Filter
Associated Lab
- Ahrens Lab (1) Apply Ahrens Lab filter
- Aso Lab (9) Apply Aso Lab filter
- Betzig Lab (1) Apply Betzig Lab filter
- Bock Lab (1) Apply Bock Lab filter
- Branson Lab (4) Apply Branson Lab filter
- Card Lab (6) Apply Card Lab filter
- Dickson Lab (7) Apply Dickson Lab filter
- Funke Lab (1) Apply Funke Lab filter
- Hermundstad Lab (1) Apply Hermundstad Lab filter
- Hess Lab (2) Apply Hess Lab filter
- Jayaraman Lab (1) Apply Jayaraman Lab filter
- Keleman Lab (1) Apply Keleman Lab filter
- Lavis Lab (2) Apply Lavis Lab filter
- Lippincott-Schwartz Lab (1) Apply Lippincott-Schwartz Lab filter
- Otopalik Lab (1) Apply Otopalik Lab filter
- Reiser Lab (3) Apply Reiser Lab filter
- Romani Lab (1) Apply Romani Lab filter
- Rubin Lab (8) Apply Rubin Lab filter
- Saalfeld Lab (1) Apply Saalfeld Lab filter
- Scheffer Lab (1) Apply Scheffer Lab filter
- Schreiter Lab (1) Apply Schreiter Lab filter
- Stern Lab (5) Apply Stern Lab filter
- Svoboda Lab (1) Apply Svoboda Lab filter
- Truman Lab (1) Apply Truman Lab filter
- Turaga Lab (2) Apply Turaga Lab filter
- Turner Lab (3) Apply Turner Lab filter
Associated Project Team
- CellMap (1) Apply CellMap filter
- COSEM (1) Apply COSEM filter
- Fly Descending Interneuron (4) Apply Fly Descending Interneuron filter
- Fly Functional Connectome (4) Apply Fly Functional Connectome filter
- FlyEM (3) Apply FlyEM filter
- FlyLight (16) Apply FlyLight filter
- GENIE (1) Apply GENIE filter
- Tool Translation Team (T3) (1) Apply Tool Translation Team (T3) filter
Associated Support Team
- Project Pipeline Support (1) Apply Project Pipeline Support filter
- Fly Facility (13) Apply Fly Facility filter
- Janelia Experimental Technology (4) Apply Janelia Experimental Technology filter
- Molecular Genomics (3) Apply Molecular Genomics filter
- Primary & iPS Cell Culture (1) Apply Primary & iPS Cell Culture filter
- Remove Project Technical Resources filter Project Technical Resources
- Quantitative Genomics (2) Apply Quantitative Genomics filter
- Scientific Computing Software (5) Apply Scientific Computing Software filter
- Scientific Computing Systems (2) Apply Scientific Computing Systems filter
- Viral Tools (1) Apply Viral Tools filter
36 Janelia Publications
Showing 11-20 of 36 resultsSingle-molecule localization microscopy (SMLM) uses activatable or switchable fluorophores to create non-diffraction limited maps of molecular location in biological samples. Despite the utility of this imaging technique, the portfolio of appropriate labels for SMLM remains limited. Here, we describe a general strategy for the construction of “glitter bomb” labels by simply combining rhodamine and coumarin dyes though an amide bond. Condensation of the ortho-carboxyl group on the pendant phenyl ring of rhodamine dyes with a 7-aminocoumarin yields photochromic or spontaneously blinking fluorophores depending on the parent rhodamine structure. We apply this strategy to prepare labels useful super-resolution experiments in fixed cells using different attachment techniques. This general glitter bomb strategy should lead to improved labels for SMLM, ultimately enabling the creation of detailed molecular maps in biological samples.
