Main Menu (Mobile)- Block

Main Menu - Block

janelia7_blocks-janelia7_secondary_menu | block
More in this page
janelia7_blocks-janelia7_fake_breadcrumb | block
Funke Lab / Publications
custom | custom

Filter

facetapi-Q2b17qCsTdECvJIqZJgYMaGsr8vANl1n | block
facetapi-W9JlIB1X0bjs93n1Alu3wHJQTTgDCBGe | block
facetapi-PV5lg7xuz68EAY8eakJzrcmwtdGEnxR0 | block
facetapi-021SKYQnqXW6ODq5W5dPAFEDBaEJubhN | block
general_search_page-panel_pane_1 | views_panes

42 Publications

Showing 1-10 of 42 results
12/08/25 | Uncertainty quantification for connectomics.
Funke J
Nat Methods. 2025 Dec 08;22(12):2484-2486. doi: 10.1038/s41592-025-02945-3

No abstract available.

View Publication Page
10/09/25 | Sexual dimorphism in the complete connectome of the <I>Drosophila</I> male central nervous system
Berg S, Beckett IR, Costa M, Schlegel P, Januszewski M, Marin EC, Nern A, Preibisch S, Qiu W, Takemura S, Fragniere AM, Champion AS, Adjavon D, Cook M, Gkantia M, Hayworth KJ, Huang GB, Katz WT, Kämpf F, Lu Z, Ordish C, Paterson T, Stürner T, Trautman ET, Whittle CR, Burnett LE, Hoeller J, Li F, Loesche F, Morris BJ, Pietzsch T, Pleijzier MW, Silva V, Yin Y, Ali I, Badalamente G, Bates AS, Bogovic J, Brooks P, Cachero S, Canino BS, Chaisrisawatsuk B, Clements J, Crowe A, de Haan Vicente I, Dempsey G, Donà E, dos Santos M, Dreher M, Dunne CR, Eichler K, Finley-May S, Flynn MA, Hameed I, Hopkins GP, Hubbard PM, Kiassat L, Kovalyak J, Lauchie SA, Leonard M, Lohff A, Longden KD, Maldonado CA, Mitletton M, Moitra I, Moon SS, Mooney C, Munnelly EJ, Okeoma N, Olbris DJ, Pai A, Patel B, Phillips EM, Plaza SM, Richards A, Rivas Salinas J, Roberts RJ, Rogers EM, Scott AL, Scuderi LA, Seenivasan P, Serratosa Capdevila L, Smith C, Svirskas R, Takemura S, Tastekin I, Thomson A, Umayam L, Walsh JJ, Whittome H, Xu CS, Yakal EA, Yang T, Zhao A, George R, Jain V, Jayaraman V, Korff W, Meissner GW, Romani S, Funke J, Knecht C, Saalfeld S, Scheffer LK, Waddell S, Card GM, Ribeiro C, Reiser MB, Hess HF, Rubin GM, Jefferis GS
bioRxiv. 2025 Oct 09:. doi: 10.1101/2025.10.09.680999

Sex differences in behaviour exist across the animal kingdom, typically under strong genetic regulation. In Drosophila, previous work has shown that fruitless and doublesex transcription factors identify neurons driving sexually dimorphic behaviour. However, the organisation of dimorphic neurons into functional circuits remains unclear.We now present the connectome of the entire Drosophila male central nervous system. This contains 166,691 neurons spanning the brain and ventral nerve cord, fully proofread and comprehensively annotated including fruitless and doublesex expression and 11,691 cell types. By comparison with a previous female brain connectome, we provide the first comprehensive description of the differences between male and female brains to synaptic resolution. Of 7,319 cross-matched cell types in the central brain, 114 are dimorphic with an additional 262 male- and 69 female-specific (totalling 4.8% of neurons in males and 2.4% in females).This resource enables analysis of full sensory-to-motor circuits underlying complex behaviours as well as the impact of dimorphic elements. Sex-specific and dimorphic neurons are concentrated in higher brain centres while the sensory and motor periphery are largely isomorphic. Within higher centres, male-specific connections are organised into hotspots defined by male-specific neurons or the presence of male-specific arbours on neurons that are otherwise similar between sexes. Numerous circuit switches reroute sensory information to form conserved, antagonistic circuits controlling opposing behaviours.

