@article {69881, title = {Comparative connectomics of Drosophila descending and ascending neurons.}, journal = {Nature}, year = {2025}, month = {2025 Apr 30}, abstract = {

In most complex nervous systems there is a clear anatomical separation between the nerve cord, which contains most of the final motor outputs necessary for behaviour, and the brain. In insects, the neck connective is both a physical and an information bottleneck connecting the brain and the ventral nerve cord (an analogue of the spinal cord) and comprises diverse populations of descending neurons (DNs), ascending neurons (ANs) and sensory ascending neurons, which are crucial for sensorimotor signalling and control. Here, by integrating three separate electron microscopy (EM) datasets, we provide a complete connectomic description of the ANs and DNs of the Drosophila female nervous system and compare them with neurons of the male nerve cord. Proofread neuronal reconstructions are matched across hemispheres, datasets and sexes. Crucially, we also match 51\% of DN cell types to light-level data defining specific driver lines, as well as classifying all ascending populations. We use these results to reveal the anatomical and circuit logic of neck connective neurons. We observe connected chains of DNs and ANs spanning the neck, which may subserve motor sequences. We provide a complete description of sexually dimorphic DN and AN populations, with detailed analyses of selected circuits for reproductive behaviours, including male courtship (DNa12; also known as aSP22) and song production (AN neurons from hemilineage 08B) and female ovipositor extrusion (DNp13). Our work provides EM-level circuit analyses that span the entire central nervous system of an adult animal.

}, issn = {1476-4687}, doi = {10.1038/s41586-025-08925-z}, url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-08925-z}, author = {St{\"u}rner, Tomke and Brooks, Paul and Serratosa Capdevila, Laia and Morris, Billy J and Javier, Alexandre and Fang, Siqi and Gkantia, Marina and Cachero, Sebastian and Beckett, Isabella R and Marin, Elizabeth C and Schlegel, Philipp and Champion, Andrew S and Moitra, Ilina and Richards, Alana and Klemm, Finja and Kugel, Leonie and Namiki, Shigehiro and Cheong, Han S J and Kovalyak, Julie and Tenshaw, Emily and Parekh, Ruchi and Phelps, Jasper S and Mark, Brandon and Dorkenwald, Sven and Bates, Alexander S and Matsliah, Arie and Yu, Szi-Chieh and McKellar, Claire E and Sterling, Amy and Seung, H Sebastian and Murthy, Mala and Tuthill, John C and Lee, Wei-Chung Allen and Card, Gwyneth M and Costa, Marta and Jefferis, Gregory S X E and Eichler, Katharina} } @article {65860, title = {Central processing of leg proprioception in Drosophila.}, journal = {eLife}, volume = {9}, year = {2020}, month = {2020 Dec 02}, abstract = {

Proprioception, the sense of self-movement and position, is mediated by mechanosensory neurons that detect diverse features of body kinematics. Although proprioceptive feedback is crucial for accurate motor control, little is known about how downstream circuits transform limb sensory information to guide motor output. Here, we investigate neural circuits in that process proprioceptive information from the fly leg. We identify three cell-types from distinct developmental lineages that are positioned to receive input from proprioceptor subtypes encoding tibia position, movement, and vibration. 13Bα neurons encode femur-tibia joint angle and mediate postural changes in tibia position. 9Aα neurons also drive changes in leg posture, but encode a combination of directional movement, high frequency vibration, and joint angle. Activating 10Bα neurons, which encode tibia vibration at specific joint angles, elicits pausing in walking flies. Altogether, our results reveal that central circuits integrate information across proprioceptor subtypes to construct complex sensorimotor representations that mediate diverse behaviors, including reflexive control of limb posture and detection of leg vibration.

}, issn = {2050-084X}, doi = {10.7554/eLife.60299}, author = {Agrawal, Sweta and Dickinson, Evyn S and Sustar, Anne and Gurung, Pralaksha and Shepherd, David and Truman, James W and Tuthill, John C} } @article {6091, title = {Contributions of the 12 neuron classes in the fly lamina to motion vision.}, journal = {Neuron}, volume = {79}, year = {2013}, month = {07/2013}, pages = {128-140}, abstract = {

Motion detection is a fundamental neural computation performed by many sensory systems. In the fly, local motion computation is thought to occur within the first two layers of the visual system, the lamina and medulla. We constructed specific genetic driver lines for each of the 12 neuron classes in the lamina. We then depolarized and hyperpolarized each neuron type and quantified fly behavioral responses to a diverse set of motion stimuli. We found that only a small number of lamina output neurons are essential for motion detection, while most neurons serve to sculpt and enhance these feedforward pathways. Two classes of feedback neurons (C2 and C3), and lamina output neurons (L2 and L4), are required for normal detection of directional motion stimuli. Our results reveal a prominent role for feedback and lateral interactions in motion processing and demonstrate that motion-dependent behaviors rely on contributions from nearly all lamina neuron classes.

}, doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2013.05.024}, author = {Tuthill, John C and Nern, Aljoscha and Stephen L. Holtz and Rubin, Gerald M and Reiser, Michael B} }