Internal representations are thought to support the generation of flexible, long-timescale behavioral patterns in both animals and artificial agents. Here, we present a novel conceptual framework for how Drosophila use their internal representation of head direction to maintain preferred headings in their surroundings, and how they learn to modify these preferences in the presence of selective thermal reinforcement. To develop the framework, we analyzed flies’ behavior in a classical operant visual learning paradigm and found that they use stochastically generated fixations and directed turns to express their heading preferences. Symmetries in the visual scene used in the paradigm allowed us to expose how flies’ probabilistic behavior in this setting is tethered to their head direction representation. We describe how flies’ ability to quickly adapt their behavior to the rules of their environment may rest on a behavioral policy whose parameters are flexible but whose form is genetically encoded in the structure of their circuits. Many of the mechanisms we outline may also be relevant for rapidly adaptive behavior driven by internal representations in other animals, including mammals.
Memory guides behavior across widely varying environments and must therefore be both sufficiently specific and general. A memory too specific will be useless in even a slightly different environment, while an overly general memory may lead to suboptimal choices. Animals successfully learn to both distinguish between very similar stimuli and generalize across cues. Rather than forming memories that strike a balance between specificity and generality, Drosophila can flexibly categorize a given stimulus into different groups depending on the options available. We asked how this flexibility manifests itself in the well-characterized learning and memory pathways of the fruit fly. We show that flexible categorization in neuronal activity as well as behavior depends on the order and identity of the perceived stimuli. Our results identify the neural correlates of flexible stimulus-categorization in the fruit fly.
To effectively control their bodies, animals rely on feedback from proprioceptive mechanosensory neurons. In the Drosophila leg, different proprioceptor subtypes monitor joint position, movement direction, and vibration. Here, we investigate how these diverse sensory signals are integrated by central proprioceptive circuits. We find that signals for leg joint position and directional movement converge in second-order neurons, revealing pathways for local feedback control of leg posture. Distinct populations of second-order neurons integrate tibia vibration signals across pairs of legs, suggesting a role in detecting external substrate vibration. In each pathway, the flow of sensory information is dynamically gated and sculpted by inhibition. Overall, our results reveal parallel pathways for processing of internal and external mechanosensory signals, which we propose mediate feedback control of leg movement and vibration sensing, respectively. The existence of a functional connectivity map also provides a resource for interpreting connectomic reconstruction of neural circuits for leg proprioception.
The brain generates diverse neuron types which express unique homeodomain transcription factors (TFs) and assemble into precise neural circuits. Yet a mechanistic framework is lacking for how homeodomain TFs specify both neuronal fate and synaptic connectivity. We use Drosophila lamina neurons (L1-L5) to show the homeodomain TF Brain-specific homeobox (Bsh) is initiated in lamina precursor cells (LPCs) where it specifies L4/L5 fate and suppresses homeodomain TF Zfh1 to prevent L1/L3 fate. Subsequently, Bsh activates the homeodomain TF Apterous (Ap) in L4 in a feedforward loop to express the synapse recognition molecule DIP-β, in part by Bsh direct binding a DIP-β intron. Thus, homeodomain TFs function hierarchically: primary homeodomain TF (Bsh) first specifies neuronal fate, and subsequently acts with secondary homeodomain TF (Ap) to activate DIP-β, thereby generating precise synaptic connectivity. We speculate that hierarchical homeodomain TF function may represent a general principle for coordinating neuronal fate specification and circuit assembly.
Insects constitute the most species-rich radiation of metazoa, a success that is due to the evolution of active flight. Unlike pterosaurs, birds and bats, the wings of insects did not evolve from legs, but are novel structures that are attached to the body via a biomechanically complex hinge that transforms tiny, high-frequency oscillations of specialized power muscles into the sweeping back-and-forth motion of the wings. The hinge consists of a system of tiny, hardened structures called sclerites that are interconnected to one another via flexible joints and regulated by the activity of specialized control muscles. Here we imaged the activity of these muscles in a fly using a genetically encoded calcium indicator, while simultaneously tracking the three-dimensional motion of the wings with high-speed cameras. Using machine learning, we created a convolutional neural network that accurately predicts wing motion from the activity of the steering muscles, and an encoder-decoder that predicts the role of the individual sclerites on wing motion. By replaying patterns of wing motion on a dynamically scaled robotic fly, we quantified the effects of steering muscle activity on aerodynamic forces. A physics-based simulation incorporating our hinge model generates flight manoeuvres that are remarkably similar to those of free-flying flies. This integrative, multi-disciplinary approach reveals the mechanical control logic of the insect wing hinge, arguably among the most sophisticated and evolutionarily important skeletal structures in the natural world.
