Filter
Associated Lab
- Ahrens Lab (1) Apply Ahrens Lab filter
- Aso Lab (2) Apply Aso Lab filter
- Baker Lab (2) Apply Baker Lab filter
- Betzig Lab (5) Apply Betzig Lab filter
- Bock Lab (1) Apply Bock Lab filter
- Branson Lab (3) Apply Branson Lab filter
- Card Lab (1) Apply Card Lab filter
- Cardona Lab (6) Apply Cardona Lab filter
- Chklovskii Lab (1) Apply Chklovskii Lab filter
- Cui Lab (6) Apply Cui Lab filter
- Dickson Lab (3) Apply Dickson Lab filter
- Druckmann Lab (3) Apply Druckmann Lab filter
- Eddy/Rivas Lab (1) Apply Eddy/Rivas Lab filter
- Fetter Lab (1) Apply Fetter Lab filter
- Fitzgerald Lab (1) Apply Fitzgerald Lab filter
- Gonen Lab (7) Apply Gonen Lab filter
- Grigorieff Lab (7) Apply Grigorieff Lab filter
- Harris Lab (3) Apply Harris Lab filter
- Heberlein Lab (9) Apply Heberlein Lab filter
- Hess Lab (3) Apply Hess Lab filter
- Jayaraman Lab (2) Apply Jayaraman Lab filter
- Ji Lab (2) Apply Ji Lab filter
- Kainmueller Lab (2) Apply Kainmueller Lab filter
- Karpova Lab (1) Apply Karpova Lab filter
- Keleman Lab (2) Apply Keleman Lab filter
- Keller Lab (3) Apply Keller Lab filter
- Koay Lab (1) Apply Koay Lab filter
- Lavis Lab (4) Apply Lavis Lab filter
- Lee (Albert) Lab (2) Apply Lee (Albert) Lab filter
- Leonardo Lab (2) Apply Leonardo Lab filter
- Lippincott-Schwartz Lab (12) Apply Lippincott-Schwartz Lab filter
- Looger Lab (13) Apply Looger Lab filter
- Magee Lab (6) Apply Magee Lab filter
- Otopalik Lab (1) Apply Otopalik Lab filter
- Pachitariu Lab (1) Apply Pachitariu Lab filter
- Pastalkova Lab (1) Apply Pastalkova Lab filter
- Pavlopoulos Lab (1) Apply Pavlopoulos Lab filter
- Pedram Lab (1) Apply Pedram Lab filter
- Reiser Lab (1) Apply Reiser Lab filter
- Riddiford Lab (1) Apply Riddiford Lab filter
- Rubin Lab (8) Apply Rubin Lab filter
- Saalfeld Lab (7) Apply Saalfeld Lab filter
- Satou Lab (2) Apply Satou Lab filter
- Scheffer Lab (3) Apply Scheffer Lab filter
- Schreiter Lab (2) Apply Schreiter Lab filter
- Sgro Lab (1) Apply Sgro Lab filter
- Simpson Lab (1) Apply Simpson Lab filter
- Singer Lab (11) Apply Singer Lab filter
- Spruston Lab (4) Apply Spruston Lab filter
- Stern Lab (5) Apply Stern Lab filter
- Sternson Lab (4) Apply Sternson Lab filter
- Svoboda Lab (9) Apply Svoboda Lab filter
- Tervo Lab (1) Apply Tervo Lab filter
- Tjian Lab (1) Apply Tjian Lab filter
- Truman Lab (3) Apply Truman Lab filter
Associated Project Team
Publication Date
- December 2012 (16) Apply December 2012 filter
- November 2012 (16) Apply November 2012 filter
- October 2012 (23) Apply October 2012 filter
- September 2012 (6) Apply September 2012 filter
- August 2012 (13) Apply August 2012 filter
- July 2012 (9) Apply July 2012 filter
- June 2012 (15) Apply June 2012 filter
- May 2012 (13) Apply May 2012 filter
- April 2012 (14) Apply April 2012 filter
- March 2012 (10) Apply March 2012 filter
- February 2012 (19) Apply February 2012 filter
- January 2012 (36) Apply January 2012 filter
- Remove 2012 filter 2012
Type of Publication
190 Publications
Showing 71-80 of 190 resultsPhase precession is a well known phenomenon in which a hippocampal place cell will fire action potentials at successively earlier phases (relative to the theta-band oscillations recorded in the local field potential) as an animal moves through the cell’s receptive field (also known as a place field). We present a model in which CA1 pyramidal cell spiking is driven by dual input components arising from CA3 and EC3. The receptive fields of these two input components overlap but are offset in space from each other such that as the animal moves through the model place field, action potentials are driven first by the CA3 input component and then the EC3 input component. As CA3 synaptic input is known to arrive in CA1 at a later theta phase than EC3 input (Mizuseki et al., 2009; Montgomery et al., 2009), CA1 spiking advances in phase as the model transitions from CA3-driven spiking to EC3-driven spiking. Here spike phase is a function of animal location, placing our results in agreement with many experimental observations characterizing CA1 phase precession (O’Keefe and Recce, 1993; Huxter et al., 2003; Geisler et al., 2007). We predict that experimental manipulations that dramatically enhance or disrupt activity in either of these areas should have a significant effect on phase precession observed in CA1.
