Filter
Associated Lab
- Ahrens Lab (4) Apply Ahrens Lab filter
- Aso Lab (3) Apply Aso Lab filter
- Betzig Lab (4) Apply Betzig Lab filter
- Beyene Lab (1) Apply Beyene Lab filter
- Branson Lab (3) Apply Branson Lab filter
- Card Lab (5) Apply Card Lab filter
- Cardona Lab (3) Apply Cardona Lab filter
- Clapham Lab (1) Apply Clapham Lab filter
- Dickson Lab (4) Apply Dickson Lab filter
- Dudman Lab (2) Apply Dudman Lab filter
- Espinosa Medina Lab (2) Apply Espinosa Medina Lab filter
- Fitzgerald Lab (3) Apply Fitzgerald Lab filter
- Funke Lab (3) Apply Funke Lab filter
- Grigorieff Lab (3) Apply Grigorieff Lab filter
- Harris Lab (1) Apply Harris Lab filter
- Heberlein Lab (2) Apply Heberlein Lab filter
- Hermundstad Lab (2) Apply Hermundstad Lab filter
- Hess Lab (5) Apply Hess Lab filter
- Jayaraman Lab (4) Apply Jayaraman Lab filter
- Keller Lab (5) Apply Keller Lab filter
- Lavis Lab (9) Apply Lavis Lab filter
- Lee (Albert) Lab (5) Apply Lee (Albert) Lab filter
- Lippincott-Schwartz Lab (8) Apply Lippincott-Schwartz Lab filter
- Liu (Zhe) Lab (7) Apply Liu (Zhe) Lab filter
- Looger Lab (7) Apply Looger Lab filter
- Pachitariu Lab (2) Apply Pachitariu Lab filter
- Podgorski Lab (5) Apply Podgorski Lab filter
- Reiser Lab (2) Apply Reiser Lab filter
- Romani Lab (2) Apply Romani Lab filter
- Rubin Lab (9) Apply Rubin Lab filter
- Saalfeld Lab (2) Apply Saalfeld Lab filter
- Scheffer Lab (1) Apply Scheffer Lab filter
- Schreiter Lab (5) Apply Schreiter Lab filter
- Spruston Lab (5) Apply Spruston Lab filter
- Stern Lab (4) Apply Stern Lab filter
- Sternson Lab (4) Apply Sternson Lab filter
- Stringer Lab (2) Apply Stringer Lab filter
- Svoboda Lab (5) Apply Svoboda Lab filter
- Truman Lab (3) Apply Truman Lab filter
- Turaga Lab (1) Apply Turaga Lab filter
- Turner Lab (3) Apply Turner Lab filter
- Zlatic Lab (2) Apply Zlatic Lab filter
Associated Project Team
- Fly Descending Interneuron (2) Apply Fly Descending Interneuron filter
- Fly Functional Connectome (1) Apply Fly Functional Connectome filter
- FlyEM (3) Apply FlyEM filter
- FlyLight (8) Apply FlyLight filter
- GENIE (5) Apply GENIE filter
- MouseLight (1) Apply MouseLight filter
- Tool Translation Team (T3) (3) Apply Tool Translation Team (T3) filter
- Transcription Imaging (1) Apply Transcription Imaging filter
Associated Support Team
- Anatomy and Histology (3) Apply Anatomy and Histology filter
- Cryo-Electron Microscopy (2) Apply Cryo-Electron Microscopy filter
- Electron Microscopy (1) Apply Electron Microscopy filter
- Fly Facility (10) Apply Fly Facility filter
- Integrative Imaging (2) Apply Integrative Imaging filter
- Janelia Experimental Technology (8) Apply Janelia Experimental Technology filter
- Molecular Genomics (4) Apply Molecular Genomics filter
- Primary & iPS Cell Culture (5) Apply Primary & iPS Cell Culture filter
- Project Technical Resources (3) Apply Project Technical Resources filter
- Quantitative Genomics (3) Apply Quantitative Genomics filter
- Scientific Computing Software (2) Apply Scientific Computing Software filter
- Scientific Computing Systems (2) Apply Scientific Computing Systems filter
- Viral Tools (2) Apply Viral Tools filter
- Vivarium (1) Apply Vivarium filter
Publication Date
- Remove 2020 filter 2020
177 Janelia Publications
Showing 161-170 of 177 resultsModern recording techniques now permit brain-wide sensorimotor circuits to be observed at single neuron resolution in small animals. Extracting theoretical understanding from these recordings requires principles that organize findings and guide future experiments. Here we review theoretical principles that shed light onto brain-wide sensorimotor processing. We begin with an analogy that conceptualizes principles as streetlamps that illuminate the empirical terrain, and we illustrate the analogy by showing how two familiar principles apply in new ways to brain-wide phenomena. We then focus the bulk of the review on describing three more principles that have wide utility for mapping brain-wide neural activity, making testable predictions from highly parameterized mechanistic models, and investigating the computational determinants of neuronal response patterns across the brain.