View Publication Page
09/28/25 | Combinatorial protein barcodes enable self-correcting neuron tracing with nanoscale molecular context
Park SY, Sheridan A, An B, Jarvis E, Lyudchik J, Patton W, Axup JY, Chan SW, Damstra HG, Leible D, Leung KS, Magno CA, Meeran A, Michalska JM, Rieger F, Wang C, Wu M, Church GM, Funke J, Huffman T, Leeper KG, Truckenbrodt S, Winnubst J, Kornfeld JM, Boyden ES, Rodriques SG, Payne AC
bioRxiv. 2025 Sep 28:. doi: 10.1101/2025.09.26.678648

Mapping nanoscale neuronal morphology with molecular annotations is critical for understanding healthy and dysfunctional brain circuits. Current methods are constrained by image segmentation errors and by sample defects (e.g., signal gaps, section loss). Genetic strategies promise to overcome these challenges by using easily distinguishable cell identity labels. However, multicolor approaches are spectrally limited in diversity, whereas nucleic acid barcoding lacks a cell-filling morphology signal for segmentation. Here, we introduce PRISM (Protein-barcode Reconstruction via Iterative Staining with Molecular annotations), a platform that integrates combinatorial delivery of antigenically distinct, cell-filling proteins with tissue expansion, multi-cycle imaging, barcode-augmented reconstruction, and molecular annotation. Protein barcodes increase label diversity by >750-fold over multicolor labeling and enable morphology reconstruction with intrinsic error correction. We acquired a \~10 million μm3 volume of mouse hippocampal area CA2/3, multiplexed across 23 barcode antigen and synaptic marker channels. By combining barcodes with shape information we achieve an 8x increase in automatic tracing accuracy of genetically labelled neurons. We demonstrate PRISM supports automatic proofreading across micron-scale spatial gaps and reconnects neurites across discontinuities spanning hundreds of microns. Using PRISM’s molecular annotation capability, we map the distribution of synapses onto traced neural morphology, characterizing challenging synaptic structures such as thorny excrescences (TEs), and discovering a size correlation among spatially proximal TEs on the same dendrite. PRISM thus supports self-correcting neuron reconstruction with molecular context.

View Publication Page
08/02/25 | Distributed control circuits across a brain-and-cord connectome
Bates AS, Phelps JS, Kim M, Yang HH, Matsliah A, Ajabi Z, Perlman E, Delgado KM, Osman MA, Salmon CK, Gager J, Silverman B, Renauld S, Collie MF, Fan J, Pacheco DA, Zhao Y, Patel J, Zhang W, Serratosa Capdevilla L, Roberts RJ, Munnelly EJ, Griggs N, Langley H, Moya-Llamas B, Maloney RT, Yu S, Sterling AR, Sorek M, Kruk K, Serafetinidis N, Dhawan S, Stürner T, Klemm F, Brooks P, Lesser E, Jones JM, Pierce-Lundgren SE, Lee S, Luo Y, Cook AP, McKim TH, Kophs EC, Falt T, Negrón Morales AM, Burke A, Hebditch J, Willie KP, Willie R, Popovych S, Kemnitz N, Ih D, Lee K, Lu R, Halageri A, Bae JA, Jourdan B, Schwartzman G, Demarest DD, Behnke E, Bland D, Kristiansen A, Skelton J, Stocks T, Garner D, Salman F, Daly KC, Hernandez A, Kumar S, The BANC-FlyWire Consortium , Dorkenwald S, Collman F, Suver MP, Fenk LM, Pankratz MJ, Jefferis GS, Eichler K, Seeds AM, Hampel S, Agrawal S, Zandawala M, Macrina T, Adjavon D, Funke J, Tuthill JC, Azevedo A, Seung HS, de Bivort BL, Murthy M, Drugowitsch J, Wilson RI, Lee WA
bioRxiv. 2025 Aug 02:. doi: 10.1101/2025.07.31.667571

Just as genomes revolutionized molecular genetics, connectomes (maps of neurons and synapses) are transforming neuroscience. To date, the only species with complete connectomes are worms and sea squirts (103-104 synapses). By contrast, the fruit fly is more complex (108 synaptic connections), with a brain that supports learning and spatial memory and an intricate ventral nerve cord analogous to the vertebrate spinal cord. Here we report the first adult fly connectome that unites the brain and ventral nerve cord, and we leverage this resource to investigate principles of neural control. We show that effector cells (motor neurons, endocrine cells and efferent neurons targeting the viscera) are primarily influenced by local sensory cells in the same body part, forming local feedback loops. These local loops are linked by long-range circuits involving ascending and descending neurons organized into behavior-centric modules. Single ascending and descending neurons are often positioned to influence the voluntary movements of multiple body parts, together with endocrine cells or visceral organs that support those movements. Brain regions involved in learning and navigation supervise these circuits. These results reveal an architecture that is distributed, parallelized and embodied (tightly connected to effectors), reminiscent of distributed control architectures in engineered systems.

