Filter
Associated Lab
- Ahrens Lab (2) Apply Ahrens Lab filter
- Aso Lab (1) Apply Aso Lab filter
- Betzig Lab (2) Apply Betzig Lab filter
- Beyene Lab (1) Apply Beyene Lab filter
- Branson Lab (2) Apply Branson Lab filter
- Card Lab (1) Apply Card Lab filter
- Cardona Lab (5) Apply Cardona Lab filter
- Clapham Lab (1) Apply Clapham Lab filter
- Dickson Lab (2) Apply Dickson Lab filter
- Dudman Lab (2) Apply Dudman Lab filter
- Espinosa Medina Lab (2) Apply Espinosa Medina Lab filter
- Feliciano Lab (1) Apply Feliciano Lab filter
- Funke Lab (3) Apply Funke Lab filter
- Harris Lab (2) Apply Harris Lab filter
- Heberlein Lab (1) Apply Heberlein Lab filter
- Hermundstad Lab (3) Apply Hermundstad Lab filter
- Hess Lab (5) Apply Hess Lab filter
- Jayaraman Lab (1) Apply Jayaraman Lab filter
- Karpova Lab (1) Apply Karpova Lab filter
- Keller Lab (2) Apply Keller Lab filter
- Lavis Lab (10) Apply Lavis Lab filter
- Lee (Albert) Lab (1) Apply Lee (Albert) Lab filter
- Lippincott-Schwartz Lab (14) Apply Lippincott-Schwartz Lab filter
- Liu (Zhe) Lab (6) Apply Liu (Zhe) Lab filter
- Looger Lab (11) Apply Looger Lab filter
- O'Shea Lab (1) Apply O'Shea Lab filter
- Pachitariu Lab (6) Apply Pachitariu Lab filter
- Podgorski Lab (1) Apply Podgorski Lab filter
- Reiser Lab (3) Apply Reiser Lab filter
- Romani Lab (4) Apply Romani Lab filter
- Rubin Lab (4) Apply Rubin Lab filter
- Saalfeld Lab (4) Apply Saalfeld Lab filter
- Scheffer Lab (2) Apply Scheffer Lab filter
- Schreiter Lab (1) Apply Schreiter Lab filter
- Spruston Lab (3) Apply Spruston Lab filter
- Stern Lab (5) Apply Stern Lab filter
- Sternson Lab (3) Apply Sternson Lab filter
- Stringer Lab (2) Apply Stringer Lab filter
- Svoboda Lab (7) Apply Svoboda Lab filter
- Tebo Lab (1) Apply Tebo Lab filter
- Tervo Lab (1) Apply Tervo Lab filter
- Tillberg Lab (3) Apply Tillberg Lab filter
- Truman Lab (3) Apply Truman Lab filter
- Turaga Lab (12) Apply Turaga Lab filter
- Turner Lab (1) Apply Turner Lab filter
- Zlatic Lab (1) Apply Zlatic Lab filter
Associated Project Team
Associated Support Team
- Cryo-Electron Microscopy (3) Apply Cryo-Electron Microscopy filter
- Electron Microscopy (1) Apply Electron Microscopy filter
- Fly Facility (3) Apply Fly Facility filter
- Integrative Imaging (2) Apply Integrative Imaging filter
- Janelia Experimental Technology (2) Apply Janelia Experimental Technology filter
- Molecular Genomics (2) Apply Molecular Genomics filter
- Primary & iPS Cell Culture (1) Apply Primary & iPS Cell Culture filter
- Project Technical Resources (3) Apply Project Technical Resources filter
- Quantitative Genomics (1) Apply Quantitative Genomics filter
- Scientific Computing Software (1) Apply Scientific Computing Software filter
- Viral Tools (2) Apply Viral Tools filter
Publication Date
- December 2021 (19) Apply December 2021 filter
- November 2021 (15) Apply November 2021 filter
- October 2021 (12) Apply October 2021 filter
- September 2021 (14) Apply September 2021 filter
- August 2021 (15) Apply August 2021 filter
- July 2021 (17) Apply July 2021 filter
- June 2021 (10) Apply June 2021 filter
- May 2021 (20) Apply May 2021 filter
- April 2021 (20) Apply April 2021 filter
- March 2021 (7) Apply March 2021 filter
- February 2021 (12) Apply February 2021 filter
- January 2021 (13) Apply January 2021 filter
- Remove 2021 filter 2021
174 Janelia Publications
Showing 11-20 of 174 resultsProlonged periods of forced social isolation is detrimental to well-being, yet we know little about which genes regulate susceptibility to its effects. In the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, social isolation induces stark changes in behavior including increased aggression, locomotor activity, and resistance to ethanol sedation. To identify genes regulating sensitivity to isolation, I screened a collection of sixteen hundred P-element insertion lines for mutants with abnormal levels of all three isolation-induced behaviors. The screen identified three mutants whose affected genes are likely central to regulating the effects of isolation in flies. One mutant, sex pistol (sxp), became extremely aggressive and resistant to ethanol sedation when socially isolated. sxp also had a high level of male-male courtship. The mutation in sxp reduced the expression of two minor isoforms of the actin regulator hts (adducin), as well as mildly reducing expression of CalpA, a calcium-dependent protease. As a consequence, sxp also had increased expression of the insulin-like peptide, dILP5. Analysis of the social behavior of sxp suggests that these minor hts isoforms function to limit isolation-induced aggression, while chronically high levels of dILP5 increase male-male courtship.
