Filter
Associated Lab
- Ahrens Lab (3) Apply Ahrens Lab filter
- Aso Lab (3) Apply Aso Lab filter
- Baker Lab (5) Apply Baker Lab filter
- Betzig Lab (8) Apply Betzig Lab filter
- Branson Lab (6) Apply Branson Lab filter
- Card Lab (1) Apply Card Lab filter
- Cardona Lab (1) Apply Cardona Lab filter
- Chklovskii Lab (2) Apply Chklovskii Lab filter
- Cui Lab (2) Apply Cui Lab filter
- Darshan Lab (1) Apply Darshan Lab filter
- Dickson Lab (6) Apply Dickson Lab filter
- Druckmann Lab (1) Apply Druckmann Lab filter
- Dudman Lab (4) Apply Dudman Lab filter
- Eddy/Rivas Lab (3) Apply Eddy/Rivas Lab filter
- Egnor Lab (1) Apply Egnor Lab filter
- Fetter Lab (1) Apply Fetter Lab filter
- Fitzgerald Lab (1) Apply Fitzgerald Lab filter
- Freeman Lab (3) Apply Freeman Lab filter
- Gonen Lab (10) Apply Gonen Lab filter
- Grigorieff Lab (3) Apply Grigorieff Lab filter
- Harris Lab (2) Apply Harris Lab filter
- Heberlein Lab (2) Apply Heberlein Lab filter
- Hermundstad Lab (2) Apply Hermundstad Lab filter
- Hess Lab (5) Apply Hess Lab filter
- Jayaraman Lab (1) Apply Jayaraman Lab filter
- Ji Lab (3) Apply Ji Lab filter
- Johnson Lab (1) Apply Johnson Lab filter
- Kainmueller Lab (2) Apply Kainmueller Lab filter
- Karpova Lab (1) Apply Karpova Lab filter
- Keller Lab (8) Apply Keller Lab filter
- Lavis Lab (7) Apply Lavis Lab filter
- Lee (Albert) Lab (4) Apply Lee (Albert) Lab filter
- Leonardo Lab (4) Apply Leonardo Lab filter
- Li Lab (1) Apply Li Lab filter
- Lippincott-Schwartz Lab (12) Apply Lippincott-Schwartz Lab filter
- Liu (Zhe) Lab (4) Apply Liu (Zhe) Lab filter
- Looger Lab (11) Apply Looger Lab filter
- Magee Lab (1) Apply Magee Lab filter
- Menon Lab (3) Apply Menon Lab filter
- Murphy Lab (1) Apply Murphy Lab filter
- Pavlopoulos Lab (2) Apply Pavlopoulos Lab filter
- Reiser Lab (2) Apply Reiser Lab filter
- Riddiford Lab (4) Apply Riddiford Lab filter
- Romani Lab (2) Apply Romani Lab filter
- Rubin Lab (9) Apply Rubin Lab filter
- Saalfeld Lab (1) Apply Saalfeld Lab filter
- Scheffer Lab (7) Apply Scheffer Lab filter
- Sgro Lab (1) Apply Sgro Lab filter
- Simpson Lab (2) Apply Simpson Lab filter
- Singer Lab (10) Apply Singer Lab filter
- Spruston Lab (1) Apply Spruston Lab filter
- Stern Lab (6) Apply Stern Lab filter
- Sternson Lab (5) Apply Sternson Lab filter
- Stringer Lab (1) Apply Stringer Lab filter
- Svoboda Lab (7) Apply Svoboda Lab filter
- Tebo Lab (2) Apply Tebo Lab filter
- Tervo Lab (1) Apply Tervo Lab filter
- Tillberg Lab (1) Apply Tillberg Lab filter
- Tjian Lab (4) Apply Tjian Lab filter
- Truman Lab (1) Apply Truman Lab filter
- Turaga Lab (1) Apply Turaga Lab filter
- Turner Lab (1) Apply Turner Lab filter
- Wang (Shaohe) Lab (1) Apply Wang (Shaohe) Lab filter
- Wu Lab (2) Apply Wu Lab filter
- Zlatic Lab (1) Apply Zlatic Lab filter
- Zuker Lab (1) Apply Zuker Lab filter
Associated Project Team
Publication Date
- December 2014 (35) Apply December 2014 filter
- November 2014 (14) Apply November 2014 filter
- October 2014 (15) Apply October 2014 filter
- September 2014 (17) Apply September 2014 filter
- August 2014 (14) Apply August 2014 filter
- July 2014 (26) Apply July 2014 filter
- June 2014 (14) Apply June 2014 filter
- May 2014 (14) Apply May 2014 filter
- April 2014 (20) Apply April 2014 filter
- March 2014 (18) Apply March 2014 filter
- February 2014 (15) Apply February 2014 filter
- January 2014 (34) Apply January 2014 filter
- Remove 2014 filter 2014
Type of Publication
236 Publications
Showing 31-40 of 236 resultsThe reciprocal hemizygosity test is a straightforward genetic test that can positively identify genes that have evolved to contribute to a phenotypic difference between strains or between species. The test involves a comparison between hybrids that are genetically identical throughout the genome except at the test locus, which is rendered hemizygous for alternative alleles from the two parental strains. If the two reciprocal hemizygotes display different phenotypes, then the two parental alleles must have evolved. New methods for targeted mutagenesis will allow application of the reciprocal hemizygosity test in many organisms. This review discusses the principles, advantages, and limitations of the test.
