons to produce appropriate behavior.

}, issn = {1097-4199}, doi = {10.1016/j.neuron.2018.08.037}, author = {Dolan, Michael-John and Belliart-Gu{\'e}rin, Ghislain and Bates, Alexander Shakeel and Frechter, Shahar and Lampin-Saint-Amaux, Aur{\'e}lie and Aso, Yoshinori and Roberts, Ruair{\'\i} J V and Schlegel, Philipp and Wong, Allan and Hammad, Adnan and Bock, Davi and Rubin, Gerald M and Preat, Thomas and Placais, Pierre-Yves and Jefferis, Gregory S X E} }