Filter
Associated Lab
- Aguilera Castrejon Lab (15) Apply Aguilera Castrejon Lab filter
- Ahrens Lab (11) Apply Ahrens Lab filter
- Baker Lab (19) Apply Baker Lab filter
- Betzig Lab (12) Apply Betzig Lab filter
- Beyene Lab (5) Apply Beyene Lab filter
- Bock Lab (3) Apply Bock Lab filter
- Branson Lab (3) Apply Branson Lab filter
- Card Lab (6) Apply Card Lab filter
- Cardona Lab (19) Apply Cardona Lab filter
- Chklovskii Lab (3) Apply Chklovskii Lab filter
- Clapham Lab (1) Apply Clapham Lab filter
- Darshan Lab (4) Apply Darshan Lab filter
- Dennis Lab (1) Apply Dennis Lab filter
- Dickson Lab (14) Apply Dickson Lab filter
- Druckmann Lab (4) Apply Druckmann Lab filter
- Dudman Lab (12) Apply Dudman Lab filter
- Egnor Lab (7) Apply Egnor Lab filter
- Espinosa Medina Lab (4) Apply Espinosa Medina Lab filter
- Fetter Lab (10) Apply Fetter Lab filter
- Fitzgerald Lab (13) Apply Fitzgerald Lab filter
- Gonen Lab (32) Apply Gonen Lab filter
- Grigorieff Lab (28) Apply Grigorieff Lab filter
- Harris Lab (10) Apply Harris Lab filter
- Heberlein Lab (81) Apply Heberlein Lab filter
- Hermundstad Lab (4) Apply Hermundstad Lab filter
- Hess Lab (3) Apply Hess Lab filter
- Jayaraman Lab (4) Apply Jayaraman Lab filter
- Johnson Lab (5) Apply Johnson Lab filter
- Kainmueller Lab (19) Apply Kainmueller Lab filter
- Karpova Lab (1) Apply Karpova Lab filter
- Keleman Lab (5) Apply Keleman Lab filter
- Keller Lab (15) Apply Keller Lab filter
- Koay Lab (16) Apply Koay Lab filter
- Lavis Lab (12) Apply Lavis Lab filter
- Lee (Albert) Lab (5) Apply Lee (Albert) Lab filter
- Leonardo Lab (4) Apply Leonardo Lab filter
- Li Lab (24) Apply Li Lab filter
- Lippincott-Schwartz Lab (72) Apply Lippincott-Schwartz Lab filter
- Liu (Yin) Lab (5) Apply Liu (Yin) Lab filter
- Liu (Zhe) Lab (5) Apply Liu (Zhe) Lab filter
- Looger Lab (1) Apply Looger Lab filter
- Magee Lab (18) Apply Magee Lab filter
- Menon Lab (6) Apply Menon Lab filter
- Murphy Lab (7) Apply Murphy Lab filter
- O'Shea Lab (1) Apply O'Shea Lab filter
- Otopalik Lab (12) Apply Otopalik Lab filter
- Pachitariu Lab (12) Apply Pachitariu Lab filter
- Pastalkova Lab (13) Apply Pastalkova Lab filter
- Pavlopoulos Lab (12) Apply Pavlopoulos Lab filter
- Pedram Lab (11) Apply Pedram Lab filter
- Reiser Lab (6) Apply Reiser Lab filter
- Riddiford Lab (24) Apply Riddiford Lab filter
- Romani Lab (12) Apply Romani Lab filter
- Rubin Lab (38) Apply Rubin Lab filter
- Saalfeld Lab (17) Apply Saalfeld Lab filter
- Satou Lab (15) Apply Satou Lab filter
- Schreiter Lab (17) Apply Schreiter Lab filter
- Sgro Lab (20) Apply Sgro Lab filter
- Simpson Lab (5) Apply Simpson Lab filter
- Singer Lab (43) Apply Singer Lab filter
- Spruston Lab (36) Apply Spruston Lab filter
- Stern Lab (83) Apply Stern Lab filter
- Sternson Lab (7) Apply Sternson Lab filter
- Stringer Lab (3) Apply Stringer Lab filter
- Svoboda Lab (4) Apply Svoboda Lab filter
- Tebo Lab (24) Apply Tebo Lab filter
- Tillberg Lab (3) Apply Tillberg Lab filter
- Tjian Lab (47) Apply Tjian Lab filter
- Truman Lab (30) Apply Truman Lab filter
- Turaga Lab (12) Apply Turaga Lab filter
- Turner Lab (11) Apply Turner Lab filter
- Wang (Shaohe) Lab (19) Apply Wang (Shaohe) Lab filter
- Wu Lab (1) Apply Wu Lab filter
- Zlatic Lab (2) Apply Zlatic Lab filter
- Zuker Lab (20) Apply Zuker Lab filter
Associated Project Team
Publication Date
- 2024 (1) Apply 2024 filter
- 2023 (1) Apply 2023 filter
- 2022 (26) Apply 2022 filter
- 2021 (19) Apply 2021 filter
- 2020 (19) Apply 2020 filter
- 2019 (25) Apply 2019 filter
- 2018 (26) Apply 2018 filter
- 2017 (31) Apply 2017 filter
- 2016 (18) Apply 2016 filter
- 2015 (57) Apply 2015 filter
- 2014 (46) Apply 2014 filter
- 2013 (58) Apply 2013 filter
- 2012 (78) Apply 2012 filter
- 2011 (92) Apply 2011 filter
- 2010 (100) Apply 2010 filter
