@article {69472, title = {The physical and cellular mechanism of structural color change in zebrafish.}, journal = {Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A}, volume = {121}, year = {2024}, month = {2024 Jun 04}, pages = {e2308531121}, abstract = {

Many animals exhibit remarkable colors that are produced by the constructive interference of light reflected from arrays of intracellular guanine crystals. These animals can fine-tune their crystal-based structural colors to communicate with each other, regulate body temperature, and create camouflage. While it is known that these changes in color are caused by changes in the angle of the crystal arrays relative to incident light, the cellular machinery that drives color change is not understood. Here, using a combination of 3D focused ion beam scanning electron microscopy (FIB-SEM), micro-focused X-ray diffraction, superresolution fluorescence light microscopy, and pharmacological perturbations, we characterized the dynamics and 3D cellular reorganization of crystal arrays within zebrafish iridophores during norepinephrine (NE)-induced color change. We found that color change results from a coordinated 20{\textdegree} tilting of the intracellular crystals, which alters both crystal packing and the angle at which impinging light hits the crystals. Importantly, addition of the dynein inhibitor dynapyrazole-a completely blocked this NE-induced red shift by hindering crystal dynamics upon NE addition. FIB-SEM and microtubule organizing center (MTOC) mapping showed that microtubules arise from two MTOCs located near the poles of the iridophore and run parallel to, and in between, individual crystals. This suggests that dynein drives crystal angle change in response to NE by binding to the limiting membrane surrounding individual crystals and walking toward microtubule minus ends. Finally, we found that intracellular cAMP regulates the color change process. Together, our results provide mechanistic insight into the cellular machinery that drives structural color change.

}, keywords = {Animals, Color, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Norepinephrine, Pigmentation, Zebrafish, Zebrafish Proteins}, issn = {1091-6490}, doi = {10.1073/pnas.2308531121}, author = {Gur, Dvir and Moore, Andrew S and Deis, Rachael and Song, Pang and Wu, Xufeng and Pinkas, Iddo and Deo, Claire and Iyer, Nirmala and Hess, Harald F and Hammer, John A and Lippincott-Schwartz, Jennifer} } @article {65896, title = {In situ differentiation of iridophore crystallotypes underlies zebrafish stripe patterning.}, journal = {Nature Communications}, volume = {11}, year = {2020}, month = {2020 Dec 15}, pages = {6391}, abstract = {

Skin color patterns are ubiquitous in nature, impact social behavior, predator avoidance, and protection from ultraviolet irradiation. A leading model system for vertebrate skin patterning is the zebrafish; its alternating blue stripes and yellow interstripes depend on light-reflecting cells called iridophores. It was suggested that the zebrafish{\textquoteright}s color pattern arises from a single type of iridophore migrating differentially to stripes and interstripes. However, here we find that iridophores do not migrate between stripes and interstripes but instead differentiate and proliferate in-place, based on their micro-environment. RNA-sequencing analysis further reveals that stripe and interstripe iridophores have different transcriptomic states, while cryogenic-scanning-electron-microscopy and micro-X-ray diffraction identify different crystal-arrays architectures, indicating that stripe and interstripe iridophores are different cell types. Based on these results, we present an alternative model of skin patterning in zebrafish in which distinct iridophore crystallotypes containing specialized, physiologically responsive, organelles arise in stripe and interstripe by in-situ differentiation.

}, keywords = {Animals, Cell Differentiation, Cell Proliferation, Chromatophores, Microphthalmia-Associated Transcription Factor, Mutagenesis, Skin, Skin Pigmentation, Transcriptome, X-Ray Diffraction, Zebrafish, Zebrafish Proteins}, issn = {2041-1723}, doi = {10.1038/s41467-020-20088-1}, author = {Gur, Dvir and Bain, Emily J and Johnson, Kory R and Aman, Andy J and Pasoili, H Amalia and Flynn, Jessica D and Allen, Michael C and Deheyn, Dimitri D and Lee, Jennifer C and Lippincott-Schwartz, Jennifer and Parichy, David M} } @article {64959, title = {Fate plasticity and reprogramming in genetically distinct populations of leucophores.}, journal = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America}, volume = {116}, year = {2019}, month = {2019 Jun 11}, pages = {11806-11}, abstract = {

Understanding genetic and cellular bases of adult form remains a fundamental goal at the intersection of developmental and evolutionary biology. The skin pigment cells of vertebrates, derived from embryonic neural crest, are a useful system for elucidating mechanisms of fate specification, pattern formation, and how particular phenotypes impact organismal behavior and ecology. In a survey of fishes, including the zebrafish , we identified two populations of white pigment cells-leucophores-one of which arises by transdifferentiation of adult melanophores and another of which develops from a yellow-orange xanthophore or xanthophore-like progenitor. Single-cell transcriptomic, mutational, chemical, and ultrastructural analyses of zebrafish leucophores revealed cell-type-specific chemical compositions, organelle configurations, and genetic requirements. At the organismal level, we identified distinct physiological responses of leucophores during environmental background matching, and we showed that leucophore complement influences behavior. Together, our studies reveal independently arisen pigment cell types and mechanisms of fate acquisition in zebrafish and illustrate how concerted analyses across hierarchical levels can provide insights into phenotypes and their evolution.

}, issn = {1091-6490}, doi = {10.1073/pnas.1901021116}, author = {Lewis, Victor M and Saunders, Lauren M and Larson, Tracy A and Bain, Emily J and Sturiale, Samantha L and Gur, Dvir and Chowdhury, Sarwat and Flynn, Jessica D and Allen, Michael C and Deheyn, Dimitri D and Lee, Jennifer C and Simon, Julian A and Lippincott-Schwartz, Jennifer and Raible, David W and Parichy, David M} }