Filter
Associated Lab
- Ahrens Lab (2) Apply Ahrens Lab filter
- Aso Lab (1) Apply Aso Lab filter
- Baker Lab (2) Apply Baker Lab filter
- Betzig Lab (4) Apply Betzig Lab filter
- Bock Lab (2) Apply Bock Lab filter
- Cardona Lab (1) Apply Cardona Lab filter
- Cui Lab (2) Apply Cui Lab filter
- Dickson Lab (1) Apply Dickson Lab filter
- Druckmann Lab (1) Apply Druckmann Lab filter
- Dudman Lab (2) Apply Dudman Lab filter
- Eddy/Rivas Lab (2) Apply Eddy/Rivas Lab filter
- Egnor Lab (1) Apply Egnor Lab filter
- Fetter Lab (3) Apply Fetter Lab filter
- Gonen Lab (9) Apply Gonen Lab filter
- Grigorieff Lab (1) Apply Grigorieff Lab filter
- Harris Lab (3) Apply Harris Lab filter
- Heberlein Lab (1) Apply Heberlein Lab filter
- Hess Lab (2) Apply Hess Lab filter
- Jayaraman Lab (3) Apply Jayaraman Lab filter
- Ji Lab (1) Apply Ji Lab filter
- Karpova Lab (1) Apply Karpova Lab filter
- Keller Lab (9) Apply Keller Lab filter
- Lavis Lab (4) Apply Lavis Lab filter
- Leonardo Lab (3) Apply Leonardo Lab filter
- Looger Lab (10) Apply Looger Lab filter
- Magee Lab (3) Apply Magee Lab filter
- Menon Lab (3) Apply Menon Lab filter
- Reiser Lab (1) Apply Reiser Lab filter
- Riddiford Lab (5) Apply Riddiford Lab filter
- Rubin Lab (5) Apply Rubin Lab filter
- Scheffer Lab (3) Apply Scheffer Lab filter
- Schreiter Lab (5) Apply Schreiter Lab filter
- Spruston Lab (2) Apply Spruston Lab filter
- Stern Lab (5) Apply Stern Lab filter
- Sternson Lab (3) Apply Sternson Lab filter
- Svoboda Lab (10) Apply Svoboda Lab filter
- Tjian Lab (1) Apply Tjian Lab filter
- Truman Lab (3) Apply Truman Lab filter
- Wu Lab (3) Apply Wu Lab filter
- Zlatic Lab (2) Apply Zlatic Lab filter
Associated Project Team
Associated Support Team
Publication Date
- December 2013 (7) Apply December 2013 filter
- November 2013 (10) Apply November 2013 filter
- October 2013 (16) Apply October 2013 filter
- September 2013 (14) Apply September 2013 filter
- August 2013 (11) Apply August 2013 filter
- July 2013 (13) Apply July 2013 filter
- June 2013 (13) Apply June 2013 filter
- May 2013 (5) Apply May 2013 filter
- April 2013 (9) Apply April 2013 filter
- March 2013 (9) Apply March 2013 filter
- February 2013 (9) Apply February 2013 filter
- January 2013 (20) Apply January 2013 filter
- Remove 2013 filter 2013
136 Janelia Publications
Showing 81-90 of 136 resultsNancy E. Beckage is widely recognized for her pioneering work in the field of insect host-parasitoid interactions beginning with endocrine influences of the tobacco hornworm, Manduca sexta, host and its parasitoid wasp Apanteles congregatus (now Cotesia congregata) on each other’s development. Moreover, her studies show that the polydnavirus carried by the parasitoid wasp not only protects the parasitoid from the host’s immune defenses, but also is responsible for some of the developmental effects of parasitism. Nancy was a highly regarded mentor of both undergraduate and graduate students and more widely of women students and colleagues in entomology. Her service both to her particular area and to entomology in general through participation on federal grant review panels and in the governance of the Entomological Society of America, organization of symposia at both national and international meetings, and editorship of several different journal issues and of several books, is legendary. She has left behind a lasting legacy of increased understanding of multilevel endocrine and physiological interactions among insects and other organisms and a strong network of interacting scientists and colleagues in her area of entomology.
