Filter
Associated Lab
- Ahrens Lab (2) Apply Ahrens Lab filter
- Aso Lab (3) Apply Aso Lab filter
- Baker Lab (1) Apply Baker Lab filter
- Betzig Lab (8) Apply Betzig Lab filter
- Bock Lab (1) Apply Bock Lab filter
- Branson Lab (7) Apply Branson Lab filter
- Card Lab (4) Apply Card Lab filter
- Cardona Lab (8) Apply Cardona Lab filter
- Cui Lab (1) Apply Cui Lab filter
- Dickson Lab (1) Apply Dickson Lab filter
- Druckmann Lab (3) Apply Druckmann Lab filter
- Dudman Lab (4) Apply Dudman Lab filter
- Eddy/Rivas Lab (1) Apply Eddy/Rivas Lab filter
- Feliciano Lab (1) Apply Feliciano Lab filter
- Fetter Lab (4) Apply Fetter Lab filter
- Funke Lab (1) Apply Funke Lab filter
- Gonen Lab (11) Apply Gonen Lab filter
- Grigorieff Lab (6) Apply Grigorieff Lab filter
- Harris Lab (5) Apply Harris Lab filter
- Heberlein Lab (1) Apply Heberlein Lab filter
- Hermundstad Lab (1) Apply Hermundstad Lab filter
- Hess Lab (4) Apply Hess Lab filter
- Jayaraman Lab (4) Apply Jayaraman Lab filter
- Ji Lab (5) Apply Ji Lab filter
- Keleman Lab (1) Apply Keleman Lab filter
- Keller Lab (2) Apply Keller Lab filter
- Lavis Lab (16) Apply Lavis Lab filter
- Lee (Albert) Lab (6) Apply Lee (Albert) Lab filter
- Leonardo Lab (2) Apply Leonardo Lab filter
- Lippincott-Schwartz Lab (9) Apply Lippincott-Schwartz Lab filter
- Liu (Zhe) Lab (5) Apply Liu (Zhe) Lab filter
- Looger Lab (6) Apply Looger Lab filter
- Magee Lab (2) Apply Magee Lab filter
- Menon Lab (1) Apply Menon Lab filter
- Pachitariu Lab (1) Apply Pachitariu Lab filter
- Reiser Lab (6) Apply Reiser Lab filter
- Riddiford Lab (1) Apply Riddiford Lab filter
- Romani Lab (6) Apply Romani Lab filter
- Rubin Lab (15) Apply Rubin Lab filter
- Saalfeld Lab (4) Apply Saalfeld Lab filter
- Scheffer Lab (4) Apply Scheffer Lab filter
- Schreiter Lab (4) Apply Schreiter Lab filter
- Shroff Lab (1) Apply Shroff Lab filter
- Simpson Lab (2) Apply Simpson Lab filter
- Singer Lab (6) Apply Singer Lab filter
- Spruston Lab (1) Apply Spruston Lab filter
- Stern Lab (8) Apply Stern Lab filter
- Sternson Lab (2) Apply Sternson Lab filter
- Svoboda Lab (9) Apply Svoboda Lab filter
- Truman Lab (6) Apply Truman Lab filter
- Turaga Lab (3) Apply Turaga Lab filter
- Turner Lab (2) Apply Turner Lab filter
- Wu Lab (1) Apply Wu Lab filter
- Zlatic Lab (7) Apply Zlatic Lab filter
Associated Project Team
- Fly Descending Interneuron (1) Apply Fly Descending Interneuron filter
- Fly Functional Connectome (4) Apply Fly Functional Connectome filter
- Fly Olympiad (1) Apply Fly Olympiad filter
- FlyEM (4) Apply FlyEM filter
- FlyLight (2) Apply FlyLight filter
- GENIE (3) Apply GENIE filter
- ThalamoSeq (1) Apply ThalamoSeq filter
- Tool Translation Team (T3) (3) Apply Tool Translation Team (T3) filter
- Transcription Imaging (6) Apply Transcription Imaging filter
Associated Support Team
- Anatomy and Histology (2) Apply Anatomy and Histology filter
- Cryo-Electron Microscopy (4) Apply Cryo-Electron Microscopy filter
- Electron Microscopy (1) Apply Electron Microscopy filter
- Fly Facility (1) Apply Fly Facility filter
- Integrative Imaging (1) Apply Integrative Imaging filter
- Project Technical Resources (1) Apply Project Technical Resources filter
- Quantitative Genomics (2) Apply Quantitative Genomics filter
- Scientific Computing Software (9) Apply Scientific Computing Software filter
- Viral Tools (1) Apply Viral Tools filter
- Vivarium (1) Apply Vivarium filter
Publication Date
- December 2017 (15) Apply December 2017 filter
- November 2017 (11) Apply November 2017 filter
- October 2017 (7) Apply October 2017 filter
- September 2017 (14) Apply September 2017 filter
- August 2017 (15) Apply August 2017 filter
- July 2017 (20) Apply July 2017 filter
- June 2017 (18) Apply June 2017 filter
- May 2017 (25) Apply May 2017 filter
- April 2017 (21) Apply April 2017 filter
- March 2017 (15) Apply March 2017 filter
- February 2017 (7) Apply February 2017 filter
- January 2017 (18) Apply January 2017 filter
- Remove 2017 filter 2017
186 Janelia Publications
Showing 21-30 of 186 resultsNervous systems combine lower-level sensory signals to detect higher-order stimulus features critical to survival, such as the visual looming motion created by an imminent collision or approaching predator. Looming-sensitive neurons have been identified in diverse animal species. Different large-scale visual features such as looming often share local cues, which means loom-detecting neurons face the challenge of rejecting confounding stimuli. Here we report the discovery of an ultra-selective looming detecting neuron, lobula plate/lobula columnar, type II (LPLC2) in Drosophila, and show how its selectivity is established by radial motion opponency. In the fly visual system, directionally selective small-field neurons called T4 and T5 form a spatial map in the lobula plate, where they each terminate in one of four retinotopic layers, such that each layer responds to motion in a different cardinal direction. Single-cell anatomical analysis reveals that each arm of the