View Publication Page
04/04/25 | A Bayesian Model to Count the Number of Two-State Emitters in a Diffraction Limited Spot.
Hillsley A, Stein J, Tillberg PW, Stern DL, Funke J
Nano Lett. 2025 Apr 04:. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c06304

We address the problem of inferring the number of independently blinking fluorescent light emitters, when only their combined intensity contributions can be observed. This problem occurs regularly in light microscopy of objects smaller than the diffraction limit, where one wishes to count the number of fluorescently labeled subunits. Our proposed solution directly models the photophysics of the system, as well as the blinking kinetics of the fluorescent emitters as a fully differentiable hidden Markov model, estimating a posterior distribution of the total number of emitters. We show that our model is more accurate and increases the range of countable subunits by a factor of 2 compared to current state-of-the-art methods. Furthermore, we demonstrate that our model can be used to investigate the effect of blinking kinetics on counting ability and therefore can inform optimal experimental conditions.

View Publication Page
12/08/24 | Spatial single-cell Organellomics reveals nutrient dependent hepatocyte heterogeneity and predicts pathophysiological status in vivo
Hillsley A, Adhikari R, Johnson AD, Espinosa-Medina I, Funke J, Feliciano D
bioRxiv. 2024 Dec 08:. doi: 10.1101/2024.12.06.627285

Cellular heterogeneity within complex tissues and organs is essential to coordinate biological processes across biological scales. The effect of local cues and tissue microenvironments on cell heterogeneity has been mainly studied at the transcriptional level. However, it is within the subcellular scale - the organelles - that lays the machinery to conduct most metabolic reactions and maintain cells alive, ensuring proper tissue function. How changes in subcellular organization under different microenvironments define the functional diversity of cells within organs remains largely unexplored. Here we determine how organelles adapt to different microenvironments using the mouse liver as model system, in combination with computational approaches and machine-learning. To understand organelle adaptation in response to changing nutritional conditions, we analyzed 3D fluorescent microscopy volumes of liver samples labeled to simultaneously visualize mitochondria, peroxisomes, and lipid droplets from mice subjected to different diets: a control diet, a high-fat diet, and a control diet plus fasting. A Cellpose based pipeline was implemented for cell and organelle segmentation, which allowed us to measure 100 different organelle metrics and helped us define subcellular architectures in liver samples at the single cell level. Our results showed that hepatocytes display distinct subcellular architectures within different regions of the liver-close to the central vein, in the middle region, and near the portal vein- and across the various diet groups, thus reflecting their adaptation to specific nutritional inputs. Principal component analysis and clustering of hepatocytes based on organelle signatures revealed 12 different hepatocyte categories within the different experimental groups, highlighting a reduction in hepatocyte heterogeneity under nutritional perturbations. Finally, using single cell organelle signatures exclusively, we generated machine learning models that were able to predict with high accuracy different hepatocyte categories, diet groups, and the stages of MASLD. Our results demonstrate how organelle signatures can be used as hallmarks to define hepatocyte heterogeneity and their adaptation to different nutritional conditions. In the future, our strategy, which combines subcellular resolution imaging of liver volumes and machine learning, could help establish protocols to better define and predict liver disease progression.

View Publication Page
10/02/24 | A Drosophila computational brain model reveals sensorimotor processing.
Shiu PK, Sterne GR, Spiller N, Franconville R, Sandoval A, Zhou J, Simha N, Kang CH, Yu S, Kim JS, Dorkenwald S, Matsliah A, Schlegel P, Yu S, McKellar CE, Sterling A, Costa M, Eichler K, Bates AS, Eckstein N, Funke J, Jefferis GS, Murthy M, Bidaye SS, Hampel S, Seeds AM, Scott K
Nature. 2024 Oct 02;634(8032):210-219. doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07763-9