Neuroscience is at a crossroads. Great effort is being invested into deciphering specific neural interactions and circuits. At the same time, there exist few general theories or principles that explain brain function. We attribute this disparity, in part, to limitations in current methodologies. Traditional neurophysiological approaches record the activities of one neuron or a few neurons at a time. Neurochemical approaches focus on single neurotransmitters. Yet, there is an increasing realization that neural circuits operate at emergent levels, where the interactions between hundreds or thousands of neurons, utilizing multiple chemical transmitters, generate functional states. Brains function at the nanoscale, so tools to study brains must ultimately operate at this scale, as well. Nanoscience and nanotechnology are poised to provide a rich toolkit of novel methods to explore brain function by enabling simultaneous measurement and manipulation of activity of thousands or even millions of neurons. We and others refer to this goal as the Brain Activity Mapping Project. In this Nano Focus, we discuss how recent developments in nanoscale analysis tools and in the design and synthesis of nanomaterials have generated optical, electrical, and chemical methods that can readily be adapted for use in neuroscience. These approaches represent exciting areas of technical development and research. Moreover, unique opportunities exist for nanoscientists, nanotechnologists, and other physical scientists and engineers to contribute to tackling the challenging problems involved in understanding the fundamentals of brain function.
How does an organism’s internal state direct its actions? At one moment an animal forages for food with acrobatic feats such as tree climbing and jumping between branches. At another time, it travels along the ground to find water or a mate, exposing itself to predators along the way. These behaviors are costly in terms of energy or physical risk, and the likelihood of performing one set of actions relative to another is strongly modulated by internal state. For example, an animal in energy deficit searches for food and a dehydrated animal looks for water. The crosstalk between physiological state and motivational processes influences behavioral intensity and intent, but the underlying neural circuits are poorly understood. Molecular genetics along with optogenetic and pharmacogenetic tools for perturbing neuron function have enabled cell type-selective dissection of circuits that mediate behavioral responses to physiological state changes. Here, we review recent progress into neural circuit analysis of hunger in the mouse by focusing on a starvation-sensitive neuron population in the hypothalamus that is sufficient to promote voracious eating. We also consider research into the motivational processes that are thought to underlie hunger in order to outline considerations for bridging the gap between homeostatic and motivational neural circuits.
Active sensation requires the convergence of external stimuli with representations of body movements. We used mouse behavior, electrophysiology and optogenetics to dissect the temporal interactions among whisker movement, neural activity and sensation of touch. We photostimulated layer 4 activity in single barrels in a closed loop with whisking. Mimicking touch-related neural activity caused illusory perception of an object at a particular location, but scrambling the timing of the spikes over one whisking cycle (tens of milliseconds) did not abolish the illusion, indicating that knowledge of instantaneous whisker position is unnecessary for discriminating object locations. The illusions were induced only during bouts of directed whisking, when mice expected touch, and in the relevant barrel. Reducing activity biased behavior, consistent with a spike count code for object detection at a particular location. Our results show that mice integrate coding of touch with movement over timescales of a whisking bout to produce perception of active touch.
Midbrain dopaminergic (DA) neurons are thought to guide learning via phasic elevations of firing in response to reward predicting stimuli. The mechanism for these signals remains unclear. Using extracellular recording during associative learning, we found that inhibitory neurons in the ventral midbrain of mice responded to salient auditory stimuli with a burst of activity that occurred before the onset of the phasic response of DA neurons. This population of inhibitory neurons exhibited enhanced responses during extinction and was anticorrelated with the phasic response of simultaneously recorded DA neurons. Optogenetic stimulation revealed that this population was, in part, derived from inhibitory projection neurons of the substantia nigra that provide a robust monosynaptic inhibition of DA neurons. Thus, our results elaborate on the dynamic upstream circuits that shape the phasic activity of DA neurons and suggest that the inhibitory microcircuit of the midbrain is critical for new learning in extinction.
Visualization of cellular and molecular processes is an indispensable tool for cell biologists, and innovations in microscopy methods unfailingly lead to new biological discoveries. Today, light microscopy (LM) provides ever-higher spatial and temporal resolution and visualization of biological process over enormous ranges. Electron microscopy (EM) is moving into the atomic resolution regime and allowing cellular analyses that are more physiological and sophisticated in scope. Importantly, much is being gained by combining multiple approaches, (e.g., LM and EM) to take advantage of their complementary strengths. The advent of high-throughput microscopies has led to a common need for sophisticated computational methods to quantitatively analyze huge amounts of data and translate images into new biological insights.
