Filter
Associated Lab
- Aguilera Castrejon Lab (15) Apply Aguilera Castrejon Lab filter
- Ahrens Lab (11) Apply Ahrens Lab filter
- Baker Lab (19) Apply Baker Lab filter
- Betzig Lab (12) Apply Betzig Lab filter
- Beyene Lab (5) Apply Beyene Lab filter
- Bock Lab (3) Apply Bock Lab filter
- Branson Lab (3) Apply Branson Lab filter
- Card Lab (6) Apply Card Lab filter
- Cardona Lab (19) Apply Cardona Lab filter
- Chklovskii Lab (3) Apply Chklovskii Lab filter
- Clapham Lab (1) Apply Clapham Lab filter
- Darshan Lab (4) Apply Darshan Lab filter
- Dennis Lab (1) Apply Dennis Lab filter
- Dickson Lab (14) Apply Dickson Lab filter
- Druckmann Lab (4) Apply Druckmann Lab filter
- Dudman Lab (12) Apply Dudman Lab filter
- Egnor Lab (7) Apply Egnor Lab filter
- Espinosa Medina Lab (4) Apply Espinosa Medina Lab filter
- Fetter Lab (10) Apply Fetter Lab filter
- Fitzgerald Lab (13) Apply Fitzgerald Lab filter
- Gonen Lab (32) Apply Gonen Lab filter
- Grigorieff Lab (28) Apply Grigorieff Lab filter
- Harris Lab (10) Apply Harris Lab filter
- Heberlein Lab (81) Apply Heberlein Lab filter
- Hermundstad Lab (4) Apply Hermundstad Lab filter
- Hess Lab (3) Apply Hess Lab filter
- Jayaraman Lab (4) Apply Jayaraman Lab filter
- Johnson Lab (5) Apply Johnson Lab filter
- Kainmueller Lab (19) Apply Kainmueller Lab filter
- Karpova Lab (1) Apply Karpova Lab filter
- Keleman Lab (5) Apply Keleman Lab filter
- Keller Lab (15) Apply Keller Lab filter
- Koay Lab (16) Apply Koay Lab filter
- Lavis Lab (12) Apply Lavis Lab filter
- Lee (Albert) Lab (5) Apply Lee (Albert) Lab filter
- Leonardo Lab (4) Apply Leonardo Lab filter
- Li Lab (24) Apply Li Lab filter
- Lippincott-Schwartz Lab (72) Apply Lippincott-Schwartz Lab filter
- Liu (Yin) Lab (5) Apply Liu (Yin) Lab filter
- Liu (Zhe) Lab (5) Apply Liu (Zhe) Lab filter
- Looger Lab (1) Apply Looger Lab filter
- Magee Lab (18) Apply Magee Lab filter
- Menon Lab (6) Apply Menon Lab filter
- Murphy Lab (7) Apply Murphy Lab filter
- O'Shea Lab (1) Apply O'Shea Lab filter
- Otopalik Lab (12) Apply Otopalik Lab filter
- Pachitariu Lab (12) Apply Pachitariu Lab filter
- Pastalkova Lab (13) Apply Pastalkova Lab filter
- Pavlopoulos Lab (12) Apply Pavlopoulos Lab filter
- Pedram Lab (11) Apply Pedram Lab filter
- Reiser Lab (6) Apply Reiser Lab filter
- Riddiford Lab (24) Apply Riddiford Lab filter
- Romani Lab (12) Apply Romani Lab filter
- Rubin Lab (38) Apply Rubin Lab filter
- Saalfeld Lab (17) Apply Saalfeld Lab filter
- Satou Lab (15) Apply Satou Lab filter
- Schreiter Lab (17) Apply Schreiter Lab filter
- Sgro Lab (20) Apply Sgro Lab filter
- Simpson Lab (5) Apply Simpson Lab filter
- Singer Lab (43) Apply Singer Lab filter
- Spruston Lab (36) Apply Spruston Lab filter
- Stern Lab (83) Apply Stern Lab filter
- Sternson Lab (7) Apply Sternson Lab filter
- Stringer Lab (3) Apply Stringer Lab filter
- Svoboda Lab (4) Apply Svoboda Lab filter
