Filter
Associated Lab
- Aguilera Castrejon Lab (1) Apply Aguilera Castrejon Lab filter
- Ahrens Lab (2) Apply Ahrens Lab filter
- Aso Lab (4) Apply Aso Lab filter
- Betzig Lab (1) Apply Betzig Lab filter
- Beyene Lab (1) Apply Beyene Lab filter
- Bock Lab (2) Apply Bock Lab filter
- Branson Lab (6) Apply Branson Lab filter
- Card Lab (2) Apply Card Lab filter
- Cardona Lab (4) Apply Cardona Lab filter
- Clapham Lab (1) Apply Clapham Lab filter
- Cui Lab (1) Apply Cui Lab filter
- Darshan Lab (1) Apply Darshan Lab filter
- Dickson Lab (1) Apply Dickson Lab filter
- Druckmann Lab (2) Apply Druckmann Lab filter
- Dudman Lab (1) Apply Dudman Lab filter
- Eddy/Rivas Lab (2) Apply Eddy/Rivas Lab filter
- Egnor Lab (1) Apply Egnor Lab filter
- Fetter Lab (3) Apply Fetter Lab filter
- Freeman Lab (1) Apply Freeman Lab filter
- Funke Lab (4) Apply Funke Lab filter
- Gonen Lab (1) Apply Gonen Lab filter
- Harris Lab (3) Apply Harris Lab filter
- Heberlein Lab (1) Apply Heberlein Lab filter
- Hess Lab (6) Apply Hess Lab filter
- Jayaraman Lab (4) Apply Jayaraman Lab filter
- Keller Lab (2) Apply Keller Lab filter
- Lavis Lab (2) Apply Lavis Lab filter
- Lee (Albert) Lab (1) Apply Lee (Albert) Lab filter
- Li Lab (1) Apply Li Lab filter
- Lippincott-Schwartz Lab (2) Apply Lippincott-Schwartz Lab filter
- Liu (Zhe) Lab (2) Apply Liu (Zhe) Lab filter
- Looger Lab (1) Apply Looger Lab filter
- Magee Lab (1) Apply Magee Lab filter
- Otopalik Lab (1) Apply Otopalik Lab filter
- Pachitariu Lab (1) Apply Pachitariu Lab filter
- Reiser Lab (3) Apply Reiser Lab filter
- Rubin Lab (12) Apply Rubin Lab filter
- Saalfeld Lab (9) Apply Saalfeld Lab filter
- Satou Lab (1) Apply Satou Lab filter
- Scheffer Lab (8) Apply Scheffer Lab filter
- Singer Lab (1) Apply Singer Lab filter
- Spruston Lab (3) Apply Spruston Lab filter
- Stern Lab (2) Apply Stern Lab filter
- Sternson Lab (1) Apply Sternson Lab filter
- Stringer Lab (2) Apply Stringer Lab filter
- Svoboda Lab (2) Apply Svoboda Lab filter
- Tebo Lab (2) Apply Tebo Lab filter
- Tillberg Lab (2) Apply Tillberg Lab filter
- Truman Lab (1) Apply Truman Lab filter
- Turaga Lab (4) Apply Turaga Lab filter
- Turner Lab (3) Apply Turner Lab filter
- Wang (Meng) Lab (1) Apply Wang (Meng) Lab filter
- Zlatic Lab (1) Apply Zlatic Lab filter
Associated Project Team
- CellMap (5) Apply CellMap filter
- COSEM (2) Apply COSEM filter
- Fly Functional Connectome (1) Apply Fly Functional Connectome filter
- Fly Olympiad (1) Apply Fly Olympiad filter
- FlyEM (16) Apply FlyEM filter
- FlyLight (5) Apply FlyLight filter
- GENIE (3) Apply GENIE filter
- MouseLight (2) Apply MouseLight filter
- Tool Translation Team (T3) (1) Apply Tool Translation Team (T3) filter
Associated Support Team
- Project Pipeline Support (2) Apply Project Pipeline Support filter
- Anatomy and Histology (1) Apply Anatomy and Histology filter
- Electron Microscopy (2) Apply Electron Microscopy filter
- Gene Targeting and Transgenics (1) Apply Gene Targeting and Transgenics filter
- Integrative Imaging (1) Apply Integrative Imaging filter
- Invertebrate Shared Resource (4) Apply Invertebrate Shared Resource filter
- Janelia Experimental Technology (3) Apply Janelia Experimental Technology filter
- Management Team (1) Apply Management Team filter
- Primary & iPS Cell Culture (1) Apply Primary & iPS Cell Culture filter
- Project Technical Resources (9) Apply Project Technical Resources filter
- Quantitative Genomics (1) Apply Quantitative Genomics filter
- Remove Scientific Computing Software filter Scientific Computing Software
- Scientific Computing Systems (1) Apply Scientific Computing Systems filter
Publication Date
- 2025 (13) Apply 2025 filter
- 2024 (15) Apply 2024 filter
- 2023 (7) Apply 2023 filter
- 2022 (4) Apply 2022 filter
- 2021 (4) Apply 2021 filter
- 2020 (2) Apply 2020 filter
- 2019 (5) Apply 2019 filter
- 2018 (9) Apply 2018 filter
- 2017 (9) Apply 2017 filter
- 2016 (7) Apply 2016 filter
- 2015 (11) Apply 2015 filter
- 2014 (5) Apply 2014 filter
- 2012 (1) Apply 2012 filter
92 Janelia Publications