LPLC2 cross-shaped primary dendrites ramifies in one of these layers and extends along that layer's preferred motion direction. In vivo calcium imaging demonstrates that, as their shape predicts, individual LPLC2 neurons respond strongly to outward motion emanating from the centre of the neuron's receptive field. Each dendritic arm also receives local inhibitory inputs directionally selective for inward motion opposing the excitation. This radial motion opponency generates a balance of excitation and inhibition that makes LPLC2 non-responsive to related patterns of motion such as contraction, wide-field rotation or luminance change. As a population, LPLC2 neurons densely cover visual space and terminate onto the giant fibre descending neurons, which drive the jump muscle motor neuron to trigger an escape take off. Our findings provide a mechanistic description of the selective feature detection that flies use to discern and escape looming threats.
The packaging and budding of Gag polyprotein and viral RNA is a critical step in the HIV-1 life cycle. High-resolution structures of the Gag polyprotein have revealed that the capsid (CA) and spacer peptide 1 (SP1) domains contain important interfaces for Gag self-assembly. However, the molecular details of the multimerization process, especially in the presence of RNA and the cell membrane, have remained unclear. In this work, we investigate the mechanisms that work in concert between the polyproteins, RNA, and membrane to promote immature lattice growth. We develop a coarse-grained (CG) computational model that is derived from subnanometer resolution structural data. Our simulations recapitulate contiguous and hexameric lattice assembly driven only by weak anisotropic attractions at the helical CA-SP1 junction. Importantly, analysis from CG and single-particle tracking photoactivated localization (spt-PALM) trajectories indicates that viral RNA and the membrane are critical constituents that actively promote Gag multimerization through scaffolding, while overexpression of short competitor RNA can suppress assembly. We also find that the CA amino-terminal domain imparts intrinsic curvature to the Gag lattice. As a consequence, immature lattice growth appears to be coupled to the dynamics of spontaneous membrane deformation. Our findings elucidate a simple network of interactions that regulate the early stages of HIV-1 assembly and budding.
Insects and mammals share similarities of neural organization underlying the perception of odors, taste, vision, sound, and gravity. We observed that insect somatosensation also corresponds to that of mammals. In Drosophila, the projections of all the somatosensory neuron types to the insect's equivalent of the spinal cord segregated into modality-specific layers comparable to those in mammals. Some sensory neurons innervate the ventral brain directly to form modality-specific and topological somatosensory maps. Ascending interneurons with dendrites in matching layers of the nerve cord send axons that converge to respective brain regions. Pathways arising from leg somatosensory neurons encode distinct qualities of leg movement information and play different roles in ground detection. Establishment of the ground pattern and genetic tools for neuronal manipulation should provide the basis for elucidating the mechanisms underlying somatosensation.
The basement membrane (BM) is a thin layer of extracellular matrix (ECM) beneath nearly all epithelial cell types that is critical for cellular and tissue function. It is composed of numerous components conserved among all bilaterians [1]; however, it is unknown how all of these components are generated and subsequently constructed to form a fully mature BM in the living animal. Although BM formation is thought to simply involve a process of self-assembly [2], this concept suffers from a number of logistical issues when considering its construction in vivo. First, incorporation of BM components appears to be hierarchical [3-5], yet it is unclear whether their production during embryogenesis must also be regulated in a temporal fashion. Second, many BM proteins are produced not only by the cells residing on the BM but also by surrounding cell types [6-9], and it is unclear how large, possibly insoluble protein complexes [10] are delivered into the matrix. Here we exploit our ability to live image and genetically dissect de novo BM formation during Drosophila development. This reveals that there is a temporal hierarchy of BM protein production that is essential for proper component incorporation. Furthermore, we show that BM components require secretion by migrating macrophages (hemocytes) during their developmental dispersal, which is critical for embryogenesis. Indeed, hemocyte migration is essential to deliver a subset of ECM components evenly throughout the embryo. This reveals that de novo BM construction requires a combination of both production and distribution logistics allowing for the timely delivery of core components.
