Main Menu (Mobile)- Block

Main Menu - Block

custom | custom

Search Results

filters_region_cap | custom

Filter

facetapi-Q2b17qCsTdECvJIqZJgYMaGsr8vANl1n | block

Associated Lab

facetapi-W9JlIB1X0bjs93n1Alu3wHJQTTgDCBGe | block
facetapi-61yz1V0li8B1bixrCWxdAe2aYiEXdhd0 | block
facetapi-PV5lg7xuz68EAY8eakJzrcmwtdGEnxR0 | block
general_search_page-panel_pane_1 | views_panes

2691 Janelia Publications

Showing 211-220 of 2691 results
Card LabLeonardo Lab
07/17/14 | A spike-timing mechanism for action selection.
von Reyn CR, Breads P, Peek MY, Zheng GZ, Williamson WR, Yee AL, Leonardo A, Card GM
Nature Neuroscience. 2014 Jul 17;17(7):962-70. doi: 10.1038/nn.3741

We discovered a bimodal behavior in the genetically tractable organism Drosophila melanogaster that allowed us to directly probe the neural mechanisms of an action selection process. When confronted by a predator-mimicking looming stimulus, a fly responds with either a long-duration escape behavior sequence that initiates stable flight or a distinct, short-duration sequence that sacrifices flight stability for speed. Intracellular recording of the descending giant fiber (GF) interneuron during head-fixed escape revealed that GF spike timing relative to parallel circuits for escape actions determined which of the two behavioral responses was elicited. The process was well described by a simple model in which the GF circuit has a higher activation threshold than the parallel circuits, but can override ongoing behavior to force a short takeoff. Our findings suggest a neural mechanism for action selection in which relative activation timing of parallel circuits creates the appropriate motor output.

View Publication Page
01/10/24 | A split-GAL4 driver line resource for Drosophila CNS cell types
Geoffrey W Meissner , Allison Vannan , Jennifer Jeter , Kari Close , Gina M DePasquale , Zachary Dorman , Kaitlyn Forster , Jaye Anne Beringer , Theresa V Gibney , Joanna H Hausenfluck , Yisheng He , Kristin Henderson , Lauren Johnson , Rebecca M Johnston , Gudrun Ihrke , Nirmala Iyer , Rachel Lazarus , Kelley Lee , Hsing-Hsi Li , Hua-Peng Liaw , Brian Melton , Scott Miller , Reeham Motaher , Alexandra Novak , Omotara Ogundeyi , Alyson Petruncio , Jacquelyn Price , Sophia Protopapas , Susana Tae , Jennifer Taylor , Rebecca Vorimo , Brianna Yarbrough , Kevin Xiankun Zeng , Christopher T Zugates , Heather Dionne , Claire Angstadt , Kelly Ashley , Amanda Cavallaro , Tam Dang , Guillermo A Gonzalez III , Karen L Hibbard , Cuizhen Huang , Jui-Chun Kao , Todd Laverty , Monti Mercer , Brenda Perez , Scarlett Pitts , Danielle Ruiz , Viruthika Vallanadu , Grace Zhiyu Zheng , Cristian Goina , Hideo Otsuna , Konrad Rokicki , Robert R Svirskas , Han SJ Cheong , Michael-John Dolan , Erica Ehrhardt , Kai Feng , Basel El Galfi , Jens Goldammer , Stephen J Huston , Nan Hu , Masayoshi Ito , Claire McKellar , Ryo Minegishi , Shigehiro Namiki , Aljoscha Nern , Catherine E Schretter , Gabriella R Sterne , Lalanti Venkatasubramanian , Kaiyu Wang , Tanya Wolff , Ming Wu , Reed George , Oz Malkesman , Yoshinori Aso , Gwyneth M Card , Barry J Dickson , Wyatt Korff , Kei Ito , James W Truman , Marta Zlatic , Gerald M Rubin , FlyLight Project Team
bioRxiv. 2024 Jan 10:. doi: 10.1101/2024.01.09.574419

Techniques that enable precise manipulations of subsets of neurons in the fly central nervous system have greatly facilitated our understanding of the neural basis of behavior. Split-GAL4 driver lines allow specific targeting of cell types in Drosophila melanogaster and other species. We describe here a collection of 3060 lines targeting a range of cell types in the adult Drosophila central nervous system and 1373 lines characterized in third-instar larvae. These tools enable functional, transcriptomic, and proteomic studies based on precise anatomical targeting. NeuronBridge and other search tools relate light microscopy images of these split-GAL4 lines to connectomes reconstructed from electron microscopy images. The collections are the result of screening over 77,000 split hemidriver combinations. In addition to images and fly stocks for these well-characterized lines, we make available 300,000 new 3D images of other split-GAL4 lines.

