Filter
Associated Lab
- Aguilera Castrejon Lab (1) Apply Aguilera Castrejon Lab filter
- Ahrens Lab (2) Apply Ahrens Lab filter
- Aso Lab (3) Apply Aso Lab filter
- Baker Lab (1) Apply Baker Lab filter
- Betzig Lab (8) Apply Betzig Lab filter
- Beyene Lab (2) Apply Beyene Lab filter
- Bock Lab (1) Apply Bock Lab filter
- Branson Lab (7) Apply Branson Lab filter
- Card Lab (4) Apply Card Lab filter
- Cardona Lab (8) Apply Cardona Lab filter
- Cui Lab (1) Apply Cui Lab filter
- Darshan Lab (1) Apply Darshan Lab filter
- Dickson Lab (1) Apply Dickson Lab filter
- Druckmann Lab (3) Apply Druckmann Lab filter
- Dudman Lab (4) Apply Dudman Lab filter
- Eddy/Rivas Lab (1) Apply Eddy/Rivas Lab filter
- Feliciano Lab (1) Apply Feliciano Lab filter
- Fetter Lab (4) Apply Fetter Lab filter
- Funke Lab (1) Apply Funke Lab filter
- Gonen Lab (11) Apply Gonen Lab filter
- Grigorieff Lab (6) Apply Grigorieff Lab filter
- Harris Lab (5) Apply Harris Lab filter
- Heberlein Lab (1) Apply Heberlein Lab filter
- Hermundstad Lab (1) Apply Hermundstad Lab filter
- Hess Lab (4) Apply Hess Lab filter
- Jayaraman Lab (4) Apply Jayaraman Lab filter
- Ji Lab (5) Apply Ji Lab filter
- Johnson Lab (1) Apply Johnson Lab filter
- Kainmueller Lab (1) Apply Kainmueller Lab filter
- Keleman Lab (1) Apply Keleman Lab filter
- Keller Lab (2) Apply Keller Lab filter
- Koay Lab (3) Apply Koay Lab filter
- Lavis Lab (16) Apply Lavis Lab filter
- Lee (Albert) Lab (6) Apply Lee (Albert) Lab filter
- Leonardo Lab (2) Apply Leonardo Lab filter
- Li Lab (4) Apply Li Lab filter
- Lippincott-Schwartz Lab (11) Apply Lippincott-Schwartz Lab filter
- Liu (Zhe) Lab (5) Apply Liu (Zhe) Lab filter
- Looger Lab (6) Apply Looger Lab filter
- Magee Lab (2) Apply Magee Lab filter
- Menon Lab (1) Apply Menon Lab filter
- Otopalik Lab (3) Apply Otopalik Lab filter
- Pachitariu Lab (5) Apply Pachitariu Lab filter
- Pedram Lab (1) Apply Pedram Lab filter
- Reiser Lab (6) Apply Reiser Lab filter
- Riddiford Lab (1) Apply Riddiford Lab filter
- Romani Lab (6) Apply Romani Lab filter
- Rubin Lab (15) Apply Rubin Lab filter
- Saalfeld Lab (4) Apply Saalfeld Lab filter
- Scheffer Lab (4) Apply Scheffer Lab filter
- Schreiter Lab (4) Apply Schreiter Lab filter
- Shroff Lab (1) Apply Shroff Lab filter
- Simpson Lab (2) Apply Simpson Lab filter
- Singer Lab (6) Apply Singer Lab filter
- Spruston Lab (1) Apply Spruston Lab filter
- Stern Lab (8) Apply Stern Lab filter
- Sternson Lab (2) Apply Sternson Lab filter
- Svoboda Lab (9) Apply Svoboda Lab filter
- Tebo Lab (3) Apply Tebo Lab filter
- Truman Lab (6) Apply Truman Lab filter
- Turaga Lab (3) Apply Turaga Lab filter
- Turner Lab (2) Apply Turner Lab filter
- Wang (Shaohe) Lab (4) Apply Wang (Shaohe) Lab filter
- Wu Lab (1) Apply Wu Lab filter
- Zlatic Lab (7) Apply Zlatic Lab filter
Associated Project Team
- Fly Descending Interneuron (1) Apply Fly Descending Interneuron filter
- Fly Functional Connectome (4) Apply Fly Functional Connectome filter
- Fly Olympiad (1) Apply Fly Olympiad filter
- FlyEM (4) Apply FlyEM filter
- FlyLight (2) Apply FlyLight filter
- GENIE (3) Apply GENIE filter
- ThalamoSeq (1) Apply ThalamoSeq filter
- Tool Translation Team (T3) (3) Apply Tool Translation Team (T3) filter
- Transcription Imaging (6) Apply Transcription Imaging filter
Publication Date
- December 2017 (16) Apply December 2017 filter
- November 2017 (13) Apply November 2017 filter
- October 2017 (10) Apply October 2017 filter
- September 2017 (14) Apply September 2017 filter
- August 2017 (18) Apply August 2017 filter
- July 2017 (25) Apply July 2017 filter
- June 2017 (19) Apply June 2017 filter
- May 2017 (27) Apply May 2017 filter
- April 2017 (22) Apply April 2017 filter
- March 2017 (19) Apply March 2017 filter
- February 2017 (13) Apply February 2017 filter
- January 2017 (21) Apply January 2017 filter
- Remove 2017 filter 2017
Type of Publication
217 Publications
Showing 101-110 of 217 resultsRNA-protein interactions are essential for proper gene expression regulation, particularly in neurons with unique spatial constraints. Currently, these interactions are defined biochemically, but a method is needed to evaluate them quantitatively within morphological context. Colocalization of two-color labels using wide-field microscopy is a method to infer these interactions. However, because of chromatic aberrations in the objective lens, this approach lacks the resolution to determine whether two molecules are physically in contact or simply nearby by chance. Here, we developed a robust super registration methodology that corrected the chromatic aberration across the entire image field to within 10 