SUMMARY: Sequence database searches are an essential part of molecular biology, providing information about the function and evolutionary history of proteins, RNA molecules and DNA sequence elements. We present a tool for DNA/DNA sequence comparison that is built on the HMMER framework, which applies probabilistic inference methods based on hidden Markov models to the problem of homology search. This tool, called nhmmer, enables improved detection of remote DNA homologs, and has been used in combination with Dfam and RepeatMasker to improve annotation of transposable elements in the human genome. AVAILABILITY: nhmmer is a part of the new HMMER3.1 release. Source code and documentation can be downloaded from http://hmmer.org. HMMER3.1 is freely licensed under the GNU GPLv3 and should be portable to any POSIX-compliant operating system, including Linux and Mac OS/X. CONTACT: wheelert@janelia.hhmi.org.
Many species are critically dependent on olfaction for survival. In the main olfactory system of mammals, odours are detected by sensory neurons that express a large repertoire of canonical odorant receptors and a much smaller repertoire of trace amine-associated receptors (TAARs). Odours are encoded in a combinatorial fashion across glomeruli in the main olfactory bulb, with each glomerulus corresponding to a specific receptor. The degree to which individual receptor genes contribute to odour perception is unclear. Here we show that genetic deletion of the olfactory Taar gene family, or even a single Taar gene (Taar4), eliminates the aversion that mice display to low concentrations of volatile amines and to the odour of predator urine. Our findings identify a role for the TAARs in olfaction, namely, in the high-sensitivity detection of innately aversive odours. In addition, our data reveal that aversive amines are represented in a non-redundant fashion, and that individual main olfactory receptor genes can contribute substantially to odour perception.
A basic task faced by the visual system of many organisms is to accurately track the position of moving prey. The retina is the first stage in the processing of such stimuli; the nature of the transformation here, from photons to spike trains, constrains not only the ultimate fidelity of the tracking signal but also the ease with which it can be extracted by other brain regions. Here we demonstrate that a population of fast-OFF ganglion cells in the salamander retina, whose dynamics are governed by a nonlinear circuit, serve to compute the future position of the target over hundreds of milliseconds. The extrapolated position of the target is not found by stimulus reconstruction but is instead computed by a weighted sum of ganglion cell outputs, the population vector average (PVA). The magnitude of PVA extrapolation varies systematically with target size, speed, and acceleration, such that large targets are tracked most accurately at high speeds, and small targets at low speeds, just as is seen in the motion of real prey. Tracking precision reaches the resolution of single photoreceptors, and the PVA algorithm performs more robustly than several alternative algorithms. If the salamander brain uses the fast-OFF cell circuit for target extrapolation as we suggest, the circuit dynamics should leave a microstructure on the behavior that may be measured in future experiments. Our analysis highlights the utility of simple computations that, while not globally optimal, are efficiently implemented and have close to optimal performance over a limited but ethologically relevant range of stimuli.
The histone variant H2A.Z is a genome-wide signature of nucleosomes proximal to eukaryotic regulatory DNA. Whereas the multisubunit chromatin remodeler SWR1 is known to catalyze ATP-dependent deposition of H2A.Z, the mechanism of SWR1 recruitment to S. cerevisiae promoters has been unclear. A sensitive assay for competitive binding of dinucleosome substrates revealed that SWR1 preferentially binds long nucleosome-free DNA and the adjoining nucleosome core particle, allowing discrimination of gene promoters over gene bodies. Analysis of mutants indicates that the conserved Swc2/YL1 subunit and the adenosine triphosphatase domain of Swr1 are mainly responsible for binding to substrate. SWR1 binding is enhanced on nucleosomes acetylated by the NuA4 histone acetyltransferase, but recognition of nucleosome-free and nucleosomal DNA is dominant over interaction with acetylated histones. Such hierarchical cooperation between DNA and histone signals expands the dynamic range of genetic switches, unifying classical gene regulation by DNA-binding factors with ATP-dependent nucleosome remodeling and posttranslational histone modifications.