Sex differences in behavior exist across all animals, typically under strong genetic regulation. In Drosophila, fruitless/doublesex transcription factors identify dimorphic neurons, but their organization into functional circuits remains unclear. We present the connectome of the entire Drosophila male central nervous system. This contains 166,700 neurons spanning the brain and nerve cord, fully proofread and annotated, including fruitless/doublesex expression and 11,710 neuron types. We provide the first comprehensive comparison between male and female brain connectomes to synaptic resolution, finding 8,069 isomorphic, 138 dimorphic, 289 male-specific, and 71 female-specific types. This resource enables analysis of full sensory-to-motor circuits underlying complex behaviors and the impact of dimorphic elements. Sex-specific/dimorphic neurons are concentrated in higher brain centers, while the sensory and motor periphery is largely isomorphic. Within higher centers, male-specific connections are organized into hotspots defined by male-specific neurons or arbors. Dimorphic neurons reroute information across sexes.

Visual systems transform photoreceptor inputs into rich perceptual representations through hierarchical networks that extract features along parallel pathways. Although this architecture is conserved across species, how visual information is routed throughout an entire brain remains elusive in any animal. Using the male Drosophila connectome, we trace signals from photoreceptors through the optic lobes—layered, retinotopic regions containing two-thirds of the brain’s neurons—and onward into the central brain. Network-based analyses reveal a multilayered architecture of pathway classes with distinct input mixtures. Signals from visual-input channels spread broadly yet converge in focal regions apparently specialized for particular features and fine spatial sampling. Predictions of receptive-field structure and feature-related input biases are consistent with physiological data and extend to thousands of uncharacterized neuron types. These analyses provide a neuron-by-neuron account of how a visual system organizes and integrates information across an entire brain.

T4 and T5 neurons are the first direction-selective neurons in the visual pathway. They are the most numerous cell types in the fly brain (~6000 within each optic lobe) and, as a population, their compact dendritic arbours span the entire visual field. They are classified into four subtypes (a, b, c, and d). Each subtype encodes one of four orthogonal motion directions (up, down, forwards, backwards). Crucially, the dendrites of these neurons are oriented inversely to the functional direction of motion which they encode. This dendritic orientation is what ultimately determines their functional directional encoding. The development of these neurons is well characterised up to the point of neuropil innervation. However, the full population of these neurons innervate their target neuropil prior to the emergence of directionality within their dendrites. As it stands, development prior to the emergence of dendritic orientations, and the adult oriented dendrite are both well understood, but the key components relating to the emergence of orientation itself are missing. Recent whole-brain electron microscopy (EM) connectomes of Drosophila melanogaster provide an unprecedented level of resolution and completeness when considering the morphology of neurons. Utilising this, we isolate the dendritic arbour of every T4 and T5 neuron within a female adult Drosophila brain, made available through FAFB-FlyWire. In doing so we are able to rigorously quantify the morphology of these dendrites in order to understand their similarities and differences. In doing so we aim to shed light on the origins of dendritic directionality. We reason that either this emerges through a tightly controlled, subtype specific mechanism, or is the result of a subtype agnostic mechanism and external factors. In the former case, we would expect evidence of this in differences between the morphological structure of individual dendrites between T4 and T5, and their subtypes. Our analysis however reveals a high degree of structural similarity between T4 and T5, and within their subtypes. Particularly, the geometry of branching, section orientation, and tree-graph structure of these dendrites show only minor variability, with no consistent separation between T4 and T5, or their subtypes. These results indicate that, despite forming in different neuropils, and serving distinct motion directions, T4 and T5 dendrites follow closely aligned morphological patterns. This suggests a shared mechanism of directed outgrowth, as opposed to symmetry breaking emerging through neuron type or subtype specific mechanisms.

Nervous systems can process information in serial or in parallel, trading off efficiency for flexibility and speed. How these network architectures are implemented across sensorimotor pathways to control behavior is unclear. We investigate this tradeoff directly in Drosophila by comparing neuronal circuits underlying landing and takeoff, behaviors transforming similar visual cues to whole-body motor output. Using a whole-CNS connectome, electrophysiology, and behavioral analysis, we reconstruct the complete feedforward pathway for landing, including visual feature detectors, a dedicated ensemble of descending neurons (DNs), and a core premotor circuit in the nerve cord. Comparison to the takeoff pathway reveals that, despite encoding the same sensory feature and engaging similar muscle groups, neuronal circuits controlling the two behaviors are separated at every sensorimotor level. Extending this analysis to the complete DN population reveals a blueprint for descending motor control: DNs across the behavioral space utilized by the fly are organized as a set of parallel, loosely-overlapping ensembles that form a continuum from command-like control, with individual DNs determining behavioral output, to population coding, with multiple DNs controlling behavior synergistically. Distinct combinations of sensory feature detectors differentially recruit DN ensembles to enable flexible, context-dependent behavioral control.

Quantitative analysis of neuron morphology is essential in order to develop our understanding of circuit organisation and development. The recent acquisition of whole-brain electron microscopy-based (EM) reconstructions of the Drosophila melanogaster nervous system now provide the resolution needed to examine morphology at scale. Utilising these data, together with new computational tools, we extract and analyse the dendrites of all T4 and T5 neurons within one hemisphere (n \~ 6000).T4 and T5 neurons are the first uniquely direction-selective neurons in the visual pathway, and are classified into four subtypes (a,b,c, and d). Each subtype encodes one of four cardinal motion directions (up, down, forwards, backwards). The dendrites of these neurons form in two distinct neuropils, the Medulla (T4) and the Lobula (T5), and are asymmetrically oriented in a direction inverse to the direction of motion which they encode. However, their densely overlapping and compact arbours has made rigorous morphological quantification challenging. The presence of differences beyond their characteristic orientation, both between T4 and T5, as well as within subtypes, has remained poorly understood.Our analysis reveals a high degree of structural similarity across both types and subtypes. Particularly, measures of geometry and graph topology show only minor variation, with no consistent separation between T4 and T5, or their subtypes.These results indicate that, despite forming in different neuropils, and serving distinct motion directions, T4 and T5 dendrites follow closely aligned morphological patterns. This suggests that their arborization may be governed by shared developmental constraints and mechanisms.