nm, which is capable of determining whether two molecules are physically interacting or simply in proximity by random chance. We applied this approach to image single-molecule FISH in combination with immunofluorescence (smFISH-IF) and determined whether the association between an mRNA and binding protein(s) within a neuron was significant or accidental. We evaluated several mRNA-binding proteins identified from RNA pulldown assays to determine which of these exhibit bona fide interactions. Surprisingly, many known mRNA-binding proteins did not bind the mRNA in situ, indicating that adventitious interactions are significant using existing technology. This method provides an ability to evaluate two-color registration compatible with the scale of molecular interactions.
The packaging and budding of Gag polyprotein and viral RNA is a critical step in the HIV-1 life cycle. High-resolution structures of the Gag polyprotein have revealed that the capsid (CA) and spacer peptide 1 (SP1) domains contain important interfaces for Gag self-assembly. However, the molecular details of the multimerization process, especially in the presence of RNA and the cell membrane, have remained unclear. In this work, we investigate the mechanisms that work in concert between the polyproteins, RNA, and membrane to promote immature lattice growth. We develop a coarse-grained (CG) computational model that is derived from subnanometer resolution structural data. Our simulations recapitulate contiguous and hexameric lattice assembly driven only by weak anisotropic attractions at the helical CA-SP1 junction. Importantly, analysis from CG and single-particle tracking photoactivated localization (spt-PALM) trajectories indicates that viral RNA and the membrane are critical constituents that actively promote Gag multimerization through scaffolding, while overexpression of short competitor RNA can suppress assembly. We also find that the CA amino-terminal domain imparts intrinsic curvature to the Gag lattice. As a consequence, immature lattice growth appears to be coupled to the dynamics of spontaneous membrane deformation. Our findings elucidate a simple network of interactions that regulate the early stages of HIV-1 assembly and budding.
The termination of the proliferation of Drosophila neural stem cells, also known as neuroblasts (NBs), requires a "decommissioning" phase that is controlled in a lineage-specific manner. Most NBs, with the exception of those of the Mushroom body (MB), are decommissioned by the ecdysone receptor and mediator complex causing them to shrink during metamorphosis, followed by nuclear accumulation of Prospero and cell cycle exit. Here, we demonstrate that the levels of Imp and Syp RNA-binding proteins regulate NB decommissioning. Descending Imp and ascending Syp expression have been shown to regulate neuronal temporal fate. We show that Imp levels decline slower in the MB than other central brain NBs. MB NBs continue to express Imp into pupation, and the presence of Imp prevents decommissioning partly by inhibiting the mediator complex. Late-larval induction of transgenic Imp prevents many non-MB NBs from decommissioning in early pupae. Moreover, the presence of abundant Syp in aged NBs permits Prospero accumulation that, in turn, promotes cell cycle exit. Together our results reveal that progeny temporal fate and progenitor decommissioning are co-regulated in protracted neuronal lineages.
Neural progenitors (NP), found in fetal and adult brain, differentiate into neurons potentially able to be used in cell replacement therapies. This approach however, raises technical and ethical problems which limit their potential therapeutic use. Alternately, NPs can be obtained by transdifferentiation of non-neural somatic cells evading these difficulties. Human bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) are suggested to transdifferentiate into NP-like cells, which however, have a low proliferation capacity. The present study demonstrates the requisite of cell adhesion for proliferation and survival of NP-like cells and re-evaluates some neuronal features after differentiation by standard procedures. Mature neuronal markers, though, were not detected by these procedures. A chemical differentiation approach was used in this study to convert MSCs-derived NP-like cells into neurons by using a cocktail of six molecules, CHIR99021, I-BET151, RepSox, DbcAMP, forskolin and Y-27632, defined after screening combinations of 22 small molecules. Direct transdifferentiation of MSCs into neuronal cells was obtained with the small molecule cocktail, without requiring the NP-like intermediate stage.