Structured illumination microscopy (SIM) is widely used for fast, long-term, live-cell super-resolution imaging. However, SIM images can contain substantial artifacts if the sample does not conform to the underlying assumptions of the reconstruction algorithm. Here we describe a simple, easy to implement, process that can be combined with any reconstruction algorithm to alleviate many common SIM reconstruction artifacts and briefly discuss possible extensions.
State-of-the-art tissue-clearing methods provide subcellular-level optical access to intact tissues from individual organs and even to some entire mammals. When combined with light-sheet microscopy and automated approaches to image analysis, existing tissue-clearing methods can speed up and may reduce the cost of conventional histology by several orders of magnitude. In addition, tissue-clearing chemistry allows whole-organ antibody labelling, which can be applied even to thick human tissues. By combining the most powerful labelling, clearing, imaging and data-analysis tools, scientists are extracting structural and functional cellular and subcellular information on complex mammalian bodies and large human specimens at an accelerated pace. The rapid generation of terabyte-scale imaging data furthermore creates a high demand for efficient computational approaches that tackle challenges in large-scale data analysis and management. In this Review, we discuss how tissue-clearing methods could provide an unbiased, system-level view of mammalian bodies and human specimens and discuss future opportunities for the use of these methods in human neuroscience.
State-of-the-art tissue-clearing methods provide subcellular-level optical access to intact tissues from individual organs and even to some entire mammals. When combined with light-sheet microscopy and automated approaches to image analysis, existing tissue-clearing methods can speed up and may reduce the cost of conventional histology by several orders of magnitude. In addition, tissue-clearing chemistry allows whole-organ antibody labelling, which can be applied even to thick human tissues. By combining the most powerful labelling, clearing, imaging and data-analysis tools, scientists are extracting structural and functional cellular and subcellular information on complex mammalian bodies and large human specimens at an accelerated pace. The rapid generation of terabyte-scale imaging data furthermore creates a high demand for efficient computational approaches that tackle challenges in large-scale data analysis and management. In this Review, we discuss how tissue-clearing methods could provide an unbiased, system-level view of mammalian bodies and human specimens and discuss future opportunities for the use of these methods in human neuroscience.
The Mushroom Body (MB) is the primary location of stored associative memories in the Drosophila brain. We discuss recent advances in understanding the MB's neuronal circuits made using advanced light microscopic methods and cell-type-specific genetic tools. We also review how the compartmentalized nature of the MB's organization allows this brain area to form and store memories with widely different dynamics.
The early and accurate differential diagnosis of parkinsonian disorders is still a significant challenge for clinicians. In recent years, a number of studies have used magnetic resonance imaging data combined with machine learning and statistical classifiers to successfully differentiate between different forms of Parkinsonism. However, several questions and methodological issues remain, to minimize bias and artefact-driven classification. In this study, we compared different approaches for feature selection, as well as different magnetic resonance imaging modalities, with well-matched patient groups and tightly controlling for data quality issues related to patient motion. Our sample was drawn from a cohort of 69 healthy controls, and patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease (= 35), progressive supranuclear palsy Richardson's syndrome (= 52) and corticobasal syndrome (= 36). Participants underwent standardized T1-weighted and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Strict data quality control and group matching reduced the control and patient numbers to 43, 32, 33 and 26, respectively. We compared two different methods for feature selection and dimensionality reduction: whole-brain principal components analysis, and an anatomical region-of-interest based approach. In both cases, support vector machines were used to construct a statistical model for pairwise classification of healthy controls and patients. The accuracy of each model was estimated using a leave-two-out cross-validation approach, as well as an independent validation using a different set of subjects. Our cross-validation results suggest that using principal components analysis for feature extraction provides higher classification accuracies when compared to a region-of-interest based approach. However, the differences between the two feature extraction methods were significantly reduced when an independent sample was used for validation, suggesting that the principal components analysis approach may be more vulnerable to overfitting with cross-validation. Both T1-weighted and diffusion magnetic resonance imaging data could be used to successfully differentiate between subject groups, with neither modality outperforming the other across all pairwise comparisons in the cross-validation analysis. However, features obtained from diffusion magnetic resonance imaging data resulted in significantly higher classification accuracies when an independent validation cohort was used. Overall, our results support the use of statistical classification approaches for differential diagnosis of parkinsonian disorders. However, classification accuracy can be affected by group size, age, sex and movement artefacts. With appropriate controls and out-of-sample cross validation, diagnostic biomarker evaluation including magnetic resonance imaging based classifiers may be an important adjunct to clinical evaluation.