Efficient representation of structural deformations is crucial for monitoring the instantaneous state of biological structures. Insects’ ability to encode wing deformations during flight demonstrates a general morphological computing principle applicable across sensory systems in nature as well as engineered systems. To characterize how relevant features are encoded, we measured and modelled displacement and strain across dragonfly wing surfaces in tethered and free flight. Functional interpretations were supported by neuroanatomical maps, and ablation and perturbation experiments. We find that signal redundancy is reduced by non-random sensor distributions and that morphology limits the stimulus space such that sensory systems can monitor natural states with few sensors. Deviations from the natural states are detected by a flexible population of additional sensors with many distinguishable activation patterns.
Motor neurons are the final common pathway through which the brain controls movement of the body, forming the basic elements from which all movement is composed. Yet how a single motor neuron contributes to control during natural movement remains unclear. Here we anatomically and functionally characterize the individual roles of the motor neurons that control head movement in the fly, Drosophila melanogaster. Counterintuitively, we find that activity in a single motor neuron rotates the head in different directions, depending on the starting posture of the head, such that the head converges towards a pose determined by the identity of the stimulated motor neuron. A feedback model predicts that this convergent behaviour results from motor neuron drive interacting with proprioceptive feedback. We identify and genetically suppress a single class of proprioceptive neuron that changes the motor neuron-induced convergence as predicted by the feedback model. These data suggest a framework for how the brain controls movements: instead of directly generating movement in a given direction by activating a fixed set of motor neurons, the brain controls movements by adding bias to a continuing proprioceptive-motor loop.
Many motor control systems generate multiple movements using a common set of muscles. How are premotor circuits able to flexibly generate diverse movement patterns? Here, we characterize the neuronal circuits that drive the distinct courtship songs of Drosophila melanogaster. Male flies vibrate their wings towards females to produce two different song modes – pulse and sine song – which signal species identity and male quality. Using cell-type specific genetic reagents and the connectome, we provide a cellular and synaptic map of the circuits in the male ventral nerve cord that generate these songs and examine how activating or inhibiting each cell type within these circuits affects the song. Our data reveal that the song circuit is organized into two nested feed-forward pathways, with extensive reciprocal and feed-back connections. The larger network produces pulse song, the more complex and ancestral song form. A subset of this network produces sine song, the simpler and more recent form. Such nested organization may be a common feature of motor control circuits in which evolution has layered increasing flexibility on to a basic movement pattern.
How memories are used by the brain to guide future action is poorly understood. In olfactory associative learning in Drosophila, multiple compartments of the mushroom body act in parallel to assign valence to a stimulus. Here, we show that appetitive memories stored in different compartments induce different levels of upwind locomotion. Using a photoactivation screen of a new collection of split-GAL4 drivers and EM connectomics, we identified a cluster of neurons postsynaptic to the mushroom body output neurons (MBONs) that can trigger robust upwind steering. These UpWind Neurons (UpWiNs) integrate inhibitory and excitatory synaptic inputs from MBONs of appetitive and aversive memory compartments, respectively. After training, disinhibition from the appetitive-memory MBONs enhances the response of UpWiNs to reward-predicting odors. Blocking UpWiNs impaired appetitive memory and reduced upwind locomotion during retrieval. Photoactivation of UpWiNs also increased the chance of returning to a location where activation was initiated, suggesting an additional role in olfactory navigation. Thus, our results provide insight into how learned abstract valences are gradually transformed into concrete memory-driven actions through divergent and convergent networks, a neuronal architecture that is commonly found in the vertebrate and invertebrate brains.