Filter
Associated Lab
- Aguilera Castrejon Lab (17) Apply Aguilera Castrejon Lab filter
- Ahrens Lab (69) Apply Ahrens Lab filter
- Aso Lab (42) Apply Aso Lab filter
- Baker Lab (38) Apply Baker Lab filter
- Betzig Lab (115) Apply Betzig Lab filter
- Beyene Lab (14) Apply Beyene Lab filter
- Bock Lab (17) Apply Bock Lab filter
- Branson Lab (54) Apply Branson Lab filter
- Card Lab (43) Apply Card Lab filter
- Cardona Lab (64) Apply Cardona Lab filter
- Chklovskii Lab (13) Apply Chklovskii Lab filter
- Clapham Lab (15) Apply Clapham Lab filter
- Cui Lab (19) Apply Cui Lab filter
- Darshan Lab (12) Apply Darshan Lab filter
- Dennis Lab (2) Apply Dennis Lab filter
- Dickson Lab (46) Apply Dickson Lab filter
- Druckmann Lab (25) Apply Druckmann Lab filter
- Dudman Lab (53) Apply Dudman Lab filter
- Eddy/Rivas Lab (30) Apply Eddy/Rivas Lab filter
- Egnor Lab (11) Apply Egnor Lab filter
- Espinosa Medina Lab (21) Apply Espinosa Medina Lab filter
- Feliciano Lab (10) Apply Feliciano Lab filter
- Fetter Lab (41) Apply Fetter Lab filter
- FIB-SEM Technology (1) Apply FIB-SEM Technology filter
- Fitzgerald Lab (29) Apply Fitzgerald Lab filter
- Freeman Lab (15) Apply Freeman Lab filter
- Funke Lab (42) Apply Funke Lab filter
- Gonen Lab (91) Apply Gonen Lab filter
- Grigorieff Lab (62) Apply Grigorieff Lab filter
- Harris Lab (64) Apply Harris Lab filter
- Heberlein Lab (94) Apply Heberlein Lab filter
- Hermundstad Lab (30) Apply Hermundstad Lab filter
- Hess Lab (79) Apply Hess Lab filter
- Ilanges Lab (3) Apply Ilanges Lab filter
- Jayaraman Lab (48) Apply Jayaraman Lab filter
- Ji Lab (33) Apply Ji Lab filter
- Johnson Lab (6) Apply Johnson Lab filter
- Kainmueller Lab (19) Apply Kainmueller Lab filter
- Karpova Lab (14) Apply Karpova Lab filter
- Keleman Lab (13) Apply Keleman Lab filter
- Keller Lab (76) Apply Keller Lab filter
- Koay Lab (18) Apply Koay Lab filter
- Lavis Lab (154) Apply Lavis Lab filter
- Lee (Albert) Lab (34) Apply Lee (Albert) Lab filter
- Leonardo Lab (23) Apply Leonardo Lab filter
- Li Lab (30) Apply Li Lab filter
- Lippincott-Schwartz Lab (178) Apply Lippincott-Schwartz Lab filter
- Liu (Yin) Lab (7) Apply Liu (Yin) Lab filter
- Liu (Zhe) Lab (64) Apply Liu (Zhe) Lab filter
- Looger Lab (138) Apply Looger Lab filter
- Magee Lab (49) Apply Magee Lab filter
- Menon Lab (18) Apply Menon Lab filter
- Murphy Lab (13) Apply Murphy Lab filter
- O'Shea Lab (7) Apply O'Shea Lab filter
- Otopalik Lab (13) Apply Otopalik Lab filter
- Pachitariu Lab (49) Apply Pachitariu Lab filter
- Pastalkova Lab (18) Apply Pastalkova Lab filter
- Pavlopoulos Lab (19) Apply Pavlopoulos Lab filter
- Pedram Lab (15) Apply Pedram Lab filter
- Podgorski Lab (16) Apply Podgorski Lab filter
- Reiser Lab (54) Apply Reiser Lab filter
- Riddiford Lab (44) Apply Riddiford Lab filter
- Romani Lab (49) Apply Romani Lab filter
- Rubin Lab (148) Apply Rubin Lab filter
- Saalfeld Lab (64) Apply Saalfeld Lab filter
- Satou Lab (16) Apply Satou Lab filter
- Scheffer Lab (38) Apply Scheffer Lab filter
- Schreiter Lab (69) Apply Schreiter Lab filter
- Sgro Lab (21) Apply Sgro Lab filter
- Shroff Lab (31) Apply Shroff Lab filter
- Simpson Lab (23) Apply Simpson Lab filter
- Singer Lab (80) Apply Singer Lab filter
- Spruston Lab (97) Apply Spruston Lab filter
- Stern Lab (158) Apply Stern Lab filter
- Sternson Lab (54) Apply Sternson Lab filter
- Stringer Lab (39) Apply Stringer Lab filter
- Svoboda Lab (135) Apply Svoboda Lab filter
- Tebo Lab (35) Apply Tebo Lab filter
- Tervo Lab (9) Apply Tervo Lab filter
- Tillberg Lab (21) Apply Tillberg Lab filter
- Tjian Lab (64) Apply Tjian Lab filter
- Truman Lab (88) Apply Truman Lab filter
- Turaga Lab (53) Apply Turaga Lab filter
- Turner Lab (39) Apply Turner Lab filter