- Tebo Lab (24) Apply Tebo Lab filter
- Tillberg Lab (3) Apply Tillberg Lab filter
- Tjian Lab (47) Apply Tjian Lab filter
- Truman Lab (30) Apply Truman Lab filter
- Turaga Lab (12) Apply Turaga Lab filter
- Turner Lab (11) Apply Turner Lab filter
- Wang (Shaohe) Lab (19) Apply Wang (Shaohe) Lab filter
- Wu Lab (1) Apply Wu Lab filter
- Zlatic Lab (2) Apply Zlatic Lab filter
- Zuker Lab (20) Apply Zuker Lab filter
Associated Project Team
Publication Date
- 2024 (1) Apply 2024 filter
- 2023 (1) Apply 2023 filter
- 2022 (26) Apply 2022 filter
- 2021 (19) Apply 2021 filter
- 2020 (19) Apply 2020 filter
- 2019 (25) Apply 2019 filter
- 2018 (26) Apply 2018 filter
- 2017 (31) Apply 2017 filter
- 2016 (18) Apply 2016 filter
- 2015 (57) Apply 2015 filter
- 2014 (46) Apply 2014 filter
- 2013 (58) Apply 2013 filter
- 2012 (78) Apply 2012 filter
- 2011 (92) Apply 2011 filter
- 2010 (100) Apply 2010 filter
- 2009 (102) Apply 2009 filter
- 2008 (100) Apply 2008 filter
- 2007 (85) Apply 2007 filter
- 2006 (89) Apply 2006 filter
- 2005 (67) Apply 2005 filter
- 2004 (57) Apply 2004 filter
- 2003 (58) Apply 2003 filter
- 2002 (39) Apply 2002 filter
- 2001 (28) Apply 2001 filter
- 2000 (29) Apply 2000 filter
- 1999 (14) Apply 1999 filter
- 1998 (18) Apply 1998 filter
- 1997 (16) Apply 1997 filter
- 1996 (10) Apply 1996 filter
- 1995 (18) Apply 1995 filter
- 1994 (12) Apply 1994 filter
- 1993 (10) Apply 1993 filter
- 1992 (6) Apply 1992 filter
- 1991 (11) Apply 1991 filter
- 1990 (11) Apply 1990 filter
- 1989 (6) Apply 1989 filter
- 1988 (1) Apply 1988 filter
- 1987 (7) Apply 1987 filter
- 1986 (4) Apply 1986 filter
- 1985 (5) Apply 1985 filter
- 1984 (2) Apply 1984 filter
- 1983 (2) Apply 1983 filter
- 1982 (3) Apply 1982 filter
- 1981 (3) Apply 1981 filter
- 1980 (1) Apply 1980 filter
- 1979 (1) Apply 1979 filter
- 1976 (2) Apply 1976 filter
- 1973 (1) Apply 1973 filter
- 1970 (1) Apply 1970 filter
- 1967 (1) Apply 1967 filter
Type of Publication
- Remove Non-Janelia filter Non-Janelia
1417 Publications
Showing 1231-1240 of 1417 resultsIn humans, repeated alcohol consumption leads to the development of tolerance, manifested as a reduced physiological and behavioral response to a particular dose of alcohol. Here we show that adult Drosophila develop tolerance to the sedating and motor-impairing effects of ethanol with kinetics of acquisition and dissipation that mimic those seen in mammals. Importantly, this tolerance is not caused by changes in ethanol absorption or metabolism. Rather, the development of tolerance requires the functional and structural integrity of specific central brain regions. Mutants unable to synthesize the catecholamine octopamine are also impaired in their ability to develop tolerance. Taken together, these data show that Drosophila is a suitable model system in which to study the molecular and neuroanatomical bases of ethanol tolerance.
