Filter
Associated Lab
- Aso Lab (30) Apply Aso Lab filter
- Betzig Lab (1) Apply Betzig Lab filter
- Bock Lab (2) Apply Bock Lab filter
- Branson Lab (8) Apply Branson Lab filter
- Card Lab (5) Apply Card Lab filter
- Clapham Lab (1) Apply Clapham Lab filter
- Dickson Lab (2) Apply Dickson Lab filter
- Druckmann Lab (1) Apply Druckmann Lab filter
- Fetter Lab (1) Apply Fetter Lab filter
- Funke Lab (1) Apply Funke Lab filter
- Harris Lab (3) Apply Harris Lab filter
- Heberlein Lab (2) Apply Heberlein Lab filter
- Hermundstad Lab (2) Apply Hermundstad Lab filter
- Hess Lab (5) Apply Hess Lab filter
- Jayaraman Lab (6) Apply Jayaraman Lab filter
- Lippincott-Schwartz Lab (1) Apply Lippincott-Schwartz Lab filter
- Looger Lab (2) Apply Looger Lab filter
- O'Shea Lab (1) Apply O'Shea Lab filter
- Otopalik Lab (1) Apply Otopalik Lab filter
- Reiser Lab (15) Apply Reiser Lab filter
- Riddiford Lab (1) Apply Riddiford Lab filter
- Romani Lab (1) Apply Romani Lab filter
- Rubin Lab (143) Apply Rubin Lab filter
- Saalfeld Lab (4) Apply Saalfeld Lab filter
- Scheffer Lab (7) Apply Scheffer Lab filter
- Schreiter Lab (1) Apply Schreiter Lab filter
- Simpson Lab (3) Apply Simpson Lab filter
- Singer Lab (1) Apply Singer Lab filter
- Spruston Lab (1) Apply Spruston Lab filter
- Stern Lab (1) Apply Stern Lab filter
- Svoboda Lab (3) Apply Svoboda Lab filter
- Tjian Lab (1) Apply Tjian Lab filter
- Truman Lab (4) Apply Truman Lab filter
- Turaga Lab (1) Apply Turaga Lab filter
- Turner Lab (5) Apply Turner Lab filter
- Zuker Lab (1) Apply Zuker Lab filter
Associated Project Team
- CellMap (1) Apply CellMap filter
- Fly Functional Connectome (4) Apply Fly Functional Connectome filter
- Fly Olympiad (3) Apply Fly Olympiad filter
- FlyEM (11) Apply FlyEM filter
- FlyLight (20) Apply FlyLight filter
- GENIE (1) Apply GENIE filter
- Transcription Imaging (1) Apply Transcription Imaging filter
Publication Date
- 2025 (4) Apply 2025 filter
- 2024 (4) Apply 2024 filter
- 2023 (5) Apply 2023 filter
- 2022 (1) Apply 2022 filter
- 2021 (4) Apply 2021 filter
- 2020 (9) Apply 2020 filter
- 2019 (6) Apply 2019 filter
- 2018 (7) Apply 2018 filter
- 2017 (15) Apply 2017 filter
- 2016 (3) Apply 2016 filter
- 2015 (16) Apply 2015 filter
- 2014 (9) Apply 2014 filter
- 2013 (5) Apply 2013 filter
- 2012 (8) Apply 2012 filter
- 2011 (4) Apply 2011 filter
- 2010 (4) Apply 2010 filter
- 2009 (2) Apply 2009 filter
- 2008 (4) Apply 2008 filter
- 2007 (2) Apply 2007 filter
- 2006 (1) Apply 2006 filter
- 2002 (1) Apply 2002 filter
- 2000 (2) Apply 2000 filter
- 1999 (1) Apply 1999 filter
- 1997 (1) Apply 1997 filter
- 1995 (2) Apply 1995 filter
- 1994 (2) Apply 1994 filter
- 1993 (2) Apply 1993 filter
- 1992 (1) Apply 1992 filter
- 1991 (2) Apply 1991 filter
- 1990 (3) Apply 1990 filter
- 1989 (2) Apply 1989 filter
- 1987 (2) Apply 1987 filter
- 1986 (1) Apply 1986 filter
- 1985 (1) Apply 1985 filter
- 1984 (1) Apply 1984 filter
- 1983 (1) Apply 1983 filter
- 1982 (2) Apply 1982 filter
- 1981 (1) Apply 1981 filter
- 1979 (1) Apply 1979 filter
- 1973 (1) Apply 1973 filter
Type of Publication
143 Publications
Showing 111-120 of 143 resultsWe show that the activities of two Ets-related transcription factors required for normal eye development in Drosophila, pointed and yan, are regulated by the Ras1/MAPK pathway. The pointed gene codes for two related proteins, and we show that one form is a constitutive activator of transcription, while the activity of the other form is stimulated by the Ras1/MAPK pathway. Mutation of the single consensus MAPK phosphorylation site in the second form abrogates this responsiveness. yan is a negative regulator of photoreceptor determination, and genetic data suggest that it acts as an antagonist of Ras1. We demonstrate that yan can repress transcription and that this repression activity is negatively regulated by the Ras1/MAPK signal, most likely through direct phosphorylation of yan by MAPK.