- Vale Lab (8) Apply Vale Lab filter
- Voigts Lab (4) Apply Voigts Lab filter
- Wang (Meng) Lab (27) Apply Wang (Meng) Lab filter
- Wang (Shaohe) Lab (25) Apply Wang (Shaohe) Lab filter
- Wu Lab (9) Apply Wu Lab filter
- Zlatic Lab (28) Apply Zlatic Lab filter
- Zuker Lab (25) Apply Zuker Lab filter
Associated Project Team
- CellMap (12) Apply CellMap filter
- COSEM (3) Apply COSEM filter
- FIB-SEM Technology (5) Apply FIB-SEM Technology filter
- Fly Descending Interneuron (12) Apply Fly Descending Interneuron filter
- Fly Functional Connectome (14) Apply Fly Functional Connectome filter
- Fly Olympiad (5) Apply Fly Olympiad filter
- FlyEM (56) Apply FlyEM filter
- FlyLight (50) Apply FlyLight filter
- GENIE (47) Apply GENIE filter
- Integrative Imaging (7) Apply Integrative Imaging filter
- Larval Olympiad (2) Apply Larval Olympiad filter
- MouseLight (18) Apply MouseLight filter
- NeuroSeq (1) Apply NeuroSeq filter
- ThalamoSeq (1) Apply ThalamoSeq filter
- Tool Translation Team (T3) (28) Apply Tool Translation Team (T3) filter
- Transcription Imaging (49) Apply Transcription Imaging filter
Publication Date
- 2025 (227) Apply 2025 filter
- 2024 (212) Apply 2024 filter
- 2023 (158) Apply 2023 filter
- 2022 (192) Apply 2022 filter
- 2021 (194) Apply 2021 filter
- 2020 (196) Apply 2020 filter
- 2019 (202) Apply 2019 filter
- 2018 (232) Apply 2018 filter
- 2017 (217) Apply 2017 filter
- 2016 (209) Apply 2016 filter
- 2015 (252) Apply 2015 filter
- 2014 (236) Apply 2014 filter
- 2013 (194) Apply 2013 filter
- 2012 (190) Apply 2012 filter
- 2011 (190) Apply 2011 filter
- 2010 (161) Apply 2010 filter
- 2009 (158) Apply 2009 filter
- 2008 (140) Apply 2008 filter
- 2007 (106) Apply 2007 filter
- 2006 (92) Apply 2006 filter
- 2005 (67) Apply 2005 filter
- 2004 (57) Apply 2004 filter
- 2003 (58) Apply 2003 filter
- 2002 (39) Apply 2002 filter
- 2001 (28) Apply 2001 filter
- 2000 (29) Apply 2000 filter
- 1999 (14) Apply 1999 filter
- 1998 (18) Apply 1998 filter
- 1997 (16) Apply 1997 filter
- 1996 (10) Apply 1996 filter
- 1995 (18) Apply 1995 filter
- 1994 (12) Apply 1994 filter
- 1993 (10) Apply 1993 filter
- 1992 (6) Apply 1992 filter
- 1991 (11) Apply 1991 filter
- 1990 (11) Apply 1990 filter
- 1989 (6) Apply 1989 filter
- 1988 (1) Apply 1988 filter
- 1987 (7) Apply 1987 filter
- 1986 (4) Apply 1986 filter
- 1985 (5) Apply 1985 filter
- 1984 (2) Apply 1984 filter
- 1983 (2) Apply 1983 filter
- 1982 (3) Apply 1982 filter
- 1981 (3) Apply 1981 filter
- 1980 (1) Apply 1980 filter
- 1979 (1) Apply 1979 filter
- 1976 (2) Apply 1976 filter
- 1973 (1) Apply 1973 filter
- 1970 (1) Apply 1970 filter
- 1967 (1) Apply 1967 filter
Type of Publication
4202 Publications
Showing 1-10 of 4202 resultsCreating artificial organelles that sequester and release specific proteins in response to a small molecule in mammalian cells is an attractive approach for regulating protein function. In this work, by combining phase-separated condensates formed by the tandem fusion of two oligomeric proteins with a trimethoprim (TMP)-responsive nanobody switch for GFP (LAMA; ligand-modulated antibody fragment), we developed a synthetic condensate system that initially sequesters GFP-tagged proteins within condensates and rapidly releases them into the cytoplasm upon TMP treatment. The released proteins can then be resequestered by washing out the TMP. This system enabled user-defined, temporal, rapid, and reversible control of cellular processes, including membrane ruffling mediated by exogenously expressed GFP-Vav2 and modulation of the cellular localization of endogenous ERK2-GFP generated by genome knock-in. Our results highlight the utility of the LAMA-based synthetic condensate platform as a novel, chemically switchable tool for regulating protein function through controlled protein sequestration and release in mammalian cells.