Muscular hydrostats (such as mollusks), and fluid-filled animals (such as annelids), can exploit their constant-volume tissues to transfer forces and displacements in predictable ways, much as articulated animals use hinges and levers. Although larval insects contain pressurized fluids, they also have internal air tubes that are compressible and, as a result, they have more uncontrolled degrees of freedom. Therefore, the mechanisms by which larval insects control their movements are expected to reveal useful strategies for designing soft biomimetic robots. Using caterpillars as a tractable model system, it is now possible to identify the biomechanical and neural strategies for controlling movements in such highly deformable animals. For example, the tobacco hornworm, Manduca sexta, can stiffen its body by increasing muscular tension (and therefore body pressure) but the internal cavity (hemocoel) is not iso-barometric, nor is pressure used to directly control the movements of its limbs. Instead, fluid and tissues flow within the hemocoel and the body is soft and flexible to conform to the substrate. Even the gut contributes to the biomechanics of locomotion; it is decoupled from the movements of the body wall and slides forward within the body cavity at the start of each step. During crawling the body is kept in tension for part of the stride and compressive forces are exerted on the substrate along the axis of the caterpillar, thereby using the environment as a skeleton. The timing of muscular activity suggests that crawling is coordinated by proleg-retractor motoneurons and that the large segmental muscles produce anterograde waves of lifting that do not require precise timing. This strategy produces a robust form of locomotion in which the kinematics changes little with orientation. In different species of caterpillar, the presence of prolegs on particular body segments is related to alternative kinematics such as "inching." This suggests a mechanism for the evolution of different gaits through changes in the usage of prolegs, rather than, through extensive alterations in the motor program controlling the body wall. Some of these findings are being used to design and test novel control-strategies for highly deformable robots. These "softworm" devices are providing new insights into the challenges faced by any soft animal navigating in a terrestrial environment.
Post-translational histone modifications are highly correlated with transcriptional activity, but the relative timing of these marks and their dynamic interplay during gene regulation remains controversial. To shed light on this problem and clarify the connections between histone modifications and transcription, we demonstrate how FabLEM (Fab-based Live Endogenous Modification labeling) can be used to simultaneously track histone H3 Lysine 9 acetylation (H3K9ac) together with RNA polymerase II Serine 2 and Serine 5 phosphorylation (RNAP2 Ser2ph/Ser5ph) in single living cells and their progeny. We provide a detailed description of the FabLEM methodology, including helpful tips for preparing and loading fluorescently conjugated antigen binding fragments (Fab) into cells for optimal results. We also introduce simple procedures for analyzing and visualizing FabLEM data, including color-coded scatterplots to track correlations between modifications through the cell cycle and temporal cross-correlation analysis to dissect modification dynamics. Using these methods, we find significant correlations that span cell generations, with a relatively strong correlation between H3K9ac and Ser5ph that appears to peak a few hours before mitosis and may reflect the bookmarking of genes for efficient re-initiation following mitosis. The techniques we have developed are broadly applicable and should help clarify how histone modifications dynamically contribute to gene regulation.