Many animals navigate using optic flow, detecting rotational image velocity differences between their eyes to adjust direction. Forward locomotion produces strong symmetric translational optic flow that can mask these differences, yet the brain efficiently extracts these binocular asymmetries for course control. In Drosophila melanogaster, monocular horizontal system neurons facilitate detection of binocular asymmetries and contribute to steering. To understand these functions, we reconstructed horizontal system cells' central network using electron microscopy datasets, revealing convergent visual inputs, a recurrent inhibitory middle layer and a divergent output layer projecting to the ventral nerve cord and deeper brain regions. Two-photon imaging, GABA receptor manipulations and modeling, showed that lateral disinhibition reduces the output's translational sensitivity while enhancing its rotational selectivity. Unilateral manipulations confirmed the role of interneurons and descending outputs in steering. These findings establish competitive disinhibition as a key circuit mechanism for detecting rotational motion during translation, supporting navigation in dynamic environments.

Preprint: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.08.06.552150

The body of an animal influences how its nervous system generates behavior1. Accurately modeling the neural control of sensorimotor behavior requires an anatomically detailed biomechanical representation of the body. Here, we introduce a whole-body model of the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster in a physics simulator. Designed as a general-purpose framework, our model enables the simulation of diverse fly behaviors, including both terrestrial and aerial locomotion. We validate its versatility by replicating realistic walking and flight behaviors. To support these behaviors, we develop new phenomenological models for fluid and adhesion forces. Using data-driven, end-to-end reinforcement learning we train neural network controllers capable of generating naturalistic locomotion along complex trajectories in response to high-level steering commands. Additionally, we show the use of visual sensors and hierarchical motor control, training a high-level controller to reuse a pre-trained low-level flight controller to perform visually guided flight tasks. Our model serves as an open-source platform for studying the neural control of sensorimotor behavior in an embodied context.

Preprint: www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2024/03/14/2024.03.11.584515

Vision provides animals with detailed information about their surroundings, conveying diverse features such as color, form, and movement across the visual scene. Computing these parallel spatial features requires a large and diverse network of neurons, such that in animals as distant as flies and humans, visual regions comprise half the brain’s volume. These visual brain regions often reveal remarkable structure-function relationships, with neurons organized along spatial maps with shapes that directly relate to their roles in visual processing. To unravel the stunning diversity of a complex visual system, a careful mapping of the neural architecture matched to tools for targeted exploration of that circuitry is essential. Here, we report a new connectome of the right optic lobe from a male Drosophila central nervous system FIB-SEM volume and a comprehensive inventory of the fly’s visual neurons. We developed a computational framework to quantify the anatomy of visual neurons, establishing a basis for interpreting how their shapes relate to spatial vision. By integrating this analysis with connectivity information, neurotransmitter identity, and expert curation, we classified the 53,000 neurons into 727 types, about half of which are systematically described and named for the first time. Finally, we share an extensive collection of split-GAL4 lines matched to our neuron type catalog. Together, this comprehensive set of tools and data unlock new possibilities for systematic investigations of vision in Drosophila, a foundation for a deeper understanding of sensory processing.

The body of an animal influences how the nervous system produces behavior. Therefore, detailed modeling of the neural control of sensorimotor behavior requires a detailed model of the body. Here we contribute an anatomically-detailed biomechanical whole-body model of the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster in the MuJoCo physics engine. Our model is general-purpose, enabling the simulation of diverse fly behaviors, both on land and in the air. We demonstrate the generality of our model by simulating realistic locomotion, both flight and walking. To support these behaviors, we have extended MuJoCo with phenomenological models of fluid forces and adhesion forces. Through data-driven end-to-end reinforcement learning, we demonstrate that these advances enable the training of neural network controllers capable of realistic locomotion along complex trajectories based on high-level steering control signals. We demonstrate the use of visual sensors and the re-use of a pre-trained general-purpose flight controller by training the model to perform visually guided flight tasks. Our project is an open-source platform for modeling neural control of sensorimotor behavior in an embodied context.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.

The brain generates diverse neuron types which express unique homeodomain transcription factors (TFs) and assemble into precise neural circuits. Yet a mechanistic framework is lacking for how homeodomain TFs specify both neuronal fate and synaptic connectivity. We use Drosophila lamina neurons (L1-L5) to show the homeodomain TF Brain-specific homeobox (Bsh) is initiated in lamina precursor cells (LPCs) where it specifies L4/L5 fate and suppresses homeodomain TF Zfh1 to prevent L1/L3 fate. Subsequently, Bsh activates the homeodomain TF Apterous (Ap) in L4 in a feedforward loop to express the synapse recognition molecule DIP-β, in part by Bsh direct binding a DIP-β intron. Thus, homeodomain TFs function hierarchically: primary homeodomain TF (Bsh) first specifies neuronal fate, and subsequently acts with secondary homeodomain TF (Ap) to activate DIP-β, thereby generating precise synaptic connectivity. We speculate that hierarchical homeodomain TF function may represent a general principle for coordinating neuronal fate specification and circuit assembly.