- 2009 (102) Apply 2009 filter
- 2008 (100) Apply 2008 filter
- 2007 (85) Apply 2007 filter
- 2006 (89) Apply 2006 filter
- 2005 (67) Apply 2005 filter
- 2004 (57) Apply 2004 filter
- 2003 (58) Apply 2003 filter
- 2002 (39) Apply 2002 filter
- 2001 (28) Apply 2001 filter
- 2000 (29) Apply 2000 filter
- 1999 (14) Apply 1999 filter
- 1998 (18) Apply 1998 filter
- 1997 (16) Apply 1997 filter
- 1996 (10) Apply 1996 filter
- 1995 (18) Apply 1995 filter
- 1994 (12) Apply 1994 filter
- 1993 (10) Apply 1993 filter
- 1992 (6) Apply 1992 filter
- 1991 (11) Apply 1991 filter
- 1990 (11) Apply 1990 filter
- 1989 (6) Apply 1989 filter
- 1988 (1) Apply 1988 filter
- 1987 (7) Apply 1987 filter
- 1986 (4) Apply 1986 filter
- 1985 (5) Apply 1985 filter
- 1984 (2) Apply 1984 filter
- 1983 (2) Apply 1983 filter
- 1982 (3) Apply 1982 filter
- 1981 (3) Apply 1981 filter
- 1980 (1) Apply 1980 filter
- 1979 (1) Apply 1979 filter
- 1976 (2) Apply 1976 filter
- 1973 (1) Apply 1973 filter
- 1970 (1) Apply 1970 filter
- 1967 (1) Apply 1967 filter
Type of Publication
- Remove Non-Janelia filter Non-Janelia
1417 Publications
Showing 91-100 of 1417 resultsThe ability of animals to accumulate sensory information across time is fundamental to decision-making. Using a mouse behavioral paradigm where navigational decisions are based on accumulating pulses of visual cues, I compared neural activity in primary visual (V1) to secondary visual and retrosplenial cortices. Even in V1, only a small fraction of neurons had sensory-like responses to cues. Instead, all areas were grossly similar in how neural populations contained a large variety of task-related information from sensory to cognitive, including cue timings, accumulated counts, place/time, decision and reward outcome. Across-trial influences were prevalent, possibly relevant to how animal behavior incorporates past contexts. Intriguingly, all these variables also modulated the amplitudes of sensory responses. While previous work often modeled the accumulation process as integration, the observed scaling of sensory responses by accumulated counts instead suggests a recursive process where sensory responses are gradually amplified. I show that such a multiplicative feedback-loop algorithm better explains psychophysical data than integration, particularly in how the performance transitions into following Weber-Fechner's Law only at high counts.
A fundamental goal of systems neuroscience is to understand how neural activity gives rise to natural behavior. In order to achieve this goal, we must first build comprehensive models that offer quantitative descriptions of behavior. We develop a new class of probabilistic models to tackle this challenge in the study of larval zebrafish, an important model organism for neuroscience. Larval zebrafish locomote via sequences of punctate swim bouts--brief flicks of the tail--which are naturally modeled as a marked point process. However, these sequences of swim bouts belie a set of discrete and continuous internal states, latent variables that are not captured by standard point process models. We incorporate these variables as latent marks of a point process and explore various models for their dynamics. To infer the latent variables and fit the parameters of this model, we develop an amortized variational inference algorithm that targets the collapsed posterior distribution, analytically marginalizing out the discrete latent variables. With a dataset of over 120,000 swim bouts, we show that our models reveal interpretable discrete classes of swim bouts and continuous internal states like hunger that modulate their dynamics. These models are a major step toward understanding the natural behavioral program of the larval zebrafish and, ultimately, its neural underpinnings.
