Filter
Associated Lab
- Aguilera Castrejon Lab (19) Apply Aguilera Castrejon Lab filter
- Ahrens Lab (77) Apply Ahrens Lab filter
- Aso Lab (42) Apply Aso Lab filter
- Baker Lab (38) Apply Baker Lab filter
- Betzig Lab (116) Apply Betzig Lab filter
- Beyene Lab (15) Apply Beyene Lab filter
- Bock Lab (17) Apply Bock Lab filter
- Branson Lab (56) Apply Branson Lab filter
- Card Lab (43) Apply Card Lab filter
- Cardona Lab (64) Apply Cardona Lab filter
- Chklovskii Lab (13) Apply Chklovskii Lab filter
- Clapham Lab (16) Apply Clapham Lab filter
- Cui Lab (19) Apply Cui Lab filter
- Darshan Lab (12) Apply Darshan Lab filter
- Dennis Lab (3) Apply Dennis Lab filter
- Dickson Lab (46) Apply Dickson Lab filter
- Druckmann Lab (25) Apply Druckmann Lab filter
- Dudman Lab (58) Apply Dudman Lab filter
- Eddy/Rivas Lab (30) Apply Eddy/Rivas Lab filter
- Egnor Lab (11) Apply Egnor Lab filter
- Espinosa Medina Lab (25) Apply Espinosa Medina Lab filter
- Feliciano Lab (16) Apply Feliciano Lab filter
- Fetter Lab (41) Apply Fetter Lab filter
- FIB-SEM Technology (1) Apply FIB-SEM Technology filter
- Fitzgerald Lab (30) Apply Fitzgerald Lab filter
- Freeman Lab (15) Apply Freeman Lab filter
- Funke Lab (46) Apply Funke Lab filter
- Gonen Lab (91) Apply Gonen Lab filter
- Grigorieff Lab (62) Apply Grigorieff Lab filter
- Harris Lab (65) Apply Harris Lab filter
- Heberlein Lab (94) Apply Heberlein Lab filter
- Hermundstad Lab (32) Apply Hermundstad Lab filter
- Hess Lab (81) Apply Hess Lab filter
- Ilanges Lab (4) Apply Ilanges Lab filter
- Jayaraman Lab (49) Apply Jayaraman Lab filter
- Ji Lab (33) Apply Ji Lab filter
- Johnson Lab (7) Apply Johnson Lab filter
- Kainmueller Lab (19) Apply Kainmueller Lab filter
- Karpova Lab (15) Apply Karpova Lab filter
- Keleman Lab (13) Apply Keleman Lab filter
- Keller Lab (77) Apply Keller Lab filter
- Koay Lab (20) Apply Koay Lab filter
- Lavis Lab (164) Apply Lavis Lab filter
- Lee (Albert) Lab (34) Apply Lee (Albert) Lab filter
- Leonardo Lab (23) Apply Leonardo Lab filter
- Li Lab (32) Apply Li Lab filter
- Lippincott-Schwartz Lab (182) Apply Lippincott-Schwartz Lab filter
- Liu (Yin) Lab (9) Apply Liu (Yin) Lab filter
- Liu (Zhe) Lab (65) Apply Liu (Zhe) Lab filter
- Looger Lab (138) Apply Looger Lab filter
- Magee Lab (49) Apply Magee Lab filter
- Menon Lab (18) Apply Menon Lab filter
- Murphy Lab (13) Apply Murphy Lab filter
- O'Shea Lab (8) Apply O'Shea Lab filter
- Otopalik Lab (13) Apply Otopalik Lab filter
- Pachitariu Lab (56) Apply Pachitariu Lab filter
- Pastalkova Lab (19) Apply Pastalkova Lab filter
- Pavlopoulos Lab (19) Apply Pavlopoulos Lab filter
- Pedram Lab (15) Apply Pedram Lab filter
- Podgorski Lab (16) Apply Podgorski Lab filter
- Reiser Lab (56) Apply Reiser Lab filter
- Riddiford Lab (44) Apply Riddiford Lab filter
- Romani Lab (52) Apply Romani Lab filter
- Rubin Lab (149) Apply Rubin Lab filter
- Saalfeld Lab (66) Apply Saalfeld Lab filter
- Satou Lab (18) Apply Satou Lab filter
- Scheffer Lab (38) Apply Scheffer Lab filter
- Schreiter Lab (72) Apply Schreiter Lab filter
- Schulze Lab (1) Apply Schulze Lab filter
- Sgro Lab (23) Apply Sgro Lab filter
- Shroff Lab (35) Apply Shroff Lab filter
- Simpson Lab (23) Apply Simpson Lab filter
- Singer Lab (80) Apply Singer Lab filter
- Spruston Lab (99) Apply Spruston Lab filter
- Stern Lab (161) Apply Stern Lab filter
- Sternson Lab (54) Apply Sternson Lab filter
- Stringer Lab (44) Apply Stringer Lab filter
- Svoboda Lab (136) Apply Svoboda Lab filter
- Tebo Lab (36) Apply Tebo Lab filter
- Tervo Lab (10) Apply Tervo Lab filter
- Tillberg Lab (22) Apply Tillberg Lab filter
- Tjian Lab (64) Apply Tjian Lab filter
- Truman Lab (88) Apply Truman Lab filter