Showing 21-30 of 92 resultsWe present a method to automatically identify and track nuclei in time-lapse microscopy recordings of entire developing embryos. The method combines deep learning and global optimization. On a mouse dataset, it reconstructs 75.8% of cell lineages spanning 1 h, as compared to 31.8% for the competing method. Our approach improves understanding of where and when cell fate decisions are made in developing embryos, tissues, and organs.
Mapping the connectivity of neurons in the brain (i.e., connectomics) is a challenging problem due to both the number of connections in even the smallest organisms and the nanometer resolution required to resolve them. Because of this, previous connectomes contain only hundreds of neurons, such as in the C.elegans connectome. Recent technological advances will unlock the mysteries of increasingly large connectomes (or partial connectomes). However, the value of these maps is limited by our ability to reason with this data and understand any underlying motifs. To aid connectome analysis, we introduce algorithms to cluster similarly-shaped neurons, where 3D neuronal shapes are represented as skeletons. In particular, we propose a novel location-sensitive clustering algorithm. We show clustering results on neurons reconstructed from the Drosophila medulla that show high-accuracy.
Animals avoid predators and find the best food and mates by learning from the consequences of their behavior. However, reinforcers are not always uniquely appetitive or aversive but can have complex properties. Most intoxicating substances fall within this category; provoking aversive sensory and physiological reactions while simultaneously inducing overwhelming appetitive properties. Here we describe the subtle behavioral features associated with continued seeking for alcohol despite aversive consequences. We developed an automated runway apparatus to measure how Drosophila respond to consecutive exposures of a volatilized substance. Behavior within this Behavioral Expression of Ethanol Reinforcement Runway (BEER Run) demonstrated a defined shift from aversive to appetitive responses to volatilized ethanol. Behavioral metrics attained by combining computer vision and machine learning methods, reveal that a subset of 9 classified behaviors and component behavioral features associate with this shift. We propose this combination of 9 be
Circular RNAs (circRNAs) are formed in all domains of life and via different mechanisms. There has been an explosion in the number of circRNA papers in recent years; however, as a relatively young field, circRNA biology has an urgent need for common experimental standards for isolating, analyzing, expressing and depleting circRNAs. Here we propose a set of guidelines for circRNA studies based on the authors’ experience. This Perspective will specifically address the major class of circRNAs in Eukarya that are generated by a spliceosome-catalyzed back-splicing event. We hope that the implementation of best practice principles for circRNA research will help move the field forward and allow a better functional understanding of this fascinating group of RNAs.
Modern algorithms for biological segmentation can match inter-human agreement in annotation quality. This however is not a performance bound: a hypothetical human-consensus segmentation could reduce error rates in half. To obtain a model that generalizes better we adapted the pretrained transformer backbone of a foundation model (SAM) to the Cellpose framework. The resulting Cellpose-SAM model substantially outperforms inter-human agreement and approaches the human-consensus bound. We increase generalization performance further by making the model robust to channel shuffling, cell size, shot noise, downsampling, isotropic and anisotropic blur. The new model can be readily adopted into the Cellpose ecosystem which includes finetuning, human-in-the-loop training, image restoration and 3D segmentation approaches. These properties establish Cellpose-SAM as a foundation model for biological segmentation.