The argos gene encodes a protein that is required for viability and that regulates the determination of cells in the Drosophila eye. A developmental analysis of argos mutant eyes indicates that the mystery cells, which are usually nonneuronal, are transformed into extra photoreceptors, and that supernumerary cone cells and pigment cells are also recruited. Clonal analysis indicates that argos acts nonautonomously and can diffuse over the range of several cell diameters. Conceptual translation of the argos gene suggests that it encodes a secreted protein.
A fundamental goal of genetics and functional genomics is to identify and mutate every gene in model organisms such as Drosophila melanogaster. The Berkeley Drosophila Genome Project (BDGP) gene disruption project generates single P-element insertion strains that each mutate unique genomic open reading frames. Such strains strongly facilitate further genetic and molecular studies of the disrupted loci, but it has remained unclear if P elements can be used to mutate all Drosophila genes. We now report that the primary collection has grown to contain 1045 strains that disrupt more than 25% of the estimated 3600 Drosophila genes that are essential for adult viability. Of these P insertions, 67% have been verified by genetic tests to cause the associated recessive mutant phenotypes, and the validity of most of the remaining lines is predicted on statistical grounds. Sequences flanking >920 insertions have been determined to exactly position them in the genome and to identify 376 potentially affected transcripts from collections of EST sequences. Strains in the BDGP collection are available from the Bloomington Stock Center and have already assisted the research community in characterizing >250 Drosophila genes. The likely identity of 131 additional genes in the collection is reported here. Our results show that Drosophila genes have a wide range of sensitivity to inactivation by P elements, and provide a rationale for greatly expanding the BDGP primary collection based entirely on insertion site sequencing. We predict that this approach can bring >85% of all Drosophila open reading frames under experimental control.
Analysing computations in neural circuits often uses simplified models because the actual neuronal implementation is not known. For example, a problem in vision, how the eye detects image motion, has long been analysed using Hassenstein-Reichardt (HR) detector or Barlow-Levick (BL) models. These both simulate motion detection well, but the exact neuronal circuits undertaking these tasks remain elusive. We reconstructed a comprehensive connectome of the circuits of Drosophila's motion-sensing T4 cells using a novel EM technique. We uncover complex T4 inputs and reveal that putative excitatory inputs cluster at T4's dendrite shafts, while inhibitory inputs localize to the bases. Consistent with our previous study, we reveal that Mi1 and Tm3 cells provide most synaptic contacts onto T4. We are, however, unable to reproduce the spatial offset between these cells reported previously. Our comprehensive connectome reveals complex circuits that include candidate anatomical substrates for both HR and BL types of motion detectors.