- Turaga Lab (53) Apply Turaga Lab filter
- Turner Lab (38) Apply Turner Lab filter
- Vale Lab (8) Apply Vale Lab filter
- Voigts Lab (5) Apply Voigts Lab filter
- Wang (Meng) Lab (32) Apply Wang (Meng) Lab filter
- Wang (Shaohe) Lab (25) Apply Wang (Shaohe) Lab filter
- Wong-Campos Lab (1) Apply Wong-Campos Lab filter
- Wu Lab (9) Apply Wu Lab filter
- Zlatic Lab (28) Apply Zlatic Lab filter
- Zuker Lab (25) Apply Zuker Lab filter
Associated Project Team
- CellMap (13) Apply CellMap filter
- COSEM (3) Apply COSEM filter
- FIB-SEM Technology (5) Apply FIB-SEM Technology filter
- Fly Descending Interneuron (12) Apply Fly Descending Interneuron filter
- Fly Functional Connectome (14) Apply Fly Functional Connectome filter
- Fly Olympiad (5) Apply Fly Olympiad filter
- FlyEM (56) Apply FlyEM filter
- FlyLight (50) Apply FlyLight filter
- GENIE (47) Apply GENIE filter
- Integrative Imaging (11) Apply Integrative Imaging filter
- Larval Olympiad (2) Apply Larval Olympiad filter
- MouseLight (18) Apply MouseLight filter
- NeuroSeq (1) Apply NeuroSeq filter
- ThalamoSeq (1) Apply ThalamoSeq filter
- Tool Translation Team (T3) (29) Apply Tool Translation Team (T3) filter
- Transcription Imaging (49) Apply Transcription Imaging filter
Publication Date
- 2026 (129) Apply 2026 filter
- 2025 (223) Apply 2025 filter
- 2024 (209) Apply 2024 filter
- 2023 (158) Apply 2023 filter
- 2022 (192) Apply 2022 filter
- 2021 (194) Apply 2021 filter
- 2020 (196) Apply 2020 filter
- 2019 (202) Apply 2019 filter
- 2018 (232) Apply 2018 filter
- 2017 (217) Apply 2017 filter
- 2016 (209) Apply 2016 filter
- 2015 (252) Apply 2015 filter
- 2014 (236) Apply 2014 filter
- 2013 (194) Apply 2013 filter
- 2012 (190) Apply 2012 filter
- 2011 (190) Apply 2011 filter
- 2010 (161) Apply 2010 filter
- 2009 (158) Apply 2009 filter
- 2008 (140) Apply 2008 filter
- 2007 (106) Apply 2007 filter
- 2006 (92) Apply 2006 filter
- 2005 (67) Apply 2005 filter
- 2004 (57) Apply 2004 filter
- 2003 (58) Apply 2003 filter
- 2002 (39) Apply 2002 filter
- 2001 (28) Apply 2001 filter
- 2000 (29) Apply 2000 filter
- 1999 (14) Apply 1999 filter
- 1998 (18) Apply 1998 filter
- 1997 (16) Apply 1997 filter
- 1996 (10) Apply 1996 filter
- 1995 (18) Apply 1995 filter
- 1994 (12) Apply 1994 filter
- 1993 (10) Apply 1993 filter
- 1992 (6) Apply 1992 filter
- 1991 (11) Apply 1991 filter
- 1990 (11) Apply 1990 filter
- 1989 (6) Apply 1989 filter
- 1988 (1) Apply 1988 filter
- 1987 (7) Apply 1987 filter
- 1986 (4) Apply 1986 filter
- 1985 (5) Apply 1985 filter
- 1984 (2) Apply 1984 filter
- 1983 (2) Apply 1983 filter
- 1982 (3) Apply 1982 filter
- 1981 (3) Apply 1981 filter
- 1980 (1) Apply 1980 filter
- 1979 (1) Apply 1979 filter
- 1976 (2) Apply 1976 filter
- 1973 (1) Apply 1973 filter
- 1970 (1) Apply 1970 filter
- 1967 (1) Apply 1967 filter
Type of Publication
4324 Publications
Showing 371-380 of 4324 resultsFluorescence microscopy provides insights into cellular structure and function, but the undesirable bending of light from the sample or imperfect optics (“optical aberrations”) often degrade imaging resolution or signal. Adaptive Optics (AO) techniques that sense and subsequently correct the aberrations can restore diffraction-limited imaging, but most implementations remain technically complex and expensive. Wavefront sensing, the key step in AO, remains particularly challenging due to slow speed or additional illumination dose imparted to the sample. Previously we showed that phase diversity (PD), a method for wavefront sensing originally developed for use in astronomy, can rapidly sense and correct aberrations in a widefield fluorescence microscope. Here we extend this approach to light sheet microscopy, showing that the PD-based AO of sample-induced aberrations in live Caenorhabditis elegans embryos restores image contrast and resolution, enabling subcellular imaging throughout the imaging volume. In addition to these preliminary results, the further improvement and extension of this technology to additional samples and microscopes will be discussed.