The contrast between the disruption of genome topology after cohesin loss and the lack of downstream gene expression changes instigates intense debates regarding the structure-function relationship between genome and gene regulation. Here, by analyzing transcriptome and chromatin accessibility at the single-cell level, we discover that, instead of dictating population-wide gene expression levels, cohesin supplies a general function to neutralize stochastic coexpression tendencies of cis-linked genes in single cells. Notably, cohesin loss induces widespread gene coactivation and chromatin co-opening tens of million bases apart in cis. Spatial genome and protein imaging reveals that cohesin prevents gene co-bursting along the chromosome and blocks spatial mixing of transcriptional hubs. Single-molecule imaging shows that cohesin confines the exploration of diverse enhancer and core promoter binding transcriptional regulators. Together, these results support that cohesin arranges nuclear topology to control gene coexpression in single cells.
The GAL4-UAS system has proven its versatility in studying the function and expression patterns of neurons the Drosophila central nervous system. Although the GAL4 system has been used for 25 years, recent genetic intersectional tools have enabled genetic targeting of very small numbers of neurons aiding in the understanding of their function. This split-GAL4 system is extremely powerful for studying neuronal morphology and the neural basis of animal behavior. However, choosing lines to intersect that have overlapping patterns restricted to one to a few neurons has been cumbersome. This challenge is now growing as the collections of GAL4 driver lines has increased. Here we present a new method and software plug-in for Fiji to dramatically improve the speed of querying large databases of potential lines to intersect and aid in the split-GAL4 creation. We also provide pre-computed datasets for the Janelia GAL4 (5,738 lines) and VT GAL4 (7,429 lines) of the Drosophila central nervous system (CNS). The tool reduced our split-GAL4 creation effort dramatically.
Understanding the circuit mechanisms behind motion detection is a long-standing question in visual neuroscience. In , recent synapse-level connectomes in the optic lobe, particularly in ON-pathway (T4) receptive-field circuits, in concert with physiological studies, suggest an increasingly intricate motion model compared with the ubiquitous Hassenstein-Reichardt model, while our knowledge of OFF-pathway (T5) has been incomplete. Here we present a conclusive and comprehensive connectome that for the first time integrates detailed connectivity information for inputs to both T4 and T5 pathways in a single EM dataset covering the entire optic lobe. With novel reconstruction methods using automated synapse prediction suited to such a large connectome, we successfully corroborate previous findings in the T4 pathway and comprehensively identify inputs and receptive fields for T5. While the two pathways are likely evolutionarily linked and indeed exhibit many similarities, we uncover interesting differences and interactions that may underlie their distinct functional properties.
Even a simple sensory stimulus can elicit distinct innate behaviors and sequences. During sensorimotor decisions, competitive interactions among neurons that promote distinct behaviors must ensure the selection and maintenance of one behavior, while suppressing others. The circuit implementation of these competitive interactions is still an open question. By combining comprehensive electron microscopy reconstruction of inhibitory interneuron networks, modeling, electrophysiology, and behavioral studies, we determined the circuit mechanisms that contribute to the Drosophila larval sensorimotor decision to startle, explore, or perform a sequence of the two in response to a mechanosensory stimulus. Together, these studies reveal that, early in sensory processing, (1) reciprocally connected feedforward inhibitory interneurons implement behavioral choice, (2) local feedback disinhibition provides positive feedback that consolidates and maintains the chosen behavior, and (3) lateral disinhibition promotes sequence transitions. The combination of these interconnected circuit motifs can implement both behavior selection and the serial organization of behaviors into a sequence.
Vision provides animals with detailed information about their surroundings, conveying diverse features such as color, form, and movement across the visual scene. Computing these parallel spatial features requires a large and diverse network of neurons, such that in animals as distant as flies and humans, visual regions comprise half the brain’s volume. These visual brain regions often reveal remarkable structure-function relationships, with neurons organized along spatial maps with shapes that directly relate to their roles in visual processing. To unravel the stunning diversity of a complex visual system, a careful mapping of the neural architecture matched to tools for targeted exploration of that circuitry is essential. Here, we report a new connectome of the right optic lobe from a male Drosophila central nervous system FIB-SEM volume and a comprehensive inventory of the fly’s visual neurons. We developed a computational framework to quantify the anatomy of visual neurons, establishing a basis for interpreting how their shapes relate to spatial vision. By integrating this analysis with connectivity information, neurotransmitter identity, and expert curation, we classified the 53,000 neurons into 727 types, about half of which are systematically described and named for the first time. Finally, we share an extensive collection of split-GAL4 lines matched to our neuron type catalog. Together, this comprehensive set of tools and data unlock new possibilities for systematic investigations of vision in Drosophila, a foundation for a deeper understanding of sensory processing.