Interleukin 15 (IL-15) is an essential cytokine for the survival and proliferation of natural killer (NK) cells. IL-15 activates signaling by the β and common γ (γ) chain heterodimer of the IL-2 receptor through -presentation by cells expressing IL-15 bound to the α chain of the IL-15 receptor (IL-15Rα). We show here that membrane-associated IL-15Rα-IL-15 complexes are transferred from presenting cells to NK cells through -endocytosis and contribute to the phosphorylation of ribosomal protein S6 and NK cell proliferation. NK cell interaction with soluble or surface-bound IL-15Rα-IL-15 complex resulted in Stat5 phosphorylation and NK cell survival at a concentration or density of the complex much lower than required to stimulate S6 phosphorylation. Despite this efficient response, Stat5 phosphorylation was reduced after inhibition of metalloprotease-induced IL-15Rα-IL-15 shedding from -presenting cells, whereas S6 phosphorylation was unaffected. Conversely, inhibition of -endocytosis by silencing of the small GTPase TC21 or expression of a dominant-negative TC21 reduced S6 phosphorylation but not Stat5 phosphorylation. Thus, -endocytosis of membrane-associated IL-15Rα-IL-15 provides a mode of regulating NK cells that is not afforded to IL-2 and is distinct from activation by soluble IL-15. These results may explain the strict IL-15 dependence of NK cells and illustrate how the cellular compartment in which receptor-ligand interaction occurs can influence functional outcome.
Long-term memory depends on the control of activity-dependent neuronal gene expression, which is regulated by epigenetic modifications. The epigenetic modification of histones is orchestrated by the opposing activities of two classes of regulatory complexes: permissive co-activators and silencing co-repressors. Much work has focused on co-activator complexes, but little is known about the co-repressor complexes that suppress the expression of plasticity-related genes. Here, we define a critical role for the co-repressor SIN3A in memory and synaptic plasticity, showing that postnatal neuronal deletion of Sin3a enhances hippocampal long-term potentiation and long-term contextual fear memory. SIN3A regulates the expression of genes encoding proteins in the post-synaptic density. Loss of SIN3A increases expression of the synaptic scaffold Homer1, alters the mGluR1α- and mGluR5-dependence of long-term potentiation, and increases activation of extracellular signal regulated kinase (ERK) in the hippocampus after learning. Our studies define a critical role for co-repressors in modulating neural plasticity and memory consolidation and reveal that Homer1/mGluR signaling pathways may be central molecular mechanisms for memory enhancement.
Enzymatic probes of chromatin structure reveal accessible versus inaccessible chromatin states, while super-resolution microscopy reveals a continuum of chromatin compaction states. Characterizing histone H2B movements by single-molecule tracking (SMT), we resolved chromatin domains ranging from low to high mobility and displaying different subnuclear localizations patterns. Heterochromatin constituents correlated with the lowest mobility chromatin, whereas transcription factors varied widely with regard to their respective mobility with low- or high-mobility chromatin. Pioneer transcription factors, which bind nucleosomes, can access the low-mobility chromatin domains, whereas weak or non-nucleosome binding factors are excluded from the domains and enriched in higher mobility domains. Nonspecific DNA and nucleosome binding accounted for most of the low mobility of strong nucleosome interactor FOXA1. Our analysis shows how the parameters of the mobility of chromatin-bound factors, but not their diffusion behaviors or SMT-residence times within chromatin, distinguish functional characteristics of different chromatin-interacting proteins.
This protocol provides a two-parameter analysis of single-molecule tracking (SMT) trajectories of Halo-tagged histones in living adherent cell lines and unveils a chromatin mobility landscape composed of five chromatin types, ranging from low to high mobility. When the analysis is applied to Halo-tagged, chromatin-binding proteins, it associates chromatin interaction properties with known functions in a way that previously used SMT parameters did not. For complete information on the use and execution of this protocol, please refer to Lerner et al. (2020).