Targeting visually identified neurons for electrophysiological recording is a fundamental neuroscience technique; however, its potential is hampered by poor visualization of pipette tips in deep brain tissue. We describe quantum dot-coated glass pipettes that provide strong two-photon contrast at deeper penetration depths than those achievable with current methods. We demonstrated the pipettes' utility in targeted patch-clamp recording experiments and single-cell electroporation of identified rat and mouse neurons in vitro and in vivo.
Serial section Microscopy is an established method for volumetric anatomy reconstruction. Section series imaged with Electron Microscopy are currently vital for the reconstruction of the synaptic connectivity of entire animal brains such as that of Drosophila melanogaster. The process of removing ultrathin layers from a solid block containing the specimen, however, is a fragile procedure and has limited precision with respect to section thickness. We have developed a method to estimate the relative z-position of each individual section as a function of signal change across the section series. First experiments show promising results on both serial section Transmission Electron Microscopy (ssTEM) data and Focused Ion Beam Scanning Electron Microscopy (FIB-SEM) series. We made our solution available as Open Source plugins for the TrakEM2 software and the ImageJ distribution Fiji.
Information processing in the sensory periphery is shaped by natural stimulus statistics. In the periphery, a transmission bottleneck constrains performance; thus efficient coding implies that natural signal components with a predictably wider range should be compressed. In a different regime--when sampling limitations constrain performance--efficient coding implies that more resources should be allocated to informative features that are more variable. We propose that this regime is relevant for sensory cortex when it extracts complex features from limited numbers of sensory samples. To test this prediction, we use central visual processing as a model: we show that visual sensitivity for local multi-point spatial correlations, described by dozens of independently-measured parameters, can be quantitatively predicted from the structure of natural images. This suggests that efficient coding applies centrally, where it extends to higher-order sensory features and operates in a regime in which sensitivity increases with feature variability.
By providing quantitative, visual data of live cells, fluorescent protein-based microscopy techniques are furnishing novel insights into the complexities of membrane trafficking pathways and organelle dynamics. In this chapter, we describe experimental protocols employing fluorescent protein-based photohighlighting techniques to quantify protein movement into and out of the Golgi apparatus, an organelle that serves as the central sorting and processing station of the secretory pathway. The methods allow kinetic characteristics of Golgi-associated protein trafficking to be deciphered, which can help clarify how the Golgi maintains itself as a steady-state structure despite a continuous flux of secretory cargo passing into and out of this organelle. The guidelines presented in this chapter can also be applied to examine the dynamics of other intracellular organelle systems, elucidating mechanisms for how proteins are maintained in specific organelles and/or circulated to other destinations within the cell.
The molecular and cellular architecture of the organs in a whole mouse is revealed through optical clearing.
Central nervous system (CNS) function is dependent on the stringent regulation of metabolites, drugs, cells, and pathogens exposed to the CNS space. Cellular blood-brain barrier (BBB) structures are highly specific checkpoints governing entry and exit of all small molecules to and from the brain interstitial space, but the precise mechanisms that regulate the BBB are not well understood. In addition, the BBB has long been a challenging obstacle to the pharmacologic treatment of CNS diseases; thus model systems that can parse the functions of the BBB are highly desirable. In this study, we sought to define the transcriptome of the adult Drosophila melanogaster BBB by isolating the BBB surface glia with fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) and profiling their gene expression with microarrays. By comparing the transcriptome of these surface glia to that of all brain glia, brain neurons, and whole brains, we present a catalog of transcripts that are selectively enriched at the Drosophila BBB. We found that the fly surface glia show high expression of many ATP-binding cassette (ABC) and solute carrier (SLC) transporters, cell adhesion molecules, metabolic enzymes, signaling molecules, and components of xenobiotic metabolism pathways. Using gene sequence-based alignments, we compare the Drosophila and Murine BBB transcriptomes and discover many shared chemoprotective and small molecule control pathways, thus affirming the relevance of invertebrate models for studying evolutionary conserved BBB properties. The Drosophila BBB transcriptome is valuable to vertebrate and insect biologists alike as a resource for studying proteins underlying diffusion barrier development and maintenance, glial biology, and regulation of drug transport at tissue barriers.