The origin of the spatial receptive fields of hippocampal place cells has not been established. A hippocampal CA1 pyramidal cell receives thousands of synaptic inputs, mostly from other spatially tuned neurons; however, how the postsynaptic neuron’s cellular properties determine the response to these inputs during behavior is unknown. We discovered that, contrary to expectations from basic models of place cells and neuronal integration, a small, spatially uniform depolarization of the spatially untuned somatic membrane potential of a silent cell leads to the sudden and reversible emergence of a spatially tuned subthreshold response and place-field spiking. Such gating of inputs by postsynaptic neuronal excitability reveals a cellular mechanism for receptive field origin and may be critical for the formation of hippocampal memory representations.
Relating the function of neuronal cell types to information processing and behavior is a central goal of neuroscience. In the hippocampus, pyramidal cells in CA1 and the subiculum process sensory and motor cues to form a cognitive map encoding spatial, contextual, and emotional information, which they transmit throughout the brain. Do these cells constitute a single class or are there multiple cell types with specialized functions? Using unbiased cluster analysis, we show that there are two morphologically and electrophysiologically distinct principal cell types that carry hippocampal output. We show further that these two cell types are inversely modulated by the synergistic action of glutamate and acetylcholine acting on metabotropic receptors that are central to hippocampal function. Combined with prior connectivity studies, our results support a model of hippocampal processing in which the two pyramidal cell types are predominantly segregated into two parallel pathways that process distinct modalities of information.
In insects juvenile hormone (JH) regulates both metamorphosis and reproduction. This lecture focuses on our current understanding of JH action at the molecular level in both of these processes based primarily on studies in the tobacco hornworm Manduca sexta, the flour beetle Tribolium castaneum, the mosquito Aedes aegypti, and the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. The roles of the JH receptor complex and the transcription factors that it regulates during larval molting and metamorphosis are summarized. Also highlighted are the intriguing interactions of the JH and insulin signaling pathways in both imaginal disc development and vitellogenesis. Critical actions of JH and its receptor in the timing of maturation of the adult optic lobe and of female receptivity in Drosophila are also discussed.
In primary neurons, the oncofetal RNA-binding protein IGF2BP1 (IGF2 mRNA-binding protein 1) controls spatially restricted β-actin (ACTB) mRNA translation and modulates growth cone guidance. In cultured tumor-derived cells, IGF2BP1 was shown to regulate the formation of lamellipodia and invadopodia. However, how and via which target mRNAs IGF2BP1 controls the motility of tumor-derived cells has remained elusive. In this study, we reveal that IGF2BP1 promotes the velocity and directionality of tumor-derived cell migration by determining the cytoplasmic fate of two novel target mRNAs: MAPK4 and PTEN. Inhibition of MAPK4 mRNA translation by IGF2BP1 antagonizes MK5 activation and prevents phosphorylation of HSP27, which sequesters actin monomers available for F-actin polymerization. Consequently, HSP27-ACTB association is reduced, mobilizing cellular G-actin for polymerization in order to promote the velocity of cell migration. At the same time, stabilization of the PTEN mRNA by IGF2BP1 enhances PTEN expression and antagonizes PIP(3)-directed signaling. This enforces the directionality of cell migration in a RAC1-dependent manner by preventing additional lamellipodia from forming and sustaining cell polarization intrinsically. IGF2BP1 thus promotes the velocity and persistence of tumor cell migration by controlling the expression of signaling proteins. This fine-tunes and connects intracellular signaling networks in order to enhance actin dynamics and cell polarization.