Foraging animals often sample options that yield rewards with different probabilities. In such scenarios, many animals exhibit “matching”, whereby they allocate their choices such that the fraction of rewarded samples is equal across options. While matching can be optimal in environments with diminishing returns, this condition alone is not sufficient to determine optimality. Moreover, diminishing returns arise when resources deplete and replenish over time, but their form depends on the temporal structure and statistics of replenishment. Here, we investigate how these environmental properties influence whether matching is optimal. We consider an agent that samples options at fixed rates and derive the resulting reward probabilities across different types of environments. This allows us to analytically determine conditions under which the optimal policy exhibits matching. When all options share the same replenishment dynamics, matching emerges as optimal across a wide range of environments. However, when dynamics differ across options, optimal policies can deviate from matching. In such cases, the rank-ordering of observed reward probabilities depends only on the qualitative nature of the replenishment process, and not on the specific replenishment rates. As a result, the optimal policy can exhibit under- or over-matching depending on which options are more rewarding. We use this result to identify environments where performance differs substantially between matching and optimality. Finally, we show that fluctuations in replenishment rates—representing environmental stochasticity or internal uncertainty—can amplify deviations from matching. These findings deepen our understanding of the relationship between environmental variability and behavioral optimality, and provide testable predictions across diverse settings.
Much focus has shifted towards understanding how glial dysfunction contributes to age-related neurodegeneration due to the critical roles glial cells play in maintaining healthy brain function. Cell-cell interactions, which are largely mediated by cell-surface proteins, control many critical aspects of development and physiology; as such, dysregulation of glial cell-surface proteins in particular is hypothesized to play an important role in age-related neurodegeneration. However, it remains technically difficult to profile glial cell-surface proteins in intact brains. Here, we applied a cell-surface proteomic profiling method to glial cells from intact brains in Drosophila, which enabled us to fully profile cell-surface proteomes in-situ, preserving native cell-cell interactions that would otherwise be omitted using traditional proteomics methods. Applying this platform to young and old flies, we investigated how glial cell-surface proteomes change during aging. We identified candidate genes predicted to be involved in brain aging, including several associated with neural development and synapse wiring molecules not previously thought to be particularly active in glia. Through a functional genetic screen, we identified one surface protein, DIP-β, which is down-regulated in old flies and can increase fly lifespan when overexpressed in adult glial cells. We further performed whole-head single-nucleus RNA-seq, and revealed that DIP-β overexpression mainly impacts glial and fat cells. We also found that glial DIP-β overexpression was associated with improved cell-cell communication, which may contribute to the observed lifespan extension. Our study is the first to apply in-situ cell-surface proteomics to glial cells in Drosophila, and to identify DIP-β as a potential glial regulator of brain aging.