Proliferation of neural precursors in the optic lobe of Manduca sexta is controlled by circulating steroids and by local production of nitric oxide (NO). Diaphorase staining, anti-NO synthase (NOS) immunocytochemistry and the NO-indicator, DAF-2, show that cells throughout the optic anlage contain NOS and produce NO. Signaling via NO inhibits proliferation in the anlage. When exposed to low levels of ecdysteroid, NO production is stimulated and proliferation ceases. When steroid levels are increased, NO production begins to decrease within 15 minutes independent of RNA or protein synthesis and cells rapidly resume proliferation. Resumption of proliferation is not due simply to the removal of NO repression though, but also requires an ecdysteroid stimulatory pathway. The consequence of these opposing pathways is a sharpening of the responsiveness to the steroid, thereby facilitating a tight coordination between development of the different elements of the adult visual system.
One of the oldest problems in evolutionary biology remains largely unsolved. Which mutations generate evolutionarily relevant phenotypic variation? What kinds of molecular changes do they entail? What are the phenotypic magnitudes, frequencies of origin, and pleiotropic effects of such mutations? How is the genome constructed to allow the observed abundance of phenotypic diversity? Historically, the neo-Darwinian synthesizers stressed the predominance of micromutations in evolution, whereas others noted the similarities between some dramatic mutations and evolutionary transitions to argue for macromutationism. Arguments on both sides have been biased by misconceptions of the developmental effects of mutations. For example, the traditional view that mutations of important developmental genes always have large pleiotropic effects can now be seen to be a conclusion drawn from observations of a small class of mutations with dramatic effects. It is possible that some mutations, for example, those in cis-regulatory DNA, have few or no pleiotropic effects and may be the predominant source of morphological evolution. In contrast, mutations causing dramatic phenotypic effects, although superficially similar to hypothesized evolutionary transitions, are unlikely to fairly represent the true path of evolution. Recent developmental studies of gene function provide a new way of conceptualizing and studying variation that contrasts with the traditional genetic view that was incorporated into neo-Darwinian theory and population genetics. This new approach in developmental biology is as important for microevolutionary studies as the actual results from recent evolutionary developmental studies. In particular, this approach will assist in the task of identifying the specific mutations generating phenotypic variation and elucidating how they alter gene function. These data will provide the current missing link between molecular and phenotypic variation in natural populations.
BACKGROUND: In most organisms in which acute ethanol exposure has been studied, it leads to similar changes in behavior. Generally, low ethanol doses activate the central nervous system, whereas high doses are sedative. Sensitivity to the acute intoxicating effects of ethanol is in part under genetic control in rodents and humans, and reduced sensitivity in humans predicts the development of alcoholism (Crabbe et al., 1994; Schuckit, 1994). We have established Drosophila melanogaster as a model organism to study the mechanisms that regulate acute sensitivity to ethanol. METHODS: We measured the effects of ethanol vapor on Drosophila locomotor behaviors by using three different assays. Horizontal locomotion was quantified in a locomotor chamber, turning behavior was assayed in narrow tubes, and ethanol-induced loss of postural control was measured in an inebriometer. Mutants with altered sensitivity to the acute effects of ethanol were generated by treatment with ethyl methane sulfonate and isolated by selection in the inebriometer. We ascertained the effects of these mutations on ethanol pharmacokinetics by measuring ethanol levels in extracts of flies at various times during and after ethanol exposure. RESULTS: Among nearly 30,000 potentially mutant flies tested, we isolated 19 mutant strains with reduced and 4 strains with increased sensitivity to the acute effects of ethanol as measured in the inebriometer. Of these mutants, four showed changes in ethanol absorption. Two mutants, named barfly and tipsy to reflect their reduced and increased ethanol sensitivity in the inebriometer, respectively, were analyzed for locomotor behaviors. Both mutants exhibited ethanol-induced hyperactivity that was indistinguishable from wild type. However, barfly and tipsy displayed reduced and increased sensitivity to the sedative effects of ethanol, respectively. Finally, both mutants showed an increased rate of ethanol-induced turning behavior. CONCLUSIONS: The effects of acute ethanol exposure on Drosophila locomotor behaviors are remarkably similar to those described for mammals. The analysis of mutants with altered sensitivity to ethanol revealed that the genetic pathways which regulate these responses are complex and that single genes can affect hyperactivity, turning, and sedation independently.