Macroscale fluorescence imaging is increasingly used to observe biological samples. However, it may suffer from spectral interferences that originate from ambient light or autofluorescence of the sample or its support. In this manuscript, we built a simple and inexpensive fluorescence macroscope, which has been used to evaluate the performance of Speed OPIOM (Out of Phase Imaging after Optical Modulation), which is a reference-free dynamic contrast protocol, to selectively image reversibly photoswitchable fluorophores as labels against detrimental autofluorescence and ambient light. By tuning the intensity and radial frequency of the modulated illumination to the Speed OPIOM resonance and adopting a phase-sensitive detection scheme that ensures noise rejection, we enhanced the sensitivity and the signal-to-noise ratio for fluorescence detection in blot assays by factors of 50 and 10, respectively, over direct fluorescence observation under constant illumination. Then, we overcame the strong autofluorescence of growth media that are currently used in microbiology and realized multiplexed fluorescence observation of colonies of spectrally similar fluorescent bacteria with a unique configuration of excitation and emission wavelengths. Finally, we easily discriminated fluorescent labels from the autofluorescent and reflective background in labeled leaves, even under the interference of incident light at intensities that are comparable to sunlight. The proposed approach is expected to find multiple applications, from biological assays to outdoor observations, in fluorescence macroimaging.
Population recordings of calcium activity are a major source of insight into neural function. Large dataset sizes often require automated methods, but automation can introduce errors that are difficult to detect. Here we show that automatic time course estimation can sometimes lead to significant misattribution errors, in which fluorescence is ascribed to the wrong cell. Misattribution arises when the shapes of overlapping cells are imperfectly defined, or when entire cells or processes are not identified, and misattribution can even be produced by methods specifically designed to handle overlap. To diagnose this problem, we develop a transient-by-transient metric and a visualization tool that allow users to quickly assess the degree of misattribution in large populations. To filter out misattribution, we also design a robust estimator that explicitly accounts for contaminating signals in a generative model. Our methods can be combined with essentially any cell finding technique, empowering users to diagnose and correct at large scale a problem that has the potential to significantly alter scientific conclusions.
Noncovalent interactions between single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) oligonucleotides and single wall carbon nanotubes (SWNTs) have provided a unique class of tunable chemistries for a variety of applications. However, mechanistic insight into both the photophysical and intermolecular phenomena underlying their utility is lacking, which results in obligate heuristic approaches for producing ssDNA-SWNT based technologies. In this work, we present an ultrasensitive "turn-on" nanosensor for neuromodulators dopamine and norepinephrine with strong relative change in fluorescence intensity (Δ F/ F) of up to 3500%, a signal appropriate for in vivo neuroimaging, and uncover the photophysical principles and intermolecular interactions that govern the molecular recognition and fluorescence modulation of this nanosensor synthesized from the spontaneous self-assembly of (GT) ssDNA rings on SWNTs. The fluorescence modulation of the ssDNA-SWNT conjugate is shown to exhibit remarkable sensitivity to the ssDNA sequence chemistry, length, and surface density, providing a set of parameters with which to tune nanosensor dynamic range, analyte selectivity and strength of fluorescence turn-on. We employ classical and quantum mechanical molecular dynamics simulations to rationalize our experimental findings. Calculations show that (GT) ssDNA form ordered rings around (9,4) SWNTs, inducing periodic surface potentials that modulate exciton recombination lifetimes. Further evidence is presented to elucidate how dopamine analyte binding modulates SWNT fluorescence. We discuss the implications of our findings for SWNT-based molecular imaging applications.