Making inferences about the computations performed by neuronal circuits from synapse-level connectivity maps is an emerging opportunity in neuroscience. The mushroom body (MB) is well positioned for developing and testing such an approach due to its conserved neuronal architecture, recently completed dense connectome, and extensive prior experimental studies of its roles in learning, memory and activity regulation. Here we identify new components of the MB circuit in , including extensive visual input and MB output neurons (MBONs) with direct connections to descending neurons. We find unexpected structure in sensory inputs, in the transfer of information about different sensory modalities to MBONs, and in the modulation of that transfer by dopaminergic neurons (DANs). We provide insights into the circuitry used to integrate MB outputs, connectivity between the MB and the central complex and inputs to DANs, including feedback from MBONs. Our results provide a foundation for further theoretical and experimental work.
We have identified a Drosophila gene, peanut (pnut), that is related in sequence to the CDC3, CDC10, CDC11, and CDC12 genes of S. cerevisiae. These genes are required for cytokinesis, and their products are present at the bud neck during cell division. We find that pnut is also required for cytokinesis: in pnut mutants, imaginal tissues fail to proliferate and instead develop clusters of large, multinucleate cells. Pnut protein is localized to the cleavage furrow of dividing cells during cytokinesis and to the intercellular bridge connecting postmitotic daughter cells. In addition to its role in cytokinesis, pnut displays genetic interactions with seven in absentia, a gene required for neuronal fate determination in the compound eye, suggesting that pnut may have pleiotropic functions. Our results suggest that this class of proteins is involved in aspects of cytokinesis that have been conserved between flies and yeast.
Thirty-six isogenic D. melanogaster strains that differed only in the chromosomal location of a 7.2 or an 8.1 kb DNA segment containing the (autosomal) rosy gene were constructed by P-element-mediated gene transfer. Since the flies were homozygous for a rosy- allele, rosy gene function in these indicated the influence of flanking sequences on gene expression. The tissue distribution of XDH activity in all the strains was normal. Each line exhibited a characteristic level of adult XDH-specific activity. The majority of these values were close to wild-type levels; however, the total variation in specific activity among the lines was nearly fivefold. Thus position effects influence expression of the rosy gene quantitatively but do not detectably alter tissue specificity. X-linked rosy insertions were expressed on average 1.6 times more activity in males than in females. Hence the gene acquires at least partial dosage compensation upon insertion into the X chromosome.
The analysis of genetic mosaics, in which an animal carries populations of cells with differing genotypes, is a powerful tool for understanding developmental and cell biology. In 1990, we set out to improve the methods used to make genetic mosaics in Drosophila by taking advantage of recently developed approaches for genome engineering. These efforts led to the work described in our 1993 Development paper.
The perception of visual motion is critical for animal navigation, and flies are a prominent model system for exploring this neural computation. In Drosophila, the T4 cells of the medulla are directionally selective and necessary for ON motion behavioral responses. To examine the emergence of directional selectivity, we developed genetic driver lines for the neuron types with the most synapses onto T4 cells. Using calcium imaging, we found that these neuron types are not directionally selective and that selectivity arises in the T4 dendrites. By silencing each input neuron type, we identified which neurons are necessary for T4 directional selectivity and ON motion behavioral responses. We then determined the sign of the connections between these neurons and T4 cells using neuronal photoactivation. Our results indicate a computational architecture for motion detection that is a hybrid of classic theoretical models.
The fly Drosophila melanogaster is one of the most intensively studied organisms in biology and serves as a model system for the investigation of many developmental and cellular processes common to higher eukaryotes, including humans. We have determined the nucleotide sequence of nearly all of the approximately 120-megabase euchromatic portion of the Drosophila genome using a whole-genome shotgun sequencing strategy supported by extensive clone-based sequence and a high-quality bacterial artificial chromosome physical map. Efforts are under way to close the remaining gaps; however, the sequence is of sufficient accuracy and contiguity to be declared substantially complete and to support an initial analysis of genome structure and preliminary gene annotation and interpretation. The genome encodes approximately 13,600 genes, somewhat fewer than the smaller Caenorhabditis elegans genome, but with comparable functional diversity.