In the primate primary visual area (V1), the ocular dominance pattern consists of alternating monocular stripes. Stripe orientation follows systematic trends preserved across several species. I propose that these trends result from minimizing the length of intra-cortical wiring needed to recombine information from the two eyes in order to achieve the perception of depth. I argue that the stripe orientation at any point of V1 should follow the direction of binocular disparity in the corresponding point of the visual field. The optimal pattern of stripes determined from this argument agrees with the ocular dominance pattern of macaque and Cebus monkeys. This theory predicts that for any point in the visual field the limits of depth perception are greatest in the direction along the ocular dominance stripes at that point.
The RNA polymerase II general transcription factor TFIID is a complex containing the TATA-binding protein (TBP) and associated factors (TAFs). We have used a mutant allele of the gene encoding yeast TAF(II)68/61p to analyze its function in vivo. We provide biochemical and genetic evidence that the C-terminal alpha-helix of TAF(II)68/61p is required for its direct interaction with TBP, the stable incorporation of TBP into the TFIID complex, the integrity of the TFIID complex, and the transcription of most genes in vivo. This is the first evidence that a yeast TAF(II) other than TAF(II)145/130 interacts with TBP, and the implications of this on the interpretation of data obtained studying TAF(II) mutants in vivo are discussed. We have identified a high copy suppressor of the TAF68/61 mutation, TSG2, that has sequence similarity to a region of the SAGA subunit Ada1. We demonstrate that it directly interacts with TAF(II)68/61p in vitro, is a component of TFIID, is required for the stability of the complex in vivo, and is necessary for the transcription of many yeast genes. On the basis of these functions, we propose that Tsg2/TAF(II)48p is the histone 2A-like dimerization partner for the histone 2B-like TAF(II)68/61p in the yeast TFIID complex.
Electrophysiology and optical indicators have been used in vertebrate systems to investigate excitable cell firing and calcium transients, but both techniques have been difficult to apply in organisms with powerful reverse genetics. To overcome this limitation, we expressed cameleon proteins, genetically encoded calcium indicators, in the pharyngeal muscle of the nematode worm Caenorhabditis elegans. In intact transgenic animals expressing cameleons, fluorescence ratio changes accompanied muscular contraction, verifying detection of calcium transients. By comparing the magnitude and duration of calcium influx in wild-type and mutant animals, we were able to determine the effects of calcium channel proteins on pharyngeal calcium transients. We also successfully used cameleons to detect electrically evoked calcium transients in individual C. elegans neurons. This technique therefore should have broad applications in analyzing the regulation of excitable cell activity in genetically tractable organisms.
We report an extreme morphological difference between Drosophila sechellia and related species of the pattern of hairs on first-instar larvae. On the dorsum of most species, the posterior region of the anterior compartment of most segments is covered by a carpet of fine hairs. In D. sechellia, these hairs have been lost and replaced with naked cuticle. Genetic mapping experiments and interspecific complementation tests indicate that this difference is caused, in its entirety, by evolution at the ovo/shaven-baby locus. The pattern of expression of the ovo/shaven-baby transcript is correlated with this morphological change. The altered dorsal cuticle pattern is probably caused by evolution of the cis-regulatory region of ovo/shaven-baby in the D. sechellia lineage.
In the March 24 issue of Science, a flurry of papers report on the impending completion of the Drosophila melanogaster genome sequence. This historic achievement is the result of a unique collaboration between the Berkeley Drosophila Genome Project (BDGP), led by Gerry Rubin, and the genomics company Celera, headed by Craig Venter. With its genome almost completely sequenced ahead of schedule, Drosophila is another important model organism to enter the postgenomic age, and represents the largest genome sequenced to date.