Many plasticity rules rely on adjusting the strength of synapses between pairs of cells based on their coincident activity. We uncovered a new mechanism for coincidence detection in the Drosophila head direction network. To maintain an accurate sense of direction, head direction neurons that signal orientation during navigation must learn to anchor to relevant external sensory cues in novel environments. Yet the synaptic mechanism for this form of unsupervised learning is unknown in any organism. In Drosophila, GABAergic visual inputs converge onto head direction neurons, and these inhibitory synapses change strength with experience to learn the relationship between visual landmarks and head direction. However, how coincident pre- and postsynaptic activity is detected across this inhibitory synapse is not understood. We discovered that neurons which release the monoamine octopamine close a feedback loop that conveys postsynaptic head direction activity onto presynaptic terminals of visual inputs. This octopamine pathway is required for anchoring the head direction network to visual cues. Furthermore, pairing structured activation of octopamine neurons with a visual cue is sufficient to drive rapid plasticity, even without postsynaptic head direction cell activity. Previous work has extensively characterized coincidence detection mechanisms at excitatory synapses; our work defines a novel mechanism for coincidence detection at an inhibitory synapse, in which postsynaptic activity is relayed via a neuromodulatory neuron onto presynaptic terminals
Nervous systems can process information in serial or in parallel, trading off efficiency for flexibility and speed. How these network architectures are implemented across sensorimotor pathways to control behavior is unclear. We investigate this tradeoff directly in Drosophila by comparing neuronal circuits underlying landing and takeoff, behaviors transforming similar visual cues to whole-body motor output. Using a whole-CNS connectome, electrophysiology, and behavioral analysis, we reconstruct the complete feedforward pathway for landing, including visual feature detectors, a dedicated ensemble of descending neurons (DNs), and a core premotor circuit in the nerve cord. Comparison to the takeoff pathway reveals that, despite encoding the same sensory feature and engaging similar muscle groups, neuronal circuits controlling the two behaviors are separated at every sensorimotor level. Extending this analysis to the complete DN population reveals a blueprint for descending motor control: DNs across the behavioral space utilized by the fly are organized as a set of parallel, loosely-overlapping ensembles that form a continuum from command-like control, with individual DNs determining behavioral output, to population coding, with multiple DNs controlling behavior synergistically. Distinct combinations of sensory feature detectors differentially recruit DN ensembles to enable flexible, context-dependent behavioral control.
Mainstream medicine commonly categorizes acupuncture as “alternative and complementary,” a designation that reflects conceptual gaps in existing treatment classification systems. Integrating complementary medicine into the mainstream medical system requires a conceptual adjustment. Here, I propose a mechanism-based 5R classification—Removing, Repairing, Replacing, Replenishing, Regulating—to systematically categorize therapies. Based on this classification, acupuncture and its related interventions fall under functional regulation therapy. This framework offers a unified, functional perspective that facilitates the integration of complementary medicine into mainstream medical taxonomy.
Maintaining physiological homeostasis requires a complex interplay among endocrine organs, peripheral tissues, and distributed neuroendocrine control circuits, all of which are coupled through feedback loops that operate over minutes to hours. Although many physiological needs are broadcast through hormones, metabolites, and other chemical compounds circulating in the bloodstream, we rarely observe more than a few of these messengers together and at high cadence during behavior. To address this, we developed a minimally disruptive workflow to measure the free fraction of hundreds of amines and small peptides at a 7.5-minute cadence for \~8 hrs in freely moving mice using chronic jugular microdialysis implants and chemical isotope labeling Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry. Single-compound profiles behave according to known physiology, such as purine turnover correlating with movement, delayed histamine/5-HIAA changes, and coordinated amino-acid dynamics. Our multiplexed measures enable high-dimensional analyses that uncover properties of the underlying dynamics. For example, systems-level analyses show that 10 dimensions explain over 70% of the variance in hormone/metabolite covariation, consistent with a low rank description of the physiological state space, with projections aligned to locomotion state transitions. Our work opens avenues for the discovery of hormonal dynamics, compound interactions, and their effects on behavior.