View Publication Page
01/06/25 | A split-GAL4 driver line resource for Drosophila neuron types
Meissner GW, Vannan A, Jeter J, Close K, Depasquale GM, Dorman Z, Forster K, Beringer JA, Gibney TV, Hausenfluck JH, He Y, Henderson K, Johnson L, Johnston RM, Ihrke G, Iyer N, Lazarus R, Lee K, Li H, Liaw H, Melton B, Miller S, Motaher R, Novak A, Ogundeyi O, Petruncio A, Price J, Protopapas S, Tae S, Taylor J, Vorimo R, Yarbrough B, Zeng KX, Zugates CT, Dionne H, Angstadt C, Ashley K, Cavallaro A, Dang T, Gonzalez GA, Hibbard KL, Huang C, Kao J, Laverty T, Mercer M, Perez B, Pitts S, Ruiz D, Vallanadu V, Zheng GZ, Goina C, Otsuna H, Rokicki K, Svirskas RR, Cheong HS, Dolan M, Ehrhardt E, Feng K, El Galfi B, Goldammer J, Huston SJ, Hu N, Ito M, McKellar C, minegishi r, Namiki S, Nern A, Schretter CE, Sterne GR, Venkatasubramanian L, Wang K, Wolff T, Wu M, George R, Malkesman O, Aso Y, Card GM, Dickson BJ, Korff W, Ito K, Truman JW, Zlatic M, Rubin GM
01/01/17 | A statistical test for conserved RNA structure shows lack of evidence for structure in lncRNAs.
Rivas E, Clements J, Eddy SR
Nature Methods. 2017 Jan 31;14(1):45-8

Many functional RNAs have an evolutionarily conserved secondary structure. Conservation of RNA base pairing induces pairwise covariations in sequence alignments. We developed a computational method, R-scape (RNA Structural Covariation Above Phylogenetic Expectation), that quantitatively tests whether covariation analysis supports the presence of a conserved RNA secondary structure. R-scape analysis finds no statistically significant support for proposed secondary structures of the long noncoding RNAs HOTAIR, SRA, and Xist.

View Publication Page
08/23/12 | A subset of dopamine neurons signals reward for odour memory in Drosophila.
Liu C, Placais P, Yamagata N, Pfeiffer BD, Aso Y, Friedrich AB, Siwanowicz I, Rubin GM, Preat T, Tanimoto H
Nature. 2012 Aug 23;488(7412):512-6. doi: 10.1038/nature11304

Animals approach stimuli that predict a pleasant outcome. After the paired presentation of an odour and a reward, Drosophila melanogaster can develop a conditioned approach towards that odour. Despite recent advances in understanding the neural circuits for associative memory and appetitive motivation, the cellular mechanisms for reward processing in the fly brain are unknown. Here we show that a group of dopamine neurons in the protocerebral anterior medial (PAM) cluster signals sugar reward by transient activation and inactivation of target neurons in intact behaving flies. These dopamine neurons are selectively required for the reinforcing property of, but not a reflexive response to, the sugar stimulus. In vivo calcium imaging revealed that these neurons are activated by sugar ingestion and the activation is increased on starvation. The output sites of the PAM neurons are mainly localized to the medial lobes of the mushroom bodies (MBs), where appetitive olfactory associative memory is formed. We therefore propose that the PAM cluster neurons endow a positive predictive value to the odour in the MBs. Dopamine in insects is known to mediate aversive reinforcement signals. Our results highlight the cellular specificity underlying the various roles of dopamine and the importance of spatially segregated local circuits within the MBs.

View Publication Page
Heberlein LabSimpson Lab
09/02/15 | A subset of serotonergic neurons evokes hunger in adult Drosophila.
Albin SD, Kaun KR, Knapp J, Chung P, Heberlein U, Simpson JH
Current Biology : CB. 2015 Sep 2;25(18):2435-40. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.08.005

Hunger is a complex motivational state that drives multiple behaviors. The sensation of hunger is caused by an imbalance between energy intake and expenditure. One immediate response to hunger is increased food consumption. Hunger also modulates behaviors related to food seeking such as increased locomotion and enhanced sensory sensitivity in both insects [1-5] and vertebrates [6, 7]. In addition, hunger can promote the expression of food-associated memory [8, 9]. Although progress is being made [10], how hunger is represented in the brain and how it coordinates these behavioral responses is not fully understood in any system. Here, we use Drosophila melanogaster to identify neurons encoding hunger. We found a small group of neurons that, when activated, induced a fed fly to eat as though it were starved, suggesting that these neurons are downstream of the metabolic regulation of hunger. Artificially activating these neurons also promotes appetitive memory performance in sated flies, indicating that these neurons are not simply feeding command neurons but likely play a more general role in encoding hunger. We determined that the neurons relevant for the feeding effect are serotonergic and project broadly within the brain, suggesting a possible mechanism for how various responses to hunger are coordinated. These findings extend our understanding of the neural circuitry that drives feeding and enable future exploration of how state influences neural activity within this circuit.