Spatial multiomic profiling has been transforming the understanding of local tumor ecosystems. Yet, the spatial analyses of tumor-immune interactions at systemic levels, such as in liquid biopsies, are challenging. Within the last 10 years, we have longitudinally collected nearly 3,000 patient blood samples for multiplexing imaging of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and their interactions with white blood cells (WBCs). Multicellular CTC clusters exhibit enhanced metastatic potential. The detection of CTCs and characterization of tumor immune ecosystems are constrained by (1) low frequency of CTCs in blood samples; (2) specific lineages of immune cells are not recognized by limited channels of current imaging methods, (3) reliance on labor-intensive manual analysis slows down the discovery of biomarkers for predicting therapy response and survival in cancer patients. We hypothesize that an AI-powered platform will accelerate the lineage and spatial characterization of tumor immune ecosystems for prognostic evaluations.
Medial frontal cortical areas are thought to play a critical role in the brain's ability to flexibly deploy strategies that are effective in complex settings. Still, the specific circuit computations that underpin this foundational aspect of intelligence remain unclear. Here, by examining neural ensemble activity in rats that sample different strategies in a self-guided search for latent task structure, we demonstrate a robust tracking of individual strategy prevalence in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), especially in an area homologous to primate area 32D. Prevalence encoding in the ACC is wide-scale, independent of reward delivery, and persists through a substantial ensemble reorganization that tags ACC representations with contextual content. Our findings argue that ACC ensemble dynamics is structured by a summary statistic of recent behavioral choices, raising the possibility that ACC plays a role in estimating - through statistical learning - which actions promote the occurrence of events in the environment.
Recent advances in automatic image segmentation and synapse prediction in electron microscopy (EM) datasets of the brain enable more efficient reconstruction of neural connectivity. In these datasets, a single neuron can span thousands of images containing complex tree-like arbors with thousands of synapses. While image segmentation algorithms excel within narrow fields of views, the algorithms sometimes struggle to correctly segment large neurons, which require large context given their size and complexity. Conversely, humans are comparatively good at reasoning with large objects. In this paper, we introduce several semi-automated strategies that combine 3D visualization and machine guidance to accelerate connectome reconstruction. In particular, we introduce a strategy to quickly correct a segmentation through merging and cleaving, or splitting a segment along supervoxel boundaries, with both operations driven by affinity scores in the underlying segmentation. We deploy these algorithms as streamlined workflows in a tool called Neu3 and demonstrate superior performance compared to prior work, thus enabling efficient reconstruction of much larger datasets. The insights into proofreading from our work clarify the trade-offs to consider when tuning the parameters of image segmentation algorithms.