The anterior insular cortex (aIC) plays a critical role in cognitive and motivational control of behavior, but the underlying neural mechanism remains elusive. Here, we show that aIC neurons expressing Fezf2 (aIC), which are the pyramidal tract neurons, signal motivational vigor and invigorate need-seeking behavior through projections to the brainstem nucleus tractus solitarii (NTS). aIC neurons and their postsynaptic NTS neurons acquire anticipatory activity through learning, which encodes the perceived value and the vigor of actions to pursue homeostatic needs. Correspondingly, aIC → NTS circuit activity controls vigor, effort, and striatal dopamine release but only if the action is learned and the outcome is needed. Notably, aIC neurons do not represent taste or valence. Moreover, aIC → NTS activity neither drives reinforcement nor influences total consumption. These results pinpoint specific functions of aIC → NTS circuit for selectively controlling motivational vigor and suggest that motivation is subserved, in part, by aIC's top-down regulation of dopamine signaling.
L-Lactate, traditionally considered a metabolic waste product, is increasingly recognized as an important intercellular energy currency in mammals. To enable investigations of the emerging roles of intercellular shuttling of L-lactate, we now report an intensiometric green fluorescent genetically encoded biosensor for extracellular L-lactate. This biosensor, designated eLACCO1.1, enables cellular resolution imaging of extracellular L-lactate in cultured mammalian cells and brain tissue.
Considerable attention has been recently paid to improving replicability and reproducibility in life science research. This has resulted in commendable efforts to standardize a variety of reagents, assays, cell lines and other resources. However, given that microscopy is a dominant tool for biologists, comparatively little discussion has been offered regarding how the proper reporting and documentation of microscopy relevant details should be handled. Image processing is a critical step of almost any microscopy-based experiment; however, improper, or incomplete reporting of its use in the literature is pervasive. The chosen details of an image processing workflow can dramatically determine the outcome of subsequent analyses, and indeed, the overall conclusions of a study. This Review aims to illustrate how proper reporting of image processing methodology improves scientific reproducibility and strengthens the biological conclusions derived from the results.
Although most experimentally characterized proteins with similar sequences assume the same folds and perform similar functions, an increasing number of exceptions is emerging. One class of exceptions comprises sequence-similar fold switchers, whose secondary structures shift from α-helix <-> β-sheet through a small number of mutations, a sequence insertion, or a deletion. Predictive methods for identifying sequence-similar fold switchers are desirable because some are associated with disease and/or can perform different functions in cells. Here, we use homology-based secondary structure predictions to identify sequence-similar fold switchers from their amino acid sequences alone. To do this, we predicted the secondary structures of sequence-similar fold switchers using three different homology-based secondary structure predictors: PSIPRED, JPred4, and SPIDER3. We found that α-helix <-> β-strand prediction discrepancies from JPred4 discriminated between the different conformations of sequence-similar fold switchers with high statistical significance (P < 1.8*10 ). Thus, we used these discrepancies as a classifier and found that they can often robustly discriminate between sequence-similar fold switchers and sequence-similar proteins that maintain the same folds (Matthews Correlation Coefficient of 0.82). We found that JPred4 is a more robust predictor of sequence-similar fold switchers because of (a) the curated sequence database it uses to produce multiple sequence alignments and (b) its use of sequence profiles based on Hidden Markov Models. Our results indicate that inconsistencies between JPred4 secondary structure predictions can be used to identify some sequence-similar fold switchers from their sequences alone. Thus, the negative information from inconsistent secondary structure predictions can potentially be leveraged to identify sequence-similar fold switchers from the broad base of genomic sequences.
In an elaborate form of inter-species exploitation, many insects hijack plant development to induce novel plant organs called galls that provide the insect with a source of nutrition and a temporary home. Galls result from dramatic reprogramming of plant cell biology driven by insect molecules, but the roles of specific insect molecules in gall development have not yet been determined. Here, we study the aphid Hormaphis cornu, which makes distinctive "cone" galls on leaves of witch hazel Hamamelis virginiana. We found that derived genetic variants in the aphid gene determinant of gall color (dgc) are associated with strong downregulation of dgc transcription in aphid salivary glands, upregulation in galls of seven genes involved in anthocyanin synthesis, and deposition of two red anthocyanins in galls. We hypothesize that aphids inject DGC protein into galls and that this results in differential expression of a small number of plant genes. dgc is a member of a large, diverse family of novel predicted secreted proteins characterized by a pair of widely spaced cysteine-tyrosine-cysteine (CYC) residues, which we named BICYCLE proteins. bicycle genes are most strongly expressed in the salivary glands specifically of galling aphid generations, suggesting that they may regulate many aspects of gall development. bicycle genes have experienced unusually frequent diversifying selection, consistent with their potential role controlling gall development in a molecular arms race between aphids and their host plants.