Unveiling the genetic profiles of spatially distinguished cells is an important aspect in many areas of brain research, as the genetic identity contains information about a cell’s physiological properties and internal state. On top of this, knowledge of the genetic details of each cell can reveal structural organization within tissue. As image-based spatial transcriptomics moves toward applications in tissues with dense cellular packing, accurate assignment of detected mRNA transcripts ("spots") to correct segmented cells becomes increasingly difficult, rendering simple methods insufficient with many incorrect assignments to neighboring cells. Here we introduce SpotDMix, a statistical model for assigning spots to cells by modeling spots as coming from a mixture model of distributions matching segmented cell shapes, with assignment probabilities and shape parameters optimized using the Expectation Maximization algorithm. Performance is assessed and compared against several simple methods in various scenarios on both surrogate data and larval zebrafish data. In all tested scenarios SpotDMix outperforms the simple methods on all evaluated metrics, including individual transcript assignment accuracy, total assigned number of spots per cell error and cell type classification. Further, SpotDMix produces a higher degree of exclusivity between genes which are known to not or rarely co-express.
To navigate their environments effectively, animals frequently track time elapsed or distance traveled while seeking food and avoiding threats. The hippocampus is implicated in this process, but the neural mechanisms remain unclear. Using virtual reality tasks that require mice to integrate time or distance to collect a reward, we identified two previously unknown functional subpopulations of CA1 pyramidal neurons. Both subpopulations encode time or distance via distinct ramping dynamics. The first subpopulation exhibits a rapid, synchronous rise in activity upon movement-initiated integration. Subsequently, individual neurons ramp down at heterogeneous rates, creating progressively diverging firing rates that encode elapsed time or distance. Closed-loop optogenetic inactivation of somatostatin-positive (SST) interneurons counterintuitively reduced the ramping activity, leading mice to prematurely attempt reward collection, suggesting impaired time/distance estimation. Conversely, the second CA1 subpopulation shows opposite dynamics - an initial rapid suppression followed by a gradual ramp-up. Inactivating parvalbumin-positive (PV) interneurons diminished this initial suppression, resulting in transient attempts to collect reward near integration onset. These findings reveal parallel hippocampal circuits that initiate and maintain time or distance encoding, controlled by PV and SST interneurons, respectively, and provide insights into the neural computations supporting goal-directed navigation.
Background/Objectives: High-grade gliomas (HGGs), including glioblastomas, are among the most aggressive brain tumors due to their high intratumoral heterogeneity and extensive infiltration. Glioma stem-like cells (GSCs) frequently invade along white matter tracts such as the corpus callosum, but the molecular programs driving this region-specific invasion remain poorly defined. The aim of this study was to identify transcriptional signatures associated with GSC infiltration into the corpus callosum. Methods: We established an orthotopic xenograft model by implanting fluorescently labeled human GSCs into nude mouse brains. Tumor growth and invasion patterns were assessed using tissue clearing, light-sheet fluorescence microscopy, and histological analyses. To characterize region-specific molecular profiles, we performed microfluidic-based single-cell RNA expression analysis of 48 invasion- and stemness-related genes in cells isolated from the tumor bulk (TB) and corpus callosum (CC). Results: By six weeks post-implantation, GSCs displayed marked tropism for the corpus callosum, with distinct infiltration patterns captured by three-dimensional imaging. Single-cell gene expression profiling revealed significant differences in 7 of the 48 genes (14.6%) between TB- and CC-derived GSCs. These genes—NES, CCND1, GUSB, NOTCH1, E2F1, EGFR, and TGFB1—collectively defined a “corpus callosum invasion signature” (CC-Iv). CC-derived cells showed a unimodal, high-expression profile of CC-Iv genes, whereas TB cells exhibited bimodal distributions, suggesting heterogeneous transcriptional states. Importantly, higher CC-Iv expression correlated with worse survival in patients with low-grade gliomas. Conclusions: This multimodal approach identified a corpus callosum-specific invasion signature in glioma stem-like cells, revealing how local microenvironmental cues shape transcriptional reprogramming during infiltration. These findings provide new insights into the spatial heterogeneity of gliomas and highlight potential molecular targets for therapies designed to limit tumor spread through white matter tracts.