Chemical signaling between neurons in the brain can be divided into two major categories: fast synaptic transmission and neuromodulation. Fast synaptic transmission, mediated by amino acids such as glutamate and GABA, occurs on millisecond time scales and results in the influx of ions through ligand-gated ion channels on postsynaptic neurons (Figure 1A). Electrophysiological and optical imaging tools, including genetically encoded voltage indicators, have enabled neuroscientists to link cause (neurotransmitter release) and effect (membrane polarization) of synaptic transmission in time and space. Unlike classical neurotransmitters, neuromodulators do not produce immediate electrical effects that excite or inhibit target neurons. Instead, neuromodulators tune the intrinsic or synaptic properties of neurons, most commonly through interaction with G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) (Figure 1B). Neuromodulators can escape the synaptic cleft and diffuse broadly, allowing them to influence the activity of many neurons in a state-dependent manner. Therefore, the spatial component of neuromodulator flux is fundamentally important. However, the temporal and/or spatial limitations of techniques classically used to study neuromodulation, such as microdialysis and fast-scan cyclic voltammetry (FSCV), make it difficult to interpret how neuromodulator release affects the plasticity or function of target neuronal populations on a moment-to-moment basis. Therefore, tools that can detect neuromodulators with high spatiotemporal resolution are critical for understanding their impact on neural computations that control behavior in health and disease.
Despite advances in experimental techniques and accumulation of large datasets concerning the composition and properties of the cortex, quantitative modeling of cortical circuits under in-vivo-like conditions remains challenging. Here we report and publicly release a biophysically detailed circuit model of layer 4 in the mouse primary visual cortex, receiving thalamo-cortical visual inputs. The 45,000-neuron model was subjected to a battery of visual stimuli, and results were compared to published work and new in vivo experiments. Simulations reproduced a variety of observations, including effects of optogenetic perturbations. Critical to the agreement between responses in silico and in vivo were the rules of functional synaptic connectivity between neurons. Interestingly, after extreme simplification the model still performed satisfactorily on many measurements, although quantitative agreement with experiments suffered. These results emphasize the importance of functional rules of cortical wiring and enable a next generation of data-driven models of in vivo neural activity and computations.
Abstract Single molecule RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization (smFISH) has become the standard tool for high spatial resolution analysis of gene expression in the context of tissue organization. This article describes protocols to perform smFISH on whole-mount mouse embryonic organs, where tissue organization can be compared to RNA expression by co-immunostaining of known protein markers. An enzymatic labeling strategy is also introduced to produce low-cost smFISH probes. Important considerations and practical guidelines for imaging smFISH samples using fluorescence confocal microscopy are described. Finally, a suite of custom-written ImageJ macros is included with detailed instructions to enable semi-automated smFISH image analysis of both 2D and 3D images. © 2018 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
There is increased appreciation that dopamine (DA) neurons in the midbrain respond not only to reward 1,2 and reward-predicting cues 1,3,4, but also to other variables such as distance to reward 5, movements 6–11 and behavioral choices 12–15. Based on these findings, a major open question is how the responses to these diverse variables are organized across the population of DA neurons. In other words, do individual DA neurons multiplex multiple variables, or are subsets of neurons specialized in encoding specific behavioral variables? The reason that this fundamental question has been difficult to resolve is that recordings from large populations of individual DA neurons have not been performed in a behavioral task with sufficient complexity to examine these diverse variables simultaneously. To address this gap, we used 2-photon calcium imaging through an implanted lens to record activity of >300 midbrain DA neurons in the VTA during a complex decision-making task. As mice navigated in a virtual reality (VR) environment, DA neurons encoded an array of sensory, motor, and cognitive variables. These responses were functionally clustered, such that subpopulations of neurons transmitted information about a subset of behavioral variables, in addition to encoding reward. These functional clusters were spatially organized, such that neighboring neurons were more likely to be part of the same cluster. Taken together with the topography between DA neurons and their projections, this specialization and anatomical organization may aid downstream circuits in correctly interpreting the wide range of signals transmitted by DA neurons.
Neural network remodeling underpins the ability to remember life experiences, but little is known about the long-term plasticity of neural populations. To study how the brain encodes episodic events, we used time-lapse two-photon microscopy and a fluorescent reporter of neural plasticity based on an enhanced form of the synaptic activity-responsive element (E-SARE) within the Arc promoter to track thousands of CA1 hippocampal pyramidal cells over weeks in mice that repeatedly encountered different environments. Each environment evokes characteristic patterns of ensemble neural plasticity, but with each encounter, the set of activated cells gradually evolves. After repeated exposures, the plasticity patterns evoked by an individual environment progressively stabilize. Compared with young adults, plasticity patterns in aged mice are less specific to individual environments and less stable across repeat experiences. Long-term consolidation of hippocampal plasticity patterns may support long-term memory formation, whereas weaker consolidation in aged subjects might reflect declining memory function.