Chronic stress could induce severe cognitive impairments. Despite extensive investigations in mammalian models, the underlying mechanisms remain obscure. Here, we show that chronic stress could induce dramatic learning and memory deficits in The chronic stress-induced learning deficit (CSLD) is long lasting and associated with other depression-like behaviors. We demonstrated that excessive dopaminergic activity provokes susceptibility to CSLD. Remarkably, a pair of PPL1-γ1pedc dopaminergic neurons that project to the mushroom body (MB) γ1pedc compartment play a key role in regulating susceptibility to CSLD so that stress-induced PPL1-γ1pedc hyperactivity facilitates the development of CSLD. Consistently, the mushroom body output neurons (MBON) of the γ1pedc compartment, MBON-γ1pedc>α/β neurons, are important for modulating susceptibility to CSLD. Imaging studies showed that dopaminergic activity is necessary to provoke the development of chronic stress-induced maladaptations in the MB network. Together, our data support that PPL1-γ1pedc mediates chronic stress signals to drive allostatic maladaptations in the MB network that lead to CSLD.
The application of microscopy in biomedical research has come a long way since Antonie van Leeuwenhoek discovered unicellular organisms. Countless innovations have positioned light microscopy as a cornerstone of modern biology and a method of choice for connecting omics datasets to their biological and clinical correlates. Still, regardless of how convincing published imaging data looks, it does not always convey meaningful information about the conditions in which it was acquired, processed, and analyzed. Adequate record-keeping, reporting, and quality control are therefore essential to ensure experimental rigor and data fidelity, allow experiments to be reproducibly repeated, and promote the proper evaluation, interpretation, comparison, and re-use. To this end, microscopy images should be accompanied by complete descriptions detailing experimental procedures, biological samples, microscope hardware specifications, image acquisition parameters, and image analysis procedures, as well as metrics accounting for instrument performance and calibration. However, universal, community-accepted Microscopy Metadata standards and reporting specifications that would result in Findable Accessible Interoperable and Reproducible (FAIR) microscopy data have not yet been established. To understand this shortcoming and to propose a way forward, here we provide an overview of the nature of microscopy metadata and its importance for fostering data quality, reproducibility, scientific rigor, and sharing value in light microscopy. The proposal for tiered Microscopy Metadata Specifications that extend the OME Data Model put forth by the 4D Nucleome Initiative and by Bioimaging North America [1-3] as well as a suite of three complementary and interoperable tools are being developed to facilitate the process of image data documentation and are presented in related manuscripts [4-6].
Extant fold-switching proteins remodel their secondary structures and change their functions in response to cellular stimuli, regulating biological processes and affecting human health. In spite of their biological importance, these proteins remain understudied. Few representative examples of fold switchers are available in the Protein Data Bank, and they are difficult to predict. In fact, all 96 experimentally validated examples of extant fold switchers were stumbled upon by chance. Thus, predictive methods are needed to expedite the process of discovering and characterizing more of these shapeshifting proteins. Previous approaches require a solved structure or all-atom simulations, greatly constraining their use. Here, we propose a high-throughput sequence-based method for predicting extant fold switchers that transition from α-helix in one conformation to β-strand in the other. This method leverages two previous observations: (1) α-helix <-> β-strand prediction discrepancies from JPred4 are a robust predictor of fold switching, and (2) the fold-switching regions (FSRs) of some extant fold switchers have different secondary structure propensities when expressed in isolation (isolated FSRs) than when expressed within the context of their parent protein (contextualized FSRs). Combining these two observations, we ran JPred4 on the sequences of isolated and contextualized FSRs from 14 known extant fold switchers and found α-helix <->β-strand prediction discrepancies in every case. To test the overall robustness of this finding, we randomly selected regions of proteins not expected to switch folds (single-fold proteins) and found significantly fewer α-helix <-> β-strand prediction discrepancies (p < 4.2*10−20, Kolmogorov-Smirnov test). Combining these discrepancies with the overall percentage of predicted secondary structure, we developed a classifier that often robustly identifies extant fold switchers (Matthews Correlation Coefficient of 0.70). Although this classifier had a high false negative rate (6/14), its false positive rate was very low (1/211), suggesting that it can be used to predict a subset of extant fold switchers from billions of available genomic sequences.
Many different functions are regulated by circadian rhythms, including those orchestrated by discrete clock neurons within animal brains. To comprehensively characterize and assign cell identity to the 75 pairs of circadian neurons, we optimized a single cell RNA sequencing method and assayed clock neuron gene expression at different times of day. The data identify at least 17 clock neuron categories with striking spatial regulation of gene expression. Transcription factor regulation is prominent and likely contributes to the robust circadian oscillation of many transcripts, including those that encode cell-surface proteins previously shown to be important for cell recognition and synapse formation during development. The many other clock-regulated genes also constitute an important resource for future mechanistic and functional studies between clock neurons and/or for temporal signaling to circuits elsewhere in the fly brain.