We give a covering number bound for deep learning networks that is independent of the size of the network. The key for the simple analysis is that for linear classifiers, rotating the data doesn't affect the covering number. Thus, we can ignore the rotation part of each layer's linear transformation, and get the covering number bound by concentrating on the scaling part.
Transcription factors bind low-affinity DNA sequences for only short durations. It is not clear how brief, low-affinity interactions can drive efficient transcription. Here we report that the transcription factor Ultrabithorax (Ubx) utilizes low-affinity binding sites in the Drosophila melanogastershavenbaby (svb) locus and related enhancers in nuclear microenvironments of high Ubx concentrations. Related enhancers colocalize to the same microenvironments independently of their chromosomal location, suggesting that microenvironments are highly differentiated transcription domains. Manipulating the affinity of svb enhancers revealed an inverse relationship between enhancer affinity and Ubx concentration required for transcriptional activation. The Ubx cofactor, Homothorax (Hth), was co-enriched with Ubx near enhancers that require Hth, even though Ubx and Hth did not co-localize throughout the nucleus. Thus, microenvironments of high local transcription factor and cofactor concentrations could help low-affinity sites overcome their kinetic inefficiency. Mechanisms that generate these microenvironments could be a general feature of eukaryotic transcriptional regulation.
Discoveries spanning several decades have pointed to vital membrane lipid trafficking pathways involving both vesicular and non-vesicular carriers. But the relative contributions for distinct membrane delivery pathways in cell growth and organelle biogenesis continue to be a puzzle. This is because lipids flow from many sources and across many paths via transport vesicles, non-vesicular transfer proteins, and dynamic interactions between organelles at membrane contact sites. This forum presents our latest understanding, appreciation, and queries regarding the lipid transport mechanisms necessary to drive membrane expansion during organelle biogenesis and cell growth.
RNAs have been shown to undergo transfer between mammalian cells, although the mechanism behind this phenomenon and its overall importance to cell physiology is not well understood. Numerous publications have suggested that RNAs (microRNAs and incomplete mRNAs) undergo transfer via extracellular vesicles (e.g., exosomes). However, in contrast to a diffusion-based transfer mechanism, we find that full-length mRNAs undergo direct cell-cell transfer via cytoplasmic extensions characteristic of membrane nanotubes (mNTs), which connect donor and acceptor cells. By employing a simple coculture experimental model and using single-molecule imaging, we provide quantitative data showing that mRNAs are transferred between cells in contact. Examples of mRNAs that undergo transfer include those encoding GFP, mouse β-actin, and human Cyclin D1, BRCA1, MT2A, and HER2. We show that intercellular mRNA transfer occurs in all coculture models tested (e.g., between primary cells, immortalized cells, and in cocultures of immortalized human and murine cells). Rapid mRNA transfer is dependent upon actin but is independent of de novo protein synthesis and is modulated by stress conditions and gene-expression levels. Hence, this work supports the hypothesis that full-length mRNAs undergo transfer between cells through a refined structural connection. Importantly, unlike the transfer of miRNA or RNA fragments, this process of communication transfers genetic information that could potentially alter the acceptor cell proteome. This phenomenon may prove important for the proper development and functioning of tissues as well as for host-parasite or symbiotic interactions.
During postembryonic development, the nervous system must adapt to a growing body. How changes in neuronal structure and connectivity contribute to the maintenance of appropriate circuit function remains unclear. In a previous paper (Schneider-Mizell et al., 2016), we measured the cellular neuroanatomy underlying synaptic connectivity in Drosophila. Here, we examined how neuronal morphology and connectivity change between 1st instar and 3rd instar larval stages using serial section electron microscopy. We reconstructed nociceptive circuits in a larva of each stage and found consistent topographically arranged connectivity between identified neurons. Five-fold increases in each size, number of terminal dendritic branches, and total number of synaptic inputs were accompanied by cell-type specific connectivity changes that preserved the fraction of total synaptic input associated with each presynaptic partner. We propose that precise patterns of structural growth act to conserve the computational function of a circuit, for example determining the location of a dangerous stimulus.
In bacteria, mRNA transcription and translation are coupled to coordinate optimal gene expression and maintain genome stability. Coupling is thought to involve direct interactions between RNA polymerase (RNAP) and the translational machinery. We present cryo-EM structures of E. coli RNAP core bound to the small ribosomal 30S subunit. The complex is stable under cell-like ionic conditions, consistent with functional interaction between RNAP and the 30S subunit. The RNA exit tunnel of RNAP aligns with the Shine-Dalgarno-binding site of the 30S subunit. Ribosomal protein S1 forms a wall of the tunnel between RNAP and the 30S subunit, consistent with its role in directing mRNAs onto the ribosome. The nucleic-acid-binding cleft of RNAP samples distinct conformations, suggesting different functional states during transcription-translation coupling. The architecture of the 30S•RNAP complex provides a structural basis for co-localization of the transcriptional and translational machineries, and inform future mechanistic studies of coupled transcription and translation.