Whole-cell recording has been used to measure and manipulate a neuron's spiking and subthreshold membrane potential, allowing assessment of the cell's inputs and outputs as well as its intrinsic membrane properties. This technique has also been combined with pharmacology and optogenetics as well as morphological reconstruction to address critical questions concerning neuronal integration, plasticity, and connectivity. This protocol describes a technique for obtaining whole-cell recordings in awake head-fixed animals, allowing such questions to be investigated within the context of an intact network and natural behavioral states. First, animals are habituated to sit quietly with their heads fixed in place. Then, a whole-cell recording is obtained using an efficient, blind patching protocol. We have successfully applied this technique to rats and mice.
Place cells in the CA1 region of the hippocampus express location-specific firing despite receiving a steady barrage of heterogeneously tuned excitatory inputs that should compromise output dynamic range and timing. We examined the role of synaptic inhibition in countering the deleterious effects of off-target excitation. Intracellular recordings in behaving mice demonstrate that bimodal excitation drives place cells, while unimodal excitation drives weaker or no spatial tuning in interneurons. Optogenetic hyperpolarization of interneurons had spatially uniform effects on place cell membrane potential dynamics, substantially reducing spatial selectivity. These data and a computational model suggest that spatially uniform inhibitory conductance enhances rate coding in place cells by suppressing out-of-field excitation and by limiting dendritic amplification. Similarly, we observed that inhibitory suppression of phasic noise generated by out-of-field excitation enhances temporal coding by expanding the range of theta phase precession. Thus, spatially uniform inhibition allows proficient and flexible coding in hippocampal CA1 by suppressing heterogeneously tuned excitation.
Elucidating the diversity and spatial organization of cell types in the brain is an essential goal of neuroscience, with many emerging technologies helping to advance this endeavor. Using a new in situ hybridization method that can measure the expression of hundreds of genes in a given mouse brain section (amplified seqFISH), Shah et al. (2016) describe a spatial organization of hippocampal cell types that differs from previous reports. In seeking to understand this discrepancy, we find that many of the barcoded genes used by seqFISH to characterize this spatial organization, when cross-validated by other sensitive methodologies, exhibit negligible expression in the hippocampus. Additionally, the results of Shah et al. (2016) do not recapitulate canonical cellular hierarchies and improperly classify major neuronal cell types. We suggest that, when describing the spatial organization of brain regions, cross-validation using multiple techniques should be used to yield robust and informative cellular classification. This Matters Arising paper is in response to Shah et al. (2016), published in Neuron. See also the response by Shah et al. (2017), published in this issue.
RNAs have been shown to undergo transfer between mammalian cells, although the mechanism behind this phenomenon and its overall importance to cell physiology is not well understood. Numerous publications have suggested that RNAs (microRNAs and incomplete mRNAs) undergo transfer via extracellular vesicles (e.g., exosomes). However, in contrast to a diffusion-based transfer mechanism, we find that full-length mRNAs undergo direct cell-cell transfer via cytoplasmic extensions characteristic of membrane nanotubes (mNTs), which connect donor and acceptor cells. By employing a simple coculture experimental model and using single-molecule imaging, we provide quantitative data showing that mRNAs are transferred between cells in contact. Examples of mRNAs that undergo transfer include those encoding GFP, mouse β-actin, and human Cyclin D1, BRCA1, MT2A, and HER2. We show that intercellular mRNA transfer occurs in all coculture models tested (e.g., between primary cells, immortalized cells, and in cocultures of immortalized human and murine cells). Rapid mRNA transfer is dependent upon actin but is independent of de novo protein synthesis and is modulated by stress conditions and gene-expression levels. Hence, this work supports the hypothesis that full-length mRNAs undergo transfer between cells through a refined structural connection. Importantly, unlike the transfer of miRNA or RNA fragments, this process of communication transfers genetic information that could potentially alter the acceptor cell proteome. This phenomenon may prove important for the proper development and functioning of tissues as well as for host-parasite or symbiotic interactions.
Long‐distance biological electron transfer occurs through a hopping mechanism and often involves tyrosine as a high potential intermediate, for example in the early charge separation steps during photosynthesis. Protein design allows for the development of minimal systems to study the underlying principles of complex systems. Herein, we report the development of the first ruthenium‐linked designed protein for the photogeneration of a tyrosine radical by intramolecular electron transfer.
From patch-clamp techniques to recombinant DNA technologies, three-dimensional protein modeling, and optogenetics, diverse and sophisticated methods have been used to study ion channels and how they determine the electrical properties of cells.