The recent assembly of the adult Drosophila melanogaster central brain connectome, containing more than 125,000 neurons and 50 million synaptic connections, provides a template for examining sensory processing throughout the brain. Here we create a leaky integrate-and-fire computational model of the entire Drosophila brain, on the basis of neural connectivity and neurotransmitter identity, to study circuit properties of feeding and grooming behaviours. We show that activation of sugar-sensing or water-sensing gustatory neurons in the computational model accurately predicts neurons that respond to tastes and are required for feeding initiation. In addition, using the model to activate neurons in the feeding region of the Drosophila brain predicts those that elicit motor neuron firing-a testable hypothesis that we validate by optogenetic activation and behavioural studies. Activating different classes of gustatory neurons in the model makes accurate predictions of how several taste modalities interact, providing circuit-level insight into aversive and appetitive taste processing. Additionally, we applied this model to mechanosensory circuits and found that computational activation of mechanosensory neurons predicts activation of a small set of neurons comprising the antennal grooming circuit, and accurately describes the circuit response upon activation of different mechanosensory subtypes. Our results demonstrate that modelling brain circuits using only synapse-level connectivity and predicted neurotransmitter identity generates experimentally testable hypotheses and can describe complete sensorimotor transformations.

View Publication Page
10/02/24 | Network statistics of the whole-brain connectome of Drosophila
Albert Lin , Runzhe Yang , Sven Dorkenwald , Arie Matsliah , Amy R. Sterling , Philipp Schlegel , Szi-chieh Yu , Claire E. McKellar , Marta Costa , Katharina Eichler , Alexander Shakeel Bates , Nils Eckstein , Jan Funke , Gregory S.X.E. Jefferis , Mala Murthy
Nature. 2024 Oct 02;634(8032):153–165. doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07968-y

Brains comprise complex networks of neurons and connections, similar to the nodes and edges of artificial networks. Network analysis applied to the wiring diagrams of brains can offer insights into how they support computations and regulate the flow of information underlying perception and behaviour. The completion of the first whole-brain connectome of an adult fly, containing over 130,000 neurons and millions of synaptic connections, offers an opportunity to analyse the statistical properties and topological features of a complete brain. Here we computed the prevalence of two- and three-node motifs, examined their strengths, related this information to both neurotransmitter composition and cell type annotations, and compared these metrics with wiring diagrams of other animals. We found that the network of the fly brain displays rich-club organization, with a large population (30% of the connectome) of highly connected neurons. We identified subsets of rich-club neurons that may serve as integrators or broadcasters of signals. Finally, we examined subnetworks based on 78 anatomically defined brain regions or neuropils. These data products are shared within the FlyWire Codex (https://codex.flywire.ai) and should serve as a foundation for models and experiments exploring the relationship between neural activity and anatomical structure.

View Publication Page
08/05/24 | DaCapo: a modular deep learning framework for scalable 3D image segmentation
Patton W, Rhoades JL, Zouinkhi M, Ackerman DG, Malin-Mayor C, Adjavon D, Heinrich L, Bennett D, Zubov Y, Team CP, Weigel A, Funke J
arXiv. 2024 Aug 05:. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2408.02834

DaCapo is a specialized deep learning library tailored to expedite the training and application of existing machine learning approaches on large, near-isotropic image data. In this correspondence, we introduce DaCapo's unique features optimized for this specific domain, highlighting its modular structure, efficient experiment management tools, and scalable deployment capabilities. We discuss its potential to improve access to large-scale, isotropic image segmentation and invite the community to explore and contribute to this open-source initiative.

View Publication Page
05/09/24 | Neurotransmitter classification from electron microscopy images at synaptic sites in Drosophila melanogaster
Eckstein N, Bates AS, Champion A, Du M, Yin Y, Schlegel P, Lu AK, Rymer T, Finley-May S, Paterson T, Parekh R, Dorkenwald S, Matsliah A, Yu S, McKellar C, Sterling A, Eichler K, Costa M, Seung S, Murthy M, Hartenstein V, Jefferis GS, Funke J
Cell. 2024 May 09;187(10):2574-2594.e23. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2024.03.016

High-resolution electron microscopy of nervous systems has enabled the reconstruction of synaptic connectomes. However, we do not know the synaptic sign for each connection (i.e., whether a connection is excitatory or inhibitory), which is implied by the released transmitter. We demonstrate that artificial neural networks can predict transmitter types for presynapses from electron micrographs: a network trained to predict six transmitters (acetylcholine, glutamate, GABA, serotonin, dopamine, octopamine) achieves an accuracy of 87% for individual synapses, 94% for neurons, and 91% for known cell types across a D. melanogaster whole brain. We visualize the ultrastructural features used for prediction, discovering subtle but significant differences between transmitter phenotypes. We also analyze transmitter distributions across the brain and find that neurons that develop together largely express only one fast-acting transmitter (acetylcholine, glutamate, or GABA). We hope that our publicly available predictions act as an accelerant for neuroscientific hypothesis generation for the fly.

View Publication Page