Profile hidden Markov models (profile HMMs) and probabilistic inference methods have made important contributions to the theory of sequence database homology search. However, practical use of profile HMM methods has been hindered by the computational expense of existing software implementations. Here I describe an acceleration heuristic for profile HMMs, the "multiple segment Viterbi" (MSV) algorithm. The MSV algorithm computes an optimal sum of multiple ungapped local alignment segments using a striped vector-parallel approach previously described for fast Smith/Waterman alignment. MSV scores follow the same statistical distribution as gapped optimal local alignment scores, allowing rapid evaluation of significance of an MSV score and thus facilitating its use as a heuristic filter. I also describe a 20-fold acceleration of the standard profile HMM Forward/Backward algorithms using a method I call "sparse rescaling". These methods are assembled in a pipeline in which high-scoring MSV hits are passed on for reanalysis with the full HMM Forward/Backward algorithm. This accelerated pipeline is implemented in the freely available HMMER3 software package. Performance benchmarks show that the use of the heuristic MSV filter sacrifices negligible sensitivity compared to unaccelerated profile HMM searches. HMMER3 is substantially more sensitive and 100- to 1000-fold faster than HMMER2. HMMER3 is now about as fast as BLAST for protein searches.
We introduce an efficient search strategy to substantially accelerate feature based registration. Previous feature based registration algorithms often use truncated search strategies in order to achieve small computation times. Our new accelerated search strategy is based on the realization that the search for corresponding features can be dramatically accelerated by utilizing Johnson-Lindenstrauss dimension reduction. Order of magnitude calculations for the search strategy we propose here indicate that the algorithm proposed is more than a million times faster than previously utilized naive search strategies, and this advantage in speed is directly translated into an advantage in accuracy as the fast speed enables more comparisons to be made in the same amount of time. We describe the accelerated scheme together with a full complexity analysis. The registration algorithm was applied to large transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of neural ultrastructure. Our experiments demonstrate that our algorithm enables alignment of TEM images with increased accuracy and efficiency compared to previous algorithms.
Comprehensive mapping of neural connections is essential for understanding brain function. Existing automated methods for connectome reconstruction from high-resolution images of brain tissue introduce errors that require extensive and time-consuming manual correction, a critical bottleneck in the field. To address this, we developed PATHFINDER, an AI system that segments volumetric image data, identifies potential ways to assemble neuron fragments, and evaluates the plausibility of resulting shapes to reconstruct complete neurons. Using a dataset of all axons in an IBEAM-mSEM volume of mouse cortex, we show that PATHFINDER reduces the error rate in axon reconstruction by an order of magnitude over previous state of the art, leading to an improvement in proofreading throughput of up to 84× relative to prior estimates in the context of a whole mouse brain. By drastically reducing the manual effort required for analysis, this advance unlocks the potential for both large-scale connectome mapping and routine investigation of smaller volumes.
Only a few years after its inception, localization-based super-resolution microscopy has become widely employed in biological studies. Yet, it is primarily used in two-dimensional imaging and accessing the organization of cellular structures at the nanoscale in three dimensions (3D) still poses important challenges. Here, we review optical and computational techniques that enable the 3D localization of individual emitters and the reconstruction of 3D super-resolution images. These techniques are grouped into three main categories: PSF engineering, multiple plane imaging and interferometric approaches. We provide an overview of their technical implementation as well as commentary on their applicability. Finally, we discuss future trends in 3D localization-based super-resolution microscopy.
Transcription factors (TFs) control gene expression by binding to genomic DNA in a sequence-specific manner. Mutations in TF binding sites are increasingly found to be associated with human disease, yet we currently lack robust methods to predict these sites. Here, we developed a versatile maximum likelihood framework named No Read Left Behind (NRLB) that infers a biophysical model of protein-DNA recognition across the full affinity range from a library of in vitro selected DNA binding sites. NRLB predicts human Max homodimer binding in near-perfect agreement with existing low-throughput measurements. It can capture the specificity of the p53 tetramer and distinguish multiple binding modes within a single sample. Additionally, we confirm that newly identified low-affinity enhancer binding sites are functional in vivo, and that their contribution to gene expression matches their predicted affinity. Our results establish a powerful paradigm for identifying protein binding sites and interpreting gene regulatory sequences in eukaryotic genomes.