The olfactory system encodes information about molecules by spatiotemporal patterns of activity across distributed populations of neurons and extracts information from these patterns to control specific behaviors. Recent studies used in vivo recordings, optogenetics, and other methods to analyze the mechanisms by which odor information is encoded and processed in the olfactory system, the functional connectivity within and between olfactory brain areas, and the impact of spatiotemporal patterning of neuronal activity on higher-order neurons and behavioral outputs. The results give rise to a faceted picture of olfactory processing and provide insights into fundamental mechanisms underlying neuronal computations. This review focuses on some of this work presented in a Mini-Symposium at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Neuroscience in 2012.
The ability to chronically monitor neuronal activity in the living brain is essential for understanding the organization and function of the nervous system. The genetically encoded green fluorescent protein based calcium sensor GCaMP provides a powerful tool for detecting calcium transients in neuronal somata, processes, and synapses that are triggered by neuronal activities. Here we report the generation and characterization of transgenic mice that express improved GCaMPs in various neuronal subpopulations under the control of the Thy1 promoter. In vitro and in vivo studies show that calcium transients induced by spontaneous and stimulus-evoked neuronal activities can be readily detected at the level of individual cells and synapses in acute brain slices, as well as in awake behaving animals. These GCaMP transgenic mice allow investigation of activity patterns in defined neuronal populations in the living brain, and will greatly facilitate dissecting complex structural and functional relationships of neural networks.
The molecular mechanism responsible for capturing, sorting and retrieving vesicle membrane proteins following triggered exocytosis is not understood. Here we image the post-fusion release and then capture of a vesicle membrane protein, the vesicular acetylcholine transporter, from single vesicles in living neuroendocrine cells. We combine these measurements with super-resolution interferometric photo-activation localization microscopy and electron microscopy, and modelling to map the nanometer-scale topography and architecture of the structures responsible for the transporter’s capture following exocytosis. We show that after exocytosis, the transporter rapidly diffuses into the plasma membrane, but most travels only a short distance before it is locally captured over a dense network of membrane-resident clathrin-coated structures. We propose that the extreme density of these structures acts as a short-range diffusion trap. They quickly sequester diffusing vesicle material and limit its spread across the membrane. This system could provide a means for clathrin-mediated endocytosis to quickly recycle vesicle proteins in highly excitable cells.
The regulation of translation provides a mechanism to control not only the abundance of proteins, but also the precise time and subcellular location that they are synthesized. Much of what is known concerning the molecular basis for translational control has been gleaned from experiments (e.g., luciferase assays and polysome analysis) that measure average changes in the protein synthesis of a population of cells, however, mechanistic insights can be obscured in ensemble measurements. The development of fluorescent microscopy techniques and reagents has allowed translation to be studied within its cellular context. Here we highlight recent methodologies that can be used to study global changes in protein synthesis or regulation of specific mRNAs in single cells. Imaging of translation has provided direct evidence for local translation of mRNAs at synapses in neurons and will become an important tool for studying translational control.
SUMMARY: ImgLib2 is an open-source Java library for n-dimensional data representation and manipulation with focus on image processing. It aims at minimizing code duplication by cleanly separating pixel-algebra, data access and data representation in memory. Algorithms can be implemented for classes of pixel types and generic access patterns by which they become independent of the specific dimensionality, pixel type and data representation. ImgLib2 illustrates that an elegant high-level programming interface can be achieved without sacrificing performance. It provides efficient implementations of common data types, storage layouts and algorithms. It is the data model underlying ImageJ2, the KNIME Image Processing toolbox and an increasing number of Fiji-Plugins. AVAILABILITY: ImgLib2 is licensed under BSD. Documentation and source code are available at http://imglib2.net and in a public repository at https://github.com/imagej/imglib. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics Online. CONTACT: saalfeld@mpi-cbg.de