View Publication Page
Gonen Lab
06/01/14 | A suite of software for processing MicroED data of extremely small protein crystals.
Iadanza MG, Gonen T
Journal of Applied Crystallography. 2014 Jun 1;47(Pt 3):1140-45. doi: 10.1107/S1600576714008073

Electron diffraction of extremely small three-dimensional crystals (MicroED) allows for structure determination from crystals orders of magnitude smaller than those used for X-ray crystallography. MicroED patterns, which are collected in a transmission electron microscope, were initially not amenable to indexing and intensity extraction by standard software, which necessitated the development of a suite of programs for data processing. The MicroED suite was developed to accomplish the tasks of unit-cell determination, indexing, background subtraction, intensity measurement and merging, resulting in data that can be carried forward to molecular replacement and structure determination. This ad hoc solution has been modified for more general use to provide a means for processing MicroED data until the technique can be fully implemented into existing crystallographic software packages. The suite is written in Python and the source code is available under a GNU General Public License.

View Publication Page
Simpson Lab
08/19/14 | A suppression hierarchy among competing motor programs drives sequential grooming in Drosophila.
Seeds AM, Ravbar P, Chung P, Hampel S, Midgley FM, Mensh BD, Simpson JH
eLife. 2014 Aug 19;3:e02951. doi: 10.7554/eLife.02951

Motor sequences are formed through the serial execution of different movements, but how nervous systems implement this process remains largely unknown. We determined the organizational principles governing how dirty fruit flies groom their bodies with sequential movements. Using genetically targeted activation of neural subsets, we drove distinct motor programs that clean individual body parts. This enabled competition experiments revealing that the motor programs are organized into a suppression hierarchy; motor programs that occur first suppress those that occur later. Cleaning one body part reduces the sensory drive to its motor program, which relieves suppression of the next movement, allowing the grooming sequence to progress down the hierarchy. A model featuring independently evoked cleaning movements activated in parallel, but selected serially through hierarchical suppression, was successful in reproducing the grooming sequence. This provides the first example of an innate motor sequence implemented by the prevailing model for generating human action sequences.

View Publication Page
10/25/12 | A survey of 6,300 genomic fragments for cis-regulatory activity in the imaginal discs of Drosophila melanogaster.
Jory A, Estella C, Giorgianni MW, Slattery M, Laverty TR, Rubin GM, Mann RS
Cell Reports. 2012 Oct 25;2(4):1014-24. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2012.09.010

Over 6,000 fragments from the genome of Drosophila melanogaster were analyzed for their ability to drive expression of GAL4 reporter genes in the third-instar larval imaginal discs. About 1,200 reporter genes drove expression in the eye, antenna, leg, wing, haltere, or genital imaginal discs. The patterns ranged from large regions to individual cells. About 75% of the active fragments drove expression in multiple discs; 20% were expressed in ventral, but not dorsal, discs (legs, genital, and antenna), whereas \~{}23% were expressed in dorsal but not ventral discs (wing, haltere, and eye). Several patterns, for example, within the leg chordotonal organ, appeared a surprisingly large number of times. Unbiased searches for DNA sequence motifs suggest candidate transcription factors that may regulate enhancers with shared activities. Together, these expression patterns provide a valuable resource to the community and offer a broad overview of how transcriptional regulatory information is distributed in the Drosophila genome.

View Publication Page
Eddy/Rivas Lab
01/01/09 | A survey of nematode SmY RNAs.
Jones TA, Otto W, Marz M, Eddy SR, Stadler PF
RNA Biology. 2009 Jan-Mar;6(1):5-8

SmY RNAs are a family of approximately 70-90 nt small nuclear RNAs found in nematodes. In C. elegans, SmY RNAs copurify in a small ribonucleoprotein (snRNP) complex related to the SL1 and SL2 snRNPs that are involved in nematode mRNA trans-splicing. Here we describe a comprehensive computational analysis of SmY RNA homologs found in the currently available genome sequences. We identify homologs in all sequenced nematode genomes in class Chromadorea. We are unable to identify homologs in a more distantly related nematode species, Trichinella spiralis (class: Dorylaimia), and in representatives of non-nematode phyla that use trans-splicing. Using comparative RNA sequence analysis, we infer a conserved consensus SmY RNA secondary structure consisting of two stems flanking a consensus Sm protein binding site. A representative seed alignment of the SmY RNA family, annotated with the inferred consensus secondary structure, has been deposited with the Rfam RNA families database.

View Publication Page